<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-23-371-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Seasonal streamflow forecasts for Europe – Part 2: <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Sources of skill</article-title><alt-title>Seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasts for Europe</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasts for Europe}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{W. Greuell et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Greuell</surname><given-names>Wouter</given-names></name>
          <email>wouter.greuell@wur.nl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Franssen</surname><given-names>Wietse H. P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hutjes</surname><given-names>Ronald W. A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Water Systems and Global Change (WSG) group, Wageningen University and
Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>6708 PB Wageningen, the
Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Wouter Greuell (wouter.greuell@wur.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>371</fpage><lpage>391</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e99">This paper uses hindcasts (1981–2010) to investigate the sources of skill in
seasonal hydrological forecasts for Europe. The hindcasts were produced with
WUSHP (Wageningen University Seamless Hydrological Prediction system). Skill
was identified in a companion paper. In WUSHP, hydrological processes are
simulated by running the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrological
model forced with an ensemble of bias-corrected output from the seasonal
forecast system 4 (S4) of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). We first analysed the meteorological forcing. The
precipitation forecasts contain considerable skill for the first lead month
but hardly any significant skill at longer lead times. Seasonal forecasts of
temperature have more skill. Skill in summer temperature is related to
climate change and is more or less independent of lead time. Skill in February
and March is unrelated to climate change. Different sources of skill in
hydro-meteorological variables were isolated with a suite of specific
hydrological hindcasts akin to ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP). These
hindcasts show that in Europe, initial conditions of soil moisture (SM) form the
dominant source of skill in run-off. From April to July, initial conditions of
snow contribute significantly to the skill. Some remarkable skill features
are due to indirect effects, i.e. skill due to forcing or initial conditions
of snow and soil moisture at an earlier stage is stored in the hydrological
state (snow and/or soil moisture) of a later stage, which then contributes to
persistence of skill. Skill in evapotranspiration (ET) originates mostly in the
meteorological forcing. For run-off we also compared the full hindcasts (with
S4 forcing) with two types of ESP (or ESP-like) hindcasts (with identical forcing
for all years). Beyond the second lead month, the full hindcasts are less
skilful than the ESP (or ESP-like) hindcasts, because inter-annual variations in the
S4 forcing consist mainly of noise which enhances degradation of the skill.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e109">Society may benefit from seasonal hydrological forecasts (Viel et al., 2016;
Soares and Dessai, 2016; Crochemore et al., 2016), i.e. hydrological
forecasts for future time periods from more than 2 weeks up to about a
year (Doblas-Reyes et al., 2013). Such predictions can be exploited to
optimise, for example, hydropower energy generation (Hamlet et al., 2002),
navigability of rivers in low flow conditions (Li et al., 2008) and
irrigation management (Ghile and Schulze, 2008; Mushtaq et al., 2012) to
decrease crop yield losses.</p>
      <p id="d1e112">This is the second paper about seasonal hydrological forecasts for Europe
produced with WUSHP (Wageningen University Seamless Hydrological Prediction
system), a dynamical (i.e. model-based) system. In summary, the forecasts of
WUSHP are made with the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrological
model, which uses bias-corrected output of forecasts from the seasonal
forecasting system 4 (S4) of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) as meteorological forcing. The system is
probabilistic.</p>
      <p id="d1e115">In the present and in the companion paper (Greuell et al., 2018), WUSHP is
used as a research tool for purposes of academic interest. In the companion
paper, the set-up of WUSHP has been described, and spatial and temporal
variations of skill, or the lack thereof, in run-off and discharge in Europe have
been established by means of hindcasts.<?pagebreak page372?> Significant skill was found for many
regions, varying by initialisation and target months. For lead month 2, hotspots of significant skill in run-off are situated in Fennoscandia (for
target months from January to October), the southern part of the
Mediterranean (from June to August), Poland, northern Germany, Romania and
Bulgaria (mainly from November to January) and western France (from December
to May). In general, the spatial pattern of significant skill in run-off was
found to be fixed in space, while the skill decreased in magnitude with
increasing lead time. Some significant skill remained even at the end of the
hindcasts (7 months).</p>
      <p id="d1e118">To extend the evaluation of the system, its reliability was analysed. The
main finding is that during the 2 first lead months the system is not far
from being perfectly reliable but that with progressing lead time
reliability is reduced. We also found that discrimination skill and
reliability have similar characteristics, e.g. for longer lead times the
highest values of reliability are found in some regions with considerable
amounts of discrimination skill. Details of this analysis are provided in
Appendix A.</p>
      <p id="d1e122">The current paper aims to identify the sources of the skill in WUSHP and is
structured in two main parts. In the first part, an analysis of the skill in
the most important meteorological forcing variables (precipitation,
2 m temperature and incoming short-wave radiation from S4) is
presented. For S4, this was done earlier by Kim et al. (2012) for the boreal
winter months (DJF), with initialisation on the first of November. For that
case, they found that in Europe, S4 has no skill in the precipitation
forecasts and some skill in the temperature forecasts for southern Sweden,
southern Finland, the region southeast of Saint Petersburg and northern
Germany. Scaife et al. (2014) analysed the skill for the same target months
and starting date but with another prediction system, namely the Met Office
Global Seasonal Forecast System version 5 (GloSea5). They found that, while the
GloSea5 temperature forecasts for Europe contain hardly any significant
skill, the GloSea5 forecasts of the North Atlantic Oscillation are
correlated significantly with observed temperatures in northern and southern
Europe. This means that there is untapped predictability in the GloSea5
temperature forecasts. We will analyse predictability of the mentioned
output variables of S4 for the whole continent and will consider all
combinations of lead and target months.</p>
      <p id="d1e125">The second line of analysis aims to investigate the reasons for the presence
or absence of skill in hydro-meteorological variables by means of a series of
specific hindcasts that isolate potential sources of skill, namely
meteorological forcing, the initial conditions of soil moisture (SM) and the
initial conditions of snow. Such an approach was explored earlier by Wood et
al. (2005), Bierkens and van Beek (2009) and Koster et al. (2010). Each
specific hindcast is basically identical to the standard hindcasts that we
analysed in the companion paper, named full streamflow hindcasts (FullSHs;
climate-model-based hindcasts” according to Yuan et al., 2015). However, in
the specific hindcasts, one or two of the sources of predictability are
isolated by eliminating the effect of all of the other sources through the
removal of their inter-annual variation. In the ensuing analysis the skills
in hydro-meteorological variables found in the different specific hindcasts
will then be compared among themselves and with the skill from the FullSHs.</p>
      <p id="d1e128">These specific hindcasts are similar in structure to and inspired by the
conventional ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) technique (e.g. Wood and
Lettenmaier, 2008; Shukla and Lettenmaier, 2011; Singla et al., 2012), which
can, like our specific hindcasts, be used to isolate sources of skill. The
main difference between the specific hindcasts of this study and the ESP
technique is that in ESP and its variant reverse ESP, the meteorological
forcing is taken from data based on observations, while in the present study
the forcing is taken from meteorological hindcasts. In fact, we also
produced ESP. In Sect. 4.3 we will compare these with one of the other
specific hindcasts and discuss the relation between our
specific hindcasts and the ESP suite more generally.</p>
      <p id="d1e131">Though this paper focusses on run-off, the analysis is complemented with an
analysis of the skill in evapotranspiration (ET), since this variable has a large
effect on run-off (see Willmott et al., 1985). Predictions of
evapotranspiration also have independent value, because they are useful for
planning of water level control in polders and for planning of water use for
irrigation and fertiliser application. As for run-off, we will exploit the
specific hindcasts to isolate the different sources of predictability in
evapotranspiration forecasts.</p>
      <p id="d1e134">The version of VIC that we used was only crudely calibrated (Nijssen et al.,
2001). Hence, discharge computed by the present version of the system may be
expected to deviate substantially from observations, both in terms of the
mean and in terms of the spread of the ensemble of forecasts. Also, within
WUSHP no post-processing of discharge is carried out to correct for such
deficiencies. This makes the system unsuitable for issuing forecasts of
absolute amounts of discharge, but the system can be used to provide
information on how likely it is that the future discharge will be above or
below normal. Consequently, the most
important criteria for the selection of skill metrics (see Sect. 2.2) are
their ability of discrimination and their insensitivity to biases and to the
spread of the forecasts.</p>
      <p id="d1e137">The objective of the present paper is to analyse, at a pan-European and
regional scale, the sources of probabilistic skill of seasonal hydrological
forecasts produced by WUSHP. The next section (Sect. 2) will describe the
seasonal prediction system itself and the analysis approach as well as details
of the various specific hindcast performed. We will present the skill in the
meteorological forcing (Sect. 3.1), isolate the skill in run-off due to
either forcing or different types of initial conditions (Sect. 3.2), and
finally analyse the skill in evapotranspiration (Sect. 3.3). We conclude
with a discussion (Sect. 4) and conclusions (Sect. 5).</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page373?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>System and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>The forecast system</title>
      <p id="d1e151">The forecasts of WUSHP combine three elements, namely meteorological forcing
from ECMWF's Seasonal Forecast System 4 (Molteni et al., 2011), bias
correction of the meteorological forcing with the quantile mapping method of
Themeßl et al. (2011) and simulations with the VIC hydrological model (Liang at al., 1994). The skill of the
system was assessed with hindcasts. These cover the period 1981–2010, were
initialised on the first day of each month and extend to a lead time of
7 months. The system is probabilistic (15 members), so each set of
hindcasts consists of a total of 5400 runs (30 years <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 months <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 members).
In addition a single reference simulation was performed in which VIC was
run with a gridded data set of model-assimilated meteorological
observations, namely the WATCH Forcing Data Era-Interim (WFDEI; Weedon et
al., 2014). The reference simulation has a dual aim. The first aim is to
create initialisation states for the hindcasts. Secondly, the output of the
reference simulation, e.g. run-off, is used for verification of the
hindcasts. This output will be named “pseudo-observations” here.</p>
      <p id="d1e168">Due to the set-up of the routing module of VIC, the state of discharge could
not be saved and loaded. Hence for spin-up discharge, each 7-month hindcast
was preceded by a 1-month simulation with WFDEI forcing, which in turn was
initialised with the model states generated in the reference simulation and
zero discharge. All hindcasts and simulations were performed on a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid in natural flow mode, i.e. river
regulation, irrigation and other anthropogenic influences were not
considered. VIC is run with a time step of 3 h. More details about the
set-up of the system and the hindcasts can be found in the companion paper
(Greuell et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Methods of analysis and observations</title>
      <p id="d1e197">In this paper we analyse hindcasts of run-off, discharge and
evapotranspiration. Run-off is defined as the amount of water leaving the
model soil either, along the surface or at the bottom, while we define
discharge as the flow of water through the largest river in each grid cell.</p>
      <p id="d1e200">Discrimination skill (briefly skill from now on) is measured in terms of the
correlation coefficient between the median of the hindcasts and the
observations (or pseudo-observations; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). We will designate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values as significant for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values less than 0.05. We also considered metrics designed for the
evaluation of categorical forecasts (terciles), namely the relative
operating characteristics (ROC) area and the ranked probability skill
score (RPSS). The thresholds used for assigning individual
(pseudo-)observations to terciles were determined from the
(pseudo-)observations themselves. Similarly hindcasts were assigned to
terciles by reference to themselves. Due to this strategy metrics are
unaffected by biases, a desired property (see Sect. 1). In the companion
paper skills in terms of the considered metrics were compared, and it was
found that for all combinations of target and lead months the skill patterns
in the maps were similar to a high degree. For that reason, we selected only
one of them (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for this paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e231">Unless mentioned otherwise, prediction skill of the hydrological variables
is determined against the pseudo-observations (see Sect. 2.1). These have
the advantages of being complete in the spatial and the temporal domain and
of being available for all model variables. We will refer to this type of
skill as “theoretical skill”. In the companion paper theoretical skill for
discharge was compared to “actual skill”, which is the skill assessed with
real observations. For the determination of the skill of the meteorological
forcing we used the WFDEI data.</p>
      <p id="d1e234">To investigate the possible contribution of trends to skill, skill in the
meteorological forcing and in run-off was determined both before and after
removing the trend from both the (pseudo-) observations and the hindcasts.
Data were detrended by first constructing time series (1981–2010) for each
variable, target month, lead month and grid cell (30 values). We then
removed the trend from each time series by first fitting a least-squares
regression line to the time series and then subtracting the time series
corresponding to the line from the original data. For the hindcasts, time
series were constructed for the mean of the ensembles, and the resulting best
fit was subtracted from each member individually.</p>
      <p id="d1e238">Like in the companion paper, skill was analysed on a monthly and not on a
seasonal basis with the aim of achieving a relatively high temporal
resolution in the skill analysis. Attention was confined to consistent
skill, which we define as skill that persists during at least two
consecutive target or lead months. In accordance with Hagedorn et al. (2005),
we designated the first month of the hindcasts as lead month zero.</p>
      <p id="d1e241">In most result sections, we will first analyse and explain skill at the
level of the entire domain. We will then take out the most noteworthy
details of the summary plots and seek an explanation for them.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Isolation of sources of skill and surface water initialisation</title>
      <p id="d1e250">As already pointed out in the introduction, a number of specific hindcasts
were carried out with the aim of isolating the contributions of different
sources to skill. The FullSHs, in which skill is
due to both meteorological forcing and initial conditions, constitute the
starting point. The specific hindcasts can be seen as restricted, in the
sense of limiting the types of sources of skill, versions of the FullSHs. The
following five sets of specific hindcasts, each consisting of 5400 computer
runs, were produced:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e255">The <italic>InitSHs</italic> isolate the skill due to both types of initial conditions considered
here (soil moisture and snow). Like in the FullSHs, the annually varying
initial<?pagebreak page374?> conditions are taken from the reference simulation, while for each
year the meteorological forcing is identical and consists of an ensemble of
15 S4 hindcasts. More specifically, we selected member 1 from the 1981
hindcasts, member 2 from the 1983 hindcasts, etc. By using identical
meteorological forcing for all of the years of the hindcasts, skill in
hydro-meteorological variables due to skill in the forcing is eliminated.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e262">The <italic>SMInitSHs</italic> isolate the skill due to the initial conditions of soil moisture
only. The SMInitSHs are identical to the InitSHs, but in all SMInitSHs snow initial
conditions are taken as the 30-year average of the snow conditions in the
reference simulation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e269">The <italic>SnInitSHs</italic> isolate the skill due to the initial conditions of snow contained in
the snow cover. The SnInitSHs are identical to the InitSHs, but in all SnInitSHs soil
moisture initial conditions are taken as the 30-year average of the soil
moisture conditions in the reference simulation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e276">The <italic>MeteoSHs</italic> isolate the skill due the meteorological forcing and as such are the
full complement of the InitSHs. Like in the FullSHs, the annually varying
forcing is taken from the probabilistic S4 hindcasts, while for each year the
initial soil moisture and snow conditions are identical and equal to the 30-year average of the soil moisture and snow conditions in the reference
simulation. By taking identical initial conditions for all of the years of
the hindcasts, skill due to the initial conditions of soil moisture and snow
is eliminated.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e283">The <italic>ESP</italic> are identical to the InitSHs, both in terms of their construction and
in terms of their purpose. However, in the ESP the forcing is not taken from
the S4 hindcasts but from the WFDEI data by selecting the 15 odd years from
1981 to 2009.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e289">Forcings and initial conditions of all of these hindcasts differ among the
calendar months so that the annual cycle is conserved. Hence, in the list
above, the following apply:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e294">“Identical for all years” means that the forcings (or the initial
conditions) for all hindcasts starting in, for example, May are identical.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e298">“30-year average” means that the initial conditions for all hindcasts
starting in, for example, May are averaged over all of the 1 May model states
in the reference simulation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e302">“Annually varying” means that the forcings (or the initial conditions) for
all hindcasts starting in, for example, May vary from year to year.</p></list-item></list>
These statements also hold for the other calendar months.</p>
      <p id="d1e306">Thus, like the FullSHs, all specific hindcasts for a single starting date
consist of 15 members, which is important, since ensemble size affects skill
metrics (Richardson, 2001). Also, in all hindcasts the probabilistic
character is exclusively due to the 15 members of the meteorological forcing,
while initial conditions are deterministic. This consistency is important,
since the main aim of the various specific hindcasts is to compare them with
each other. A disadvantage of the small ensemble size is the sampling
uncertainty (see Sect. 4.2 of the companion paper).</p>
      <p id="d1e309">Discharge initialisation, a potential source of skill, is not considered.
This has no effect on most of the analyses of the paper, since these are
made in terms of run-off. Where discharge is analysed the effect of discharge
initialisation is, due to the limited residence time of water in the rivers,
restricted to the first lead month of the hindcasts (see Yuan, 2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e315">Skill of the precipitation hindcasts after bias correction.
Figure 1a shows a map of the correlation coefficient between the observations
and the median of the hindcasts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), for target month January as lead month
0. The threshold of significant skill lies at 0.31, so cells with the
lightest yellow colour have insignificant skill, and grid cells with other
colours have significant skill. The legend provides the percentage of cells
with significant values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the domain-averaged value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Figure 1b depicts the percentage of cells with significant skill in terms of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of the target and lead month. Each
coloured curve represents the hindcasts starting in a single month of the
year and has a length of 7 (lead) months. For better visualisation the parts
of the curves that end in the next year are shown twice, namely at the
left-hand and the right-hand side of the graph. Black lines connect the
results for identical lead times, which are specified in the legend (lead <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lead month). The horizontal line gives the expected fraction of cells
with significant skill due to chance in the case that the hindcasts have no
skill at all (5 %).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Explanations of skill in hydrological variables</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Skill in the meteorological forcing after bias correction</title>
      <p id="d1e374">In this sub-section, the skill of the meteorological forcing will be
analysed. Attention will be limited to the three input variables of VIC that
have the largest effect on run-off and evapotranspiration, namely
precipitation, 2 m temperature and incoming short-wave radiation. The
WFDEI data are used as a reference. Here the data after bias correction are
considered. In Appendix B we will discuss the skill of the raw S4 data,
which is the meteorological forcing before bias correction. Differences in
skill between the bias-corrected and the uncorrected data are negligible for
temperature and short-wave radiation and small for precipitation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e379">Skill of the 2 m temperature hindcasts after bias correction.
<bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> give the percentage of cells with significant
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the un-detrended <bold>(a)</bold> and the
detrended <bold>(b)</bold> temperature hindcasts (see Fig. 1b for further
explanation). <bold>(c)</bold> compares annual cycles of skill of un-detrended
and detrended data for the first 3 lead months. The three panels in the
middle row show maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the un-detrended temperature hindcasts for
target months February <bold>(d)</bold> and March <bold>(e)</bold> as lead month 1
and July as lead month 5 <bold>(f)</bold>. The bottom three panels depict the
correlation coefficient of the trend (not the trend itself) of the observed
monthly mean temperature, for March <bold>(g)</bold> and July <bold>(i)</bold>, and
mean of the hindcasted temperature for July as lead month 5 <bold>(h)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e437">Figure 1 shows results of the skill analysis of the precipitation forcing.
Figure 1a provides an example of the skill for a single target and lead month
(January as lead month 0). A summary of the skill in the precipitation
hindcasts is given in Fig. 1b, which plots the fraction of all cells within
the domain with statistically significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, so Fig. 1a condenses
into a single point in Fig. 1b. During the entire year, there is considerable
skill for lead month 0 (on average in 61 % of the domain), but skill
declines very rapidly to 6 % for lead months 1 and 2, just 1 % more
than the percentage of cells in the case of no true skill at all. Hence, from
lead month 1 on, skill is almost negligible. Regarding lead month 0, there is
more skill in January, February and March than during the other months. For
the lead month 0, hotspots of consistent skill, i.e. with a duration of
significant skill of at least 3 target months, are situated on the
Iberian Peninsula from November to March, in western Norway from January to
April, in Greece and western Turkey from December to February, and in Scotland
from December to March. All these occurrences of consistent skill are
restricted to the winter half of the year<?pagebreak page375?> and mostly to coastal regions (see
Fig. 1a), suggesting them to be linked to the initial state of the sea
surface temperature.</p>
      <p id="d1e447">Figure 2 shows important aspects of skill in the 2 m temperature
hindcasts. One aspect is the possible contribution of a 30-year trend, which
could be related to greenhouse warming, to the skill. Figure 2a and b
provide summaries of the skill of the un-detrended and the detrended data,
respectively, whereas Fig. 2c compares these two types of data. For lead
month 0, the hindcasts have significant skill in the largest part of the
domain (Fig. 2a and b), and detrending has a small effect (Fig. 2c). At
longer lead times, the percentage of cells with significant skill quickly
drops towards the theoretical no-skill limit (5 %), but there are a few
exceptions, namely the following:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e452">For lead month 1, February and March temperatures are predicted with
significant skill in a considerable part of the domain (44 % in February;
53 % in March). In both months the region with skill is more or less
contiguous and comprises the Russian part of the domain, the Ukraine and the
regions bordering the southern part of the Baltic Sea (Fig. 2d and e). In
February the region of skill extends towards central Europe. In March it
also comprises northern Fennoscandia. This skill hardly diminishes by
detrending the data (Fig. 2b and c), suggesting that the skill is not
related to climate change. Indeed, in February and March the observed trend
(in the WFDEI data set) is insignificant across most of the domain (11 %
of the domain in February and 18 % in March), and, more importantly here,
it is insignificant in the regions with significant skill in the temperature
hindcasts (Fig. 2g demonstrates this for March). We conclude that the
temperature skill in February and March as lead month 1 must be due to
initial conditions of the climate model (see also the discussion on Fig. 10).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e456">The 3 summer months (JJA) exhibit significant skill at all lead times
in much more than 5 % of the domain (a range from 22 % to 56 % for all
combinations of the 3 summer months and all lead months beyond lead
month 0; see Fig. 2a). In this case the fraction of cells with significant
skill is not a function of lead time, which is the type of behaviour that
Yuan (2016) also found for the Yellow River basin. Since Fig. 2b and c
demonstrate that the skill for JJA more or less vanishes when the
temperature hindcasts and observations are detrended, we conclude that the
skill for these months is due to trends in the data and is hence probably
related to greenhouse warming. Another conclusion is that skill that hardly
varies with lead time may be related to climate change.</p>
      <p id="d1e459">It should be noted here that trends can only cause correlation between
hindcasts and observations, and hence skill in the hindcasts, if they are
present in both time series. A random time series of hindcasts is not
correlated with a time series of observations with a trend and vice versa.
Indeed, time series of both hindcasts and observations have a maximum in
significant trends in summer, when trends form the prime source of skill
according to our analyses. In the hindcasts and on average over all lead
times beyond the first month, the summer months exhibit significant trends in
almost the entire domain (95 %), versus 79 % of the domain in the
other months<?pagebreak page376?> of the year, on average. Similarly, observed trends are
significant during the 3 summer months in 67 % of the domain, versus only
24 % of the domain in the other months of the year, on average. These
percentages also show that significant trends occur in a larger part of the
domain in the hindcasts than in the observations. So the observations, and
not the hindcasts, are mostly limiting the occurrence of trend-related skill
in the temperature hindcasts. This point is illustrated by the example of
July as lead month 5 in Fig. 2f, h and i, but a similar illustration could
have been provided for the other summer months and different lead months.
Figure 2h shows that the trends of the hindcasts for July are significant
across almost the entire domain (99 % of the domain). However, according
to Fig. 2i only 69 % of the domain has a significant trend in the
observed July temperatures. Indeed, the patterns of significance of Fig. 2f
(skill in the temperature hindcasts) and Fig. 2i (significance of observed
trends) agree to a large extent.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e463">April, May and September combine the behaviour of February and March,
which have skill due to initial conditions of the climate model, with the
skill of the summer months, which show skill related to trends (Fig. 2c).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e467">January has a considerable amount of significant skill but only for lead
month 2 (42 % across the domain). This skill occurs in a piece of land
reaching from England to Russia, which vaguely coincides with the region in
which Kim et al. (2012) found skill in the S4 temperature hindcasts for the
3 winter months. However, as this skill is not found in adjacent lead
and target months and is thus not consistent, we speculate that this skill is
spurious.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e473">Skill of the incoming short-wave radiation hindcasts after bias
correction. <bold>(a)</bold> gives the percentage of cells with significant values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 1b for further explanation). <bold>(b)</bold> compares annual cycles
of skill of un-detrended and detrended data for the first 3 lead months
(see <bold>c</bold> for further explanation).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e498">Since short-wave incoming radiation is important for evapotranspiration, we
finalise this sub-section with a short analysis of its predictability (Fig. 3).
In terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, skill is considerable during the first lead month, with
58 % of the cells having significant skill, on average over the year.
Months from<?pagebreak page377?> March to September tend to have more skill than the other months
of the year. Beyond lead month 0, skill settles around the no-skill line,
except from April to July, but the fraction of cells with significant skill
never exceeds 21 % (in May as lead month 1). Trends in the data hardly
affect skill (Fig. 3b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e510">Comparison of the annual cycles of skill of the InitSHs (blue) and
the FullSHs (red). The two panels show theoretical skill obtained with the
pseudo-observations for run-off <bold>(a)</bold> and discharge <bold>(b)</bold> at
four different lead times.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Sources of skill in run-off and discharge</title>
      <p id="d1e531">In these sub-section analyses the effects of the meteorological forcing and
the initial conditions on the predictability of run-off and discharge
(discharge is only considered in Fig. 4) are isolated. We first address the
question of how much of the skill in the run-off hindcasts is linked to
trends. To examine this question, the pseudo-observations and the hindcasts
of run-off were detrended, and the skill was compared to that of the
un-detrended data sets. We found that for lead month 2 and averaged over all
months of the year, the fraction of cells with a significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased
from 58.7 % to 57.4 % due to detrending, a difference of 1.3 %. This
difference is much smaller than the decrease for temperature (11.8 %). We
conclude that trends contribute very little to skill in run-off. All analyses
of this sub-section hereafter pertain to un-detrended data.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>The relative importance of initial hydrological conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e546">Figure 4 compares the InitSHs with the FullSHs in terms of the fraction of
cells with a significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for run-off (Fig. 4a) and discharge (Fig. 4b).
While the lumped results hardly differ between run-off and discharge (the
companion paper discusses small differences in skill between these two
variables), systematic differences in skill between the FullSHs and InitSHs
are revealed. For lead month 0, skill is higher in the FullSHs than in the
InitSHs for all target months of the year, though the difference becomes very
small when the fraction of the domain with significant skill approaches
100 % and hence becomes unsuitable to discriminate between the two cases.
Beyond lead month 1, the reverse occurs for most target months. Lead month 1
is transitional, with the order of skill depending on the time of the year.
We produced figures similar to Fig. 4, all shown in the Supplement, for the skill evaluation of the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e558">discharge with real, instead of pseudo-, observations, both for large
basins (Fig. S1a in the Supplement) and small catchments (Fig. S1b) and for a subset of the
large catchments with relatively little human impact (Fig. S2),</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e562">run-off in terms of the fraction of the domain with significant skill for
the other metrics considered (RPSS, ROC above normal – AN – and ROC below normal (BN); Figs. S3–S5) and in
terms of the domain-mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6).</p></list-item></list>
In all of these cases, the reversal of skill around lead month 1 was found.
So the reversal is a robust feature and is neither an artefact due to the type of
observations nor due to human impacts on river flow, nor is it an artefact of the
metric used in the verification procedure.</p>
      <p id="d1e573">The explanation of the reversal deals with the ranking of the run-off in
different years, since our metrics largely measure ranking. We will argue
that while the InitSH forcing has a neutral effect on the ranking of the
run-off forecasts and hence on their skill, FullSH forcing without skill has
a negative effect on the ranking of the run-off forecasts and hence on their
skill. The InitSH forcing is, by construction, identical for all years.
Using this forcing, inter-annual differences in forecasted run-off diminish
with increasing lead time and approach zero when the effect of the initial
conditions vanishes. However, to a good approximation, rankings of forecasted
run-off for different years remains the same as at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. So the forcing has
a neutral effect on the ranking and hence on skill. Contrary to the InitSHs,
the FullSH forcing differs from year to year. This changes the ranking<?pagebreak page378?> of
different years of the run-off forecasts. If the FullSH forcings contain
skill, these changes in ranking tend to bring, statistically, the forecasts
towards the observations, so skill is added to the run-off forecasts. This is
what happens at short lead times. At longer leads, the FullSHs can be
considered as having no skill. This tends to randomly shuffle the ranking of
the run-off forecasts and hence diminishes their skill. Of course, the
ranking of the (pseudo-)observations of different years also changes during
the course of the forecasts, which generally has a negative effect on run-off
skill unless forcing is perfect. This “observation argument” complicates
the whole argument but it has no consequences for the argument above, since
it affects the skill of the FullSHs and the InitSHs in the same way.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e590">Comparison of the annual cycles of the skill in the run-off
hindcasts of four specific hindcasts for lead months 0 and 2. Different
colours correspond to different specific hindcasts, and different line types
to different lead months.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>The relative contributions of soil moisture and snow initial
conditions and of meteorological forcing</title>
      <p id="d1e607">Figure 5 compares the skill in run-off of the specific hindcasts (except ESP)
for 2 lead months (0 and 2). At both lead times and for all target months,
initialisation of soil moisture is the dominant source of skill in Europe.
Initialisation of snow and meteorological forcing are less important. This
is true for all lead times (not shown here).</p>
      <p id="d1e610">Meteorological forcing does not only have a relatively small contribution to
the domain-averaged skill of Fig. 5 but also to regional skill. We searched
for combinations of a region and target months where the MeteoSHs produce
consistently equal or more skill than the SMInitSHs, but we did not find any
combination where this was clearly the case. On average across the domain
and for all target months, during the first lead month there is more skill
due to the forcing (MeteoSHs) than due to snow initial conditions (SnInitSHs).
For later lead months this order depends on the target month, mainly because
skill due to snow initial conditions varies strongly during the year.
Although skill in run-off due to meteorological forcing (in the MeteoSHs) is
relatively small, it does exceed the skill in the forcing variable to which
run-off is most sensitive, precipitation (compare Fig. 5 with Fig. 1).
Whereas predictability of precipitation is almost limited to the first lead
month, significant skill in run-off due to forcing is more widespread for
lead months 1 and 2 (on average over the year, in 23 % and 15 % of the
domain, respectively). We explain the enhanced skill in run-off mainly by an
indirect effect. Skill in the precipitation forcing of the first lead month
leads to skill in the states of soil moisture and snow at the end of that
month. These model states then serve as the source of skill during the next
lead months, when the precipitation forcing has no skill at all. In addition
to this indirect effect of precipitation, the skill in the hindcasts of
temperature (Fig. 2) contributes to skill in run-off in the MeteoSHs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page379?><p id="d1e613"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>From April to July, a considerable part of Europe has significant skill
derived from snow initialisation, provided that initialisation does not occur
earlier than in February, probably because in all parts of Europe with
significant snowfall, this process does not stop before 1 February. Skill
due to snow initialisation reaches a maximum in May and June, resulting in a
maximum in skill in the InitSH hindcasts for these months and for most lead
times. When snow contributes considerably to predictability (from April to
July), the skill in the InitSHs exceeds the skill in the SMInitSHs. Because
for target months from August to March snow contributes little to
predictability, the percentages of cells with significant skill in InitSHs
and SMInitSHs are almost identical for these months. The rapid rise in skill
due to snow initialisation at the transition from April to May explains a
remarkable feature that we noticed in the companion paper, namely an
increase in run-off skill with lead time at this time of year. Another
noticeable feature is that the skill due to snow initialisation for lead
month 2 exceeds skill due to snow initialisation for lead month 0. This
occurs for target months from May to August and will be explained in the
text corresponding to Fig. 8.</p>
      <p id="d1e617">Figures similar to Fig. 5, but for all metrics of the present study, are
included in the Supplement (Fig. S7). The graphs for the ROC areas for the AN
and BN terciles are qualitatively similar to the graph for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This also holds for
the RPSS though fractions of the domain with significant RPSS are almost
always lower than for the other metrics, probably because the RPSS is a
summary metric for all three terciles including the middle one, which
generally has much lower ROC areas than the other two terciles.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e630">Example that compares the skill in run-off of three specific
hindcasts (SMInitSHs – <bold>a</bold>, SnInitSHs – <bold>b</bold> and InitSHs – <bold>c</bold>), for target month May
as lead month 2. For more explanation, see Fig. 1a. White, terrestrial cells
correspond to cells where observations or hindcasts consist for more than
one-third of zeros or one-sixth of ties.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e648">Figure 6 compares skill maps for the three specific hindcasts that isolate
skill due to initial conditions (InitSHs, SMInitSHs and SnInitSHs). It
illustrates that skill due to snow and soil moisture initialisation is not
only more or less additive at the scale of the entire domain (Fig. 5) but
also at the regional scale. The patterns of skill due to soil moisture
initialisation, e.g. in Africa, on the Iberian Peninsula and in western
France (Fig. 5a), are also found in the map of skill due to both components
of initialisation (Fig. 5c). Small regions with considerable skill due to
snow initialisation (Fig. 5b), like those near Stockholm, in southeastern
Czechia and southeastern Austria also stick out as foci of skill on the map
of skill due to both soil moisture and snow initialisation (Fig. 5c). Where
both soil moisture and snow initialisation cause moderate skill, e.g. in
southern Finland, the combined specific hindcast exhibits more significant
skill.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e653">Example showing the variation of skill in run-off as a function of
lead time in the SnInitSHs, for initialisation on 1 March. For more
explanation, see Figs. 1a and 6.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e662">Figure 7 zooms in on the specific hindcast that isolates skill due to snow
initialisation (SnInitSHs), giving the example of a time series of skill as a
function of lead time, after initialisation on 1 March. One observation is
that skill does not gradually decrease with time but has a maximum during the
snowmelt season. We like to note that locally skill is hardly generated
during the part of the melt season when a snow pack covers the surface in
each year. The reason is that in VIC the rate of snowmelt is almost
insensitive to snow pack thickness (Sun et al., 1999). Hence, as long as the
surface is covered by snow in each year, inter-annual variation in snowmelt
is absent or negligible. Skill is only generated towards the end of the melt
season, when snowmelt differs from year to year, because snow stops being
available for melt at different dates due to different initial amounts of
snow. So, the initial snow conditions cause skill because of inter-annual
variation in the duration of the period that it takes to melt the snow
present at the time of initialisation and not because of inter-annual
variation in the melt rate. Of course, the timing of the end of the melt
season differs regionally and with elevation, which largely explains the
patterns of skill visible in the maps of Fig. 7. A good example is
Scandinavia, where the earliest skill (in April; lead month 1) occurs at low
elevations near the coasts of southern Norway and Sweden, at the end of the
local snow season. The latest skill (in July; lead month 4) occurs in the
Norwegian mountains, again at the end of the local snow season (we ascribe
the skill in southeastern Sweden in July and August to chance). It is also
relevant to note that the skill patterns in the maps of Fig. 7 are influenced
by the fact that VIC has higher vertical resolution than its horizontal
resolution may suggest by performing calculations in multiple
elevation bands within each grid cell. This way sub-grid variations in
topography are accounted for. Therefore, sub-grid topography leads to
spreading of the snow skill signal of individual cells over longer periods of
time.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e667">Example illustrating that skill in run-off for a target month may
increase with lead time, namely for run-off in May as target months
0 <bold>(a)</bold> and 1 <bold>(b)</bold> in the SnInitSHs. Skill in soil moisture in
the SnInitSHs, for May as lead month 1, is shown <bold>(c)</bold>, because it
provides part of the explanation for the mechanism causing the increase in
skill with lead time. For more explanation, see Figs. 1a and 6.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e686">To finish the analysis of the SnInitSHs, Fig. 8 analyses a noticeable
feature. In SnInitSHs, hindcasts for May have less skill when the hindcasts
are initialised on 1 May  (Fig. 8a) compared to initialisation during
preceding months (February, March or April; Fig. 8b is for initialisation on
1 April). Similar results are found for June and July as target months. This
result is noteworthy, because in hindcasts with initialisation on 1 May, there
is, due to the use of pseudo-observations for verification, perfect
knowledge about snow conditions on that date. With initialisation on 1 April,
snow conditions on 1 May  differ from those of the pseudo-observations,
which by itself must lead to less skill in May run-off. The simple
explanation is that on 1 April  more grid cells have a snow cover than a
month later on 1 May, but then the question arises of why those grid cells that
lose their snow cover in April still exhibit significant skill in run-off
during the month of May. The answer lies in an indirect effect. Inter-annual
variations in the amount of snow at 1 April  lead to predictable inter-annual
variations in soil moisture on 1 May  (Fig. 8c), when the snow cover has
melted, which then acts by itself as an additional source of skill in run-off
in May.</p>
      <p id="d1e689">To finalise this section, the specific hindcasts were exploited to attribute
the hotspots of significant skill in run-off for lead month 2, listed in the
companion paper, to the different potential sources of skill. This was done
for each of the hotspots by inspection of the maps of skill (like those<?pagebreak page380?> of
Fig. 6, for example) for three specific hindcasts that isolate the different sources
of skill (SMInitSHs, SnInitSHs and MeteoSHs). If the hotspot was present in, for example, SMInitSHs, soil moisture initialisation is one of the sources of skill.
Results are summarised in Table 1. Almost all of the significant skill in
the hotspot regions is due to the initial conditions of soil moisture.
Exceptions are formed by the target months from April to July, when skill is
caused by a mix of the initial conditions of snow and soil moisture in
regions with significant snowmelt. In these cases the relative
contributions of the two sources varies in time and space, but soil moisture
is more important than snow, except in Fennoscandia, where snow
dominates in June, and in July both sources are of about equal importance. Meteorological forcing contributed significantly to
this in none of
the hotspots of skill.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e695">Sources of skill for hotspot regions and periods of skill. SM is
soil moisture.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Source of skill</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fennoscandia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jan–Mar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Apr–Jul</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM and snow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aug–Oct</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Poland and northern Germany</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oct–Mar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Apr–May</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM and snow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Western France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dec–May</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Romania and Bulgaria</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oct–Mar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Apr–May</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM and snow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Mediterranean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Jun–Aug</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Skill and source of skill in evapotranspiration</title>
      <p id="d1e839">This section analyses skill in the hindcasts of evapotranspiration, because
hindcasts of evapotranspiration are useful in themselves and
evapotranspiration affects run-off (see Sect. 1), and in order to demonstrate
the rich possibilities of the pseudo-observations, the specific hindcasts
and the detrending to unravel the various sources of skill. In VIC,
evapotranspiration is computed with the Penman–Monteith method (see
Shuttleworth, 1993).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e844">Summary plots of the skill of the hindcasts of evapotranspiration.
<bold>(a)</bold> summarises the FullSHs (for more explanation, see Fig. 1b), <bold>(b)</bold> depicts
the annual cycles of skill for the FullSHs and three specific
hindcasts (SnInitSHs, SMInitSHs and MeteoSHs), for lead months 0 and 2, and
<bold>(c)</bold> compares the annual cycles of skill of the un-detrended and the detrended
FullSHs for the first 3 lead months.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e862">Figure 9a summarises skill in evapotranspiration in the FullSHs. Levels of
predictability are higher than for precipitation (Fig. 1), similar to those
for temperature (Fig. 2) and lower than those for run-off (Fig. 4a). Figure 9b
isolates the diverse contributions to skill for lead months 0 and 2<?pagebreak page381?> by
showing the skill for the FullSHs and three specific hindcasts. Averaged over
the year, meteorological forcing (MeteoSHs) contributes more to
predictability in evapotranspiration than the initial conditions, among
which soil moisture (SMInitSHs) causes more skill than snow (SnInitSHs).
Hence, comparing skill in run-off with skill in evapotranspiration, the most
important source of skill shifts from the initial conditions of soil
moisture to meteorological forcing.</p>
      <p id="d1e865">In the FullSHs (Fig. 9b) and focusing on lead month 2, there is hardly any
skill in the evaporation hindcasts from November to March (9 % of the
domain, on average over these months), with the exception of January
(18 %), when the region of skill (Germany and Benelux) is part of a larger
region of skill in the temperature hindcasts for the same target and lead
month. We blame the winter minimum of skill in evapotranspiration to the low
levels of evapotranspiration and the low levels of skill in the temperature
forecasts for the same period. The next month (April) exhibits the highest
level of skill of all months (44 % of the domain), which is mainly due to
meteorological forcing and has smaller contributions by the initial
conditions of soil moisture and snow. From May to September there is some
significant skill (23 % of the domain, on average over these months).
Whereas in May forcing is still the most important contributor to skill,
initial conditions of soil moisture form the main contributor from June to
October. We speculate that this shift in the order of importance between
forcing and soil moisture is due to the amount of variability in soil
moisture. In Europe in spring<?pagebreak page382?> (April and May), soil moisture variations are
relatively small and hence hardly contribute to variations in
evapotranspiration. Later in the year (June to September), soil moisture is
often available in limited amounts, so variations are larger and hence
contribute more to variations in evapotranspiration. Snow initial conditions
contribute to skill only during the snowmelt season from April to July.</p>
      <p id="d1e869">The contribution of trends to predictability of evapotranspiration is
summarised in Fig. 9c for lead months 0, 1 and 2. For lead month 2 and
averaged over all target months of the year, detrending leads to a decrease
in the fraction of cells with a significant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, from 17.6 % to 13.8 %, a
difference of 3.8 %. The contribution of trends to skill in
evapotranspiration is less than its contribution to skill in temperature (a
difference of 11.8 %) but larger than its contribution to skill in run-off
(a difference of 1.3 %). Trends contribute to skill in evapotranspiration
during the part of the year when they also contribute to skill in
atmospheric temperature (Fig. 2c), namely from April to September and in
November (for lead month 0). However, whereas during the 3 summer months
the skill in the temperature hindcasts is almost exclusively linked to
climate change, a considerable part of the domain still exhibits skill in
evapotranspiration after detrending.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e881">Explanation of the skill in the hindcasts of evapotranspiration, for
target month April as lead month 2. The panels map the skill in
evapotranspiration of the FullSHs <bold>(a)</bold>, of the MeteoSHs <bold>(b)</bold>
and of the hindcasts of temperature <bold>(c)</bold>. For more explanation, see
Fig. 1a.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e899">To provide a deeper understanding of the skill in evapotranspiration, the
skill in April and July is analysed in some detail. Figure 10 deals with
April as lead month 2, showing the skill in evapotranspiration from the
FullSHs in Fig. 10a and from the MeteoSHs in Fig. 10b. Regions of skill, mainly
a piece of land from southern Fennoscandia to the Black Sea, are the same in
the FullSHs and in the MeteoSHs, though skill is somewhat degraded in the
MeteoSHs. This indicates that meteorological forcing causes most, though not
all, of the skill. Indeed, Figs. 2e (March) and 10c (April) show that the
temperature forecasts for these two months after initialisation on 1 February
contain skill in the mentioned region. We conclude that much of the skill
in evapotranspiration is due to skill in the temperature hindcasts. The
remaining part of the skill is due to initial hydrological conditions. While
Fig. 9b shows this for the entire domain, we also found limited amounts of
skill in the SnInitSHs and the SMInitSHs for April in the stroke of land from
southern Fennoscandia to the Black Sea (not shown here). This means that in
that region, initial conditions of the hydrological model on 1 February
provide some skill to the hindcasts of evapotranspiration for April. We like
to note that this could be consistent with the conclusion in Sect. 3.1 that
the skill in the temperature hindcasts of February and March in this same
region are due to the initial conditions of the climate model. These initial
conditions could be, for example, sea surface temperatures or also the local state of snow and/or soil conditions. In
the latter case, the two types of predictability in the mentioned regions
would have the same or a similar source. Initial conditions of snow and/or
soil conditions in S4 would lead to skill in the temperature hindcasts of S4,
while initial conditions of snow and soil moisture in VIC lead to skill in
the evapotranspiration hindcasts of VIC.</p>
      <p id="d1e902">During the summer months and for all lead times, skill in evapotranspiration
occurs in two regions, namely the southern part of the Mediterranean and
western and northern Norway. Figure 11 shows target month July for lead month
5 as an example. Whereas Fig. 11a is for the FullSHs, Fig. 11b–d depict the
maps for three specific hindcasts (SnInitSHs, SMInitSHs and MeteoSHs), and
Fig. 11e shows skill for the FullSHs after detrending. Since the SnInitSHs and
the MeteoSHs exhibit hardly any skill, while the SMInitSHs have considerable skill in
the Mediterranean (Fig. 11b–d), it can be concluded that the skill in this
region is due to soil moisture initial conditions. So, in this particular
case, knowledge of soil moisture conditions on 1 February still yields skill
in evapotranspiration in July. This skill in the Mediterranean is not
affected by detrending (compare Fig. 11a and e), so it does not have a
climate-change component.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e907">Explanation of the skill in the hindcasts of evapotranspiration
(ET) for July by taking lead month 5 as an example. The panels map the skill
in evapotranspiration of the FullSHs <bold>(a)</bold>, SMInitSHs <bold>(b)</bold>,
SnInitSHs <bold>(c)</bold>, MeteoSHs <bold>(d)</bold> and the FullSHs after detrending <bold>(e)</bold>.
<bold>(f)</bold> depicts skill of the hindcasts of snow-water
equivalent (SWE) in the MeteoSHs. For more explanation, see Fig. 1a. Note
that statistics in the legends of the panels refer only to that part of the
domain for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was computed, which consists of all coloured cells.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e943">The skill in Norway has a more complicated origin. The three specific
hindcasts show that it is due to a mix of initial snow conditions (Fig. 11c)
and meteorological forcing (Fig. 11d). The effect of the initial snow
conditions (on 1 February) can be understood with the help of the analysis
of run-off skill in the SnInitSHs (Fig. 7), which led to the conclusion that
run-off skill caused by snow initialisation occurs at the end of the melt
season, which is July in much of Norway. Therefore, in this country and in
July the timing of the disappearance of snow cover varies from year to year.
This then has a considerable effect on evapotranspiration, since bare soil
has, compared to snow, higher surface temperatures and hence more
evapotranspiration in summer. The contribution to skill by forcing (Fig. 11d)
fades with, but is not removed by, detrending (not shown here), so it has
a part that is related to climate change and a part that is unrelated to
climate change. The climate-change-related skill due to forcing resides in
the temperature hindcasts, which have significant skill in this region at
all lead times (Fig. 2f). The non-climate-change-related skill in the
MeteoSHs for July is likely an indirect effect of the skill in the forcing
(especially precipitation) during the first lead month (February). This
leads to skill in snow water that is equivalent towards the end of February, which
fades but has not disappeared completely on 1 July  (Fig. 11f) and then
causes skill in evapotranspiration at the end of the melt season.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Comparison of skill with previous studies</title>
      <p id="d1e958">A remarkable result of our work is the reduction of the skill in run-off
beyond lead month 1, when annually varying S4 forcing is used (FullSHs)
instead of meteorological forcing that is identical for all years (InitSHs;
see Fig. 4). This result is counter-intuitive but is, as we discussed, a
logical consequence of forcing with inter-annual variation that has no or
insufficient skill, such as the S4 forcing. Other studies compared the FullSHs (also called climate-model-based hindcasts) with ESP hindcasts, which are
slightly different from our InitSHs (see Sect. 4.3) but like the InitSHs have
uninformative meteorological forcing for each year. Some of these studies
(e.g. Singla et al., 2012; Mackay et al., 2015) found little overall
difference in skill between the FullSHs and ESP hindcasts. However, in a study
of Canadian catchments, Bazile et al. (2017) broadly confirm our finding that
beyond the first lead month, ESP is superior to the FullSHs, while the reverse
holds for the first lead month. Arnal et al. (2018) compared FullSHs with ESP
hindcasts and found that, in Europe, ESP has more discrimination skill
(“potential usefulness”) than FullSHs, although there are exceptions both
spatially and seasonally. These authors, however, do not mention any trend
with lead time in the difference between FullSHs and ESP. In contrast with our results, in the studies of Yuan et
al. (2013), Thober et al. (2015), Yuan (2016) and Meißner et al. (2017), skill is enhanced when
using meteorological hindcasts. In those studies this also happens at longer
leads. This contrast might be explained by more skill in the meteorological
hindcasts of the mentioned studies than in the present study, which could be
due to the type of meteorological hindcasts (only Meißner et al., 2017,
used S4) or the investigated region (in the mentioned studies of the US,
Europe, China and Germany, respectively). Europe is a region with relatively
little skill in meteorological hindcasts<?pagebreak page384?> (Kim et al., 2012; Scaife et al.,
2014; Baehr et al., 2015). Effects of regional differences in the skill of
the forcing on the relative skill of FullSHs and ESP are mentioned by Wood et
al. (2005), who reported that FullSHs for the western United States have
practically no skill improvement over the ESP, except for some regions and
seasons with predictability of the forcing originating in El
Niño–Southern Oscillation teleconnections.</p>
      <p id="d1e961">The specific hindcasts of this study show that in Europe initial conditions
of soil moisture are the largest source of skill in the seasonal run-off
forecasts produced with WUSHP. Contributions to skill by the initial
conditions of snow and by the meteorological forcing are mostly much smaller.
To our knowledge, two other studies analysed sources of skill of hydrological
seasonal forecasts for Europe with dynamical systems similar to those of the
present study, namely Bierkens and van Beek (2009) and Singla et al. (2012).
Comparing our results with those of Bierkens and van Beek (2009), both
studies agree that initial conditions form the dominant source of skill.
However, compared to the present study, Bierkens and van Beek (2009) find a
larger contribution to skill by the meteorological forcing, at least in
summer. This difference might be due to the quality of the forcing. Bierkens
and van Beek (2009) developed an analogue events method to select, on the
basis of annual sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the North Atlantic, annual ERA40 meteorological forcings, which
they used as forcing for their hydrological model. One might speculate that
in Europe their semi-statistical forcing is more skilful than the S4 forcing
used in WUSHP. This suggests that there is room for improvement of
climate-model seasonal forecasts, so if and when this improvement is
realised, the relative contribution of the meteorological forcing to skill in
hydrological variables would increase. As for the second study of the sources
of skill, conclusions of Singla et al. (2012) are not directly comparable
with those of the present study, as they used ESP and reverse ESP (see
Sect. 4.3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Understanding the skill due to initial soil moisture</title>
      <p id="d1e970">The dominance of soil moisture initial conditions in terms of domain-lumped
skill also extends to the hotspot regions and periods of skill (Table 1).
The understanding of the skill linked to soil moisture can be deepened by
another level, as in Shukla and Lettenmaier (2011). The underlying idea is
that this type of skill increases with the inter-annual variability of soil
moisture at the date of initialisation and that this skill is gradually
eliminated during the course of the hindcasts by inter-annual variability in
processes like rainfall and snowmelt. The question is the following: to what extent
are the hotspots of skill (see Table 1) linked to soil moisture initialisation
due to the cause of the skill, and to what extent they are due to a lack of
inter-annual variability in the processes that eliminate the skill? Figure 12
helps answer this question for the skill found in the run-off hindcasts of
August as lead month 2 with a simple method of analysis. Figure 12a shows
the standard deviation of total modelled soil moisture (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
the day of initialisation (1 June), taken from the reference simulation.
Figure 12b depicts the standard deviation of total rainfall (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the course of the hindcast (June–August), taken from the
WFDEI data set, which is the investigated skill-eliminating factor. These
two quantities were combined into an estimate of the skill (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">est</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M28" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">est</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SM</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This estimate (Fig. 12c) needs to be compared with the skill of the
hindcasts, mapped in Fig. 12d in terms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The two maps are not expected
to be exactly equal, not only because of the simplicity of the estimation
method but also because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">est</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not a correlation coefficient. However,
in the limits, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">est</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the desired properties. It is equal to zero for
the cases of constant initial amounts of soil moisture or infinite
variability in rainfall. It is equal to 1 for the cases of infinite
variability in soil moisture or constant rainfall. The correlation
coefficient between the patterns in Fig. 12c and d is highly significant
(0.67), and the hotspot regions of skill are the same in both panels, namely
the northern part of Fennoscandia and the southern part of the
Mediterranean. So, in the case of August as lead month 2 the estimation
method is reasonably successful in computing the pattern of skill in the
hindcasts with the simple means of the WFDEI data set and model calculations
from the reference simulation. The merit of the estimation method is the
deeper understanding of the cause of the skill in the two hotspot regions.
Northern Fennoscandia is a hotspot, because the amount of inter-annual
variability in initial soil moisture is larger than elsewhere (Fig. 12a).
The southern part of the Mediterranean is a hotspot, because the amount of
inter-annual variability in rainfall is lower than elsewhere (Fig. 12b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1079">Illustration of a simple method that partly explains skill in
run-off due to initial soil moisture, exemplified for target month August as
lead month 2. <bold>(a)</bold> is a map of the standard deviation in soil moisture
at the date of initialisation (1 June). Similarly, <bold>(b)</bold> maps the
standard deviation of observed rainfall during the course of the hindcasts
(June–August). These two standard deviations are combined into an estimate
of the skill (Eq. 1) in <bold>(c)</bold>, which is compared with the skill of the
FullSHs <bold>(d)</bold>. Note that the colour scales of <bold>(c)</bold> and  <bold>(d)</bold> differ
from each other and differ from scales of other figures (e.g. Fig. 1a).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1107">This simple method of analysis helped to bring the understanding of the
skill in northern Fennoscandia and the southern Mediterranean to a deeper
level, but it was less successful for the other hotspots. A more thorough
analysis along these lines and a deeper understanding of skill in the
hindcasts is left for future work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Relation of the present specific hindcasts with conventional ESP</title>
      <p id="d1e1116">The specific hindcasts of this study are related to the well-known ESP (e.g.
Wood and Lettenmaier, 2008; Shukla and Lettenmaier, 2011; Singla et al.,
2012; Van Dijk et al., 2013; Harrigan et al., 2018). ESP is not only used as
an experimental tool in science but is also widely used to produce forecasts
in operational mode (Day, 1985). ESP used for scientific purposes can be
subdivided into proper ESP (called ESP from now on) and reverse ESP.</p>
      <p id="d1e1119">ESP (hindcasts) is similar to the InitSHs of this study. In both types of
hindcasts the initial conditions vary from year<?pagebreak page385?> to year and are
quasi-perfect, i.e. they are taken from a simulation like our reference
simulation, while the meteorological forcing is uninformative, e.g. by being
the same for all years (in the InitSHs and, for example, in the ESP of Shukla and
Lettenmaier, 2011) or by varying randomly from year to year (e.g. in the
ESP of Singla et al., 2012). This eliminates skill due to the meteorological
forcing, so skill can only be due to the initial conditions. However, while
in ESP the forcing is selected from historic observations, it is selected
from the S4 hindcasts in InitSHs in order to retain an inter-member
variability and other statistical characteristics of the time series similar
to that in the FullSHs. An advantage of ESP is that its production is
relatively cheap, because no climate-model forecasts are needed.</p>
      <p id="d1e1122">Similarly, reverse ESP (see Wood and Lettenmaier, 2008) resemble the MeteoSHs
of this study. In both types of hindcasts the meteorological forcing varies
from year to year, while the initial conditions are identical for each year.
This eliminates skill due to the initial conditions, so skill can only be
due to the forcing. However, while in reverse ESP the forcing of each year
is made up of the observations of that year, it is made up of the S4
hindcasts in the MeteoSHs. Moreover, in reverse ESP, ensembles are built by
using differing initial conditions, whereas they are built by using
differing meteorological forcings in the MeteoSHs.</p>
      <p id="d1e1125">In ESP and in the InitSHs, if all skill due to the meteorological
forcing is indeed removed, the remaining skill, which is due to the annually
varying initial conditions, should logically be the same in both types of
hindcasts, since the initial conditions are the same. To test this
expectation we produced ESP and compared its skill with that of the
InitSHs. Indeed, skill from these two types of hindcasts is almost identical,
as demonstrated in the Supplement (Fig. S8). We conclude that
skill produced with specific hindcasts with a forcing that does not vary
from year to year is not sensitive to the choice of that forcing, perhaps
with the exception of forcings that deviate strongly from being realistic.
We like to note here that, in odd years, one of the ESP ensemble members is
identical to the pseudo-observation used for verification. This is a concern,
but we deemed this less important than the requirement of identical forcing
for all years, which is crucial for the explanation of the skill reversal
(Sect. 3.2.1).</p>
      <p id="d1e1129">This similarity of the InitSHs and ESP is in sharp contrast with the skill
resulting from reverse ESP and MeteoSHs, which are expected to be totally
different. Keeping in mind that in both types of hindcasts, skill is caused
only by skill of the meteorological forcing, this is the skill of the S4
hindcasts in the MeteoSHs. The present study showed that in Europe there is a
small contribution to skill in the run-off hindcasts by the forcing and that
this contribution tends to decrease<?pagebreak page386?> with time. This differs from
reverse ESP, in which skill is small at the beginning and then increases
with lead time to reach perfect skill at very long leads (see Wood and
Lettenmaier, 2008), because the meteorological forcing is quasi-perfect (i.e.
identical to the forcing in the reference simulation), while the influence of
the initial conditions, which are non-informative in reverse ESP, decreases
with time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Towards an operational system</title>
      <p id="d1e1138">We plan to launch an operational version of WUSHP. That version might
include a post-processing procedure with the aims of removing biases in
discharge and making the system more reliable. This could perhaps be done
with statistical calibration (e.g. Gneiting et al., 2005; Schepen et
al., 2014), a technique that, contrary to quantile mapping, considers
information that is available from correlations between hindcasts and
observations (see Wood and Schaake, 2008; Madadgar et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e1141">The superiority of the InitSHs (and the ESP) with respect to the FullSHs for
hindcasts beyond the first 2 lead months raises the question of whether one
should, in an operational version of WUSHP and for these lead months, issue
forecasts like the InitSHs (or ESP) and not forecasts like the FullSHs. The
logical answer is “yes”, but such a strategy should then be reconsidered
when the meteorological forcing is taken from a new, possibly improved
version of the climate model or from another, possibly better type of
climate model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1144">The applied methods of analysis are not suitable for giving quantitative
advice on what would be the best investment for increasing the amount of
skill of WUSHP. However, since initial soil moisture is the dominant source
of predictability, a large gain of skill could possibly be made by
assimilation of soil moisture observations into the modelled state of soil
moisture (see e.g. Draper and Reichle, 2015). In addition, observations of
a snow-water equivalent could be assimilated into the modelled state of snow
(see e.g. Griessinger et al., 2016). Improving the calibration of VIC would
be another obvious road towards improvement of the seasonal predictions
discussed in this paper. This should lead to higher actual skill but not
necessarily to more theoretical skill (see the discussion section of the
companion paper).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1155">The present paper explains skill in the hindcasts of WUSHP, a seasonal
hydrological forecast system, applied to Europe. We first analysed the
meteorological forcing, which consists of bias-corrected output from a
climate model (S4), and found considerable skill in the precipitation
forecasts of the first lead month but negligible skill for later lead times.
Seasonal forecasts for temperature have more skill. Skill in summer
temperatures was found to be related to climate change occurring in both the
observations and the hindcasts, and it was found to be more or less independent of lead
time. Skill in northeastern Europe in February and March is unrelated to
climate change and must hence be due to initial conditions of the climate
model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1158">Sources of skill in run-off were isolated with specific hindcasts, namely
SMInitSHs (soil moisture initialisation), SnInitSHs (snow initialisation),
InitSHs (a combination of soil moisture and snow initialisation) and MeteoSHs
(meteorological forcing). These hindcasts revealed that, beyond the second
lead month, hindcasts with forcing that is identical for all years but with
“perfect” initial conditions (InitSHs) produce, averaged across the model
domain, more skill in run-off than the hindcasts forced with S4 output
(FullSHs). This occurs because inter-annual variability of the S4 forcing adds
noise, while it has hardly any skill. The other specific hindcasts showed
that in Europe initial conditions of soil moisture form the dominant source
of skill in run-off. For target months from April to July, initial conditions
of snow contribute significantly, with a domain-mean maximum in May and
June. The timing of that maximum varies spatially and coincides with the end
of the melt season, when snowmelt differs from year to year, because snow
stops being available for melt at different dates. All regional and temporal
hotspots of skill in run-off found in the companion paper are due to initial
conditions of soil moisture, with smaller or larger contributions by the
initial conditions of snow for target months from April to July in hotspot
regions with snowfall in earlier months. We further showed that skill due
to snow and soil moisture initialisation is more or less additive.</p>
      <p id="d1e1161">Some remarkable skill features are due to indirect effects, i.e. skill due
to forcing or initial conditions of snow and/or soil moisture is, during the
course of the model simulation, stored in the hydrological state (snow
and/or soil moisture), which then by itself acts as a source of skill.</p>
      <p id="d1e1164">Predictability of evapotranspiration was analysed in some detail. Levels of
predictability and the annual cycle of skill are similar to those for
temperature. For most combinations of target and lead months, forcing forms
the most important contributor to skill, but for lead month 2, initial
conditions of soil moisture dominate from June to October.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1171">The data from WUSHP are available to researchers upon
request. Please visit
<uri>https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Chair-groups/Environmental-Sciences/Water-Systems-and-Global-Change-Group.htm</uri>
(last access: 18 January 2019) for more details.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page387?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Reliability of the hindcasts</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1188">Reliability of the FullSH discharge hindcasts for the BN tercile in
spring (target months MAM). Pseudo-observations were used for verification.
Lead time increases from left to right. Aggregated reliability diagrams for the full domain are depicted in <bold>(a–c)</bold>. The forecasted probabilities of BN discharge (horizontal
axis) are collected in eight bins. The vertical co-ordinate is the relative
frequency of BN discharge observations for all of the forecasts in a specific
bin. The solid line is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line. The dashed line shows the best fit to
the eight data points, each weighted by the number of observations
contributing to the bin (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bin</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The area of the symbols is
proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bin</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dotted lines are the averages of the
variables along the two axes (one-third). Similar reliability diagrams were
made for all grid cells individually, and the slopes of the best-fit lines
are plotted in <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1241">To complement the analysis of discrimination skill of WUSHP published in the
companion paper, this appendix presents a short evaluation of the
reliability of the system. Per definition, forecasts are considered
“reliable” when the forecast probability is an accurate estimation of the
relative frequency of the predicted outcome (Mason and Stephenson, 2008). We
assessed the reliability of the discharge hindcasts of the FullSHs by means
of so-called reliability diagrams (see Mason and Stephenson, 2008), which we
produced and evaluated as follows.</p>
      <p id="d1e1244"><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1249">For each grid cell and combination of a category (or tercile; AN, NN and
BN), lead month and target month we proceeded as follows:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1254">Divide the 30 (number of years) observations into terciles and give them a
binary number (1 if the event falls in the considered category and
otherwise 0).</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1258">Divide the 450 (number of years <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> number of ensemble members) forecasts into
terciles.</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1269">Determine, for each of the 30 years, the forecast probability of the event
occurring (forecast falling in the considered tercile).</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1273">Pair the binary observations with the forecast probabilities.</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1277">Sort the paired data into eight bins stratified by the forecast
probabilities of the event.</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1281">Compute bin averages of the forecast probability and of the binary
observations.</p></list-item></list></p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1287">Pool the results for two consecutive lead months and the 3  target months
of the same season.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1293">The results were further processed as follows:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1298">They were aggregated for the entire domain and then plotted. Examples for
the BN tercile and the spring months (MAM) as a target are shown in
Fig. A1a–c, with the lead month number increasing from left to right. In
each diagram a linear regression is applied to the data points, weighing
individual points by the number of data pairs in the bins. Because tercile
thresholds are set independently for observations and forecasts, the
resulting line always goes through the climatological intersection (one-third
in our case; see Weisheimer and Palmer, 2014), and results are insensitive to
biases. As in Weisheimer and Palmer (2014) we use the slope of the line as a
measure of reliability. A slope equal to 1 corresponds to perfect
reliability, and a slope equal to 0 indicates no reliability at all.</p></list-item><list-item><label>–</label>
      <p id="d1e1302">Reliability diagrams similar to those in Fig. A1a–c were produced for each
terrestrial grid cell, and best-fit lines and their slopes were computed. The
slopes were plotted in maps, of which examples for the BN tercile and the
spring months (MAM) as a target are shown in Fig. A1d–f.</p></list-item></list></p>
          </list-item>
        </list>For the analysis it is helpful to first consider the value of the slope in
two extreme cases. If pseudo-observations are used for verification and lead
time approaches zero, all members of the hindcasts for a specific year
approach the pseudo-observation of that year. Hence, all hindcasts fall in
the same category as the observation, so the reliability diagram condenses to
two points at the coordinates [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], which represent,
respectively, two-thirds and one-third of all contributing data. In this case
the hindcasts are utterly reliable and utterly sharp. The second case is when
the hindcasts have no discrimination skill at all, i.e. forecast
probabilities of an event are randomly paired with the outcome (whether the
event occurs or not). In this case, the slope of the fitted line is equal to
zero, so the hindcasts are not reliable at all, and sharpness is minimal,
i.e. forecast probabilities tend to approach one-third for each of the
terciles.</p>
      <p id="d1e1332">In Fig. A1 reliability is evaluated for the case of verification with
pseudo-observations. For the first 2 lead months, the slope of the line in
the diagram of the aggregated data (Fig. A1a) is 0.916. Hence, during these
2 lead months the system is not far from being perfectly reliable, and it
is rather sharp with relative maxima in forecast probability in the lowest
and the highest bin. Then, with progressing lead time, reliability is
reduced, i.e. the slope of the aggregated data decreases to 0.767 (for lead
months 2 and 3; Fig. A1b) and 0.469 (for lead months 4 and 5; Fig. A1c).
Moreover, with increasing lead time, sharpness is reduced, with gradually
more ensemble forecasts approaching the climatological forecast, i.e. a
probability of one-third for each of the terciles.</p>
      <p id="d1e1336">The maps of Fig. A1d–f show the geographical distribution of the slope from
the reliability diagrams. For the first 2 lead months most values of the
slope for individual grid cells lie between 0.7 and 1.1 (Fig. A1d), and the
domain-averaged slope is 0.910. At longer leads, the highest values are
found in some regions with considerable amounts of discrimination skill,
such as Poland and northern Germany, western France, and Romania and
Bulgaria (see Table 1). Reliability also tends to increase towards the
northeast of the continent. Domain mean values of the grid-level slope are
generally somewhat lower than the slope of the aggregated data. This can, at
least partly, be ascribed to more scatter of individual points around the
best-fit line because of the much smaller sample size for individual grid
cells.</p>
      <p id="d1e1339">Reliability for the AN tercile is almost equal to that for the BN tercile,
while slopes are much closer to zero for the NN tercile (not shown here).
Also, levels of reliability show little variation during the year, except for
the autumn (SON), when slopes are smaller (not shown here). Finally, Fig. S9
shows<?pagebreak page388?> that for verification with real instead of pseudo-observations, slopes are closer to zero, so
forecasts seem to be less reliable and more overconfident. Strikingly,
discrimination skill and reliability have similar characteristics. Both
decrease with increasing lead time, and differences between the AN and BN
terciles are relatively small, while scores for the NN tercile are clearly
inferior to those for the two outer terciles. Also, regional maxima in
discrimination skill and reliability tend to coincide, and scores of
discrimination skill and reliability are smallest in autumn.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Skill in the meteorological forcing before bias correction</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1350">Skill, in terms of the percentage of cells with significant values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for three components of the raw S4 forcing. <bold>(a)</bold> shows
precipitation skill as a function of target and lead month. The other three
panels compare the skill of the raw S4 output (noBC), with its bias-corrected
version (BC) as a function of the target month for the first 3 lead months. Precipitation is
plotted in <bold>(b)</bold>, temperature in <bold>(c)</bold> and incoming short-wave
radiation in <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/371/2019/hess-23-371-2019-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1378">Section 3.1 contains an analysis of the skill of the meteorological forcing
after bias correction. Because predictability of the meteorological forcing
is an interesting topic by itself, we present here an analysis of the skill
of the meteorological forcing before bias correction, i.e. of the raw S4
output, again limiting attention to the three variables considered in Sect. 3.1.
Figure B1a summarises the skill of the raw precipitation hindcasts,
which should be compared with the summary for the bias-corrected hindcasts
of precipitation in Fig. 1b. Such a comparison is made for lead months 0, 1
and 2 in Fig. B1b. Similar comparisons are made for the 2 m
temperature and incoming short-wave radiation in Fig. B1c and  d,
respectively. At this level of summarising the differences in skill between
the two types of data, differences are small for precipitation and
negligible for temperature and short-wave radiation. Also, patterns of skill
for all three variables, such as those shown in the maps of Figs. 1 and 2,
are almost identical for the bias-corrected and raw data. The fact that
differences are small is not surprising, because the bias corrections hardly
change the ranking of the values, while the value of the correlation
coefficient largely depends on the ranking of the hindcasts relative to the
ranking of the observations. Results, in terms of differences in skill
between raw and bias-corrected meteorological forcing, are essentially the
same for the other metrics used (ROC area and RPSS).</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1381">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-371-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-371-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1392">WG and RWAH designed the experiments. WHPF and WG developed
the workflow scripts and performed all the simulations. WG developed the
analysis and plotting scripts in R. All co-authors participated in repeated
discussions on interpretations of results and suggested ways forward in the
analysis. WG prepared the various versions of the manuscript with
contributions from RWAH.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1398">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e1404">This article is part of the special issue “Sub-seasonal to
seasonal hydrological forecasting”. It is a result of the HEPEX workshop on
seasonal hydrological forecasting in Norrköping, Sweden, on 21–23
September 2015.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1410">This study was financially supported by the EUPORIAS project (EUropean
Provision of Regional Impact Assessment on Seasonal-to-decadal timescale),
grant agreement no. 308291, funded by the European Commission (EU) project
in the Seventh Framework Programme. Revision of this paper was carried out
in the research programme “JPI Climate &amp; Belmont – Climate
Predictability” under project number ALWCL.2016.1, funded by the Netherlands
Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by:  Ilias Pechlivanidis<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by:  three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Stephens, E., Wetterhall, F., Prudhomme, C.,
Neumann, J., Krzeminski, B., and Pappenberger, F.: Skilful seasonal forecasts
of streamflow over Europe?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2057–2072,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baehr, J., Fröhlich, K., Botzet, M., Domeisen, D. I., Kornblueh, L.,
Notz, D., Piontek, R., Pohlmann, H., Tietsche, S., and Müller, W. A.: The
prediction of surface temperature in the new seasonal prediction system based
on the MPI-ESM coupled climate model, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2723–2735, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bazile, R., Boucher, M.-A., Perreault, L., and Leconte, R.: Verification of
ECMWF System 4 for seasonal hydrological forecasting in a northern climate,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5747–5762,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5747-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-5747-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bierkens, M. F. P. and van Beek, L. P. H.: Seasonal predictability of
European discharge: NAO and hydrological response time, J. Hydrometerol., 10,
953–968, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Crochemore, L., Ramos, M. H., Pappenberger, F., Andel, S. J. V., and Wood, A.
W.: An experiment on risk-based decision-making in water management using
monthly probabilistic forecasts, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., 97, 541–551, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Day, G. N.: Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS, J. Water Res. Plan.
Man., 111, 157–170, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Doblas-Reyes, F. J., García-Serrano, J., Lienert, F., Biescas, A. P.,
and Rodrigues, L. R.: Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: status
and prospects, WIRES Clim. Change, 4, 245–268, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Draper, C. and Reichle, R.: The impact of near-surface soil moisture
assimilation at subseasonal, seasonal, and inter-annual timescales, Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4831–4844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4831-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-4831-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ghile, Y. B. and Schulze, R. E.: Development of a framework for an integrated
time-varying agrohydrological forecast system for Southern Africa: Initial
results for seasonal forecasts, Water SA, 34, 315–322, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Gneiting, T., Raftery, A. E., Westveld III, A. H., and Goldman, T.:
Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics
and minimum CRPS estimation, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1098–1118, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Greuell, W., Franssen, W. H. P., Biemans, H., and Hutjes, R. W. A.: Seasonal
streamflow forecasts for Europe – Part I: Hindcast verification with pseudo-
and real observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3453–3472,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3453-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-3453-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Griessinger, N., Seibert, J., Magnusson, J., and Jonas, T.: Assessing the
benefit of snow data assimilation for runoff modeling in Alpine catchments,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3895–3905,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3895-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-3895-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hagedorn, R., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., and Palmer, T. N.: The rationale behind
the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting – I. Basic
concept, Tellus A, 57, 219–233, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlet, A. F., Huppert, D., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Economic value of
long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia River hydropower, J. Water Res.
Plan. Man., 128, 91–101, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Harrigan, S., Prudhomme, C., Parry, S., Smith, K., and Tanguy, M.:
Benchmarking ensemble streamflow prediction skill in the UK, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 22, 2023–2039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2023-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-2023-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H. M., Webster, P. J., and Curry, J. A.: Seasonal prediction skill of
ECMWF System 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast for the Northern
Hemisphere Winter, Clim. Dynam., 39, 2957–2973, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Koster, R. D., Mahanama, S. P., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Reichle,
R. H.: Skill in streamflow forecasts derived from large-scale estimates of
soil moisture and snow, Nat. Geosci., 3, 613–616, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Luo, L., and Wood, E. F.: Seasonal hydrologic predictions of low-flow
conditions over eastern USA during the 2007 drought, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 9,
61–66, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple
hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for
general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 14415–14428, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Mackay, J. D., Jackson, C. R., Brookshaw, A., Scaife, A. A., Cook, J., and
Ward, R. S.: Seasonal forecasting of groundwater levels in principal aquifers
of the United Kingdom, J. Hydrol., 530, 815–828, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page391?><ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Madadgar, S., Moradkhani, H., and Garen, D.: Towards improved post-processing
of hydrologic forecast ensembles, Hydrol. Process., 28, 104–122, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, S. J. and Stephenson, D. B.: How do we know whether seasonal climate
forecasts are any good?, in: Seasonal Climate: Forecasting and Managing Risk,
Springer, the Netherlands,  259-289, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Meißner, D., Klein, B., and Ionita, M.: Development of a monthly to
seasonal forecast framework tailored to inland waterway transport in central
Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6401–6423,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6401-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-6401-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Molteni, F., Stockdale, T., Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., Buizza, R., Ferranti,
L., Magnusson, L., Mogensen, K., Palmer, T., and Vitart, F. The new ECMWF
seasonal forecast system (System 4) (p. 49), Reading, U. K: European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Mushtaq, S., Chen, C., Hafeez, M., Maroulis, J., and Gabriel, H.: The
economic value of improved agrometeorological information to irrigators amid
climate variability, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 567–581, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Nijssen, B., O'Donnell, G. M., Lettenmaier, D. P., Lohmann, D., and Wood, E.
F.: Predicting the discharge of global rivers, J. Climate, 14, 3307–3323,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, D. S.: Measures of skill and value of ensemble prediction
systems, their interrelationship and the effect of ensemble size, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 127, 2473–2489, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Scaife, A. A., Arribas, A., Blockley, E., Brookshaw, A., Clark, R. T.,
Dunstone, N., Eade, R., Fereday, D., Folland, C. K., Gordon, M., and
Hermanson, L.: Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American
winters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2514–2519, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Schepen, A., Wang, Q. J., and Robertson, D. E.: Seasonal forecasts of
Australian rainfall through calibration and bridging of coupled GCM outputs,
Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 1758–1770, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Shukla, S. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Seasonal hydrologic prediction in the
United States: understanding the role of initial hydrologic conditions and
seasonal climate forecast skill, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3529–3538,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3529-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-15-3529-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Shuttleworth, J. S.: Evaporation, in: Handbook of Hydrology, 1992, edited by:
Maidment, D. R., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Singla, S., Céron, J.-P., Martin, E., Regimbeau, F., Déqué, M.,
Habets, F., and Vidal, J.-P.: Predictability of soil moisture and river flows
over France for the spring season, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 201–216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-201-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-16-201-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Soares, M. B. and Dessai, S.: Barriers and enablers to the use of seasonal
climate forecasts amongst organisations in Europe, Climatic Change, 137,
89–103, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sun, S., Jin, J., and Xue, Y.: A simple snow-atmosphere-soil transfer model.
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 19587–19597, 1999.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Themeßl, M. J., Gobiet, A., and Leuprecht, A.: Empirical-statistical
downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate
models, Int. J. Climatol., 31, 1530–1544, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Thober, S., Kumar, R., Sheffield, J., Mai, J., Schäfer, D., and
Samaniego, L.: Seasonal soil moisture drought prediction over Europe using
the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME), J. Hydrometerol., 16,
2329–2344, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Van Dijk, A. I., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., Wood, E. F., Sheffield, J., and
Beck, H. E.: Global analysis of seasonal streamflow predictability using an
ensemble prediction system and observations from 6192 small catchments
worldwide, Water Resour. Res., 49, 2729–2746, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Viel, C., Beaulant, A. L., Soubeyroux, J. M., and Céron, J. P.: How
seasonal forecast could help a decision maker: an example of climate service
for water resource management, Adv. Sci. Res., 13, 51–55, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Weedon, G. P., Balsamo, G., Bellouin, N., Gomes, S., Best, M. J., and
Viterbo, P.: The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data
methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data, Water Resour. Res., 50,
7505–7514, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Weisheimer, A. and Palmer, T. N.: On the reliability of seasonal climate
forecasts, J. R. Soc. Interface, 11, 20131162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.1162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsif.2013.1162</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Willmott, C. J., Rowe, C. M., and Mintz, Y.: Climatology of the terrestrial
seasonal water cycle, J. Climatol., 5, 589–606, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Wood, A. W. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: An ensemble approach for attribution of
hydrologic prediction uncertainty, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14401,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL034648</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, A. W. and Schaake, J. C.: Correcting errors in streamflow forecast
ensemble mean and spread, J. Hydrometerol., 9, 132–148, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Wood, A. W., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A retrospective assessment of
National Centers for Environmental Prediction climate model–based ensemble
hydrologic forecasting in the western United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D04105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004508</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., Luo, L., and Pan, M.: CFSv2-based seasonal
hydroclimatic forecasts over the conterminous United States, J. Climate, 26,
4828–4847, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., and Ma, Z.: A review on climate-model-based seasonal
hydrologic forecasting: physical understanding and system development, Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2, 523–536, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, X.: An experimental seasonal hydrological forecasting system over the
Yellow River basin – Part 2: The added value from climate forecast models,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2453–2466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2453-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-2453-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Seasonal streamflow forecasts for Europe – Part 2: Sources of skill</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>This paper uses hindcasts (1981–2010) to investigate the sources of skill in
seasonal hydrological forecasts for Europe. The hindcasts were produced with
WUSHP (Wageningen University Seamless Hydrological Prediction system). Skill
was identified in a companion paper. In WUSHP, hydrological processes are
simulated by running the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrological
model forced with an ensemble of bias-corrected output from the seasonal
forecast system 4 (S4) of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). We first analysed the meteorological forcing. The
precipitation forecasts contain considerable skill for the first lead month
but hardly any significant skill at longer lead times. Seasonal forecasts of
temperature have more skill. Skill in summer temperature is related to
climate change and is more or less independent of lead time. Skill in February
and March is unrelated to climate change. Different sources of skill in
hydro-meteorological variables were isolated with a suite of specific
hydrological hindcasts akin to ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP). These
hindcasts show that in Europe, initial conditions of soil moisture (SM) form the
dominant source of skill in run-off. From April to July, initial conditions of
snow contribute significantly to the skill. Some remarkable skill features
are due to indirect effects, i.e. skill due to forcing or initial conditions
of snow and soil moisture at an earlier stage is stored in the hydrological
state (snow and/or soil moisture) of a later stage, which then contributes to
persistence of skill. Skill in evapotranspiration (ET) originates mostly in the
meteorological forcing. For run-off we also compared the full hindcasts (with
S4 forcing) with two types of ESP (or ESP-like) hindcasts (with identical forcing
for all years). Beyond the second lead month, the full hindcasts are less
skilful than the ESP (or ESP-like) hindcasts, because inter-annual variations in the
S4 forcing consist mainly of noise which enhances degradation of the skill.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Stephens, E., Wetterhall, F., Prudhomme, C.,
Neumann, J., Krzeminski, B., and Pappenberger, F.: Skilful seasonal forecasts
of streamflow over Europe?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2057–2072,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baehr, J., Fröhlich, K., Botzet, M., Domeisen, D. I., Kornblueh, L.,
Notz, D., Piontek, R., Pohlmann, H., Tietsche, S., and Müller, W. A.: The
prediction of surface temperature in the new seasonal prediction system based
on the MPI-ESM coupled climate model, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2723–2735, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bazile, R., Boucher, M.-A., Perreault, L., and Leconte, R.: Verification of
ECMWF System 4 for seasonal hydrological forecasting in a northern climate,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5747–5762,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5747-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5747-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bierkens, M. F. P. and van Beek, L. P. H.: Seasonal predictability of
European discharge: NAO and hydrological response time, J. Hydrometerol., 10,
953–968, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Crochemore, L., Ramos, M. H., Pappenberger, F., Andel, S. J. V., and Wood, A.
W.: An experiment on risk-based decision-making in water management using
monthly probabilistic forecasts, B. Am. Meterol. Soc., 97, 541–551, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Day, G. N.: Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS, J. Water Res. Plan.
Man., 111, 157–170, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Doblas-Reyes, F. J., García-Serrano, J., Lienert, F., Biescas, A. P.,
and Rodrigues, L. R.: Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: status
and prospects, WIRES Clim. Change, 4, 245–268, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Draper, C. and Reichle, R.: The impact of near-surface soil moisture
assimilation at subseasonal, seasonal, and inter-annual timescales, Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4831–4844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4831-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4831-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ghile, Y. B. and Schulze, R. E.: Development of a framework for an integrated
time-varying agrohydrological forecast system for Southern Africa: Initial
results for seasonal forecasts, Water SA, 34, 315–322, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Gneiting, T., Raftery, A. E., Westveld III, A. H., and Goldman, T.:
Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics
and minimum CRPS estimation, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1098–1118, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Greuell, W., Franssen, W. H. P., Biemans, H., and Hutjes, R. W. A.: Seasonal
streamflow forecasts for Europe – Part I: Hindcast verification with pseudo-
and real observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3453–3472,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3453-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3453-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Griessinger, N., Seibert, J., Magnusson, J., and Jonas, T.: Assessing the
benefit of snow data assimilation for runoff modeling in Alpine catchments,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3895–3905,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3895-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3895-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hagedorn, R., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., and Palmer, T. N.: The rationale behind
the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting – I. Basic
concept, Tellus A, 57, 219–233, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlet, A. F., Huppert, D., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Economic value of
long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia River hydropower, J. Water Res.
Plan. Man., 128, 91–101, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Harrigan, S., Prudhomme, C., Parry, S., Smith, K., and Tanguy, M.:
Benchmarking ensemble streamflow prediction skill in the UK, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 22, 2023–2039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2023-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2023-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, H. M., Webster, P. J., and Curry, J. A.: Seasonal prediction skill of
ECMWF System 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast for the Northern
Hemisphere Winter, Clim. Dynam., 39, 2957–2973, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Koster, R. D., Mahanama, S. P., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Reichle,
R. H.: Skill in streamflow forecasts derived from large-scale estimates of
soil moisture and snow, Nat. Geosci., 3, 613–616, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Li, H., Luo, L., and Wood, E. F.: Seasonal hydrologic predictions of low-flow
conditions over eastern USA during the 2007 drought, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 9,
61–66, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple
hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for
general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 14415–14428, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Mackay, J. D., Jackson, C. R., Brookshaw, A., Scaife, A. A., Cook, J., and
Ward, R. S.: Seasonal forecasting of groundwater levels in principal aquifers
of the United Kingdom, J. Hydrol., 530, 815–828, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Madadgar, S., Moradkhani, H., and Garen, D.: Towards improved post-processing
of hydrologic forecast ensembles, Hydrol. Process., 28, 104–122, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, S. J. and Stephenson, D. B.: How do we know whether seasonal climate
forecasts are any good?, in: Seasonal Climate: Forecasting and Managing Risk,
Springer, the Netherlands,  259-289, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Meißner, D., Klein, B., and Ionita, M.: Development of a monthly to
seasonal forecast framework tailored to inland waterway transport in central
Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6401–6423,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6401-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6401-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Molteni, F., Stockdale, T., Balmaseda, M., Balsamo, G., Buizza, R., Ferranti,
L., Magnusson, L., Mogensen, K., Palmer, T., and Vitart, F. The new ECMWF
seasonal forecast system (System 4) (p. 49), Reading, U. K: European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Mushtaq, S., Chen, C., Hafeez, M., Maroulis, J., and Gabriel, H.: The
economic value of improved agrometeorological information to irrigators amid
climate variability, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 567–581, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Nijssen, B., O'Donnell, G. M., Lettenmaier, D. P., Lohmann, D., and Wood, E.
F.: Predicting the discharge of global rivers, J. Climate, 14, 3307–3323,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, D. S.: Measures of skill and value of ensemble prediction
systems, their interrelationship and the effect of ensemble size, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 127, 2473–2489, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Scaife, A. A., Arribas, A., Blockley, E., Brookshaw, A., Clark, R. T.,
Dunstone, N., Eade, R., Fereday, D., Folland, C. K., Gordon, M., and
Hermanson, L.: Skillful long-range prediction of European and North American
winters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2514–2519, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Schepen, A., Wang, Q. J., and Robertson, D. E.: Seasonal forecasts of
Australian rainfall through calibration and bridging of coupled GCM outputs,
Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 1758–1770, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Shukla, S. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Seasonal hydrologic prediction in the
United States: understanding the role of initial hydrologic conditions and
seasonal climate forecast skill, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3529–3538,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3529-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3529-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Shuttleworth, J. S.: Evaporation, in: Handbook of Hydrology, 1992, edited by:
Maidment, D. R., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Singla, S., Céron, J.-P., Martin, E., Regimbeau, F., Déqué, M.,
Habets, F., and Vidal, J.-P.: Predictability of soil moisture and river flows
over France for the spring season, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 201–216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-201-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-201-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Soares, M. B. and Dessai, S.: Barriers and enablers to the use of seasonal
climate forecasts amongst organisations in Europe, Climatic Change, 137,
89–103, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, S., Jin, J., and Xue, Y.: A simple snow-atmosphere-soil transfer model.
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 19587–19597, 1999.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Themeßl, M. J., Gobiet, A., and Leuprecht, A.: Empirical-statistical
downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate
models, Int. J. Climatol., 31, 1530–1544, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Thober, S., Kumar, R., Sheffield, J., Mai, J., Schäfer, D., and
Samaniego, L.: Seasonal soil moisture drought prediction over Europe using
the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME), J. Hydrometerol., 16,
2329–2344, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Van Dijk, A. I., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., Wood, E. F., Sheffield, J., and
Beck, H. E.: Global analysis of seasonal streamflow predictability using an
ensemble prediction system and observations from 6192 small catchments
worldwide, Water Resour. Res., 49, 2729–2746, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Viel, C., Beaulant, A. L., Soubeyroux, J. M., and Céron, J. P.: How
seasonal forecast could help a decision maker: an example of climate service
for water resource management, Adv. Sci. Res., 13, 51–55, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Weedon, G. P., Balsamo, G., Bellouin, N., Gomes, S., Best, M. J., and
Viterbo, P.: The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data
methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data, Water Resour. Res., 50,
7505–7514, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Weisheimer, A. and Palmer, T. N.: On the reliability of seasonal climate
forecasts, J. R. Soc. Interface, 11, 20131162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.1162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.1162</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Willmott, C. J., Rowe, C. M., and Mintz, Y.: Climatology of the terrestrial
seasonal water cycle, J. Climatol., 5, 589–606, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, A. W. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: An ensemble approach for attribution of
hydrologic prediction uncertainty, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14401,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034648</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, A. W. and Schaake, J. C.: Correcting errors in streamflow forecast
ensemble mean and spread, J. Hydrometerol., 9, 132–148, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Wood, A. W., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A retrospective assessment of
National Centers for Environmental Prediction climate model–based ensemble
hydrologic forecasting in the western United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
110, D04105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004508</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., Luo, L., and Pan, M.: CFSv2-based seasonal
hydroclimatic forecasts over the conterminous United States, J. Climate, 26,
4828–4847, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., and Ma, Z.: A review on climate-model-based seasonal
hydrologic forecasting: physical understanding and system development, Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2, 523–536, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Yuan, X.: An experimental seasonal hydrological forecasting system over the
Yellow River basin – Part 2: The added value from climate forecast models,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2453–2466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2453-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2453-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
