<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-23-427-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Application of environmental tracers for investigation of groundwater mean
residence time and aquifer recharge <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in fault-influenced hydraulic drop
alluvium aquifers</article-title><alt-title>Groundwater residence time and aquifer recharge in alluvium aquifers</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Groundwater residence time and aquifer recharge in alluvium aquifers}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B. Ma et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Menggui</given-names></name>
          <email>mgjin@cug.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-4286</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Xing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences,
Wuhan, 430074, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China
University of <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratory of Basin Hydrology and Wetland Eco-restoration, China
University of <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Hubei Key Laboratory of Wetland Evolution &amp; Ecological Restoration,
China University of <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Menggui Jin (mgjin@cug.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>427</fpage><lpage>446</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>March</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e136">Investigating groundwater residence time and recharge sources is crucial for
water resource management in the alluvium aquifers of arid basins.
Environmental tracers (chlorofluorocarbons, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and groundwater hydrochemical components are used for
assessing groundwater mean residence times (MRTs) and aquifer recharge in
fault-influenced hydraulic drop alluvium aquifers in the Manas River basin
(China). Aquifers under the Manas River upstream (south of the fault)
contains very high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (41.1–60 TU), implying water
recharge affected by the nuclear bomb tests of the 1960s. Carbon-14
groundwater age correlates positively with distance from mountain area
(3000–5000 years in the midstream to &gt; 7000 years in the
downstream) and groundwater depth, but correlates negatively to a decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (1.1 TU) and more negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.
This phenomenon reveals that the source of the deeper groundwater in the
semi-confined aquifer is paleo-meteoric recharge. Special attention has been
paid to the estimation of MRTs using CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by an exponential
piston flow model. The results show that MRTs vary from 19 to 101 years by
CFCs and from 19 to 158 years by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. MRTs estimated from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are much longer than those from CFCs, probably due to the
different time lag of liquid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and gas-phase CFCs through the
unsaturated zone. The MRTs estimated by CFCs show good correlations with pH
and the concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can
provide a possible approach to estimate first-order proxies of MRTs for
groundwater age. The young water fractions are investigated by the CFC binary
mixing method in the south and north of the fault. Relatively modern recharge
is found in the south of the fault with young (post-1940) water fractions of
87 %–100 %, whereas in the north of the fault the young water
fractions vary from 12 % to 91 %. This study shows that the
combination of CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> residence time tracers can help in
analysing the groundwater MRTs and the recharge sources for the different
mixing end-members.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e324">Groundwater is the largest available freshwater resource. It supplies
freshwater to communities around the world, and it plays an essential role
in energy and food security, human health, and ecosystem conservation
(Gleeson et al., 2016). Investigating the residence time of groundwater
(i.e. the period from recharge to drainage in pumping wells, springs, or
streams) reveals information about water storage, mixing, and transport in
subsurface water systems (Cartwright et al., 2017; Dreuzy and Ginn, 2016;
McGuire and McDonnell, 2006). This is particularly important in alluvium
aquifers where groundwater renewability is generally strong (Huang<?pagebreak page428?> et al.,
2017), thus functioning as potable water sources in arid areas. Moreover,
alluvium aquifers are increasingly vulnerable to anthropogenic contaminants
and land-use changes (Morgenstern and Daughney, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e327">Because the residence time distribution in subsurface water systems cannot be
empirically measured, a commonly used approach is parametric fitting of trial
distributions to chemical concentrations (Suckow, 2014).
The widely used lumped parameter models (Małoszewski and Zuber, 1982;
Jurgens et al., 2012), which commonly assume that the hydrologic system is at
a steady state, have been applied to subsurface water systems (Cartwright et
al., 2018; McGuire et al., 2005; Morgenstern et al., 2015; Stewart et al.,
2010). The groundwater residence time tracers can be classified into three
types depending on the time span they measure. The first, isotopes of water
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), are ideal tracers for determining mean
residence times (MRTs) shorter than 5 years with stable isotopes (Kirchner et
al., 2010; McGuire et al., 2005; Stewart et al., 2010) and up to
approximately 100 years with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Beyer et al., 2016; Cartwright and
Morgenstern, 2015, 2016; Morgenstern et al., 2010). The second, the atmospheric
concentrations of synthetic organic compounds (chlorofluorocarbons, CFC-11,
CFC-12, and CFC-113, as well as sulfur hexafluoride, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), radioactive solute
tracers such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">36</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and noble gases (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), are used to determine groundwater MRTs
with much wider time spans (decades to millenniums; Aggarwal, 2013).
The third, concentrations of major ions such as inert chloride (Cl), determine
MRTs in a similar way to stable isotopes depending on the damping of seasonal
variation input cycles that pass through a system into the output. MRTs
determined through the seasonal tracer cycle method (e.g. stable isotope
values or Cl concentrations), which requires detailed time series
measurements such as weekly or more frequent time steps, may be more
appropriate for water drainage through a catchment and discharging into a
stream (Hrachowitz et al., 2009; Kirchner et al., 2010; McGuire et al.,
2005). Nevertheless, a strong correlation of major ion concentrations with
groundwater age enables hydrochemistry to be used as proxy for age or
complementary to age via previously established relationships in closed
lithological conditions (Beyer et al., 2016; Morgenstern et al., 2010, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e462">The age of water can be determined through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a component of the
water molecule with a half-life of 12.32 years (Tadros et al., 2014).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in the Northern Hemisphere is several orders of
magnitude higher than that in the Southern Hemisphere (Clark and Fritz, 1997;
Tadros et al., 2014) due to the atmospheric thermonuclear tests in 1950s and
1960s, which resulted in mean annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity peaks reaching
several hundred times that of natural levels. The present-day rainfall
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in the Northern Hemisphere is still affected by the
tail end of the bomb pulse, particularly in arid northwestern China due to both
the continental effect (Tadros et al., 2014) and the Chinese atmospheric
nuclear tests from 1964 to 1974. Thus, measurement of a single sample of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity does not accurately assess the groundwater MRTs in the
Northern Hemisphere (Cook et al., 2017), and time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements with lumped parameter models are required (Han et al., 2007, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e538">In contrast to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CFCs degrade slowly in the atmosphere and have
longer degradation half-lives, which permit their uniform atmospheric
distribution over large areas; however, there is 1–2 years lag for the Southern
Hemisphere compared with the Northern Hemisphere (Cartwright et al., 2017;
Cook et al., 2017; Darling et al., 2012). The build-up of CFCs in the
atmosphere after the 1950s coupled with their solubility in water (despite
low solubility) enables them to be commonly used as indicators of groundwater
MRTs up to approximately 60 years (Darling et al., 2012; Han et al., 2012).
Although the atmospheric concentrations of CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113
declined between 1994 and 2002 (different CFCs peaked at different times;
Cook et al., 2017), thereby leaving room for ambiguity in the CFC ratio plots
(Darling et al., 2012), the different atmospheric CFC ratios between today
and pre-1990s (Plummer et al., 2006b) enable determination of groundwater
MRTs using CFCs. Consequently, CFCs have been commonly viewed as an
alternative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for calculating groundwater MRTs following the
decline in the bomb pulse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (Cartwright et al., 2017;
Cook et al., 2017; Qin et al., 2011). However, groundwater MRTs based on CFCs may not
always be accurate. For example, MRTs estimated from CFCs would be
underestimated if excess air in the unsaturated zone affects the CFC
concentrations during recharge (Cook et al., 2006; Darling et al., 2012), or
when CFC inputs are contaminated in urban and industrial environments
(Carlson et al., 2011; Han et al., 2007; Mahlknecht et al., 2017; Qin,
2007). On the other hand, groundwater MRTs would be overestimated if CFC
inputs are degraded in anaerobic groundwater (most notably CFC-11 and
CFC-113; Cook and Solomon, 1995; Horneman et al., 2008; Plummer et al.,
2006b).</p>
      <p id="d1e578">Additionally, mixing between water of different ages, which occurs within
the aquifer or during pumping from long-screened wells (Cook et al., 2017;
Custodio et al., 2018; Visser et al., 2013), poses difficulties for
estimating MRTs using tracer data. The calculated MRTs will be less than the
actual values in the mixed water due to aggregation errors (Cartwright and
Morgenstern, 2016; Kirchner, 2016; Stewart et al., 2017). MRT estimation
using a multi-model approach based on incorporated residence time tracers
would reduce the calculation uncertainty (Green et al., 2016; Visser et al.,
2013) and indicate whether MRTs can be realistically estimated (Cartwright
et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e583">Maps showing <bold>(a)</bold> regional location of the Manas
River Basin (modified after Ma et al., 2018), <bold>(b)</bold> surface water
(river, reservoir and irrigation ditch) system (modified after Cui et al.,
2007 and Ji, 2016) and <bold>(c)</bold> geological cross section of the
study area for A–A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> line shown in <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e613">Mixing within the aquifers and during the pumping process from the
long-screened wells is expected to be common in the fault-influenced
hydraulic drop alluvium aquifers of the Manas River Basin (MRB) in the arid northwest of China (Fig. 1a, b). In particular, pumping from long-screened
wells (of which there are over 10 000 boreholes; Ma et al., 2018) makes
groundwater mixing most likely to occur. MRTs<?pagebreak page429?> that result from a deep
unsaturated zone (with water table depths of up to 180 m) and contrasting
geological settings (hydraulic head drops of as much as 130 m caused by the
thrust fault) are still insufficiently recognised in the alluvium aquifer
(Fig. 1c). We aim to provide the first estimation of MRTs from borehole
groundwater drainage (e.g. well withdrawal) using CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
MRB. We will then analyse the major hydrochemical ions in groundwater as
first-order proxies for MRTs. In addition, we identify the recharge sources
for the different mixing end-members and constrain mixing rates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Geological and hydrogeological setting</title>
      <p id="d1e634">The bedrock of the upper Manas River catchment in the mountain area of
northwestern China consists of granites, sedimentary formations of Devonian and
Carboniferous age, and Mesozoic limestone (Jelinowska et al., 1995).
Pyroclastic rock is exposed in relatively small areas in the mountain to the south.
The piedmont and oasis plains are within the Cenozoic strata, including
Tertiary and Quaternary deposits with a total depth of more than 5000 m in
the piedmont area and 500–1000 m in the centre of the plain (Zhao, 2010).
The vertical cross section (Fig. 1c) shows that the Quaternary deposits
consist of pebbles, sandy gravel, and sand in the piedmont plain. The clay
content in the Quaternary deposits increases from the overflow spring zone
to the north oasis<?pagebreak page430?> plain, which consists of silty loam and clay. The
Huoerguosi–Manas–Tugulu thrust faults occurred in the early Pleistocene
and cut the Tertiary strata with a total length of approximately 100 km in
the piedmont alluvial fan (Fig. 1); these are water block features. These
faults were intermittently active in the middle to late Pleistocene and then
were more active from the late Holocene (Cui et al., 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e637">In the mountain area, groundwater consists of metamorphic rock fissure
water, magmatic rock fissure water, clastic rock fissure water, and Tertiary
clastic rock fissure water (Cui et al., 2007; Zhou, 1992). In the piedmont
plain of the Shihezi (SHZ) zone, groundwater is from a single-layer
unconfined aquifer. From the overflow spring zone to the central oasis
plain, groundwater consists of shallow unconfined water and deep confined
water. The hydraulic gradient, hydraulic conductivity, and transmissivity
show a large range of variations due to changes in grain size and local
increases in clay content (Wu, 2007). The groundwater flow direction is
consistent with the Manas River flow direction. In the piedmont plain, the
unconfined aquifer with saturated thickness more than 650 m is recharged by
the Manas River water and is hydraulically connected to the hydrological
network in the piedmont plain and north oasis plain (Ma et al., 2018; Wu,
2007). The depth of the piedmont plain unconfined aquifer decreases
gradually from south to north and has relatively fresh groundwater with total dissolved solids (TDS)
of &lt; 1 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Groundwater discharges via springs in the
northern area of SHZ (Fig. 1c). Groundwater in the shallow unconfined
aquifer in the north oasis plain has TDS of &gt; 3 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
the TDS of groundwater in the underlying confined aquifer varies from 0.3 to
1.0 g L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wu, 2007). The water table depth is as deep as 180 m and the
hydraulic head drops as much as 130 m due to the thrust fault in the south
margin in SHZ (Fig. 1c).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e679">Chemical–physical parameters, stable isotopes, CFC concentrations,
tritium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in groundwater samples in the Manas
River Basin.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="16">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="16" colname="col16" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sampling</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elevation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Well depth</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">EC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">DO</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">CFC-11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">CFC-12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">CFC-113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> age</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">date (d/m/y)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(m a.s.l.<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>S cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(‰)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(TU)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">(pMC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">(years)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col16">Upstream groundwater (UG) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1083</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">41.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">170<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">41.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">755</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">150</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">387</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">3.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">60.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col16">Midstream groundwater (MG) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">467</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">896</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">3.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">472</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">175</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">28.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">422</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">620</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">412</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">513</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">5.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">484</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">612</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">463</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">145</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">9.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">439</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">15.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">368</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">260</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">327</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">86.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">684</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">300</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">307</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">54.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">3158</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">370</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">556</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">1.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">364</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1650</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">0.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">0.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">7.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">357</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.69</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">4.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">367</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">263</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">53.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">3373</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">377</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">350<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">233</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">46.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">4432</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">381</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">118<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">309</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">6.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">381</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">615</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">8.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">424</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">180</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">378</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">43.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">5056</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">428</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">150</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">26.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">446</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">67.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">37.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">453</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">571</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">457</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">512</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col16">Downstream groundwater (DG) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">348</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">6.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29/7/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">323</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">280</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">244</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">23.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">10127</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3/8/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">353</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">246</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11/6/2015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">347</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">380</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">3.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">34.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col16">7001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e706"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.s.l. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> m above sea level.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Artesian well. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Contamination.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2926">Water sampling sites and unconfined groundwater head
contours (in metres) in the headwater catchments of Manas River.
UG: upstream groundwater, MG: midstream groundwater, DG: downstream
groundwater.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Water sampling</title>
      <p id="d1e2946">A total of 29 groundwater samples (pumped from fully penetrating wells and three
artesian wells) were collected along the Manas River between June and August
2015 (from G1 to G29 in Table 1 and Fig. 2). Locations were separated into
three clusters based on the hydrochemistry and stable isotope data: the
upstream groundwater (UG, south of the Wuyi Road), midstream groundwater
(MG, area between the Wuyi Road and the West Main Canal–Yisiqi), and
downstream groundwater (DG, north of the West Main Canal–Yisiqi). Groundwater
was sampled from wells for irrigation and domestic supply, in which shallow
wells were pumped for a minimum of 5 min before sampling and deep wells
were active for irrigation for more than 10 days prior to sampling. Surface
water sample data (river water, ditch and reservoir water) and groundwater
sample data (sample ID are from G30 to G39) were reported by Ji (2016) and
Ma et al. (2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e2949">Water temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and dissolved
oxygen (DO) were measured (Table 1) in the field using calibrated Hach
(HQ40d) conductivity and pH meters, which had been calibrated before use.
Bicarbonate was determined by titration with 0.05 N HCl on-site. Samples to
be analysed for chemical and stable isotopic values were filtered on-site
through 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m millipore syringe filters and stored in pre-cleaned
polypropylene bottles at 4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C until analysis. For cation
and strontium isotope analysis, the samples were acidified to pH &lt; 2
with ultrapure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2986">For CFC samples extreme precautions were taken to avoid contamination from
equipment such as pumps and tubing (Cook et al., 2017; Darling et al., 2012;
Han et al., 2012). After purging the wells the water samples were collected
directly from the borehole using a copper tube sampling pipe. One end of the
pipe was connected to the well casing, and the other end was placed in the
bottom of a 120 mL borosilicate glass bottle, inside a 2000 mL beaker. The
well water was allowed to flow through the tubing for 10 min, thoroughly
flushing the tubing. The bottle was submerged, and then filled and capped
underwater when no bubbles appeared in the bottle following the protocols
described by Han et al. (2007). In this study, five bottles were collected at
each well, three of which were analysed. A total of 10 wells were collected for
CFC analysis (CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113). Unfiltered groundwater samples
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis were collected and stored in 500 mL airtight
polypropylene bottles. Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
activity analysis was precipitated to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sealed in 500 mL
polypropylene bottles in the field from 180 to 240 L water samples following
the procedure reported by Chen et al. (2003). This was done by the addition
of excess <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> previously brought to pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 with NaOH.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Analytical techniques</title>
      <p id="d1e3048">The CFC concentrations were analysed within 1 month of sample collection at
the Groundwater Dating Laboratory of the Institute of Geology and
Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGG–CAS), using a purge-and-trap
gas chromatography procedure with an electron capture detector (ECD). The
procedure was reported by Han et al. (2012, 2015) and Qin et al. (2011), which is modified from Oster et al. (1996). The detection limit for
each CFC is about 0.01 pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of water, with an error &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. The obtained results are shown in Table 1.</p>
      <?pagebreak page432?><p id="d1e3073">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities of groundwater were measured
using liquid scintillation spectrometry (1220 Quantulus ultra-low-level
counters, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at the State Key Laboratory of
Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, in
Wuhan. Water samples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were distilled and electrolytically
enriched prior to being analysed. Detailed procedures were based on those in
Morgenstern and Taylor (2009). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities were expressed as
tritium unit (TU), with 1 TU corresponding to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples, the obtained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
samples were first converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then to acetylene
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which in turn was trimerised catalytically to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as described by
Polach (1987), prior to being analysed. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities were
reported as percent modern carbon (pMC). The achieved precision values for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> TU and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pMC
respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e3285">The cation, anion, and stable isotope measurements were performed at the
State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China
University of Geosciences, in Wuhan. Cations were analysed using
inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) (IRIS
Intrepid II XSP, Thermo Elemental). Anions were analysed on filtered
unacidified samples using ion chromatography (IC) (Metrohm 761 Compact IC).
Analytical errors were inferred from the mass balance between cations and
anions (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and are within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Stable isotopic
values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) analyses were measured using
a Finnigan MAT–253 mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, USA, manufactured in
Bremen, Germany), with the TC/EA method. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values (Table 1) were presented in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> notation in per mille
(‰) with respect to the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water
(VSMOW), with an analytical precision of 0.5 ‰ vs. VSMOW
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of 0.1 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Groundwater dating</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>CFCs indicating modern water recharge</title>
      <p id="d1e3406">Knowledge of the history of the local atmospheric mixing ratios of CFCs in
precipitation is required for indicating modern water recharge. The
difference between the local and global background atmospheric mixing ratios
of CFCs in the Northern Hemisphere – <italic>CFC excess</italic> – varies substantially based on the
industrial development of the area. Elevated CFC concentrations (10 %–15 %
higher than those of the Northern Hemisphere as a whole) have been reported
in the air of urban environments such as Las Vegas, Tucson, Vienna, and
Beijing (Barletta et al., 2006; Carlson et al., 2011; Han et al., 2007; Qin
et al., 2007), whereas the atmospheric mixing ratios of CFCs in Lanzhou and
Yinchuan (northwestern China) were approximately 10 % lower than those of
the Northern Hemisphere (Barletta et al., 2006). Manas River Basin is
located in northwestern China (Fig. 1a), has a very low population density, and
is far from industrial cities. To evaluate the modern water recharge by
CFCs, the time series trend of the Northern Hemisphere atmospheric mixing ratio
(Fig. 3; 1940–2014, <uri>https://water.usgs.gov/lab/software/air_curve/index.html</uri>,
last access: 27 October 2017) was
adopted in this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e3417">Concentrations of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 (pptv) in
the groundwater of this study area sampled in 2015 compared with the time
series trend of Northern Hemisphere atmospheric mixing ratio at a recharge
temperature of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Data are available
at <uri>https://water.usgs.gov/lab/software/air_curve/index.html</uri> (last
access: 27 October 2017).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3438">Measured CFC concentrations (in pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be interpreted in terms
of partial pressures of CFCs (in pptv) in solubility equilibrium with the
water sample based on Henry's law. The computational process was conducted
following<?pagebreak page433?> Plummer et al. (2006a). In arid northwestern China, estimating the
local shallow groundwater temperature as recharge temperature is more
suitable than the annual mean surface air temperature (Qin et al., 2011)
because the local low precipitation usually cannot reach the groundwater.
Studies on the MRB (Ji, 2016; Wu, 2007) have also indicated much less
vertical recharge water from the local precipitation compared with abundant
groundwater lateral flow recharge and river leakage from the mountain to the
piedmont areas. In this study, the measured groundwater temperature, which
varied from 11.5 to 15.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between wells (Table 1), was
used as the recharge temperature to estimate the groundwater input CFC
concentrations. Surface elevations of the recharge area vary from 316 to 755 m. The modern water recharge was then determined by comparing the calculated
partial pressures of CFCs in solubility equilibrium with the water samples
with historical CFC concentrations in the air (Fig. 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The apparent {$\protect\chem{{}^{{14}}C}$} ages}?><title>The apparent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages</title>
      <p id="d1e3481">Carbon-14 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, half-life 5730 years) activity in groundwater is
often used to estimate groundwater age over time periods of approximately 200
to 30 000 years, and to determine the recharge from mixing water in various
climate conditions (Cook  et al., 2017; Custodio et al., 2018; Huang et al.,
2017). Since groundwater age cannot be measured directly, and the age
distribution in the sample is unknown, one can derive an apparent age using a
mathematical formula for the groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sample (Suckow, 2014).
“Apparent” here describes the fact that the age is not corresponding to the
time difference between recharge and sampling during which piston flow is
assumed for a water parcel (Cartwright et al., 2017; Suckow, 2014).
Calculation of groundwater apparent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> age may be complicated if
dissolved inorganic carbon is derived from a mixture of sources, or if
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> originating from the atmosphere or soil zone is significantly
diluted by the dissolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-free carbonate minerals in the
aquifer matrix and biochemical reactions along the groundwater flow paths
(Clark and Fritz, 1997). Although only minor carbonate dissolution is likely
and determination of groundwater residence times requires <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
correction (Atkinson et al., 2014). When the dissolution of carbonate during
recharge or along the groundwater flow path may dilute the initial soil
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used to trace the process (Clark and Fritz,
1997). An equation for the reaction between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing water with a
carbonate mineral is commonly written as follows (modified after Pearson and
Hanshaw, 1970):


                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M169" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">carb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>   is the dissolved carbonate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value
(approximately 0; Clark and Fritz, 1997), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value in groundwater.</p>
      <p id="d1e3758">Depending on knowing the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity after adjustment for
the geochemical and physical dilution processes in the aquifer (without
radioactive decay), the groundwater apparent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be
calculated from the following decay equation:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M177" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decay constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5730</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity of the DIC in groundwater.</p>
      <p id="d1e3933">Previous studies in the arid northwest of China (Edmunds et al., 2006; Huang et
al., 2017) have concluded that a volumetric value of 20 % “dead” carbon
derived from the aquifer matrix was recognised, which is consistent with the
value (10 %–25 %) obtained by Vogel (1970). Therefore, the initial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 80 pMC is used to correct
groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ages (results are shown in Table 1), although this
simple correction makes no attempt to correct the age of individual samples
that may have experienced different water–rock interaction histories.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Groundwater mean residence time estimation</title>
      <p id="d1e3984">Groundwater mixing may occur both within the aquifer and in the long-screened
wells (Cook et al., 2017; Custodio et al., 2018; Visser et al., 2013). A wide
range of the groundwater residence times (ages) has been reported in an arid
unconfined aquifer because recharge occurs under various climate conditions
(Custodio et al., 2018). Furthermore, the groundwater residence time with
wide variabilities governed by the distribution of flow paths of varying
length cannot be measured directly (de Dreuz and Ginn, 2016; Suckow, 2014). A
lumped parameter model may be an alternative approach<?pagebreak page434?> to describe the
distribution of residence times, which at the same time describes a mean
residence time for the mixtures of different residence times. With the aid of
gaseous tracers (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CFCs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
one can describe the distribution of tracer concentrations (Stewart et al.,
2017; Zuber et al., 2005) to obtain the groundwater MRTs. For the
steady-state subsurface hydrologic system, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFCs tracers
entering groundwater with precipitation are injected proportionally to the
volumetric flow rates by natural processes. The output concentration in water
at the time of sampling relating to the input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFCs can be
described by the following convolution integrals (Małoszewski and Zuber,
1982):

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" specific-use="align" content-type="subnumberedsingle"><mml:math id="M191" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3.1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">out</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tracer</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3.2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">out</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CFCs</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tracer</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">out</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tracer output concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tracer
input concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the residence time, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time
when water entered the catchment, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
decay constant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the system response function that describes the residence time
distributions in the subsurface hydrologic system.</p>
      <p id="d1e4303">In this study, the CFC concentrations from the time series trend of the
Northern Hemisphere atmospheric mixing ratio (Fig. 3) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
activities in precipitation in Urumqi (Fig. 4) are treated as proxies for CFC
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recharge concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively.
The historical precipitation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in the Urumqi station
(Fig. 4) was reconstructed with the data available from the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) using a logarithmic interpolation method. The
precipitation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity between 1969 and 1983 at Hong Kong and
Irkutsk with different latitudes was used (data are available at
<uri>https://www.iaea.org/</uri>, last access: 4 December 2017). The time series
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (Fig. 4) used as the input data was based on the
following considerations. First, the MRB is located in the Northern
Hemisphere, where the bomb pulse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity is several orders of
magnitude higher than in the Southern Hemisphere (Clark and Fritz, 1997;
Tadros et al., 2014) and was superimposed with the China atmospheric nuclear
tests from 1964 to 1974 in the arid northwest of China. Thus, the remnant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity remains affected by the tail end of the bomb pulse.
Second, the study area is more than 3500 km away from the western Pacific,
and hence the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity is much higher than that at
coastal sites due to the continental effect (Tadros et al., 2014).
Furthermore, although the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity varies between
seasons (Cartwright and Morgenstern, 2016; Morgenstern et al., 2010; Tadros
et al., 2014), mean annual values (Fig. 4) were considered in this study.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e4431">Tritium concentration (TU) of the upstream groundwater (UG),
midstream groundwater (MG), and downstream groundwater (DG). Time series of
tritium concentration in precipitation at Ottawa, Urumqi, Hong Kong, and
Irkutsk were obtained by GNIP in IAEA (<uri>https://www.iaea.org/</uri>, last
access: 4 December 2017). The blue solid lines and shaded field were drawn
using the half-life (12.32 years) of tritium decayed to 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page435?><p id="d1e4443">Several residence time distributions have been described (Małoszewski and
Zuber, 1982; Jurgens et al., 2012) and have been widely used in studies of
variable timescales and catchment areas (Cartwright and Morgenstern, 2015,
2016; Cartwright et al., 2018; Hrachowitz et al., 2009; Morgenstern et al.,
2010, 2015; McGuire et al., 2005). The selection of each model depends on the
hydrogeological situations in the hydrologic system to which it is
applicable. The exponential piston flow model (EPM) describes an aquifer that
contains a segment of the exponential flow followed by a segment of piston
flow. The piston flow model assumes minimal water mixing from different flow
lines and little or no recharge in the confined aquifer; the exponential flow
model assumes that water mixing between flowlines in the unconfined aquifer
is minimal and that flowlines have an exponential distribution of transit
times
(Jurgens et al., 2012; Małoszewski and Zuber, 1982). The weighting function
of this model is given by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" specific-use="align" content-type="subnumberedsingle"><mml:math id="M210" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4.1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4.2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">for</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              The dispersion model (DM) mainly measures the relative importance of
dispersion to advection, and is applicable for confined or partially
confined aquifers (Małoszewski, 2000). Its residence time distribution is
given by

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M211" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The weighting function of the exponential mixing model (EMM) is

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M212" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean residence time and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ratio
defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the length of area at the water table receiving (or
not receiving) recharge. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dispersion parameter, which is
the reciprocal of the Peclet number (<italic>Pe</italic>) and defined as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dispersion
coefficient (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is velocity (m day<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is distance (m).</p>
      <p id="d1e4898">Each residence time distribution has one or two parameters. MRTs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are determined by convoluting the input (the time series of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFCs input in rainfall) to each model to match the output
(the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFC concentrations in groundwater). The other
parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are determined depending on the
hydrogeological conditions. To interpret the ages of the MRB data set, EPM
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.2), DM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.1), and EMM models were used,
after which MRTs were compared.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4984"><bold>(a)</bold> Plot of stable isotopes of surface water and
groundwater from the mountain to the oasis plain compared to the global
meteoric water line (GMWL; Craig, 1961) and the local meteoric water line
(LMWL, rainfall in Urumqi station of IAEA networks during 1986 and 2003; data
are available at <uri>https://www.iaea.org</uri>, last access: 27 January 2016).
The size of the hollow triangles stands for the relative amount of
precipitation. “Mean rainfall” refers to the annual amount-weighted mean
rainfall isotopic value. <bold>(b)</bold> Plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and inserted plot <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> excess vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. UG:
upstream groundwater, MG: midstream groundwater, DG: downstream groundwater.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Stable isotope and major ion hydrochemistry</title>
      <p id="d1e5062">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in the study area vary from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for the surface water, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for the groundwater. Meanwhile, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values vary from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for the surface
water, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ for the groundwater.
Figure 5a shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of surface
water and groundwater in relation to the precipitation isotopes of the
closest GNIP station (Urumqi station in Fig. 1a). Both the linear slope
(7.3) and intercept (3.1) of the Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) are lower
than that of the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL, 8 and 10, respectively;
Craig, 1961). Surface water (ditch, river, and reservoir water) is more
enriched in heavy isotopes and defines an evaporation line with a slope of
4.5 (Fig. 5b), which is much higher than that solely calculated from the
upstream river water and reservoir water (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Ma et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e5209">Groundwater deuterium excess values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">excess</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 5b) defined by Dansgaard (1964)
lie close to
the annual mean LMWL (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LMWL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), which also
suggest little isotope fractionation by evaporation as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> excess value
decreases when water evaporates (Han et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2015). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> excess values of surface water decrease from 17.12 ‰
in the upstream area to 0.68 ‰ in the downstream area,
indicating a strong evaporation effect, which is also demonstrated by the low
slope (evaporation slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the surface water. A recent study
(Benettin et al., 2018) indicated that the evaporation line obtained from
various sources of water is often not the true evaporation line. All samples
of surface water in the present study were collected in the summer of 2015
and were recharged from the mountain areas in the same season. Although they
were collected from different areas (ditch water, reservoir water, and Manas
River water), the linear trend obtained may have implications for surface
water evaporation.</p>
      <p id="d1e5285">The hydrochemistry compositions of surface water and groundwater in the MRB
reflect the evolution from the fresh <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Ca water type to
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na–Ca type and further to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na type, and finally to the brine Cl–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na
water type along the groundwater flow paths (Fig. 6). Groundwater in the
unconfined aquifers (e.g. intermountain depression and piedmont plain
aquifers in Fig. 1c) is dominated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a
relatively low concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6). Groundwater in the
confined aquifers is characterised by a wide range of ion concentrations,
with progressively increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations,
whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations decrease progressively as the
salinity spectrum moves towards the more concentrated end (Fig. 6). The
concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions gradually increases in the unconfined
aquifers and becomes less dominant in the confined aquifers along the
groundwater flow paths (Fig. 6).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e5473">Piper diagram highlights the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–Na type
of waters. The coloured symbols represent the mean values calculated from
the hydrochemistry data (light grey hollow symbols) reported by Ma et al. (2018). The
error bars are shown in the cation and anion diagrams.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f06.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Modern and paleo-meteoric recharge features</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Stable isotope indications</title>
      <p id="d1e5515">Stable isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the components
of the water molecule that record the atmospheric conditions at the time of
recharge (Batlle-Aguilar et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2003), provide valuable
information on groundwater recharge processes (Ma et al., 2017; Stumpp and
Małoszewski, 2010; Stumpp et al., 2009). Generally, there are two possible
meteoric recharge sources including precipitation in the modern climate and
in the paleoclimate. Groundwater whose isotopic values are more depleted than
the modern precipitation would usually be ascribed to one or both of two
recharge sources, including snowmelt or precipitation at higher elevation and
precipitation that fell under cooler climate conditions. Figure 5 shows that
the markers of groundwater isotopes are generally distributed along the LMWL
but do not define evaporation trend, implying that little evaporation and
isotope exchange between groundwater and the rock matrix have occurred (Ma et
al., 2018; Négrel et al., 2016). Transpiration is likely to be dominant
over evaporation in the soil when infiltration takes place, as soil water
uptake by root is not significantly isotope fractionated (Dawson and Ehleringer, 1991).</p>
      <p id="d1e5544">Three groundwater clusters can be identified in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot (Fig. 5), suggesting different
recharge sources among the upstream, midstream, and downstream areas. The
first group of UG has the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, respectively.
Figure 5a shows that UG is located much closer to the summer rainfall, which
reflects more enriched summer rainfall inputs in the upstream area of the
Manas River. Negligible evaporation trends are observed in UG, although the
recharge is mostly from the fast
river leakage in the intermountain depression through<?pagebreak page436?> highly permeable
pebbles and gravel deposits (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, the detectable CFC
concentrations and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (Table 1) also indicate a
modern precipitation recharge. An overlap between surface water and UG
indicates the same recharge sources, because some alignment of river water
and groundwater isotopic values is a qualitative indication of recharge under
climate conditions similar to contemporary conditions (Huang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e5632"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The second group has the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰, respectively, which
overlap with the annual amount-weighted mean rainfall isotopic value from
MG. Such isotopic values are comparable to the modern annual
amount-weighted mean rainfall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰,  respectively; Fig. 5a); it
probably reflects annual modern precipitation recharge. The mixing of
different timescale recharges of variable isotopic values at different
aquifers and sites along the groundwater flow paths is another explanation
for the highly scattered MG isotopic values in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot (Fig. 5b). Groundwater isotopes in the piedmont plain are
relatively rich in heavy isotopes (Fig. 5b), which overlap with the river
water, and indicate fast river leakage recharge within a short time (Ma et
al., 2018). Groundwater isotopic values in the oasis plain diverge from
those in the piedmont plain (Fig. 5b) and do not align with surface water,
indicating recharge with longer flow paths rather than fast river leakage
recharge.</p>
      <p id="d1e5755">The third group, which is most depleted in heavy isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), is from DG and is located much closer to
the winter rainfall in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot (Fig. 5b). Studies (Ji, 2016; Ma et al., 2018) have shown that vertical recharge
from the winter rainfall in the downstream area is unlikely. As
precipitation recharge from high altitudes (Clark and Fritz, 1997) and
paleo-meteoric recharge during the cooler climate (Chen et al., 2003) could
collectively account for the depletion of isotopes in groundwater, it is
usually not easy to distinguish the precipitation recharge sources at a
higher elevation from paleo-meteoric recharge. However, precipitation in
the north Tian Shan (Fig. 1a) has a positive isotope altitude
gradient due to the moisture recycling (Kong and Pang, 2016); thus
sub-cloud evaporation effects will yield more enriched isotopes from
higher-altitude precipitation recharge. The isotopically enriched UG (Fig. 5b) in the intermountain depression with higher altitude (Fig. 1c)<?pagebreak page437?> is
recharged from the high mountains. This also demonstrates that DG is
unlikely to be from the high mountain recharge. Accordingly, its depleted
isotopic values (Fig. 5b) are attributed to the paleo-meteoric recharge in
a cooler climate. In the last glacial period, temperatures in the Xinjiang
region (Li et al., 2015) and North China Plain (Chen et al., 2003) were
cooler by approximately 10  and 6–9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C,
respectively, compared with the present day. Groundwater had a depleted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ from the
paleo-meteoric recharge in the arid northwest of China, such as in the Minqin
basin (Edmunds et al., 2006), as well as in the east (Li et al., 2015) and
west (Huang et al., 2017) Junggar Basin (Fig. 1a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>CFCs indications</title>
      <p id="d1e5843">Table 1 shows that groundwater with well depths of 13–150 m contained
detectable CFC concentrations (0.17–3.77 pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-11,
0.19–2.18 pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for CFC-12, and 0.02–0.38 pmol L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
CFC-113) in both the upstream and midstream areas, indicating at least a
small fraction of young groundwater components (post-1940). The highest
concentration is observed in the UG (G3), south of the fault. The median and
the lowest concentrations are observed in the west and east banks,
respectively, of the East Main Canal in the MG, north of the fault. In the
midstream area (Fig. 2), CFC concentrations generally decrease with well
depth south of the reservoirs (G25, G8, and G9), and increase with well
depth north of the reservoirs (G15 and G16), which may indicate different
groundwater flow paths (e.g. downward or upward flow directions).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e5885">Calculated results for CFC atmospheric partial pressure (pptv),
fraction of post-1940 water, modern precipitation recharge year, and mean
residence times (EPM, DM, and EMM).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.95}[.95]?><oasis:tgroup cols="15">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center">Atmospheric partial pressure (pptv) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mixing post-1940</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fraction of post-</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col9" align="center">Modern precipitation recharge </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col11" nameend="col15" align="center">Mean residence times (F12) (years<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">water in decimal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1940 water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col7" nameend="col9" align="center">year (calendar year) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">year (F12/F113)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(BM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CFC-11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CFC-12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CFC-113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">CFC-11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CFC-12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">CFC-113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">EPM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">EPM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">DM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">DM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">EMM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(1.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(2.2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">(0.03)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">(0.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">179.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">476.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">70.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1982</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1990</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">16</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">43.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1983</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1960</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1962</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1968</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">101</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">160</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">440</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1963</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1965</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1971</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">139</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">270</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">122.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">280.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">36.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1988</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1976</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1978</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1984</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">85.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">251.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1973</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1977</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1982</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">202.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1988</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1970</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1974</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1981</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">177.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">380.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1987</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1982</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1986</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">257.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1987</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1974</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1977</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1983</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">99.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1974</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">180.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">388.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">48.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1982</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1986</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1986</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e5888"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> BM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> binary mixing, assuming a mixture of old
water with young water (post-1940). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Lumped parameter models:
DM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dispersion model with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in Eq. 3) of 0.1 and 0.03,
EPM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> exponential piston flow model with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in Eq. 2) of 2.2 and
1.5, EMM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> exponential mixing model. F12 is short for CFC-12.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6715">The groundwater aerobic environment (Table 1; DO values from 0.7 to 9.8 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
makes CFC degradation under anoxic conditions unlikely.
Nevertheless, CFC-11 has shown a greater propensity for degradation and
contamination than CFC-12 (Plummer et al., 2006b); therefore we use CFC-12
to interpret the modern groundwater recharge in the following discussions.
The estimated CFC partial pressure and possible recharge year are shown in
Table 2 and Fig. 3. The UG (G3) CFC-113 and CFC-12 both indicate the 1990
precipitation recharge (Table 2), most likely as a piston flow recharge in
the upstream area. The MG CFC-11-based modern precipitation recharge is in
agreement with that based on CFC-12 concentrations within 2–8 years, whereas
the CFC-113-based recharge is as much as 4–11 years later than that of the
other two, signifying recharge of a mixture of young and old groundwater
components in the midstream area. The most recent groundwater recharge is in
the upstream area (G3 with 1990 rainfall recharge), which is most likely
because the flow paths from recharge sources here are shorter than those of
the piedmont groundwater samples in the midstream area.</p>
      <?pagebreak page438?><p id="d1e6730">G5 and G7 are located in the east bank of the East Main Canal in the
midstream area and are closer than G15 and G16 north of the reservoir,
showing that the modern recharge is much earlier than that of G15 and G16
(Table 2). This can be explained by the lower groundwater velocities in the
east bank of the East Main Canal, where the hydraulic gradient (Fig. 2) is
much smaller than that in the west. Furthermore, groundwater recharge south
of the reservoir (G25, G8, and G9) becomes much earlier with increasing well depth from 48 to 100 m,
whereas that north of the reservoir becomes much later with increasing
well depth from 23 to 56 m (G15 and G16; Table 2, Fig. 2). The different
trends for the relationship between groundwater recharge year and well depth
may be due to the different flow paths between the two sites.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6736">Plots showing relationships of <bold>(a)</bold> CFC-113 vs. CFC-12
and <bold>(b)</bold> CFC-11 vs. CFC-12 in parts per trillion by volume
(pptv) for the
Northern Hemisphere air. The “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes selected calendar years. The
solid lines correspond to the piston flow and the dashed lines show the
binary mixing. The shaded regions in <bold>(a)</bold> indicate no post-1989
waters mixing.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e6761">Comparing CFC concentrations helps to identify samples containing young
(post-1940) and old (CFC-free) water (Han et al., 2007, 2012;
Koh et al., 2012) or exhibiting contamination or degradation (Plummer et
al., 2006b). The cross-plot of the concentrations for CFC-113 and CFC-12
(Fig. 7a) demonstrates that all of the groundwater can be characterised as
binary mixtures between young and old components, though there is still room
for some ambiguity around the crossover in the late 1980s (Darling et al.,
2012). As shown in Fig. 7a, all of the MG samples were located in the shaded
region, representing no post-1989 water recharge. The UG (G3) sample is
clearly relatively modern and seems to have been recharged in 1990 through
piston flow or mixed with old water and post-1995 water. Using the method
described by Plummer et al. (2006b) with the binary mixing model, the
fractions of young water are found to vary from 12 % to 91 % (Table 2) for
the MG samples with the relatively low young fractions of 12 % and 18 % in
the MG samples from the east bank of the East Main Canal (G5 and G7). These
two well water tables are deeper than 40 m, suggesting a relatively slow and
deep circulated groundwater flow. This hypothesis is also suggested by the
lower DO (3.7–4.6 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 1) and nitrate concentrations
(8.6–9.5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from Ma et al., 2018), and the considerably smaller
hydraulic gradient (Fig. 2). Furthermore, a fraction of young water as high
as 100 % is obtained from the G3 sample with the recharge water from
1990, and an 87 % fraction is obtained from the binary mixture of
post-1989 water and old water (Table 2). The relatively modern recharge for
the G3 sample is likewise supported by its high DO (9.8 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Table 1)
and relatively low nitrate concentration (7.9 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from Ma et al.,
2018), which represents the contribution of high-altitude recharge rather
than old water.</p>
      <p id="d1e6812">CFC contamination and sorption in the unsaturated zone during recharge
considerably influence the interpretation of groundwater recharge. Points
off the curves in the cross-plot of CFC concentrations may indicate
contamination with CFCs from the urban air during sampling (Carlson et al.,
2011; Cook et al., 2006; Mahlknecht et al., 2017) or the degradation or
sorption of CFC-11 or CFC-113 (Plummer et al., 2006b). Figure 7
demonstrates that CFC contamination from the urban air, which generally
increases CFC concentrations above the global background atmospheric CFC
concentrations for the Northern Hemisphere, are unlikely. Elevated CFC
concentrations have been reported in the air of urban environments such as
Las Vegas, Tucson, Vienna, and Beijing (Barletta et al., 2006; Carlson et
al., 2011; Han et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2007), but not in the arid northwest of China (Barletta et al., 2006). Hence, the anomalous ratios of
CFC-11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CFC-12 (Fig. 7b) off the model lines may be attributed to sorption
in the unsaturated zone during recharge but not the degradation of CFC-11
(Cook et al., 2006; Plummer et al., 2006b) under anoxic conditions (Table 1;
DO values vary from 0.7 to 9.8 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Nevertheless, the small
deviations (Fig. 7b) indicate a low sorption rate. A higher CFC sorption
rate occurs with high clay fraction and high organic matter in soils
(Russell and Thompson, 1983), and vice versa (Carlson et al., 2011).
Therefore, the hypothesis of a low sorption rate due to the low clay
fraction and low organic matter content in the intermountain depression and
the piedmont plain (Fig. 1c) is reasonable.</p>
      <p id="d1e6834">The time lag for CFC transport through the thick unsaturated zone (Cook and
Solomon, 1995) and degradation (especially as CFC-11 is common in anaerobic
groundwater; Horneman et al., 2008; Plummer et al., 2006b) are both important
considerations when interpreting groundwater recharge using CFC
concentrations. The time lag for CFC diffusions through the deep unsaturated
zone in simple porous aquifers, a function of the tracer solubility in water,
tracer diffusion coefficients, and soil water content (Cook and Solomon,
1995), have been widely proved (Darling et al., 2012; Qin et al., 2011). The
small differences in CFC-11 and CFC-12 recharge years (Table 2) demonstrate
that the time lag should be short in the fault-influenced hydraulic drop
alluvium aquifers with the deep unsaturated zone (Fig. 1c). Studies on the
MRB (Ma et al., 2018; Zhou, 1992) have shown that groundwater is mainly
recharged by fast river leakage in the upstream area and piedmont plain,
where the soil texture consists of pebbles and sandy gravel (Fig. 1c). This
suggests that the unsaturated zone air CFC closely follows that of the
atmosphere, so the recharge time lag through the unsaturated zone is not
considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{{}^{{3}}H}$} and {$\protect\chem{{}^{{14}}C}$} indications}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indications</title>
      <p id="d1e6867">Groundwater recharge was determined using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in
groundwater for time intervals from centuries to millennia (Custodio et al.,
2018), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has been used for modern precipitation recharge,
especially during the nuclear bomb periods (Cook et al., 2017; Huang et al.,
2017). Groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity varies from 1.1 to 60 TU (Fig. 4 and
Table 1), with the highest value in UG (G4), followed by MG (mean 12.4 TU)
and DG (mean 4.5 TU). All of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in UG (G1, G2, and G4)
and G23 (belonging to MG) are higher than 34.3 TU, which indicate input of
some fractions of the 1960s precipitation recharge. Groundwater with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity lower than 5.6 TU contains some pre-1950s recharge.</p>
      <p id="d1e6930">Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities show large variations with the
distance to the mountainous region along groundwater flow paths in the
midstream area (Fig. 8), suggesting recharge over a mixture of short to long
timescales. Two different trends for the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
activity with distance to the<?pagebreak page439?> mountainous region (Fig. 8) from the upstream
to midstream areas are observed. First, in the upstream area an increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity with distance is seen from 41.1 (G1 and G2) to 60 TU
(G4), indicating a larger fraction of 1960s precipitation for G4 than for G1
and G2; indeed, as seen in Fig. 2, near-G4 samples exhibited the highest
hydraulic gradient values. Second, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in groundwater in
the midstream area show an obvious reduction trend along the Manas River from
37.5 (G23) to 1.1 TU (G14), indicating that more fractions of pre-bomb
precipitation recharge may have occurred along the groundwater flow direction
north of the fault. Furthermore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities in the MG show
small increases with distance (Fig. 8) from 43.4 to 54.6 pMC, with the
exception of sample G12 at approximately 54 km (86.9 pMC with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
age of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">684</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years; modern recharge; Table 1), whereas that in the DG decrease
to 23.5 pMC. The presence of detectable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.9–6.91 TU) in DG
with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (23.5–34.3 pMC) indicates that some mixing with
post-bomb precipitation recharge may have occurred.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e7054">Distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities
with distance to the mountain. The shaded regions indicate the upstream,
midstream, and downstream of Manas River.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e7088">Combined use of CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may help to resolve even more
complicated recharge features due to the large difference of the temporal
pattern in the input functions between CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared with
plots of tracer ratios, tracer–tracer concentration plots have some
advantages because they reflect more directly the measured quantities and
potential mixtures (Plummer et al., 2006b), such as mixing with irrigation
water (Han et al., 2012, 2015; Koh et al., 2012) or young water mixtures in
different decades (Han et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2011). The plot of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. CFC-12 (Fig. 9; CFC-11 and CFC-113 can substitute for
CFC-12) shows that some samples (G9, G15, and G20) are slightly above the
piston flow line, whereas in Fig. 7a they are away from the piston flow line
but on the binary mixing lines. G15 and G20 have the shallowest well depths
of 23 and 13 m, respectively. The G9 sample was collected from the piedmont
plain near Manas River (Fig. 2), which features pebbles and sandy gravel
deposits. This situation may be explained by (i) binary mixing between
post-1989 water and older water recharged between 1950 and 1970 that did not
contain CFC-free water (pre-1940), or (ii) mixing of two end-members with
one end-member containing various mixtures of young (but pre-1989) and old
water and the other having post-1989 water. The second explanation requires
samples to contain at least some post-bomb fractions from the 1960s
(revealed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities; Fig. 9) and both post-1989 and
pre-1940 water, which is not consistent with CFC data (Fig. 7a). If the
first explanation is true, the binary mixing hypothesis and the young water
(post-1940) fractions in Table 2 for these three samples should be adjusted
accordingly.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p id="d1e7141"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity (TU) in Urumqi precipitation decayed
to 2014 vs. CFC-12 in parts per trillion of volume (pptv) for Northern Hemisphere air. The “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>” denotes
selected calendar years. The solid lines correspond to the piston flow and
the dashed lines show the binary mixing. The shaded region indicates
concentrations that could arise due to mixing water of different ages.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e7168">Because atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities have been elevated for a long
time, old water components can be identified by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activities that
are anomalously low compared with those of CFCs (Plummer et al., 2006b). The
G5 sample contains very low CFC-113 with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of 3.8 TU (Table 1),<?pagebreak page440?> indicating that this sample is likely a mixture of the older
water (pre-1940) and 1960–1970 water. The low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
can be attributed to dilution by a high fraction of old water, and thus the
“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bomb peak” cannot be recognised. The G16 sample, outside of
the shaded region (Fig. 9), has low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but a substantial CFC
concentration. This situation may be explained by (i) exposure to the
atmosphere before sampling during large water table fluctuations due to
groundwater pumping or the addition of excess air to water through the
fractured system, or (ii) river water or reservoir water with high CFC
concentration but minimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recharge. Furthermore, the relatively
high fraction of young water (89 %; Table 2) precludes the dilution effect
by old water. Irrigation re-infiltration can cause a shift of CFC
concentrations to higher values but does not alter the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (Han et al., 2015). However, the relatively low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (4.51 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; data from Ma et al., 2018) of the G16 sample
suggested that irrigation re-infiltration did not have a significant effect.
Therefore, river or reservoir water with very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration
(2.7–7.3 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; data from Ma et al., 2018) recharge is possible.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7321">Tritium and CFCs (CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113) output
vs. mean residence times for different lumped parameter models estimated
using Eqs. (2) to (5). The input <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity and CFCs
concentration are using the estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> activity in precipitation
in Urumqi station (Fig. 4) and the Northern Hemisphere atmospheric mixing
ratio (Fig. 3), respectively.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Groundwater mean residence time</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{$\protect\chem{{}^{{3}}H}$} and CFCs}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFCs</title>
      <p id="d1e7378">Residence time distribution functions (Eqs. 3 to 5) are suited to several
specific hydrogeological situations (Małoszewski and Zuber, 1982). EPM is
particularly useful for the interpretation of MRTs in aquifers that have
regions of both exponential and piston flow (Cartwright et al., 2017). The
unconfined aquifers adjacent to the rivers (Fig. 1c) are likely to exhibit
exponential flow, and the recharge through the unsaturated zone (Fig. 1c)
will most likely resemble piston flow (Cartwright and Morgenstern, 2015; Cook
and Böhlke, 2000). For the time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and CFCs inputs,
MRTs (Fig. 10) are initially calculated using EPM, with an EPM ratio of 1.5
obtained using Eqs. (2) and (3) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (3) is determined by
adding the intermountain depression to the piedmont plain in Fig. 1c). But
the river leakage and rainfall input could have come only from the piedmont
plain (Ma et al., 2018); thus a smaller proportion of piston flow in the EPM
could give an EPM ratio of 2.2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (3) would only be for
the piedmont plain in Fig. 1c). The veracity of MRTs is tested by
Eqs. (2), (4), and (5) using the DM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or 0.1) and the
EMM. Plots of the output concentrations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10a) and CFCs
(CFC-11 in Fig. 10b, CFC-12 in Fig. 10c, and CFC-113 in Fig. 10d) vs. MRTs
for different lumped parameter models show that the range of MRTs are wide
and correspond positively to the increase in MRTs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7444"><bold>(a)</bold> Mean residence times (MRTs) for CFC-12 vs.
MRTs for CFC-11 and CFC-113 data using the EPM (1.5) model. <bold>(b)</bold> MRTs
for CFC-12 with EPM (1.5) vs. those with other models. <bold>(c)</bold> MRTs for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. those with other models.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e7473">Figure 11 presents MRTs determined from the time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CFC inputs using different lumped parameter models. MRTs obtained from
different lumped parameter models tend to become more discretised with
the increase in the MRTs themselves. On the other hand, MRTs estimated from the
EPM with an EPM ratio of 1.5 in Fig. 11a vary from 19 to 101 years (median: 51 years)
for the CFC-12 rainfall input, 33 to 115 years (median: 62.3 years) for the
CFC-11 rainfall input, and 18 to 92 years (median: 50.2 years) for the CFC-113
rainfall input. Good linear relationships for MRTs between the different CFCs
rainfall inputs are obtained using the same EPM (EPM 1.5 in Fig. 11a and
EPM 2.2 in Fig. 11b). MRTs increase when the EPM ratios decrease from 2.2
to 1.5 in Fig. 11b, implying that the groundwater flow paths recharged from
the intermountain depression are much longer. MRTs in the UG, the west and
east banks of the East Main Canal of MG are estimated from the different
lumped parameter models with different CFC-12 concentrations in Figs. 2 and 11b.
The mean values of MRTs in the UG and the west bank of the East Main
Canal of MG vary from 28.6 to 64.8 years, and in the east bank of the East Main
Canal of MG vary from 129.2 to 173 years. It is seen that the mean values of
MRTs in the east bank of the East Main Canal of MG have larger differences
than those in the UG and in the west bank of the East Main Canal of MG (see
Figs. 2 and 11b, and Table 2). Overall, the youngest value is observed in the
G3 sample on the south side of the fault, and the oldest value is observed in
the G5 sample on the east bank of the East Main Canal in Fig. 2.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7491"><bold>(a)</bold> pH and silica (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), bicarbonate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and total
dissolved solids (TDS) vs. mean residence times (MRTs). The MRTs are from
CFC-12 data using the EPM (1.5) model. The dashed red line in <bold>(a)</bold> is from Morgenstern et al. (2015).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/427/2019/hess-23-427-2019-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page442?><p id="d1e7548">It is seen from Fig. 11 that MRTs determined from the time series of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs have larger uncertainties and wider ranges than those
from CFCs. For EPM with an EPM ratio of 1.5, MRTs estimated from the time
series<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>H inputs vary from 19 to 158 years with a median of 112.2 years
(Fig. 11c), which are much longer than those calculated from the CFCs inputs
by the same model (Fig. 11b). The reason is that the travel times through the
thick unsaturated zone for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are much longer than those for CFCs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> moves principally in the liquid phase, whereas CFCs travel in
the gas phase through the unsaturated zone (Cook and Solomon, 1995). The
transport in the gas phase is more rapid than that in the liquid phase in the
unsaturated zone, which is expected to give rise to longer residence times
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those determined from CFCs (Cook, et al., 2017).
Furthermore, the ranges of MRTs estimated from EPM, DM, and EMM are 16–158 years,
72–285 years, and 30–360 years, respectively. The uncertainties will
increase when MRTs increase among different models, especially for MRTs that
are higher than 130 years (Fig. 11c), which mainly exist in the DG and the
east bank of the East Main Canal of MG.</p>
      <p id="d1e7610">Groundwater MRTs in the west bank of the East Main Canal show an overall
increasing trend with the distance to the mountain in MG and DG (Fig. 11b, c).
It has been proven that much longer as well as much deeper flow paths
usually give rise to much longer MRTs (Cartwright and Morgenstern, 2015,
2016; McGuire et al., 2005). On the other hand, groundwater MRTs in the east
bank of the East Main Canal are much longer than those in the west bank. As
shown in Fig. 2, this phenomenon can partly be ascribed to the relatively
short distance to the mountain and much smaller hydraulic gradient in the west
bank. Previous studies pointed out that groundwater MRTs would vary on account
of the interplay of factors, like the uncertainties of the input concentrations
and different models (Cartwright and Morgenstern, 2015, 2016), and mixing
and dispersion in the subsurface flow systems. Moreover, the assumption of
the homogeneous aquifer with a simple geometry may result in significantly
different MRTs that are calculated by lumped parameter models to the actual MRTs
(Cartwright et al., 2017; Kirchner, 2016; Stewart et al., 2017).
Nevertheless, the homogeneous aquifers, being at steady state, justify the
use of lumped parameter models to calculate MRTs in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Hydrochemistry evolution</title>
      <p id="d1e7619">Strong correlations between hydrochemical components and groundwater age
permit their use as proxies for, or complementary to, age via previously
established relationships in similar lithological conditions. For example, an
excellent correlation between silica (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and MRTs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.997</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has
been reported (Morgenstern et al., 2010), which was much better than in Fig. 12
and in other results (Morgenstern et al., 2015). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12a),
sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), bicarbonate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and TDS (Fig. 12b) all show good correlations with groundwater age,
indicating that mineral dissolutions through water–rock interactions
dominate hydrochemical changes (Ma et al., 2018), and major ion
concentrations increase with groundwater age. However, MRTs determined by the
time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inputs show poor correlations with the ions (data
not shown). Moreover, the lithology type that the groundwater flows through
within the aquifer and the likely evolutionary path ways play important
roles in the hydrochemical compositions. The negative saturation indices with
respect to gypsum (Ma et al., 2018) indicate that the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations (Fig. 12b) are due to gypsum dissolution in the Tertiary
stratum. It is also of note that high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can originate from
geothermal water (Morgenstern et al., 2015), in contrast to studies such as
Guo et al. (2014) and Guo et al. (2017), and can be biased due to anoxic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction. However, the groundwater in this study have
relatively low temperatures and aerobic environment (Table 1), making the two
cases above unlikely.</p>
      <p id="d1e7749">The combination of hydrochemistry concentrations and groundwater age data is
also a powerful tool for investigating the groundwater flow processes and
flow-through conditions (McGuire and McDonnell, 2006; Morgenstern et al.,
2010, 2015), and for identifying the natural groundwater evolution and the
impact of anthropogenic contaminants<?pagebreak page443?> (Morgenstern et al., 2015; Morgenstern
and Daughney, 2012). The pH of the groundwater decreases from 10.1 to 8.6
over the age range from 19 to 101 years, with a log law fit of pH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MRTs</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12a). In contrast, a trend of increasing pH with
increasing groundwater age has been reported in New Zealand (the dashed red
line shown in Fig. 12a; Morgenstern et al., 2015), where pH values were all
less than 7.2. These two discrepant trends can be explained by the
relationship between pH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in water
(inserted plot in Fig. 12a). The pH increases with increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration only when the pH is less than 8.34; otherwise
it decreases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. Therefore, the
trend of increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with increasing
groundwater age (Fig. 12b) in this study supports the decreasing trend for
the pH (from 10.1 to 8.6).</p>
      <p id="d1e7841">The soda waters with an overall pH higher than 8.1 (Table 1) are in
disequilibrium with primary rock-forming minerals of the host rocks. The
incongruent dissolutions of the albite and anorthite through hydrolysis
reaction are as follows:


                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M389" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaAlSi</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaAl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where all chemical components of albite and anorthite are released into the
solution phase and produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with simultaneous precipitation of
kaolinite. A trend of increasing pH with well depth (Table 1) suggests that
groundwater whose pH is lower than 9 is likely recharged by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-containing water, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally interacts with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and organic acids in the soil to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al.,
2009). Similarly, the trend of decreasing pH with increasing MRTs (Fig. 12a)
indicates that groundwater with much longer MRTs contains much higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, which seems to suggest an anthropogenic input. The
nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations vary from 4.5 to 20.2 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
with a median of 12.2 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (data not shown), which exceed the natural
nitrate concentration in groundwater of 5–7 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Appelo and Postma,
2005). The development of the plough after the 1950s, N–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fertiliser
(with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios; Ma et al., 2018), and the extensive
groundwater withdrawal for irrigation (Ji, 2016) suggest that irrigation
infiltration can account for the high groundwater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations in the piedmont plain. On the other hand, little irrigation
infiltration was observed in the downstream area with groundwater
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of less than 5 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ma et al., 2018)
due to the water-saving irrigation style, which does not contribute to
groundwater recharge in the arid northwest of China.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e8258">In this study, we used environmental tracers and hydrochemistry to identify
the modern and paleo-meteoric recharge sources, to constrain the different
end-members mixing ratios, and to study the mixed groundwater MRTs in
fault-influenced hydraulic drop alluvium aquifer systems. The aquifer below
the Manas River downstream area is recharged by the paleo-meteoric
precipitation instead of the lateral flow from higher-elevation regions. The
relatively modern groundwater with young (post-1940) water fractions of
87 %–100 % is obtained on the south side of the fault, indicating only a
small mixing ratio between old and young water. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration (7.86 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is higher than the natural level; this,
together with the short MRTs (19 years) on the south side of the fault
(headwater area), implies the contribution of modern contaminants. This
finding requires particular attention since the headwater is used as the
domestic water supply for local communities. The young water fractions of 12 %
to 91 % are widespread on the north side of the fault, suggesting that
mixing between water of different ages may occur within the aquifer or
pumping from the different depths of long-screened boreholes. Furthermore,
the mixing diversity is highlighted by the substantial water table
fluctuations during groundwater pumping, vertical recharge through the thick
unsaturated zone, and different young water inputs in different decades. The
strong correlations between the groundwater MRTs and the hydrochemical
concentrations enable a first-order proxy for MRTs of 19 to 101 years in the
fault-influenced hydraulic drop alluvium aquifers. In addition, this study
reveals that MRTs estimated by CFCs are more appropriate to be used as an age
proxy than those estimated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the arid Manas River Basin,
which has a thick unsaturated zone.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e8302">The data are available upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e8308">XL and JL were responsible for
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses. BM undertook the sampling
program and oversaw the analysis of the hydrochemistry and CFCs. BM and
MJ prepared the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e8338">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><?pagebreak page444?><p id="d1e8344">This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (no. U1403282 and no. 41807204). The authors would like
to thank  Yunquan Wang for the valuable discussions and suggestions for
this paper. We wish to thank  Xumei Mao,  Dajun Qin, and  Yalei Liu
for sampling and laboratory works. We also wish to thank the editor and
anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions and insightful
comments.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by:  Christine Stumpp<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Michael Stewart and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aggarwal, P. K.: Introduction, in: Isotope Methods for Dating Old
Groundwater, edited by: Suckow, A., Aggarwal, P. K., and Araguas-Araguas, L.,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 1–4, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Appelo, C. A. J. and Postma, D.: Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution,
2nd ed., Balkema, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, A. P., Cartwright, I., Gilfedder, B. S., Cendón, D. I., Unland,
N. P., and Hofmann, H.: Using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to understand
groundwater flow and recharge in an aquifer window, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
18, 4951–4964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4951-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-4951-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Barletta, B., Meinardi, S., Simpson, I. J., Rowland, F. S., Chan, C. Y.,
Wang, X., Zou, S., Chan, L. Y., and Blake, D. R.: Ambient halocarbon mixing
ratios in 45 Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7706–7719,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.039</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Batlle-Aguilar, J., Banks, E. W., Batelaan, O., Kipfer, R., Brennwald, M. S.,
and Cook, P. G.: Groundwater residence time and aquifer recharge in
multilayered, semi-confined and faulted aquifer systems using environmental
tracers, J. Hydrol., 546, 150–165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.036</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Benettin, P., Volkmann, T. H. M., von Freyberg, J., Frentress, J., Penna, D.,
Dawson, T. E., and Kirchner, J. W.: Effects of climatic seasonality on the
isotopic composition of evaporating soil waters, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
22, 2881–2890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2881-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-2881-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Beyer, M., Jackson, B., Daughney, C., Morgenstern, U., and Norton, K.: Use of
hydrochemistry as a standalone and complementary groundwater age tracer, J.
Hydrol., 543, 127–144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.062</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carlson, M. A., Lohse, K. A., McIntosh J. C., and McLain, J. E. T.: Impacts
of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial
basin, J. Hydrol., 409, 196–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.020</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cartwright, I. and Morgenstern, U.: Transit times from rainfall to baseflow
in headwater catchments estimated using tritium: the Ovens River, Australia,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3771–3785,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3771-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-3771-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cartwright, I. and Morgenstern, U.: Contrasting transit times of water from
peatlands and eucalypt forests in the Australian Alps determined by tritium:
implications for vulnerability and the source of water in upland catchments,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4757–4773,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4757-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-4757-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cartwright, I., Cendón, D., Currell, M., and Meredith, K.: A review of
radioactive isotopes and other residence time tracers in understanding
groundwater recharge: Possibilities, challenges, and limitations, J. Hydrol.,
555, 797–811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.053" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.053</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cartwright, I., Irvine, D., Burton, C., and Morgenstern, U.: Assessing the
controls and uncertainties on mean transit times in contrasting headwater
catchments, J. Hydrol., 557, 16–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.007</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Z., Qi, J., Xu, J., X, J., Ye, H., and Nan, Y.: Paleoclimatic
interpretation of the past 30 ka from isotopic studies of the deep confined
aquifer of the North China Plain, Appl. Geochem., 18, 997–1009,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00206-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00206-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, I. D. and Fritz, P.: Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, Lewis,
New York, USA, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G. and Böhlke, J. K.: Determining timescales for groundwater
flow and solute transport, in: Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology,
edited by: Cook, P. G. and Herczeg, A. L., Kluwer, Boston, Netherlands,
1–30, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Cook, P. G. and Solomon, D. K.: Transport of atmospheric tracer gases to the
water table: Implications for groundwater dating with chlorofluorocarbons and
krypton 85, Water Resour. Res., 31, 263–270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94WR02232</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G., Plummer, L. N., Solomon, D. K., Busenberg, E., and Han, L. F.:
Effects and processes that can modify apparent CFC age, in: Use of
Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology: A Guidebook, edited by: Gröning, M.,
Han, L. F., and Aggarwal, P., International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna,
Austria, 31–58, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Cook, P., Dogramaci, S., McCallum, J., and Hedley, J.: Groundwater age,
mixing and flow rates in the vicinity of large open pit mines, Pilbara
region, northwestern Australia, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 39–53,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1467-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-016-1467-y</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Craig, H.: Isotopic variations in meteoric waters, Science, 133, 1702–1703,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3465.1702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.133.3465.1702</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, W. G., Mu, G. J., Wen, Q., and Yue, J.: Evolution of alluvial fans and
reaction to the regional activity at rage front of Manas River Valley, Res.
Soil Water Conserv., 14, 161–163, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Custodio, E., Jódar, J., Herrera, C., Custodio-Ayala, J., and Medina, A.:
Changes in groundwater reserves and radiocarbon and chloride content due to a
wet period intercalated in an arid climate sequence in a large unconfined
aquifer, J. Hydrol., 556, 427–437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.035</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Dansgaard, W.: Stable isotopes in precipitation, Tellus, 16, 436–468,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1964.tb00181.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1964.tb00181.x</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Darling, W. G., Gooddy, D. C., MacDonald, A. M., and Morris, B. L.: The
practicalities of using CFCs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for groundwater dating and tracing,
Appl. Geochem., 27, 1688–1697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.02.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.02.005</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Dawson, T. E. and Ehleringer, J. R.: Streamside trees do not use stream
water, Nature, 350, 335–337, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>de Dreuzy, J. R. and Ginn, T. R.: Residence times in subsurface hydrological
systems, introduction to the Special Issue, J. Hydrol., 543, 1–6,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.046</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Edmunds, W. M., Ma, J., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Kipfer, R., and Darbyshire, D.
P. F.: Groundwater recharge history and hydrogeochemical evolution in the
Minqin Basin, North West China, Appl. Geochem., 21, 2148–2170,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.07.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.07.016</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Gleeson, T., Befus, K. M., Jasechko, S., Luijendijk, E., and Cardenas, M. B.:
The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater, Nat. Geosci., 9,
161–167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2590" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO2590</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Green, C. T., Jurgens, B. C., Zhang, Y., Starn, J. J., Singleton, M. J., and
Esser, B. K.: Regional oxygen reduction and denitrification rates in
groundwater from multi-model residence time<?pagebreak page445?> distributions, San Joaquin
Valley, USA, J. Hydrol., 543, 155–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.018</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Wen, D., Liu, Z., Jia, Y., and Guo, Q.: A review of high arsenic
groundwater in Mainland and Taiwan, China: Distribution, characteristics and
geochemical processes, Appl. Geochem., 41, 196–217,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.12.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.12.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Q., Planer-Friedrich, B., Liu, M., Li, J., Zhou, C., and Wang, Y.:
Arsenic and thioarsenic species in the hot springs of the Rehai magmatic
geothermal system, Tengchong volcanic region, China, Chem. Geol., 453,
12–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.010</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Han, L., Hacker, P., and Gröning, M.: Residence times and age distributions
of spring waters at the Semmering catchment area, Eastern Austria, as
inferred from tritium, CFCs and stable isotopes, Isot. Environ. Healt. S.,
43, 31–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010601154015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256010601154015</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Han, D., Song, X., Currell, M. J., Cao, G., Zhang, Y., and Kang, Y.: A survey
of groundwater levels and hydrogeochemistry in irrigated fields in the
Karamay Agricultural Development Area, northwest China: Implications for soil
and groundwater salinity resulting from surface water transfer for
irrigation, J. Hydrol., 405, 217–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.052</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Han, D. M., Song, X. F., Currell, M. J., and Tsujimura, M.: Using
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and tritium to improve conceptual model of
groundwater flow in the South Coast Aquifers of Laizhou Bay, China, Hydrol.
Process., 26, 3614–3629, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.8450</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Han, D., Cao, G., McCallum, J., and Song, X.: Residence times of groundwater
and nitrate transport in coastal aquifer systems: Daweijia area, northeastern
China, Sci. Total Environ., 538, 539–554,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.036</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Horneman, A., Stute, M., Schlosser, P., Smethie Jr., W., Santella, N., Ho, D.
T., Mailloux, B., Gorman, E., Zheng, Y., and van Geen, A.: Degradation rates
of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 in anoxic shallow aquifers of Araihazar
Bangladesh, J. Contam. Hydrol., 97, 27–41,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.12.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.12.001</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hrachowitz, M., Soulsby, C., Tetzlaff, D., Dawson, J. J. C., Dunn, S. M., and
Malcolm, I. A.: Using long-term data sets to understand transit times in
contrasting headwater catchments, J. Hydrol., 367, 237–248,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Huang, T., Pang, Z., Li, J., Xiang, Y., and Zhao, Z.: Mapping groundwater
renewability using age data in the Baiyang alluvial fan, NW China, Hydrogeol.
J., 25, 743–755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1534-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-017-1534-z</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Jelinowska, A., Tucholka, P., Gasse, F., and Fontes, J. C.: Mineral magnetic
record of environment in Late Pleistocene and Holocene sediments, Lake Manas,
Xinjiang, China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 953–956, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00708</ext-link>,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ji, L.: Using stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope to research the conversion
relationship of surface water and groundwater in Manas River Basin, MS
thesis, Shihezi University, China, 58 pp., 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Jurgens, B. C., Böhlke, J. K., and Eberts, S. M.: TracerLPM (Version 1):
An Excel<sup>®</sup> workbook for interpreting
groundwater age distributions from environmental tracer data: U.S. Geological
Survey Techniques and Methods Report 4–F3, Reston, USA, 60 pp., 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kirchner, J. W.: Aggregation in environmental systems – Part 1: Seasonal
tracer cycles quantify young water fractions, but not mean transit times, in
spatially heterogeneous catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 279–297,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-279-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kirchner, J. W., Tetzlaff, D., and Soulsby C.: Comparing chloride and water
isotopes as hydrological tracers in two Scottish catchments, Hydrol.
Process., 24, 1631–1645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7676" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7676</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Koh, D. C., Ha, K., Lee, K. S., Yoon, Y. Y., and Ko, K. S.: Flow paths and
mixing properties of groundwater using hydrogeochemistry and environmental
tracers in the southwestern area of Jeju volcanic island, J. Hydrol.,
432–433, 61–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.030</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Kong, Y. and Pang, Z.: A positive altitude gradient of isotopes in the
precipitation over the Tianshan Mountains: Effects of moisture recycling and
sub-cloud evaporation, J. Hydrol., 542, 222–230,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Pang, Z., Froehlich, K., Huang, T., Kong, Y., Song, W., and Yun, H.:
Paleo-environment from isotopes and hydrochemistry of groundwater in East
Junggar Basin, Northwest China, J. Hydrol., 529, 650–661,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.019</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, B., Liang, X., Jin, M., Li, J., and Niu, H.: Characteristics of
fractionation of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in evaporating water in the
typical region of the North China Plain, Adv. Water Sci., 26, 639–648,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Ma, B., Liang, X., Liu, S., Jin, M., Nimmo, J. R., and Li, J.: Evaluation of
diffuse and preferential flow pathways of infiltrated precipitation and
irrigation using oxygen and hydrogen isotopes, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 675–688,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1525-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-016-1525-5</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ma, B., Jin, M., Liang, X., and Li, J.: Groundwater mixing and mineralization
processes in a mountain–oasis–desert basin, northwest China:
hydrogeochemistry and environmental tracer indicators, Hydrogeol. J., 26,
233–250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1659-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-017-1659-0</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Mahlknecht, J., Hernández-Antonio, A., Eastoe, C. J., Tamez-Meléndez,
C., Ledesma-Ruiz, R., Ramos-Leal, J. A., and Ornelas-Soto, N.: Understanding
the dynamics and contamination of an urban aquifer system using groundwater
age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CFCs) and chemistry, Hydrol. Process., 31,
2365–2380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11182" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.11182</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Małoszewski, P.: Lumped–parameter models as a tool for determining the
hydrological parameters of some groundwater systems based on isotope data,
IAHS–AISH Publication, 262, 271–276, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Małoszewski, P. and Zuber, A.: Determining the turnover time of groundwater
systems with the aid of environmental tracers, 1. Models and their
applicability, J. Hydrol., 57, 207–231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90147-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-1694(82)90147-0</ext-link>,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>McGuire, K. J. and McDonnell, J. J.: A review and evaluation of catchment
transit time modeling, J. Hydrol., 330, 543–563,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>McGuire, K. J., McDonnell, J. J., Weiler, M., Kendall, C., McGlynn, B. L.,
Welker, J. M., and Seibert, J.: The role of topography on<?pagebreak page446?> catchment-scale
water residence time, Water Resour. Res., 41, 302–317,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004WR003657</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, U. and Daughney, C. J.: Groundwater age for identification of
baseline groundwater quality and impacts of land-use intensification – The
National Groundwater Monitoring Programme of New Zealand, J. Hydrol.,
456–457, 79–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.010</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, U. and Taylor, C. B.: Ultra low-level tritium measurement using
electrolytic enrichment and LSC, Isot. Environ. Healt. S., 45, 96–117,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902931194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256010902931194</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, U., Stewart, M. K., and Stenger, R.: Dating of streamwater using
tritium in a post nuclear bomb pulse world: continuous variation of mean
transit time with streamflow, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2289–2301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2289-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-2289-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Morgenstern, U., Daughney, C. J., Leonard, G., Gordon, D., Donath, F. M., and
Reeves, R.: Using groundwater age and hydrochemistry to understand sources
and dynamics of nutrient contamination through the catchment into Lake
Rotorua, New Zealand, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 803–822,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-803-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-803-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Négrel, P., Petelet-Giraud, E., and Millot, R.: Tracing water cycle in
regulated basin using stable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
isotopes: The Ebro river basin (Spain), Chem. Geol., 422, 71–81,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.12.009</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Oster, H., Sonntag, C., and Münnich, K. O.: Groundwater age dating with
chlorofluorocarbons, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2989–3001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR01775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96WR01775</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pearson, F. J. and Hanshaw, B. B.: Sources of dissolved carbonate species in
groundwater and their effects on carbon-14 dating, in: Proceedings of A
Symposium on Use of Isotopes in Hydrology, International Atomic Energy
Agency, Vienna, Austria, 271–286, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, L. N., Busenberg, E., and Cook, P. G.: Principles of
Chlorofluorocarbon dating, in: Use of Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology: A
Guidebook, edited by: Gröning, M., Han, L. F., and Aggarwal, P.,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 17–29, 2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, L. N., Busenberg, E., and Han, L. F.: CFCs in binary mixtures of
young and old groundwater, in: Use of Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology: A
Guidebook, edited by: Gröning, M., Han, L. F., and Aggarwal, P.,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 59–72, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Polach, H. A.: Evaluation and status of liquid scintillation counting for
radiocarbon dating, Radiocarbon, 29, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200043502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0033822200043502</ext-link>,
1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Qin, D.: Decline in the concentrations of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11, CFC-12
and CFC-113) in an urban area of Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 41,
8424–8430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.005</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Qin, D., Qian, Y., Han, L., Wang, Z., Li, C., and Zhao, Z.: Assessing impact
of irrigation water on groundwater recharge and quality in arid environment
using CFCs, tritium and stable isotopes, in the Zhangye Basin, Northwest
China, J. Hydrol., 405, 194–208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.023</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Russell, A. D. and Thompson, G. M.: Mechanisms leading to enrichment of the
atmospheric fluorocarbons <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
groundwater, Water Resour. Res., 19, 57–60, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/WR019i001p00057</ext-link>,
1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, M. K., Morgenstern, U., and McDonnell, J. J.: Truncation of stream
residence time: how the use of stable isotopes has skewed our concept of
stream water age and origin, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1646–1659,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7576</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, M. K., Morgenstern, U., Gusyev, M. A., and Maloszewski, P.:
Aggregation effects on tritium-based mean transit times and young water
fractions in spatially heterogeneous catchments and groundwater systems,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4615–4627,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4615-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-4615-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Stumpp, C. and Małoszewski, P.: Quantification of preferential flow and
flow heterogeneities in an unsaturated soil planted with different crops
using the environmental isotope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Hydrol., 394, 407–415,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.014</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stumpp, C., Małoszewski, P., Stichler, W., and Fank, J.: Environmental
isotope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and hydrological data to assess water flow in
unsaturated soils planted with different crops: Case study lysimeter station
“Wagna” (Austria), J. Hydrol., 369, 198–208,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.047</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Suckow, A.: The age of groundwater – Definitions, models and why we do not
need this term, App. Geochem, 50, 222–230,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Tadros, C. V., Hughes, C. E., Crawford, J., Hollins, S. E., and Chisari, R.:
Tritium in Australian precipitation: A 50 year record, J. Hydrol., 513,
262–273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.031</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Visser, A., Broers, H. P., Purtschert, R., Sültenfuß, J., and de
Jonge, M.: Groundwater age distributions at a public drinking water supply
well field derived from multiple age tracers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Water Resour. Res., 49, 7778–7796,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013WR014012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, J. C.: Carbon-14 dating of groundwater, in: Proceedings of A Symposium
on Use of Isotopes in Hydrology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna,
Austria, 225–239, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Shvartsev, S. L., and Su, C.: Genesis of arsenic/fluoride–enriched
soda water: A case study at Datong, northern China, Appl. Geochem., 24,
641–649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.015</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, B.: Study on groundwater system evolvement law and water environment
effect of Shihezi City, PhD thesis, Xinjiang Agricultural University, China,
132 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B. F.: Recharge on water resources characteristics and its rational
development pattern for arid areas: a case of Manas River Basin, PhD thesis,
Chang'an University, China, 182 pp., 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, H. C.: Groundwater system and recharge from the remote river in
Southwestern margin of the Jungger Basin, PhD thesis, Chinese Academy of
Geological Sciences, China, 116 pp., 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Zuber, A., Witczak, S., Różański, K., Śliwka, I., Opoka, M.,
Mochalski, P., Kuc, T., Karlikowska, J., Kania, J., Jackowicz-Korczyński,
M., and Duliński, M.: Groundwater dating with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
relation to mixing patterns, transport modelling and hydrochemistry, Hydrol.
Process., 19, 2247–2275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.5669</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Application of environmental tracers for investigation of groundwater mean residence time and aquifer recharge  in fault-influenced hydraulic drop alluvium aquifers</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Investigating groundwater residence time and recharge sources is crucial for
water resource management in the alluvium aquifers of arid basins.
Environmental tracers (chlorofluorocarbons, <sup>3</sup>H, <sup>14</sup>C, <i>δ</i><sup>2</sup>H,
<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O) and groundwater hydrochemical components are used for
assessing groundwater mean residence times (MRTs) and aquifer recharge in
fault-influenced hydraulic drop alluvium aquifers in the Manas River basin
(China). Aquifers under the Manas River upstream (south of the fault)
contains very high <sup>3</sup>H activity (41.1–60&thinsp;TU), implying water
recharge affected by the nuclear bomb tests of the 1960s. Carbon-14
groundwater age correlates positively with distance from mountain area
(3000–5000 years in the midstream to &gt;&thinsp;7000 years in the
downstream) and groundwater depth, but correlates negatively to a decrease in
<sup>3</sup>H activity (1.1&thinsp;TU) and more negative <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O values.
This phenomenon reveals that the source of the deeper groundwater in the
semi-confined aquifer is paleo-meteoric recharge. Special attention has been
paid to the estimation of MRTs using CFCs and <sup>3</sup>H by an exponential
piston flow model. The results show that MRTs vary from 19 to 101 years by
CFCs and from 19 to 158 years by <sup>3</sup>H. MRTs estimated from
<sup>3</sup>H are much longer than those from CFCs, probably due to the
different time lag of liquid (<sup>3</sup>H) and gas-phase CFCs through the
unsaturated zone. The MRTs estimated by CFCs show good correlations with pH
and the concentrations of SiO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>, which can
provide a possible approach to estimate first-order proxies of MRTs for
groundwater age. The young water fractions are investigated by the CFC binary
mixing method in the south and north of the fault. Relatively modern recharge
is found in the south of the fault with young (post-1940) water fractions of
87&thinsp;%–100&thinsp;%, whereas in the north of the fault the young water
fractions vary from 12&thinsp;% to 91&thinsp;%. This study shows that the
combination of CFCs and <sup>3</sup>H residence time tracers can help in
analysing the groundwater MRTs and the recharge sources for the different
mixing end-members.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aggarwal, P. K.: Introduction, in: Isotope Methods for Dating Old
Groundwater, edited by: Suckow, A., Aggarwal, P. K., and Araguas-Araguas, L.,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 1–4, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Appelo, C. A. J. and Postma, D.: Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution,
2nd ed., Balkema, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, A. P., Cartwright, I., Gilfedder, B. S., Cendón, D. I., Unland,
N. P., and Hofmann, H.: Using <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>3</sup>H to understand
groundwater flow and recharge in an aquifer window, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
18, 4951–4964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4951-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4951-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Barletta, B., Meinardi, S., Simpson, I. J., Rowland, F. S., Chan, C. Y.,
Wang, X., Zou, S., Chan, L. Y., and Blake, D. R.: Ambient halocarbon mixing
ratios in 45 Chinese cities, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7706–7719,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.039</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Batlle-Aguilar, J., Banks, E. W., Batelaan, O., Kipfer, R., Brennwald, M. S.,
and Cook, P. G.: Groundwater residence time and aquifer recharge in
multilayered, semi-confined and faulted aquifer systems using environmental
tracers, J. Hydrol., 546, 150–165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.036</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Benettin, P., Volkmann, T. H. M., von Freyberg, J., Frentress, J., Penna, D.,
Dawson, T. E., and Kirchner, J. W.: Effects of climatic seasonality on the
isotopic composition of evaporating soil waters, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,
22, 2881–2890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2881-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2881-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Beyer, M., Jackson, B., Daughney, C., Morgenstern, U., and Norton, K.: Use of
hydrochemistry as a standalone and complementary groundwater age tracer, J.
Hydrol., 543, 127–144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.062</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Carlson, M. A., Lohse, K. A., McIntosh J. C., and McLain, J. E. T.: Impacts
of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial
basin, J. Hydrol., 409, 196–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.020</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cartwright, I. and Morgenstern, U.: Transit times from rainfall to baseflow
in headwater catchments estimated using tritium: the Ovens River, Australia,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3771–3785,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3771-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3771-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cartwright, I. and Morgenstern, U.: Contrasting transit times of water from
peatlands and eucalypt forests in the Australian Alps determined by tritium:
implications for vulnerability and the source of water in upland catchments,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4757–4773,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4757-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4757-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cartwright, I., Cendón, D., Currell, M., and Meredith, K.: A review of
radioactive isotopes and other residence time tracers in understanding
groundwater recharge: Possibilities, challenges, and limitations, J. Hydrol.,
555, 797–811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.053" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.053</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cartwright, I., Irvine, D., Burton, C., and Morgenstern, U.: Assessing the
controls and uncertainties on mean transit times in contrasting headwater
catchments, J. Hydrol., 557, 16–29, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.007</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Z., Qi, J., Xu, J., X, J., Ye, H., and Nan, Y.: Paleoclimatic
interpretation of the past 30&thinsp;ka from isotopic studies of the deep confined
aquifer of the North China Plain, Appl. Geochem., 18, 997–1009,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00206-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00206-8</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, I. D. and Fritz, P.: Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, Lewis,
New York, USA, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G. and Böhlke, J. K.: Determining timescales for groundwater
flow and solute transport, in: Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology,
edited by: Cook, P. G. and Herczeg, A. L., Kluwer, Boston, Netherlands,
1–30, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G. and Solomon, D. K.: Transport of atmospheric tracer gases to the
water table: Implications for groundwater dating with chlorofluorocarbons and
krypton 85, Water Resour. Res., 31, 263–270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02232</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G., Plummer, L. N., Solomon, D. K., Busenberg, E., and Han, L. F.:
Effects and processes that can modify apparent CFC age, in: Use of
Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology: A Guidebook, edited by: Gröning, M.,
Han, L. F., and Aggarwal, P., International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna,
Austria, 31–58, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P., Dogramaci, S., McCallum, J., and Hedley, J.: Groundwater age,
mixing and flow rates in the vicinity of large open pit mines, Pilbara
region, northwestern Australia, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 39–53,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1467-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1467-y</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, H.: Isotopic variations in meteoric waters, Science, 133, 1702–1703,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3465.1702" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3465.1702</a>, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cui, W. G., Mu, G. J., Wen, Q., and Yue, J.: Evolution of alluvial fans and
reaction to the regional activity at rage front of Manas River Valley, Res.
Soil Water Conserv., 14, 161–163, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Custodio, E., Jódar, J., Herrera, C., Custodio-Ayala, J., and Medina, A.:
Changes in groundwater reserves and radiocarbon and chloride content due to a
wet period intercalated in an arid climate sequence in a large unconfined
aquifer, J. Hydrol., 556, 427–437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.035</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Dansgaard, W.: Stable isotopes in precipitation, Tellus, 16, 436–468,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1964.tb00181.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1964.tb00181.x</a>, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Darling, W. G., Gooddy, D. C., MacDonald, A. M., and Morris, B. L.: The
practicalities of using CFCs and SF<sub>6</sub> for groundwater dating and tracing,
Appl. Geochem., 27, 1688–1697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.02.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.02.005</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Dawson, T. E. and Ehleringer, J. R.: Streamside trees do not use stream
water, Nature, 350, 335–337, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
de Dreuzy, J. R. and Ginn, T. R.: Residence times in subsurface hydrological
systems, introduction to the Special Issue, J. Hydrol., 543, 1–6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.046</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Edmunds, W. M., Ma, J., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Kipfer, R., and Darbyshire, D.
P. F.: Groundwater recharge history and hydrogeochemical evolution in the
Minqin Basin, North West China, Appl. Geochem., 21, 2148–2170,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.07.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.07.016</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gleeson, T., Befus, K. M., Jasechko, S., Luijendijk, E., and Cardenas, M. B.:
The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater, Nat. Geosci., 9,
161–167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2590" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2590</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Green, C. T., Jurgens, B. C., Zhang, Y., Starn, J. J., Singleton, M. J., and
Esser, B. K.: Regional oxygen reduction and denitrification rates in
groundwater from multi-model residence time distributions, San Joaquin
Valley, USA, J. Hydrol., 543, 155–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.018</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, H., Wen, D., Liu, Z., Jia, Y., and Guo, Q.: A review of high arsenic
groundwater in Mainland and Taiwan, China: Distribution, characteristics and
geochemical processes, Appl. Geochem., 41, 196–217,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.12.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.12.016</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, Q., Planer-Friedrich, B., Liu, M., Li, J., Zhou, C., and Wang, Y.:
Arsenic and thioarsenic species in the hot springs of the Rehai magmatic
geothermal system, Tengchong volcanic region, China, Chem. Geol., 453,
12–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.010</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Han, L., Hacker, P., and Gröning, M.: Residence times and age distributions
of spring waters at the Semmering catchment area, Eastern Austria, as
inferred from tritium, CFCs and stable isotopes, Isot. Environ. Healt. S.,
43, 31–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010601154015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010601154015</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Han, D., Song, X., Currell, M. J., Cao, G., Zhang, Y., and Kang, Y.: A survey
of groundwater levels and hydrogeochemistry in irrigated fields in the
Karamay Agricultural Development Area, northwest China: Implications for soil
and groundwater salinity resulting from surface water transfer for
irrigation, J. Hydrol., 405, 217–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.052</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Han, D. M., Song, X. F., Currell, M. J., and Tsujimura, M.: Using
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and tritium to improve conceptual model of
groundwater flow in the South Coast Aquifers of Laizhou Bay, China, Hydrol.
Process., 26, 3614–3629, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8450" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8450</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Han, D., Cao, G., McCallum, J., and Song, X.: Residence times of groundwater
and nitrate transport in coastal aquifer systems: Daweijia area, northeastern
China, Sci. Total Environ., 538, 539–554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.036</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Horneman, A., Stute, M., Schlosser, P., Smethie Jr., W., Santella, N., Ho, D.
T., Mailloux, B., Gorman, E., Zheng, Y., and van Geen, A.: Degradation rates
of CFC-11, CFC-12 and CFC-113 in anoxic shallow aquifers of Araihazar
Bangladesh, J. Contam. Hydrol., 97, 27–41,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.12.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.12.001</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hrachowitz, M., Soulsby, C., Tetzlaff, D., Dawson, J. J. C., Dunn, S. M., and
Malcolm, I. A.: Using long-term data sets to understand transit times in
contrasting headwater catchments, J. Hydrol., 367, 237–248,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, T., Pang, Z., Li, J., Xiang, Y., and Zhao, Z.: Mapping groundwater
renewability using age data in the Baiyang alluvial fan, NW China, Hydrogeol.
J., 25, 743–755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1534-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1534-z</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Jelinowska, A., Tucholka, P., Gasse, F., and Fontes, J. C.: Mineral magnetic
record of environment in Late Pleistocene and Holocene sediments, Lake Manas,
Xinjiang, China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 953–956, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00708</a>,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ji, L.: Using stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope to research the conversion
relationship of surface water and groundwater in Manas River Basin, MS
thesis, Shihezi University, China, 58 pp., 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Jurgens, B. C., Böhlke, J. K., and Eberts, S. M.: TracerLPM (Version 1):
An Excel<span style="position:relative; bottom:0.5em; " class="text">®</span> workbook for interpreting
groundwater age distributions from environmental tracer data: U.S. Geological
Survey Techniques and Methods Report 4–F3, Reston, USA, 60 pp., 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchner, J. W.: Aggregation in environmental systems – Part 1: Seasonal
tracer cycles quantify young water fractions, but not mean transit times, in
spatially heterogeneous catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 279–297,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-279-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchner, J. W., Tetzlaff, D., and Soulsby C.: Comparing chloride and water
isotopes as hydrological tracers in two Scottish catchments, Hydrol.
Process., 24, 1631–1645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7676" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7676</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Koh, D. C., Ha, K., Lee, K. S., Yoon, Y. Y., and Ko, K. S.: Flow paths and
mixing properties of groundwater using hydrogeochemistry and environmental
tracers in the southwestern area of Jeju volcanic island, J. Hydrol.,
432–433, 61–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.030</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kong, Y. and Pang, Z.: A positive altitude gradient of isotopes in the
precipitation over the Tianshan Mountains: Effects of moisture recycling and
sub-cloud evaporation, J. Hydrol., 542, 222–230,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Pang, Z., Froehlich, K., Huang, T., Kong, Y., Song, W., and Yun, H.:
Paleo-environment from isotopes and hydrochemistry of groundwater in East
Junggar Basin, Northwest China, J. Hydrol., 529, 650–661,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.019</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, B., Liang, X., Jin, M., Li, J., and Niu, H.: Characteristics of
fractionation of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in evaporating water in the
typical region of the North China Plain, Adv. Water Sci., 26, 639–648,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, B., Liang, X., Liu, S., Jin, M., Nimmo, J. R., and Li, J.: Evaluation of
diffuse and preferential flow pathways of infiltrated precipitation and
irrigation using oxygen and hydrogen isotopes, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 675–688,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1525-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1525-5</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, B., Jin, M., Liang, X., and Li, J.: Groundwater mixing and mineralization
processes in a mountain–oasis–desert basin, northwest China:
hydrogeochemistry and environmental tracer indicators, Hydrogeol. J., 26,
233–250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1659-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1659-0</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mahlknecht, J., Hernández-Antonio, A., Eastoe, C. J., Tamez-Meléndez,
C., Ledesma-Ruiz, R., Ramos-Leal, J. A., and Ornelas-Soto, N.: Understanding
the dynamics and contamination of an urban aquifer system using groundwater
age (<sup>14</sup>C, <sup>3</sup>H, CFCs) and chemistry, Hydrol. Process., 31,
2365–2380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11182" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11182</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Małoszewski, P.: Lumped–parameter models as a tool for determining the
hydrological parameters of some groundwater systems based on isotope data,
IAHS–AISH Publication, 262, 271–276, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Małoszewski, P. and Zuber, A.: Determining the turnover time of groundwater
systems with the aid of environmental tracers, 1. Models and their
applicability, J. Hydrol., 57, 207–231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90147-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90147-0</a>,
1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, K. J. and McDonnell, J. J.: A review and evaluation of catchment
transit time modeling, J. Hydrol., 330, 543–563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.020</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
McGuire, K. J., McDonnell, J. J., Weiler, M., Kendall, C., McGlynn, B. L.,
Welker, J. M., and Seibert, J.: The role of topography on catchment-scale
water residence time, Water Resour. Res., 41, 302–317,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003657" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003657</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Morgenstern, U. and Daughney, C. J.: Groundwater age for identification of
baseline groundwater quality and impacts of land-use intensification – The
National Groundwater Monitoring Programme of New Zealand, J. Hydrol.,
456–457, 79–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.010</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Morgenstern, U. and Taylor, C. B.: Ultra low-level tritium measurement using
electrolytic enrichment and LSC, Isot. Environ. Healt. S., 45, 96–117,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902931194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902931194</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Morgenstern, U., Stewart, M. K., and Stenger, R.: Dating of streamwater using
tritium in a post nuclear bomb pulse world: continuous variation of mean
transit time with streamflow, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2289–2301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2289-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2289-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Morgenstern, U., Daughney, C. J., Leonard, G., Gordon, D., Donath, F. M., and
Reeves, R.: Using groundwater age and hydrochemistry to understand sources
and dynamics of nutrient contamination through the catchment into Lake
Rotorua, New Zealand, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 803–822,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-803-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-803-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Négrel, P., Petelet-Giraud, E., and Millot, R.: Tracing water cycle in
regulated basin using stable <i>δ</i><sup>2</sup>H–<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O
isotopes: The Ebro river basin (Spain), Chem. Geol., 422, 71–81,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.12.009</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Oster, H., Sonntag, C., and Münnich, K. O.: Groundwater age dating with
chlorofluorocarbons, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2989–3001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR01775" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR01775</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pearson, F. J. and Hanshaw, B. B.: Sources of dissolved carbonate species in
groundwater and their effects on carbon-14 dating, in: Proceedings of A
Symposium on Use of Isotopes in Hydrology, International Atomic Energy
Agency, Vienna, Austria, 271–286, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, L. N., Busenberg, E., and Cook, P. G.: Principles of
Chlorofluorocarbon dating, in: Use of Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology: A
Guidebook, edited by: Gröning, M., Han, L. F., and Aggarwal, P.,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 17–29, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Plummer, L. N., Busenberg, E., and Han, L. F.: CFCs in binary mixtures of
young and old groundwater, in: Use of Chlorofluorocarbons in Hydrology: A
Guidebook, edited by: Gröning, M., Han, L. F., and Aggarwal, P.,
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 59–72, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Polach, H. A.: Evaluation and status of liquid scintillation counting for
radiocarbon dating, Radiocarbon, 29, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200043502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200043502</a>,
1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, D.: Decline in the concentrations of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11, CFC-12
and CFC-113) in an urban area of Beijing, China, Atmos. Environ., 41,
8424–8430, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.005</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Qin, D., Qian, Y., Han, L., Wang, Z., Li, C., and Zhao, Z.: Assessing impact
of irrigation water on groundwater recharge and quality in arid environment
using CFCs, tritium and stable isotopes, in the Zhangye Basin, Northwest
China, J. Hydrol., 405, 194–208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.023</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, A. D. and Thompson, G. M.: Mechanisms leading to enrichment of the
atmospheric fluorocarbons CCl<sub>3</sub>F and CCl<sub>2</sub>F<sub>2</sub> in
groundwater, Water Resour. Res., 19, 57–60, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i001p00057</a>,
1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, M. K., Morgenstern, U., and McDonnell, J. J.: Truncation of stream
residence time: how the use of stable isotopes has skewed our concept of
stream water age and origin, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1646–1659,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7576</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, M. K., Morgenstern, U., Gusyev, M. A., and Maloszewski, P.:
Aggregation effects on tritium-based mean transit times and young water
fractions in spatially heterogeneous catchments and groundwater systems,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4615–4627,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4615-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4615-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Stumpp, C. and Małoszewski, P.: Quantification of preferential flow and
flow heterogeneities in an unsaturated soil planted with different crops
using the environmental isotope <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O, J. Hydrol., 394, 407–415,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.014</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Stumpp, C., Małoszewski, P., Stichler, W., and Fank, J.: Environmental
isotope (<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O) and hydrological data to assess water flow in
unsaturated soils planted with different crops: Case study lysimeter station
“Wagna” (Austria), J. Hydrol., 369, 198–208,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.047</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Suckow, A.: The age of groundwater – Definitions, models and why we do not
need this term, App. Geochem, 50, 222–230,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.016</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tadros, C. V., Hughes, C. E., Crawford, J., Hollins, S. E., and Chisari, R.:
Tritium in Australian precipitation: A 50 year record, J. Hydrol., 513,
262–273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.031</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Visser, A., Broers, H. P., Purtschert, R., Sültenfuß, J., and de
Jonge, M.: Groundwater age distributions at a public drinking water supply
well field derived from multiple age tracers (<sup>85</sup>Kr,
<sup>3</sup>H∕<sup>3</sup>He, and <sup>39</sup>Ar), Water Resour. Res., 49, 7778–7796,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014012</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Vogel, J. C.: Carbon-14 dating of groundwater, in: Proceedings of A Symposium
on Use of Isotopes in Hydrology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna,
Austria, 225–239, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Shvartsev, S. L., and Su, C.: Genesis of arsenic/fluoride–enriched
soda water: A case study at Datong, northern China, Appl. Geochem., 24,
641–649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.12.015</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, B.: Study on groundwater system evolvement law and water environment
effect of Shihezi City, PhD thesis, Xinjiang Agricultural University, China,
132 pp., 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B. F.: Recharge on water resources characteristics and its rational
development pattern for arid areas: a case of Manas River Basin, PhD thesis,
Chang'an University, China, 182 pp., 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, H. C.: Groundwater system and recharge from the remote river in
Southwestern margin of the Jungger Basin, PhD thesis, Chinese Academy of
Geological Sciences, China, 116 pp., 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zuber, A., Witczak, S., Różański, K., Śliwka, I., Opoka, M.,
Mochalski, P., Kuc, T., Karlikowska, J., Kania, J., Jackowicz-Korczyński,
M., and Duliński, M.: Groundwater dating with <sup>3</sup>H and SF<sub>6</sub> in
relation to mixing patterns, transport modelling and hydrochemistry, Hydrol.
Process., 19, 2247–2275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5669</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
