<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-23-2077-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Does the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> explain spatial and temporal variability in sap <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> velocity in temperate forest ecosystems?</article-title><alt-title>Does the NDVI explain spatial and temporal variability in sap velocity?</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Does the NDVI explain spatial and temporal variability in sap velocity?}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~J.~Hoek~van~Dijke et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hoek van Dijke</surname><given-names>Anne J.</given-names></name>
          <email>anne.hoekvandijke@wur.nl</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0354-8517</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mallick</surname><given-names>Kaniska</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2735-930X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Teuling</surname><given-names>Adriaan J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4302-2835</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schlerf</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Machwitz</surname><given-names>Miriam</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Hassler</surname><given-names>Sibylle K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5411-8491</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Blume</surname><given-names>Theresa</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-7571</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Herold</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Environmental Sensing and Modelling, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University &amp; Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University &amp; Research, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Wageningen, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Water and River Basin Management, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Hydrology Section, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Anne J. Hoek van Dijke (anne.hoekvandijke@wur.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>23</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2077</fpage><lpage>2091</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Anne J. Hoek van Dijke et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e179">Understanding the link between vegetation characteristics and tree transpiration is a critical need
to facilitate satellite-based transpiration estimation. Many studies use the
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a proxy for tree biophysical
characteristics, to estimate evapotranspiration. In this study, we
investigated the link between sap velocity and 30 m resolution
Landsat-derived NDVI for 20 days during 2 contrasting precipitation years in
a temperate deciduous forest catchment. Sap velocity was measured in the
Attert catchment in Luxembourg in 25 plots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m covering three
geologies with sensors installed in two to four trees per plot. The results
show that, spatially, sap velocity and NDVI were significantly positively
correlated in April, i.e. NDVI successfully captured the pattern of sap
velocity during the phase of green-up. After green-up, a significant negative
correlation was found during half of the studied days. During a dry period,
sap velocity was uncorrelated with NDVI but influenced by geology and aspect.
In summary, in our study area, the correlation between sap velocity and NDVI
was not constant, but varied with phenology and water availability. The same
behaviour was found for the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI). This suggests
that methods using NDVI or EVI to predict small-scale variability in
(evapo)transpiration should be carefully applied, and that NDVI and EVI
cannot be used to scale sap velocity to stand-level transpiration in
temperate forest ecosystems.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e203">Evapotranspiration (ET) is estimated globally as 60 % of the total
precipitation (Oki and Kanae, 2006) and 80 % of total surface net radiation
(Wild et al., 2013). This makes ET the second largest component of the water
and energy balance. Changes in ET due to climate or land-use change have a
major influence on the catchment water balance. Deforestation for example
reduces ET (de Oliveira et al., 2018), leading to lower precipitation (Bagley
et al., 2014) and higher streamflow (Dos Santos et al., 2018). Teuling et
al. (2009) showed that changes in incoming radiation and water availability
impact regional ET and runoff. In order to predict these changes, a
comprehensive understanding of “what controls ET” is an important look
forward.</p>
      <p id="d1e206">The transpiration component of ET, i.e. water loss through stomata, is the
largest contributor to total terrestrial ET (Wang et al., 2014; Wei et al.,
2017), and therefore transpiration plays a major role in the global
hydrological and biogeochemical cycle. Transpiration is controlled by<?pagebreak page2078?> complex
interactions between climate (Awada et al., 2013; e.g. Hasler and Avissar,
2007), soil moisture content (Mitchell et al., 2012), topographic variables
such as slope position and aspect (Mitchell et al., 2012), and vegetation
characteristics (Williams et al., 2012). With respect to the vegetation
biophysical characteristics, it has been shown that tree transpiration
differs with leaf area index (LAI) (Wang et al., 2014; Granier et al., 2000),
tree height (Ford et al., 2011; Waring and Landsberg, 2011), tree diameter
(Jung et al., 2011; Chiu et al., 2016), tree age (Baret et al., 2018), and
phenological stage (Sobrado, 1994). With the advancements of remote sensing
and free data availability, there have been many efforts to link <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
satellite-derived vegetation indices (Carter and Liang, 2018). For example,
studying large watersheds, Nagler et al. (2005) found a positive correlation
between the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference
Vegetation Index (NDVI) and ET in a riparian area, and Szilagyi (2000) found
a positive correlation between NDVI and ET in a mixed forest. Using the NDVI
as a measure of vegetation biophysical properties has two major drawbacks:
the saturation of NDVI at high biomass and the sensitivity to soil
reflectance (Huete, 1988). Despite these drawbacks, NDVI is the most commonly
used index for vegetation monitoring (Glenn et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e223">The link between NDVI and transpiration or evapotranspiration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
used in different ways to either estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or to scale in situ water
flux measurements to the landscape level. Five different ways are described
below. First, the NDVI is used to calculate the fractional vegetation cover
to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in forests or mixed land-use types (Boegh et al., 2009;
Maselli et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2009; Chiesi et al., 2013). Second, NDVI
is used to derive a spatio-temporal crop coefficient (the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NDVI
method) for grassland and agricultural fields (e.g. Mutiibwa and Irmak, 2013;
Kamble et al., 2013; Reyes-González et al., 2018) or natural or mixed
ecosystems (Maselli et al., 2014; Hunink et al., 2017). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NDVI method neglects the soil-moisture-driven controls
on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this is one of the main drawbacks of using this method in
natural vegetation (Glenn et al., 2010). An additional water-stress term can
be used with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NDVI equation to model dry ecosystem ET or
water-stressed conditions (Maselli et al., 2014; Park et al., 2017). Third,
surface energy balance models use NDVI to parameterize aerodynamic roughness
length and displacement height (Su, 2002), and models based on the
Penman–Monteith equation use NDVI to parameterize surface conductance (Zhang
et al., 2009). Fourth, the surface temperature-NDVI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-VI)
“triangle” method is used to derive a soil moisture stress scalar to
constrain ET. If pixels from different surface conditions are plotted in a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NDVI scatterplot, they form a triangle pattern. The
evaporative fraction and the Priestley–Taylor coefficient – the ratio
potential evaporation over equilibrium evaporation – can be parameterized
from that triangle, and are consequently used to calculate ET (Zhu et al.,
2017; Jiang and Islam, 2001; Mallick et al., 2009). Fifth, NDVI is used,
e.g. as a proxy for stomatal conductance or absorbed photosynthetically
active radiation, to scale in situ measured ET to larger regions (Kim et al.,
2006; Rahman et al., 2001). Thus, in many different approaches, NDVI plays a
key role in estimating transpiration.</p>
      <p id="d1e338">The above-mentioned studies often derive the NDVI from MODIS or AVHRR data
which have a spatial resolution of 250 m and 1 km (except for
Reyes-González et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2006; Rahman et al., 2001; Su,
2002, who used airborne data or high-resolution satellite data; Landsat or
IKONOS). The NDVI is often compared with ET derived from different flux
towers with a footprint length of 100 to 1000 m (Kim et al., 2006), or a
water balance model. Therefore, these studies encompass large spatial areas,
with a larger variation in vegetation cover and sometimes multiple land-use
types. Despite the availability of high spatial resolution satellite products
increasing rapidly (e.g. Sentinel series), there is a lack of studies that
investigate the link between satellite-derived NDVI and the water balance on
the scale of forest patches or smaller. At the same time, there is a trend
towards hyper-resolution land surface modelling and monitoring (Bierkens et
al., 2015), where for example 30 m Landsat-derived NDVI data are used as a
proxy for land cover in a continental land-surface model (Chaney et al.,
2016). For many processes or parameters it is, however, unknown whether they
can be applied at such high resolutions. Therefore, in this study we aim to
understand whether the relation between NDVI and transpiration is also valid
on the scale of forest patches by using 30 m resolution NDVI data.</p>
      <p id="d1e342">Investigating the link between transpiration and NDVI requires
high-resolution satellite data as well as a dense network of in situ
transpiration observations. In the Attert catchment, a dense network of
sensor clusters with – among others – sap velocity sensors allows for a
detailed study of the link between tree transpiration and NDVI. For this
catchment Hassler et al. (2018) showed that variability in sap velocity is
mainly controlled by tree characteristics, such as tree diameter and tree
height and site characteristics, such as geology and aspect. The aim of our
study is to investigate the link between transpiration and NDVI using
measurements of sap velocity combined with 30 m resolution NDVI data.
Hassler et al. (2018) showed that small-scale variability in sap velocity was
related to tree structural characteristics, and therefore we expect sap
velocity and NDVI to be correlated. We hypothesize this correlation to be
positive, because we expect that forest stands with a higher leaf biomass
(higher NDVI) will have a larger sap velocity.</p>
      <p id="d1e345">Under water-stressed conditions, stomatal closure reduces tree transpiration
to limit the risks of hydraulic failure. Among others, leaf area and leaf
shedding play a role in mitigating these risks. To study the effect of water
stress on the link between transpiration and NDVI, two growing seasons with
above- and below-average precipitation are compared.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e350">The geology of the Attert catchment and its location in Luxembourg.
Sandstone in the catchment is a combination of Buntsandstein sandstone in the
north and Lower Jurassic sandstone in the south. Also shown are the main streams,
sensor clusters,  meteorological stations Roodt
and Useldange, and the location of the CAOS sensor cluster where wind speed and relative humidity measurements were taken from.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page2079?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e374">The study was carried out in the Attert catchment in midwestern Luxembourg.
This area was chosen because of its small-scale diversity in geology and soil
hydrological conditions. The 288 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sized catchment lies on the border
of the Ardennes Massif and the Paris Basin. The three distinct geologies in
the catchment are schists, sandstone, and marls (Fig. 1). Soils vary between
sand and silty clay loam (Müller et al., 2014). The land use is
characterized by coniferous and deciduous forest on the hillslopes in the
sandstone area, and grassland or agriculture in the valleys in the marl area
and on the plateaus in the schist area. The elevation of the studied sensor
clusters ranges from 217 to 473 m a.s.l. (above sea level). The average monthly
temperature ranges from 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (January) to 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (July), the
average yearly precipitation is 850 mm, and the mean annual
evapotranspiration is 570 mm (Müller et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e404">Within the CAOS research unit, a monitoring network was set up in the Attert
catchment including 29 sensor clusters in a forest (of which 25 are used in
this study) in order to provide a new framework for hydrological models for
catchments at the lower meso-scale (Zehe et al., 2014). A sensor cluster covers
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m, and in each sensor cluster, soil moisture
content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), meteorological characteristics, and sap velocity were
measured. More information about these measurements can be found in Renner et
al. (2016) and Hassler et al. (2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e429">Meteorological characteristics and their unit.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Symbol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Unit</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Evapotranspiration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ET</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Potential evaporation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vapour pressure deficit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">kPa</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Daily total global radiation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soil moisture content</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Daily average temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e633">Soil moisture content was measured in three soil profiles in each cluster
site using Decagon 5TE sensors at three depths (10, 30, and 50 cm). For this
study, the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 30 cm depth was calculated for the catchment.
Wind speed and relative humidity were measured above grass at a weather
station from the CAOS research unit (Fig. 1). Mean daily air
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was available from the Roodt weather station,
and global radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was available from the Useldange
weather station. Daily potential evaporation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated
for the catchment using the FAO Penman–Monteith equation (Allen et al., 1998).
Table 1 lists the used symbols and their unit.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e678">Meteorological conditions in 2014 and 2015. Daily average
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), vapour pressure deficit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), global
radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), potential evaporation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and soil moisture content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The min, mean, and
max values are calculated for July and August in both years, indicated by the grey box.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e744">Cumulative precipitation surplus (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from April to
October for 2014 (solid line) and 2015 (dashed line).  The difference in precipitation surplus between
the 2 years was largest at the end of August, as indicated by the arrow.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Meteorological conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e776">In this study, 2 meteorologically contrasting years were analysed: 2014, a
growing season with above-average precipitation, and 2015, a growing season
with below-average precipitation. For the months May and June, meteorological
conditions were not significantly different between 2014 and 2015, but for
July and August, mean daily temperature, vapour pressure deficit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
global radiation, and potential evaporation were higher in 2015.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 46 % (July) and 107 % (August) higher in 2015 compared
to the same months in 2014 (Fig. 2). Total precipitation from April to August
was 489 mm in 2014 and 249 mm in 2015, compared to an average of 374 mm
for the years 2011 to 2017. September 2015 was wet, with a total
precipitation of 160 mm. The high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and below-average
precipitation in 2015 resulted in a<?pagebreak page2080?> cumulative precipitation deficit of
113 mm at the end of August (Fig. 3). Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was low in the
summer of 2015 (Fig. 2).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Sap velocity</title>
      <p id="d1e830">Sap velocity is used as a measure of tree transpiration
(e.g. Smith and Allen, 1996). In summary, in this method,
heat is applied to the water in the xylem of the tree trunk, and this heat
is carried upwards with the water. Temperature sensors monitor the time it
takes before the heat pulse reaches the sensor. This time is related to the
velocity of the water in the xylem. More information about sap velocity
measurements can be found in e.g. Smith and Allen (1996).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e836">Sensor cluster characteristics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Geology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of sensor clusters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">No. of studied</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">No. of beech/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Elevation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">No. of stems per</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">mean</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">trees</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">oak/</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(min–max)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">cluster</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">cluster</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(min–max)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DBH (min–max)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sandstone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">217–284</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9–54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2–44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Marl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">283–351</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16–34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5–17</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Schist</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">428–473</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20–346</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4–37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1051">At each sensor cluster (all located in deciduous forest stands), four trees
roughly representative of the sensor cluster were selected for the sap velocity
measurements. The main deciduous tree species in the area are beech
(<italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> L.) and oak (<italic>Quercus robur</italic> L. and
<italic>Quercus petraea</italic> (Matt.) Liebl.); less abundant are hornbeam
(<italic>Carpinus betulus</italic> L.), maple (<italic>Acer pseudoplatanus</italic> L.), and
alder (<italic>Alnus glutinosa</italic> (L.) Gaertn.). Table 2 shows the presence of
the<?pagebreak page2081?> different species in this study. Sap velocity was measured at the
north-facing side of the stems using sap flow sensors manufactured by East
30 Sensors in Washington, US. From the measured temperatures, sap velocities
were calculated based on the equation of Campbell et al. (1991), which is
recommended by the manufacturer. Afterwards, a wounding correction was
performed following Burgess et al. (2001). Sap velocity differs with
horizontal depth in a tree, and this radial variability is one of the main
sources of uncertainty in sap velocity measurements (Hernandez-Santana et
al., 2015). To account for the radial velocity profile, the sensors measure
at three depths: 5, 18, and 30 mm. Following Hassler et al. (2018), for each
tree, the sensor with the highest mean daily sap velocity was selected. Trees
with less than 80 % available data from June to August, or with a prolonged
period of negative sap velocity, were excluded from the analysis. This
resulted in a data set with 73 trees at 25 sensor clusters (Table 2). For
each cluster, the mean daily sap velocity (from 08:00 to 20:00 LT – local
time) was calculated. To match the spatial scale of the sap velocity data to
the NDVI data with a 30 m resolution, mean daily sap velocity was calculated
for each cluster.</p>
      <p id="d1e1074">Sap velocity measurements can be scaled up to whole tree transpiration from
the total sapwood area for each tree (Smith and Allen, 1996), but these data
were not available within our study area. Alternatively, a species- and
site-specific allometric equation between tree diameter at breast height and
sapwood area can be used to calculate tree total sap flow, but this
conversion introduces uncertainties (Gebauer et al., 2012; Ford et al.,
2004). Therefore, we used sap velocity directly in our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>NDVI and EVI</title>
      <p id="d1e1085">The vegetation indices were calculated from Landsat-7 (ETM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor) and
Landsat-8 (OLI sensor) surface reflectance data obtained from EarthExplorer
of the US Geological Survey. Both sensors acquire images with a spatial
resolution of 30 m and, combined, they have a temporal resolution of 8 days.
The overpass time of the satellites is 10:27 GMT. Clouds and cloud shadows
were removed from the images using the cloud quality information delivered
with the data product, and this automatic procedure was followed by a visual
check to remove cloudy pixels. After the cloud removal, surface reflectance
values were extracted for each cluster centre using bilinear interpolation,
where the four closest raster cells are interpolated. Images were removed when
surface reflectance information was available for less than five clusters or
for only one geology type. This resulted in a total availability of 20 Landsat
images, 11 for the growing season of 2014 and 9 for the growing season of 2015.
NDVI and EVI were calculated as follows:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Red</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NIR</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Red</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Blue</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface reflectance in the near-infrared (NIR), red, and
blue parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Tree and sensor cluster characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e1223">To study the effect of static vegetation and environmental characteristics on
sap velocity and NDVI, correlations with tree and environmental
characteristics were calculated. Information on semi-static tree and cluster
site characteristics is available from Hassler et al. (2018). For every
cluster, the total number of stems was counted, and the DBH was measured for
each tree with a circumference of more than 4 cm (Table 2). The tree height
was estimated for every tree where sap velocity was measured, and for each
cluster site, aspect was noted. Elevation and geology are derived from a
digital elevation model and a geological map.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1228">Mean daily sap velocity for beech and oak trees in the three
different geologies. The drop in sap velocity in August 2014 (blue arrow) is
related to a lower incoming radiation, while the drop in
August 2015 (red arrow) is not related to a
lower incoming radiation, but falls into a period of below-average
precipitation and low soil moisture content. The min, mean, and max values
are calculated for July and August in both years, indicated by the grey box.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Temporal and spatial variability in sap velocity and NDVI</title>
      <?pagebreak page2082?><p id="d1e1254">The seasonality in sap velocity is clearly visible, with a steep increase in
April and a decrease in October (Fig. 4). Mean
daily sap velocity for July and August was highest for beech trees in the
sandstone area (8.9 cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014 and 11.3 cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015) and
lowest for beech trees in the marl area (4.3 cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014 and
2.8 cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2015). In July 2014, sap velocity was low for part of the trees,
which corresponds to a low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Also from July to August 2015, the
period with little rainfall, sap velocity was low for part of the trees
located in the marl and schist area. The reduced sap velocity in 2015 did
not correlate with a low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Redundancy analysis showed that in 2014,
78 % of the variability in daily sap velocity was explained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In 2015, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> together explained 65 %
of the variability in sap daily velocity.</p>
      <p id="d1e1379">The phenological cycle is clearly visible in the temporal dynamics of NDVI
with a rapid green-up in April (Fig. 5). In April, the mean Landsat-derived
NDVI over the clusters was 0.62 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as compared to 0.82 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
during the fully developed stage of the vegetation. On 12 August 2015, the
NDVI of all clusters was low, which did not appear in the MODIS NDVI product.
These pixels were not removed by the cloud removal procedure, but haze is
visible in the image, which possibly influenced the cluster pixels.
Unfortunately no other cloudless images were available for the second half of
July and August in 2015, the driest months of the summer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1404">Observed NDVI dynamics during the growing seasons of 2014 and 2015.
The grey line and dots represent the mean NDVI over the forested clusters
derived from the MOD13Q1 product of MODIS. It provides a better overview of
the seasonal course. The 20 boxplots (in black) show the variability in
Landsat-derived NDVI over the studied clusters for each studied day.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Correlation between sap velocity and NDVI</title>
      <p id="d1e1421">Analysing all sensor clusters together for all 20 days, a moderate positive
correlation was found between sap velocity and NDVI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Pearson's
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 6a). Considering temporal correlation, both sap velocity and
NDVI had low values at the start and end of the growing season and high
values in summer. This means that sap velocity and NDVI were positively
correlated for 22 of the 25 clusters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 6b–e). Considering the
months May to September only, when the canopy was in full leaf, there was no
(significant) correlation between sap velocity and NDVI for 22 of the
25 clusters.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1462">Temporal correlation between sap velocity and NDVI for all 20
studied days in 2014 and 2015. <bold>(a)</bold> For all sensor clusters together, sap
velocity and NDVI were positively correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">adj</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b–e)</bold> The correlation for four
different clusters in different geologies. For each shown cluster, the
correlation is significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For 1 of the 25 clusters, the
correlation is not significant, and for 2 clusters the correlation is
significant only at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dashed line represents the 95 % confidence
interval.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f06.png"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{8mm}}?>
        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1535">Relationship between sap velocity and NDVI for 6 days. Each dot
represents one sensor cluster in the sandstone, schist, and marl area. The dashed
line represents the 95 % confidence interval. <bold>(a, d)</bold> April 2014
and 2015, during the period of green-up. At the <bold>(b)</bold> start and
<bold>(e)</bold> end of the growing season in 2014. <bold>(c, f)</bold> At the
beginning of the dry summer of 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f07.png"/>

          <?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{8mm}}?>
        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2084?><p id="d1e1559">Scatterplots of spatial variability in sap velocity and NDVI show three
different patterns: (1) a significant linear positive correlation (Fig. 7a
and d: Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 0.50 and 0.60), (2) a significant linear steep
negative correlation (Fig. 7b and e: Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and (3) no significant correlation (Fig. 7c and f). The
positive correlation coefficient between sap velocity and NDVI was found in
April in both years. This was the beginning of the growing season, and sap
velocity and NDVI values were below average. For 5 of the studied days during
the growing season of 2014 and early June and September 2015, sap velocity
and NDVI were negatively correlated. For 5 days in 2014 and 6 days in 2015,
sap velocity and NDVI were uncorrelated.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1598">Relationship between sap velocity and NDVI and observed soil
moisture content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(a)</bold> The average soil moisture content at 30 cm
depth over the sensor clusters. The colours indicate the spatial correlation
coefficient (Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) between sap velocity and NDVI for the 20 studied
days. Symbols indicate whether the correlation is significant at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) or at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(b)</bold> The soil moisture content
and Pearson's correlation coefficient for the 20 studied days. Black dots
indicate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Correlation between sap velocity and NDVI in relation to soil moisture content~($\theta$)}?><title>Correlation between sap velocity and NDVI in relation to soil moisture content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e1696">Figure 8a shows the dynamic changes in the correlation coefficient between
sap velocity and NDVI. In both years, the correlation coefficient was
positive at the beginning of the growing season (April) and negative or close
to zero during the rest of the year. In the year 2014, no trend was visible
in the variability of the correlation coefficient. In 2015, the correlation
coefficient was initially positive and became negative in May. As the growing
season progressed and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dropped (to a minimum of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in mid-August), the correlation became
weaker and insignificant. At the end of September, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased
following high precipitation, the correlation between sap velocity and NDVI
was again negative. Studying all days together, sap velocity and NDVI were
positively correlated during the period of highest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (in April,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 8b). Contrastingly, at high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
during September 2015 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), sap velocity and
NDVI were negatively correlated. The correlation coefficient was close to
zero when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was lowest. At intermediate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the correlation
coefficient was mostly negative.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Effect of static vegetation and environmental characteristics on sap velocity and NDVI</title>
      <p id="d1e1850">The effects of static vegetation and environmental characteristics on sap
velocity and NDVI were calculated. This was also done to check whether
dependency on one of these characteristics could explain the negative
correlation between sap velocity and NDVI. Assessing individual trees, sap
velocity was related to tree DBH and tree height, but at cluster level, sap
velocity was not or moderately dependent on these characteristics (Table 3).
The number of stems and mean tree DBH per sensor cluster did not correlate with sap
velocity. For some days, sap velocity was higher in clusters with higher
trees. For most studied days, sap velocity for beech trees was higher than
for oak trees, but this difference was usually not significant. Altitude and
sap velocity were negatively correlated in April for both years. Geology and
aspect explained part of the variability in sap velocity, especially during
summer 2015, when sandstone clusters had a higher sap velocity than schist
and marl clusters, and north-facing slopes had a higher sap velocity than
south-facing slopes. The different cluster characteristics were not
independent and, therefore, a relation between two variables could also have
been the result of a causal relation with another variable.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1856">Seven (semi-)static sensor cluster characteristics and whether they are
significantly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with spatial variability in mean sap
velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and NDVI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Parentheses indicate a significance
level of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are based on Pearson's correlation for
numerical data and one-way ANOVA for species, geology, and aspect. The mean
sensor cluster DBH is the mean DBH of all trees in the sensor cluster, while the mean tree
height is the mean of the sap velocity trees only. Species classes are beech,
oak, or a mixture. The number of stems, DBH, and tree height are not
independent. Mean tree height, aspect, and altitude are related to geology.
Italic indicates that the correlation between sap velocity and NDVI was
positive for this day, while bold indicates a negative correlation.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Year</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Date</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mean</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Mean</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Species</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Altitude</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Geology</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Aspect</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of stems</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">tree</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">tree</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DBH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">height</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="10">2014</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>11 Apr</italic></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 May</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>6 Jun</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>22 Jun</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>16 Jul</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>24 Jul</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 Aug</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 Aug</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>2 Sep</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>26 Sep</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4 Oct</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="8">2015</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>22 Apr</italic></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>9 Jun</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17 Jun</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 Jun</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 Jul</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11 Jul</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12 Aug</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>21 Sep</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>29 Sep</bold></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3087"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Cluster-averaged tree characteristics were usually not related to NDVI, and
their direction of influence was not consistent. Also, the change in NDVI
with altitude was not consistent over the year, but in April of both years,
the correlation was negative. In both years, schist clusters had the lowest
NDVI in April (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014). From June till August 2015, sandstone
clusters had the highest NDVI, except for 9 and 25 June. Variability in
species and aspect were correlated with variability in NDVI only for a few
days.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Sap velocity and scaling to tree transpiration</title>
      <p id="d1e3119">In the present study, mean sap velocity was calculated for the two to
four trees in each sensor cluster. This is only a small selection of the total
number of trees per cluster, which varied from 9 to 346, with a median of
34 trees per cluster. The trees selected for sap velocity measurements are
roughly representative of the cluster with respect to species and DBH. But
velocity of the sap depends on tree DBH, height, species, and tree age
(Gebauer et al., 2012; Ryan et al., 2006), and therefore, making a true
representative selection remains challenging.</p>
      <p id="d1e3122">We looked for a relationship between tree sap velocity and a canopy trait,
NDVI. Please note that two scaling steps are required to scale sap velocity
up to the canopy level: a first step to scale from sap velocity to whole tree
transpiration and a second step from tree to stand transpiration. In this
study, measurements of sap velocity were preferred over whole tree or stand
transpiration, because scaling introduces uncertainties, especially when
sapwood area is not known (Gebauer et al., 2012; Ford et al., 2004). An
empirical scaling formula can be used to calculate whole tree transpiration
from (1) sap flow, (2) tree DBH, and (3) a species- and site-specific
parameter. On an individual tree level, trees with a larger DBH had a higher
sap velocity, which is also known from other studies (Jung et al., 2011).
Calculating whole tree transpiration from sap velocity would have thus
increased the mutual differences among clusters, but usually would have not
changed the order of values and direction of correlation with NDVI. The
species-specific parameter in the scaling formula would have increased the
differences in transpiration between beech and oak trees. This is because
beech trees in this study had, on average, a larger sap velocity and, despite
the lower DBH, a higher average sapwood area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Temporal and spatial variability in sap velocity and NDVI</title>
      <p id="d1e3133">The moments of vegetation green-up and leaf senescence are reflected in both
sap velocity and NDVI as they increase in April and decrease in October.
Comparing the summer (July and August) of 2014 and 2015, the higher potential
evapotranspiration in 2015 resulted in a higher sap velocity for<?pagebreak page2085?> beech and
oak trees in the sandstone area compared to 2014. For the beech trees in the
marl and schist area however, mean sap velocity was lower in summer 2015.
This drop in sap velocity in 2015 could not be attributed to a reduction in
atmospheric demand or available energy (Fig. 9), and was likely the result of
stomatal closure in response to water stress. No drought-related reduction was
observed in NDVI, and also no lagged effect. This indicates that trees were
conservative with water and closed their stomata to prevent transpirational
water loss. Under the relatively mild stress during the summer of 2015 no change
in tree canopy structure (leaf area index, leaf angle distribution) and thus no
change in structural indices like NDVI can be expected as structural vegetation
changes become visible only after a prolonged dry period (Eklundh, 1998).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3138">Relationship between sap velocity and meteorological conditions for
spring and summer 2014 and 2015 for a beech tree in the schist area. The
relationship between mean daily sap velocity and <bold>(a)</bold> global
radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> vapour pressure deficit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
<bold>(c)</bold> soil moisture content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The regression line is shown in the plot. In summer 2015, sap velocity is
low, despite high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/23/2077/2019/hess-23-2077-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3200">Considering the spatial variability, Hassler et al. (2018) found that in the
Attert catchment, tree characteristics (species, DBH, and tree height)
explained 22 % of the<?pagebreak page2086?> variability in sap velocity. Interestingly, our study
showed that cluster mean tree characteristics did not explain variability in
cluster mean sap velocity during most of the growing season (Table 3). This
is likely because of the smaller variability in sap velocity and tree
characteristics on the cluster level as compared to individual trees.</p>
      <p id="d1e3204">Part of the trees showed a water-stress-induced drop in sap velocity in 2015.
The statistical analysis revealed that during this period, geology and aspect
significantly explained part of this spatial variability in sap velocity
(Table 3). The higher sap velocity on north-facing slopes could indicate the
effect of a higher water availability compared to south-facing slopes. In the
sandstone area, trees maintained high sap velocity during the dry period, but
sap velocity was reduced in the schist and marl area. Also, this effect of
geology is likely related to water availability. Pfister et al. (2017) and
Wrede et al. (2015) showed that in the Attert catchment, sandstone has a high
storage capacity, because of the deep permeable soils, while the storage
capacity is low in the marl and schist area. Furthermore, trees in the
sandstone area were on average taller and had a larger DBH. These trees might
have been able to access water from deeper layers because of a more developed
root system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Correlation between sap velocity and NDVI</title>
      <p id="d1e3215">Temporally, sap velocity and NDVI were positively correlated, because both
follow a similar seasonal cycle with lower values in April and October than
in summer. Considering only the full leaf period (May–September), sap
velocity and NDVI were not correlated. Variability in sap velocity during the
full leaf period was to a large extent explained by daily variations
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and these meteorological controls of
transpiration are not reflected in the NDVI. Nor is the NDVI affected by
daily variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3262">Considering spatial correlation, three different patterns were found:
positive, negative, and no correlation. The different patterns are discussed
below. During April in both years, sap velocity and NDVI were positively
correlated. This was before complete leaf-out and the spatial variability in
NDVI was high. In April, elevation of the clusters significantly explained
part of the variability in both sap velocity – Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2014)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2015) – and NDVI – Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2015). Onset of
greenness varies with elevation and associated temperature differences
(Elmore et al., 2012; Kang et al., 2003), and at the moment of image
acquisition, the clusters were in different stages of phenological
development. This was reflected in both NDVI and sap velocity, and likely
explains the positive correlation between them.</p>
      <p id="d1e3303">The negative correlation between sap velocity and NDVI – a higher sap
velocity for lower leaf biomass – was found during most of the studied
period, though its was sometimes weak and not significant. There is no clear
explanation for this unexpected result, but four probable reasons are
foreseen that could have influenced the correlation. First, for NDVI it is
well known that it saturates at high LAI (Huete et al., 2002), which makes
the index insensitive to vegetation biophysical and biochemical properties
(Gamon et al., 1995). NDVI saturation was found for LAI greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in a beech forest (Wang et al., 2005) and LAI greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–6.5 for a
mixed beech, oak, and Scots pine forest (Davi et al., 2006). For the sensor
clusters in this study, measured LAI in 2012 was on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
beginning of May (sandstone and marl clusters) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for mid-August
(schist clusters) (unpublished data, described in Sun and Schulz, 2017).
Therefore the clusters are likely at saturation, which could introduce noise
into the data. The negative correlation however seems to be robust even at
high values of NDVI. Second, because we studied small-scale variability, the
spatial variability in NDVI was low (standard deviation ranges from 0.01 in
summer to 0.05 in April). Both could explain the absence of a positive
correlation, but they do not explain the negative correlation. Third, sap
velocity is<?pagebreak page2087?> not per se transpiration (as explained in Sect. 4.1), but a
conversion of sap velocity to tree transpiration is not expected to influence
the sign of the correlation. Lastly, a correlation with static tree and site
characteristics was investigated, but this was also not found to explain the
negative correlation.</p>
      <p id="d1e3350">On half of the studied days, no correlation was found between sap velocity
and NDVI, which could be due to noise in the data caused by the saturation of
the NDVI signal. Absence of a correlation could also indicate that optical
vegetation characteristics are uncoupled from ET, i.e. that no significant
control of stomata and vegetation structure on ET was apparent in the Attert
catchment. The temporal change in Pearson's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during the growing season
of 2015 – a negative correlation during the beginning (June) and end
(September) of the growing season, but no correlation during the drier period
– points to an effect of short-term water stress, which is discussed in
Sect. 4.4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Comparing the dry and wet growing seasons</title>
      <p id="d1e3368">Summer 2015 experienced below-average precipitation, but was not
exceptionally dry. Nevertheless, sap velocity dropped during this dry period.
In 2014, when ample soil water was available, temporal variability in sap
velocity was strongly coupled with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
During the period of low soil moisture content in 2015 sap velocity was, next
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, also coupled with soil moisture
content. The water stress occurred only for a short time period, and
therefore no change in NDVI was apparent. Given that the spatial pattern in
sap velocity changed from the wet to dry periods, while NDVI did not change,
the correlation between sap velocity and NDVI was different in the two summer
seasons. During the wet summer of 2014, we found a weak to moderate negative
correlation, and during the dry summer of 2015, sap velocity and NDVI were
uncorrelated. During the dry summer of 2015, water availability (through
geology and aspect) likely explained spatial variability in sap velocity, and
this soil moisture control of ET was not reflected in NDVI.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Using NDVI to estimate evapotranspiration</title>
      <p id="d1e3439">We hypothesized finding a positive correlation between sap velocity and NDVI,
but spatially, this was the case only in April. This means that NDVI
successfully captured the pattern of sap velocity during the phase of
green-up when water was not limited. After green-up, the positive correlation
changed into a negative correlation or no correlation. The inconsistent
correlation between sap velocity and NDVI would also translate into an
inconsistent correlation between transpiration and NDVI, after applying a
scaling equation. Various methods however use NDVI to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, among
others, in evergreen, boreal, and deciduous forests, and assume the two to be
positively correlated (Glenn et al., 2010, provide a review). Of these
methods, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-NDVI method is used most frequently, and it is
shown that including NDVI as a spatio-temporal crop coefficient improves
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> prediction compared to the conventional use of a crop coefficient in
forests (Maselli et al., 2014; Hunink et al., 2017). Other studies however
found a weak correlation between NDVI and flux tower transpiration and
reported that EVI provides better results in salt cedar and cottonwood
dominated stands (Nagler et al., 2005) and boreal forest (Rahman et al.,
2001), because the EVI does not saturate as quickly at high LAI (Huete et
al., 2002). Therefore we also explored the correlation between sap velocity
and the EVI. The results, although in absolute terms different and “less
significant”, tell a similar story to NDVI – a positive correlation in
April, a negative but not always significant correlation during the rest of
the year, and no correlation during the dry summer of 2015.</p>
      <p id="d1e3481">Compared to our study, earlier studies that found a positive correlation
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NDVI encompassed large spatial areas and sometimes
multiple land-use types. This raises the question whether the link
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NDVI holds on a small spatial scale. Methods that use NDVI
to estimate ET, including land-surface models, should be carefully applied
when studying small-scale variability in ET.</p>
      <p id="d1e3512">NDVI lags behind sap velocity in relation to drought and cannot be used to
predict transpiration under dry conditions. A water-stress factor has been
introduced by several studies to overcome this problem, but this stress
factor is not always spatially explicit (e.g. Maselli et al., 2014). Our
study showed that, in the studied catchment, a spatially explicit stress
factor is required for accurate transpiration prediction under drying
conditions, because neither NDVI nor meteorological conditions capture the
spatial variability in ET controlled by geologically induced differences in
water availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Using NDVI to scale transpiration</title>
      <p id="d1e3523">The scaling of water flux measurements across scales is a main challenge in
ecohydrology (Asbjornsen et al., 2011; Hatton and Wu, 1995). Scaling in situ
measurements over a larger area, for example flux tower or sap velocity
measurements, is traditionally done by scaling over in situ measured
biometric parameters such as DBH, basal area, or sapwood area (Čermák
et al., 2004). Obtaining these characteristics from satellite images is less
resource demanding, can be applied over larger areas, and provides the
opportunity to study both spatial and temporal patterns simultaneously.
Satellite-derived scaling parameters have another advantage over the
conventional ones: (semi-)static characteristics are unreliable under the
changing conditions that we face for the future, with among others more
intense droughts (Cleverly et al., 2016; IPCC, 2012).</p>
      <?pagebreak page2088?><p id="d1e3526">This study shows that, in a temperate forest with high LAI and low
variability in NDVI and EVI, these indices cannot be used to estimate
transpiration or scale sap flux measurements to the stand level. The benefits
that satellite-derived scaling parameters provide makes it worth exploring
other possibilities using remote data to characterize vegetation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Reyes-Acosta and
Lubczynski (2013) for example used high-resolution images to identify single
trees to scale sap flow data to the stand level. Future research could focus
on where and under which conditions tree characteristics control or
describe <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and whether this relation holds when scaling up to
remote-sensing-derived data on different scales.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3567">The aim of this study was to investigate the link between sap velocity and
satellite-derived NDVI in a temperate forest catchment. We focussed on
small-scale variability, in both space and time. A positive correlation
between sap velocity and NDVI was expected. Data analysis for 2 consecutive
years led us to the following conclusions.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e3572">Temporally, a correlation between sap velocity and NDVI was only found when
the entire growing season was considered. Spatially, a positive correlation
was found in April, when spatial variability in sap velocity and NDVI was
large and reflected an altitude-dependent difference in green-up. This means
that NDVI did capture the spatial pattern in leaf-out which also affected sap
velocity. During the rest of the growing season, a negative correlation was
found between sap velocity and NDVI. This negative correlation was
significant during half of the studied days. The likely saturation of the
NDVI signal in combination with the small spatial variability in NDVI could
explain the absence of a positive correlation, but does not explain this
negative correlation.</p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e3576">In 2015, during the dry summer period, the spatial correlation between sap
velocity and NDVI changed. Variability in sap velocity could not be captured
by NDVI. Instead, sap velocity was controlled by geology and aspect, likely
through their effect on water availability. This shows that a stress factor,
used to estimate transpiration during dry periods, cannot always be based on
meteorology only, but should include information that reflects the water
availability.</p></list-item><list-item><label>c.</label>
      <p id="d1e3580">The time-variable and inconsistent spatial correlation between sap velocity
and NDVI would also translate into an inconsistent correlation between
transpiration and NDVI. From this we conclude that NDVI alone cannot describe
small-scale temporal and spatial variability in sap velocity and
transpiration in a temperate forest ecosystem. Only for temporal scales that
cover the whole phenological cycle was NDVI a significant predictor of
transpiration processes. The EVI, which is less sensitive to saturation
effects, was also unsuitable as a predictor of transpiration under the
studied conditions. Therefore, we suggest that the use of vegetation indices
to predict transpiration should be limited to ecosystems and scales where the
correlation was confirmed.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3587">The satellite images are available from <uri>https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/</uri>
(last access: April 2019). The used measurements of air temperature and global
radiation are available from <uri>https://www.agrimeteo.lu/Internet/AM/inetcntrLUX.nsf/cuhome.xsp?src=L941ES4AB8&amp;p1=K1M7X321X6&amp;p3=343GO6H65M&amp;p4=6B0G8RP4G8</uri>
(last access: April 2019). Other meteorological data, soil moisture data, and
sap velocity data are available upon request from the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3599">KM, MM, MS and AJT initialized the study. SKH and TB provided
the sap flow and meteorological data. AJHvD performed the data analysis in
consultation with KM, MS, and AJT and wrote the paper. All the authors contributed
to interpreting results, discussing findings and improving the paper through joint editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3605">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3611">This article is part of the special issue “Linking landscape
organisation and hydrological functioning: from hypotheses and observations to
concepts, models and understanding (HESS/ESSD inter-journal SI)”. It is not
associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3617">This work was supported by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR)
(PRIDE15/10623093/HYDRO-CSI). We acknowledge the DFG for funding CAOS
research unit FOR 1598 and Britta Kattenstroth and Tobias Vetter for the
maintenance of the sensor network. Partial support for Kaniska Mallick and
Martin Schlerf also came through the HiWET consortium sponsored by BELSPO –
FNR (STEREOIII: INTER/STEREOIII/13/03/HiWET; contract no. SR/00/301) and
FNR-DFG (CAOS-2; INTER/DFG/14/02).</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3622">This paper was edited by Patricia Saco and reviewed by
Jozsef Szilagyi and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration:
guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO irrigation and drainage
paper 0254-5284, series 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations, Rome, 300 pp., 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Asbjornsen, H., Goldsmith, G. R., Alvarado-Barrientos, M. S., Rebel, K.,
Van Osch, F. P., Rietkerk, M., Chen, J., Gotsch, S., Tobon, C., Geissert, D. R.,
Gomez-Tagle, A., Vache, K., and Dawson, T. E.: Ecohydrological advances and
applications in plant-water relations research: a review, J. Plant Ecol., 4,
3–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jpe/rtr005</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Awada, T., El-Hage, R., Geha, M., Wedin, D. A., Huddle, J. A., Zhou, X., Msanne,
J., Sudmeyer, R. A., Martin, D. L., and Brandle, J. R.: Intra-annual variability
and environmental controls over transpiration in a 58-year-old even-aged stand
of invasive woody Juniperus virginiana L. in the Nebraska Sandhills, USA,
Ecohydrology, 6, 731–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eco.1294</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bagley, J. E., Desai, A. R., Harding, K. J., Snyder, P. K., and Foley, J. A.:
Drought and Deforestation: Has Land Cover Change Influenced Recent Precipitation
Extremes in the Amazon?, J. Climate, 27, 345–361, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00369.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jcli-d-12-00369.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Baret, M., Pepin, S., and Pothier, D.: Hydraulic limitations in dominant trees
as a contributing mechanism to the age-related growth decline of boreal forest
stands, Forest Ecol. Manage., 427, 135–142, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.043</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bierkens, M. F. P., Bell, V. A., Burek, P., Chaney, N., Condon, L. E., David,
C. H., Roo, A., Döll, P., Drost, N., Famiglietti, J. S., Flörke, M.,
Gochis, D. J., Houser, P., Hut, R., Keune, J., Kollet, S., Maxwell, R. M.,
Reager, J. T., Samaniego, L., Sudicky, E., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Giesen, N.,
Winsemius, H., and Wood, E. F.: Hyper-resolution global hydrological modelling:
what is next?, Hydrol. Process., 29, 310–320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.10391</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Boegh, E., Poulsen, R. N., Butts, M., Abrahamsen, P., Dellwik, E., Hansen, S.,
Hasager, C. B., Ibrom, A., Loerup, J. K., Pilegaard, K., and Soegaard, H.:
Remote sensing based evapotranspiration and runoff modeling of agricultural,
forest and urban flux sites in Denmark: From field to macro-scale, J. Hydrol.,
377, 300–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.029</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Burgess, S. S. O., Adams, M. A., Turner, N. C., Beverly, C. R., Ong, C. K.,
Khan, A. A., and Bleby, T. M.: An improved heat pulse method to measure low
and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants, Tree Physiol., 21, 589–598,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.9.589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/21.9.589</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Campbell, G. S., Calissendorff, C., and Williams, J. H.: Probe for Measuring
Soil Specific Heat Using A Heat-Pulse Method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55,
291–293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010052x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010052x</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Carter, C. and Liang, S.: Comprehensive evaluation of empirical algorithms for
estimating land surface evapotranspiration, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 256–257,
334–345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.027</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Čermák, J., Kučera, J., and Nadezhdina, N.: Sap flow measurements
with some thermodynamic methods, flow integration within trees and scaling up
from sample trees to entire forest stands, Trees, 18, 529–546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0339-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00468-004-0339-6</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Chaney, N. W., Metcalfe, P., and Wood, E. F.: HydroBlocks: a field-scale
resolving land surface model for application over continental extents, Hydrol.
Process., 30, 3543–3559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10891" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.10891</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Chiesi, M., Rapi, B., Battista, P., Fibbi, L., Gozzini, B., Magno, R., Raschi,
A., and Maselli, F.: Combination of ground and satellite data for the
operational estimation of daily evapotranspiration, Eur. J. Remote Sens., 46,
675–688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20134639" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5721/EuJRS20134639</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Chiu, C.-W., Komatsu, H., Katayama, A., and Otsuki, K.: Scaling-up from tree
to stand transpiration for a warm-temperate multi-specific broadleaved forest
with a wide variation in stem diameter, J. Forest Res., 21, 161–169,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-016-0532-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10310-016-0532-7</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Restrepo  oupe, N., Chen, C., Maes, W., Li, L., Faux,
R., Santini, N. S., Rumman, R., Yu, Q., and Huete, A.: Soil moisture controls
on phenology and productivity in a semi-arid critical zone, Sci. Total Environ.,
568, 1227–1237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Davi, H., Soudani, K., Deckx, T., Dufrene, E., Le Dantec, V., and FranÇois,
C.: Estimation of forest leaf area index from SPOT imagery using NDVI distribution
over forest stands, Int. J. Remote Sens., 27, 885–902, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500227896" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160500227896</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>de Oliveira, J. V., Ferreira, D. B. D. S., Sahoo, P. K., Sodré, G. R. C.,
de Souza, E. B., and Queiroz, J. C. B.: Differences in precipitation and
evapotranspiration between forested and deforested areas in the Amazon
rainforest using remote sensing data, Environ. Earth Sci., 77, 239,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7411-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12665-018-7411-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dos Santos, V., Laurent, F., Abe, C., and Messner, F.: Hydrologic Response to
Land Use Change in a Large Basin in Eastern Amazon, Water, 10, 429, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w10040429</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Eklundh, L.: Estimating relations between AVHRR NDVI and rainfall in East
Africa at 10-day and monthly time scales, Int. J. Remote Sens., 19, 563–568,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698216198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/014311698216198</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Elmore, A. J., Guinn, S. M., Minsley, B. J., and Richardson, A. D.: Landscape
controls on the timing of spring, autumn, and growing season length in
mid-Atlantic forests, Global Change Biol., 18, 656–674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02521.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02521.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Ford, C. R., McGuire, M. A., Mitchell, R. J., and Teskey, R. O.: Assessing
variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in pinus species and its
effect on daily water use, Tree Physiol., 24, 241–249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.3.241" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/24.3.241</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Ford, C. R., Hubbard, R. M., and Vose, J. M.: Quantifying structural and
physiological controls on variation in canopy transpiration among planted pine
and hardwood species in the southern Appalachians, Ecohydrology, 4, 183–195,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/eco.136</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Gamon, J. A., Field, C. B., Goulden, M. L., Griffin, K. L., Hartley, A. E.,
Joel, G., Peñuelas, J., and Valentini, R.: Relationships between NDVI,
canopy structure, and photosynthesis in three Californian vegetation types,
Ecol. Appl., 5, 28–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1942049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1942049</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Gebauer, T., Horna, V., and Leuschner, C.: Canopy transpiration of pure and
mixed forest stands with variable<?pagebreak page2090?> abundance of European beech, J. Hydrol.,
442–443, 2–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.009</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Glenn, E. P., Nagler, P. L., and Huete, A. R.: Vegetation Index Methods for
Estimating Evapotranspiration by Remote Sensing, Surv. Geophys., 31, 531–555,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-010-9102-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-010-9102-2</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Granier, A., Loustau, D., and Bréda, N.: A generic model of forest canopy
conductance dependent on climate, soil water availability and leaf area index,
Ann. Forest Sci., 57, 755–765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2000158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/forest:2000158</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hasler, N. and Avissar, R.: What controls evapotranspiration in the Amazon
Basin?, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 380–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM587.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM587.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hassler, S. K., Weiler, M., and Blume, T.: Tree-, stand- and site-specific
controls on landscape-scale patterns of transpiration, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 22, 13–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-13-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-13-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hatton, T. J. and Wu, H. I.: Scaling theory to extrapolate individual tree
water use to stand water use, Hydrol. Process., 9, 527–540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.3360090505</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hernandez-Santana, V., Hernandez-Hernandez, A., Vadeboncoeur, M. A., and
Asbjornsen, H.: Scaling from single-point sap velocity measurements to stand
transpiration in a multispecies deciduous forest: uncertainty sources, stand
structure effect, and future scenarios, Can. J. Forest Res., 45, 1489–1497,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/cjfr-2015-0009</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., and Ferreira, L. G.:
Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation
indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 195–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Huete, A. R.: A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), Remote Sens. Environ.,
25, 295–309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hunink, J. E., Eekhout, J. P. C., de Vente, J., Contreras, S., Droogers, P.,
and Baille, A.: Hydrological modelling using satellite-based crop coefficients:
a comparison of methods at the basin scale, Remote Sens., 9, 174–189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs9020174</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and
Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, A Special Report of Working
Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L.,
Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S. K., Tignor, M., and
Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, L. and Islam, S.: Estimation of surface evaporation map over Southern
Great Plains using remote sensing data, Water Resour. Res., 37, 329–340,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000WR900255</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jung, E. Y., Otieno, D., Lee, B., Lim, J. H., Kang, S. K., Schmidt, M. W. T.,
and Tenhunen, J.: Up-scaling to stand transpiration of an Asian temperate
mixed-deciduous forest from single tree sapflow measurements, Plant Ecol., 212,
383–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9829-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11258-010-9829-3</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kamble, B., Kilic, A., and Hubbard, K.: Estimating crop coefficients using
remote sensing-based vegetation index, Remote Sens., 5, 1588–1602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs5041588</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kang, S., Running, S. W., Lim, J.-H., Zhao, M., Park, C.-R., and Loehman, R.:
A regional phenology model for detecting onset of greenness in temperate mixed
forests, Korea: an application of MODIS leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ.,
86, 232–242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00103-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00103-2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J., Guo, Q., Baldocchi, D. D., Leclerc, M. Y., Xu, L., and Schmid, H. P.:
Upscaling fluxes from tower to landscape: Overlaying flux footprints on
high-resolution (IKONOS) images of vegetation cover, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
136, 132–146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.015</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Mallick, K., Bhattacharya, B. K., Rao, V. U. M., Reddy, D. R., Banerjee, S.,
Venkatesh, H., Pandey, V., Kar, G., Mukherjee, J., Vyas, S. P., Gadgil, A. S.,
and Patel, N. K.: Latent heat flux estimation in clear sky days over Indian
agroecosystems using noontime satellite remote sensing data, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 149, 1646–1665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.006</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Maselli, F., Papale, D., Chiesi, M., Matteucci, G., Angeli, L., Raschi, A.,
and Seufert, G.: Operational monitoring of daily evapotranspiration by the
combination of MODIS NDVI and ground meteorological data: Application and
evaluation in Central Italy, Remote Sens. Environ., 152, 279–290,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.021</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Mitchell, P. J., Benyon, R. G., and Lane, P. N. J.: Responses of
evapotranspiration at different topographic positions and catchment water
balance following a pronounced drought in a mixed species eucalypt forest,
Australia, J. Hydrol., 440–441, 62–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.026</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Müller, B., Bernhardt, M., and Schulz, K.: Identification of catchment
functional units by time series of thermal remote sensing images, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 18, 5345–5329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5345-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-5345-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Mutiibwa, D. and Irmak, S.: AVHRR-NDVI-based crop coefficients for analyzing
long-term trends in evapotranspiration in relation to changing climate in the
U.S. High Plains, Water Resour. Res., 49, 231–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012wr012591</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Nagler, P. L., Cleverly, J., Glenn, E., Lampkin, D., Huete, A., and Wan, Z.:
Predicting riparian evapotranspiration from MODIS vegetation indices and
meteorological data, Remote Sens. Environ., 94, 17–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.009</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Oki, T. and Kanae, S.: Global hydrological cycles and world water resources,
Science, 313, 1068–1072, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1128845</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Park, J., Baik, J., and Choi, M.: Satellite-based crop coefficient and
evapotranspiration using surface soil moisture and vegetation indices in
Northeast Asia, Catena, 156, 305–314, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.013</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Pfister, L., Martínez-Carreras, N., Hissler, C., Klaus, J., Carrer, G. E.,
Stewart, M. K., and McDonnell, J. J.: Bedrock geology controls on catchment
storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments,
Hydrol. Process., 31, 1828–1845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.11134</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Rahman, A. F., Gamon, J. A., Fuentes, D. A., Roberts, D. A., and Prentiss, D.:
Modeling spatially distributed ecosystem flux of boreal forest using
hyperspectral indices from AVIRIS imagery, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
33579–33591, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900157</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Renner, M., Hassler, S. K., Blume, T., Weiler, M., Hildebrandt, A., Guderle,
M., Schymanski, S. J., and Kleidon, A.: Dominant<?pagebreak page2091?> controls of transpiration
along a hillslope transect inferred from ecohydrological measurements and
thermodynamic limits, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2063–2083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2063-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-2063-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Reyes-Acosta, J. L. and Lubczynski, M. W.: Mapping dry-season tree transpiration
of an oak woodland at the catchment scale, using object-attributes derived from
satellite imagery and sap flow measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 174–175,
184–201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Reyes-González, A., Kjaersgaard, J., Trooien, T., Hay, C., and Ahiablame,
L.: Estimation of crop evapotranspiration using satellite remote sensing-based
vegetation index, Adv. Meteorol., 2018, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4525021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2018/4525021</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Ryan, M. G., Phillips, N., and Bond, B. J.: The hydraulic limitation hypothesis
revisited, Plant Cell Environ., 29, 367–381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Smith, D. M. and Allen, S. J.: Measurement of sap flow in plant stems, J. Exp.
Bot., 47, 1833–1844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.12.1833" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jxb/47.12.1833</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Sobrado, M. A.: Leaf age effects on photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate
and nitrogen content in a tropical dry forest, Physiol. Plant., 90, 210–215,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02213.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02213.x</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Su, Z.: The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent
heat fluxes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 85–99, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-85-2002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-6-85-2002</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Sun, L. and Schulz, K.: Spatio-Temporal LAI Modelling by Integrating Climate
and MODIS LAI Data in a Mesoscale Catchment, Remote Sens., 9, 144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs9020144</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Szilagyi, J.: Can a vegetation index derived from remote sensing be indicative
of areal transpiration?, Ecol. Model., 127, 65–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00200-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00200-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Teuling, A. J., Hirschi, M., Ohmura, A., Wild, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P.,
Buchmann, N., Ammann, C., Montagnani, L., Richardson, A. D., Wohlfahrt, G.,
and Seneviratne, S. I.: A regional perspective on trends in continental
evaporation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036584</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Good, S. P., and Caylor, K.: Global synthesis of vegetation control
on evapotranspiration partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6753–6757,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL061439</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Q., Adiku, S., Tenhunen, J., and Granier, A.: On the relationship of NDVI
with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site, Remote Sens. Environ., 94,
244–255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.006</ext-link>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Waring, R. H. and Landsberg, J. J.: Generalizing plant-water relations to
landscapes, J. Plant Ecol., 4, 101–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtq041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jpe/rtq041</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wei, Z., Yoshimura, K., Wang, L., Miralles, D. G., Jasechko, S., and Lee, X.:
Revisiting the contribution of transpiration to global terrestrial
evapotranspiration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2792–2801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL072235</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Wild, M., Folini, D., Schär, C., Loeb, N., Dutton, E. G., and König-Langlo,
G.: The global energy balance from a surface perspective, Clim. Dynam., 40,
3107–3134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Williams, C. A., Reichstein, M., Buchmann, N., Baldocchi, D., Beer, C., Schwalm,
C., Wohlfahrt, G., Hasler, N., Bernhofer, C., Foken, T., Papale, D., Schymanski,
S., and Schaefer, K.: Climate and vegetation controls on the surface water
balance: Synthesis of evapotranspiration measured across a global network of
flux towers, Water Resour. Res., 48, W06523, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011WR011586</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Wrede, S., Fenicia, F., Martínez-Carreras, N., Juilleret, J., Hissler, C.,
Krein, A., Savenije, H. H. G., Uhlenbrook, S., Kavetski, D., and Pfister, L.:
Towards more systematic perceptual model development: a case study using
3 Luxembourgish catchments, Hydrol. Process., 29, 2731–2750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.10393</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zehe, E., Ehret, U., Pfister, L., Blume, T., Schröder, B., Westhoff, M.,
Jackisch, C., Schymanski, S. J., Weiler, M., Schulz, K., Allroggen, N., Tronicke,
J., van Schaik, L., Dietrich, P., Scherer, U., Eccard, J., Wulfmeyer, V., and
Kleidon, A.: HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: a
thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization
and functioning of intermediate scale catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18,
4635–4655, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Mu, Q., Jones, L. A., Goetz, S. J., and Running, S.
W.: Satellite based analysis of northern ET trends and associated changes in
the regional water balance from 1983 to 2005, J. Hydrol., 379, 92–110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.047</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, W., Jia, S., and Lv, A.: A Universal Ts-VI Triangle Method for the
Continuous Retrieval of Evaporative Fraction From MODIS Products, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 122, 10206–10227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026964</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Does the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index  explain spatial and temporal variability in sap  velocity in temperate forest ecosystems?</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Understanding the link between vegetation characteristics and tree transpiration is a critical need
to facilitate satellite-based transpiration estimation. Many studies use the
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a proxy for tree biophysical
characteristics, to estimate evapotranspiration. In this study, we
investigated the link between sap velocity and 30&thinsp;m resolution
Landsat-derived NDVI for 20 days during 2 contrasting precipitation years in
a temperate deciduous forest catchment. Sap velocity was measured in the
Attert catchment in Luxembourg in 25 plots of 20×20&thinsp;m covering three
geologies with sensors installed in two to four trees per plot. The results
show that, spatially, sap velocity and NDVI were significantly positively
correlated in April, i.e. NDVI successfully captured the pattern of sap
velocity during the phase of green-up. After green-up, a significant negative
correlation was found during half of the studied days. During a dry period,
sap velocity was uncorrelated with NDVI but influenced by geology and aspect.
In summary, in our study area, the correlation between sap velocity and NDVI
was not constant, but varied with phenology and water availability. The same
behaviour was found for the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI). This suggests
that methods using NDVI or EVI to predict small-scale variability in
(evapo)transpiration should be carefully applied, and that NDVI and EVI
cannot be used to scale sap velocity to stand-level transpiration in
temperate forest ecosystems.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration:
guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO irrigation and drainage
paper 0254-5284, series 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations, Rome, 300&thinsp;pp., 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Asbjornsen, H., Goldsmith, G. R., Alvarado-Barrientos, M. S., Rebel, K.,
Van Osch, F. P., Rietkerk, M., Chen, J., Gotsch, S., Tobon, C., Geissert, D. R.,
Gomez-Tagle, A., Vache, K., and Dawson, T. E.: Ecohydrological advances and
applications in plant-water relations research: a review, J. Plant Ecol., 4,
3–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr005</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Awada, T., El-Hage, R., Geha, M., Wedin, D. A., Huddle, J. A., Zhou, X., Msanne,
J., Sudmeyer, R. A., Martin, D. L., and Brandle, J. R.: Intra-annual variability
and environmental controls over transpiration in a 58-year-old even-aged stand
of invasive woody Juniperus virginiana L. in the Nebraska Sandhills, USA,
Ecohydrology, 6, 731–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1294</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bagley, J. E., Desai, A. R., Harding, K. J., Snyder, P. K., and Foley, J. A.:
Drought and Deforestation: Has Land Cover Change Influenced Recent Precipitation
Extremes in the Amazon?, J. Climate, 27, 345–361, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00369.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00369.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Baret, M., Pepin, S., and Pothier, D.: Hydraulic limitations in dominant trees
as a contributing mechanism to the age-related growth decline of boreal forest
stands, Forest Ecol. Manage., 427, 135–142, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.043</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bierkens, M. F. P., Bell, V. A., Burek, P., Chaney, N., Condon, L. E., David,
C. H., Roo, A., Döll, P., Drost, N., Famiglietti, J. S., Flörke, M.,
Gochis, D. J., Houser, P., Hut, R., Keune, J., Kollet, S., Maxwell, R. M.,
Reager, J. T., Samaniego, L., Sudicky, E., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Giesen, N.,
Winsemius, H., and Wood, E. F.: Hyper-resolution global hydrological modelling:
what is next?, Hydrol. Process., 29, 310–320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10391" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10391</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Boegh, E., Poulsen, R. N., Butts, M., Abrahamsen, P., Dellwik, E., Hansen, S.,
Hasager, C. B., Ibrom, A., Loerup, J. K., Pilegaard, K., and Soegaard, H.:
Remote sensing based evapotranspiration and runoff modeling of agricultural,
forest and urban flux sites in Denmark: From field to macro-scale, J. Hydrol.,
377, 300–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.029</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Burgess, S. S. O., Adams, M. A., Turner, N. C., Beverly, C. R., Ong, C. K.,
Khan, A. A., and Bleby, T. M.: An improved heat pulse method to measure low
and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants, Tree Physiol., 21, 589–598,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.9.589" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.9.589</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Campbell, G. S., Calissendorff, C., and Williams, J. H.: Probe for Measuring
Soil Specific Heat Using A Heat-Pulse Method, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55,
291–293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010052x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010052x</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, C. and Liang, S.: Comprehensive evaluation of empirical algorithms for
estimating land surface evapotranspiration, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 256–257,
334–345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.027</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Čermák, J., Kučera, J., and Nadezhdina, N.: Sap flow measurements
with some thermodynamic methods, flow integration within trees and scaling up
from sample trees to entire forest stands, Trees, 18, 529–546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0339-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0339-6</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chaney, N. W., Metcalfe, P., and Wood, E. F.: HydroBlocks: a field-scale
resolving land surface model for application over continental extents, Hydrol.
Process., 30, 3543–3559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10891" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10891</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chiesi, M., Rapi, B., Battista, P., Fibbi, L., Gozzini, B., Magno, R., Raschi,
A., and Maselli, F.: Combination of ground and satellite data for the
operational estimation of daily evapotranspiration, Eur. J. Remote Sens., 46,
675–688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20134639" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20134639</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chiu, C.-W., Komatsu, H., Katayama, A., and Otsuki, K.: Scaling-up from tree
to stand transpiration for a warm-temperate multi-specific broadleaved forest
with a wide variation in stem diameter, J. Forest Res., 21, 161–169,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-016-0532-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-016-0532-7</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Restrepo  oupe, N., Chen, C., Maes, W., Li, L., Faux,
R., Santini, N. S., Rumman, R., Yu, Q., and Huete, A.: Soil moisture controls
on phenology and productivity in a semi-arid critical zone, Sci. Total Environ.,
568, 1227–1237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Davi, H., Soudani, K., Deckx, T., Dufrene, E., Le Dantec, V., and FranÇois,
C.: Estimation of forest leaf area index from SPOT imagery using NDVI distribution
over forest stands, Int. J. Remote Sens., 27, 885–902, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500227896" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500227896</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
de Oliveira, J. V., Ferreira, D. B. D. S., Sahoo, P. K., Sodré, G. R. C.,
de Souza, E. B., and Queiroz, J. C. B.: Differences in precipitation and
evapotranspiration between forested and deforested areas in the Amazon
rainforest using remote sensing data, Environ. Earth Sci., 77, 239,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7411-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7411-9</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dos Santos, V., Laurent, F., Abe, C., and Messner, F.: Hydrologic Response to
Land Use Change in a Large Basin in Eastern Amazon, Water, 10, 429, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040429" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040429</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Eklundh, L.: Estimating relations between AVHRR NDVI and rainfall in East
Africa at 10-day and monthly time scales, Int. J. Remote Sens., 19, 563–568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698216198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698216198</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Elmore, A. J., Guinn, S. M., Minsley, B. J., and Richardson, A. D.: Landscape
controls on the timing of spring, autumn, and growing season length in
mid-Atlantic forests, Global Change Biol., 18, 656–674, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02521.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02521.x</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Ford, C. R., McGuire, M. A., Mitchell, R. J., and Teskey, R. O.: Assessing
variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in pinus species and its
effect on daily water use, Tree Physiol., 24, 241–249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.3.241" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.3.241</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ford, C. R., Hubbard, R. M., and Vose, J. M.: Quantifying structural and
physiological controls on variation in canopy transpiration among planted pine
and hardwood species in the southern Appalachians, Ecohydrology, 4, 183–195,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.136</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Gamon, J. A., Field, C. B., Goulden, M. L., Griffin, K. L., Hartley, A. E.,
Joel, G., Peñuelas, J., and Valentini, R.: Relationships between NDVI,
canopy structure, and photosynthesis in three Californian vegetation types,
Ecol. Appl., 5, 28–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1942049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1942049</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Gebauer, T., Horna, V., and Leuschner, C.: Canopy transpiration of pure and
mixed forest stands with variable abundance of European beech, J. Hydrol.,
442–443, 2–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.009</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Glenn, E. P., Nagler, P. L., and Huete, A. R.: Vegetation Index Methods for
Estimating Evapotranspiration by Remote Sensing, Surv. Geophys., 31, 531–555,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-010-9102-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-010-9102-2</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Granier, A., Loustau, D., and Bréda, N.: A generic model of forest canopy
conductance dependent on climate, soil water availability and leaf area index,
Ann. Forest Sci., 57, 755–765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2000158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2000158</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hasler, N. and Avissar, R.: What controls evapotranspiration in the Amazon
Basin?, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 380–395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM587.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM587.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hassler, S. K., Weiler, M., and Blume, T.: Tree-, stand- and site-specific
controls on landscape-scale patterns of transpiration, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 22, 13–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-13-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-13-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hatton, T. J. and Wu, H. I.: Scaling theory to extrapolate individual tree
water use to stand water use, Hydrol. Process., 9, 527–540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090505</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Hernandez-Santana, V., Hernandez-Hernandez, A., Vadeboncoeur, M. A., and
Asbjornsen, H.: Scaling from single-point sap velocity measurements to stand
transpiration in a multispecies deciduous forest: uncertainty sources, stand
structure effect, and future scenarios, Can. J. Forest Res., 45, 1489–1497,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0009</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., and Ferreira, L. G.:
Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation
indices, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 195–213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Huete, A. R.: A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), Remote Sens. Environ.,
25, 295–309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hunink, J. E., Eekhout, J. P. C., de Vente, J., Contreras, S., Droogers, P.,
and Baille, A.: Hydrological modelling using satellite-based crop coefficients:
a comparison of methods at the basin scale, Remote Sens., 9, 174–189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020174</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and
Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, A Special Report of Working
Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by:
Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L.,
Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G.-K., Allen, S. K., Tignor, M., and
Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, L. and Islam, S.: Estimation of surface evaporation map over Southern
Great Plains using remote sensing data, Water Resour. Res., 37, 329–340,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900255" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900255</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, E. Y., Otieno, D., Lee, B., Lim, J. H., Kang, S. K., Schmidt, M. W. T.,
and Tenhunen, J.: Up-scaling to stand transpiration of an Asian temperate
mixed-deciduous forest from single tree sapflow measurements, Plant Ecol., 212,
383–395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9829-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9829-3</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kamble, B., Kilic, A., and Hubbard, K.: Estimating crop coefficients using
remote sensing-based vegetation index, Remote Sens., 5, 1588–1602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041588</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kang, S., Running, S. W., Lim, J.-H., Zhao, M., Park, C.-R., and Loehman, R.:
A regional phenology model for detecting onset of greenness in temperate mixed
forests, Korea: an application of MODIS leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ.,
86, 232–242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00103-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00103-2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J., Guo, Q., Baldocchi, D. D., Leclerc, M. Y., Xu, L., and Schmid, H. P.:
Upscaling fluxes from tower to landscape: Overlaying flux footprints on
high-resolution (IKONOS) images of vegetation cover, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
136, 132–146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.015</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Mallick, K., Bhattacharya, B. K., Rao, V. U. M., Reddy, D. R., Banerjee, S.,
Venkatesh, H., Pandey, V., Kar, G., Mukherjee, J., Vyas, S. P., Gadgil, A. S.,
and Patel, N. K.: Latent heat flux estimation in clear sky days over Indian
agroecosystems using noontime satellite remote sensing data, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 149, 1646–1665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.05.006</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Maselli, F., Papale, D., Chiesi, M., Matteucci, G., Angeli, L., Raschi, A.,
and Seufert, G.: Operational monitoring of daily evapotranspiration by the
combination of MODIS NDVI and ground meteorological data: Application and
evaluation in Central Italy, Remote Sens. Environ., 152, 279–290,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.021</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Mitchell, P. J., Benyon, R. G., and Lane, P. N. J.: Responses of
evapotranspiration at different topographic positions and catchment water
balance following a pronounced drought in a mixed species eucalypt forest,
Australia, J. Hydrol., 440–441, 62–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.026</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, B., Bernhardt, M., and Schulz, K.: Identification of catchment
functional units by time series of thermal remote sensing images, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 18, 5345–5329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5345-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5345-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Mutiibwa, D. and Irmak, S.: AVHRR-NDVI-based crop coefficients for analyzing
long-term trends in evapotranspiration in relation to changing climate in the
U.S. High Plains, Water Resour. Res., 49, 231–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012591</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Nagler, P. L., Cleverly, J., Glenn, E., Lampkin, D., Huete, A., and Wan, Z.:
Predicting riparian evapotranspiration from MODIS vegetation indices and
meteorological data, Remote Sens. Environ., 94, 17–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.009</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Oki, T. and Kanae, S.: Global hydrological cycles and world water resources,
Science, 313, 1068–1072, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Park, J., Baik, J., and Choi, M.: Satellite-based crop coefficient and
evapotranspiration using surface soil moisture and vegetation indices in
Northeast Asia, Catena, 156, 305–314, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.013</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Pfister, L., Martínez-Carreras, N., Hissler, C., Klaus, J., Carrer, G. E.,
Stewart, M. K., and McDonnell, J. J.: Bedrock geology controls on catchment
storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments,
Hydrol. Process., 31, 1828–1845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11134</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Rahman, A. F., Gamon, J. A., Fuentes, D. A., Roberts, D. A., and Prentiss, D.:
Modeling spatially distributed ecosystem flux of boreal forest using
hyperspectral indices from AVIRIS imagery, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106,
33579–33591, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900157</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Renner, M., Hassler, S. K., Blume, T., Weiler, M., Hildebrandt, A., Guderle,
M., Schymanski, S. J., and Kleidon, A.: Dominant controls of transpiration
along a hillslope transect inferred from ecohydrological measurements and
thermodynamic limits, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2063–2083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2063-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2063-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Reyes-Acosta, J. L. and Lubczynski, M. W.: Mapping dry-season tree transpiration
of an oak woodland at the catchment scale, using object-attributes derived from
satellite imagery and sap flow measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 174–175,
184–201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.012</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Reyes-González, A., Kjaersgaard, J., Trooien, T., Hay, C., and Ahiablame,
L.: Estimation of crop evapotranspiration using satellite remote sensing-based
vegetation index, Adv. Meteorol., 2018, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4525021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4525021</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Ryan, M. G., Phillips, N., and Bond, B. J.: The hydraulic limitation hypothesis
revisited, Plant Cell Environ., 29, 367–381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, D. M. and Allen, S. J.: Measurement of sap flow in plant stems, J. Exp.
Bot., 47, 1833–1844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.12.1833" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.12.1833</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Sobrado, M. A.: Leaf age effects on photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate
and nitrogen content in a tropical dry forest, Physiol. Plant., 90, 210–215,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02213.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02213.x</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Su, Z.: The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent
heat fluxes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 85–99, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-85-2002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-85-2002</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, L. and Schulz, K.: Spatio-Temporal LAI Modelling by Integrating Climate
and MODIS LAI Data in a Mesoscale Catchment, Remote Sens., 9, 144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020144" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020144</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Szilagyi, J.: Can a vegetation index derived from remote sensing be indicative
of areal transpiration?, Ecol. Model., 127, 65–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00200-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00200-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Teuling, A. J., Hirschi, M., Ohmura, A., Wild, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P.,
Buchmann, N., Ammann, C., Montagnani, L., Richardson, A. D., Wohlfahrt, G.,
and Seneviratne, S. I.: A regional perspective on trends in continental
evaporation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L02404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036584</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Good, S. P., and Caylor, K.: Global synthesis of vegetation control
on evapotranspiration partitioning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6753–6757,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061439</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Q., Adiku, S., Tenhunen, J., and Granier, A.: On the relationship of NDVI
with leaf area index in a deciduous forest site, Remote Sens. Environ., 94,
244–255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.006</a>, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Waring, R. H. and Landsberg, J. J.: Generalizing plant-water relations to
landscapes, J. Plant Ecol., 4, 101–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtq041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtq041</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Wei, Z., Yoshimura, K., Wang, L., Miralles, D. G., Jasechko, S., and Lee, X.:
Revisiting the contribution of transpiration to global terrestrial
evapotranspiration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2792–2801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072235</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Wild, M., Folini, D., Schär, C., Loeb, N., Dutton, E. G., and König-Langlo,
G.: The global energy balance from a surface perspective, Clim. Dynam., 40,
3107–3134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1569-8</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, C. A., Reichstein, M., Buchmann, N., Baldocchi, D., Beer, C., Schwalm,
C., Wohlfahrt, G., Hasler, N., Bernhofer, C., Foken, T., Papale, D., Schymanski,
S., and Schaefer, K.: Climate and vegetation controls on the surface water
balance: Synthesis of evapotranspiration measured across a global network of
flux towers, Water Resour. Res., 48, W06523, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011586</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Wrede, S., Fenicia, F., Martínez-Carreras, N., Juilleret, J., Hissler, C.,
Krein, A., Savenije, H. H. G., Uhlenbrook, S., Kavetski, D., and Pfister, L.:
Towards more systematic perceptual model development: a case study using
3 Luxembourgish catchments, Hydrol. Process., 29, 2731–2750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10393</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zehe, E., Ehret, U., Pfister, L., Blume, T., Schröder, B., Westhoff, M.,
Jackisch, C., Schymanski, S. J., Weiler, M., Schulz, K., Allroggen, N., Tronicke,
J., van Schaik, L., Dietrich, P., Scherer, U., Eccard, J., Wulfmeyer, V., and
Kleidon, A.: HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: a
thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization
and functioning of intermediate scale catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18,
4635–4655, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Mu, Q., Jones, L. A., Goetz, S. J., and Running, S.
W.: Satellite based analysis of northern ET trends and associated changes in
the regional water balance from 1983 to 2005, J. Hydrol., 379, 92–110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.047</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, W., Jia, S., and Lv, A.: A Universal Ts-VI Triangle Method for the
Continuous Retrieval of Evaporative Fraction From MODIS Products, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 122, 10206–10227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026964</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
