<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-22-4875-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Speculations on the application of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> discrimination to reveal
groundwater dependency of vegetation and provide estimates of root depth and
rates of groundwater use</article-title><alt-title>Speculations on the application of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> discrimination</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Speculations on the application of foliar {$\chem{{}^{{13}}C}$} discrimination}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R. Rumman et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rumman</surname><given-names>Rizwana</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8094-5631</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cleverly</surname><given-names>James</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-7150</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nolan</surname><given-names>Rachael H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-5142</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tarin</surname><given-names>Tonantzin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Eamus</surname><given-names>Derek</given-names></name>
          <email>derek.eamus@uts.edu.au</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2765-8040</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Terrestrial Ecohydrology Research Group, School of Life Sciences,
University of Technology Sydney, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Derek Eamus (derek.eamus@uts.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>22</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>4875</fpage><lpage>4889</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>5</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e140">Groundwater-dependent vegetation is globally distributed, having important
ecological, social, and economic value.
Along with the groundwater resources upon which it depends, this vegetation
is under increasing threat through excessive rates of groundwater extraction.</p>
    <p id="d1e143">In this study we examined one shallow-rooted and two deep-rooted tree species
at multiple sites along a naturally occurring gradient in
depth-to-groundwater. We measured (i) stable isotope ratios of leaves
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), xylem, and groundwater (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); and (ii) leaf-vein density. We established that foliar
discrimination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a reliable indicator
of groundwater use by vegetation and can also be used to estimate rooting
depth. Through comparison with a continental-scale assessment of foliar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we also estimated the upper limits to annual rates of
groundwater use. We conclude that maximum rooting depth for both deep-rooted
species ranged between 9.4 and 11.2 m and that annual rates of groundwater
use ranged from ca. 1400 to 1700 mm for <italic>Eucalyptus camaldulensis</italic>
and from 600 to 900 mm for <italic>Corymbia opaca</italic>. Several predictions
about hydraulic and leaf traits arising from the conclusion that these two
species made extensive use of groundwater were supported by additional
independent studies of these species in central Australia.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e239">Drylands cover 41 % of the earth's total land area (Reynolds et al.,
2007) and are sub-categorized as hyper-arid, arid, semi-arid, and dry
sub-humid areas. Hyper-arid, arid, and semi-arid regions are characterized by
chronic water shortage with unpredictable rainfall (Clarke, 1991).
Approximately 40 % of the world's population reside in drylands and
groundwater represents a major water resource not only for human consumptive
use, but also for groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs, Eamus et al.,
2006). Sustainable management of
both groundwater and GDEs requires identification of the location of GDEs,
rooting depth of vegetation, and rates of groundwater use, but attaining such
information presents significant technical and cost challenges (Eamus et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e242">Approximately 70 % of Australia is classified as semi-arid or arid (Eamus
et al., 2006; O'Grady et al., 2011). Furthermore, annual potential
evaporation exceeds annual rainfall across most of the continent; thus, most
Australian biomes are water-limited according to the Budyko (1974) framework
(Donohue et al., 2009). On average, central Australia receives less than
350 mm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of rainfall, making water a primary limiting resource
(Eamus et al., 2006). Because surface water bodies in this region are mostly
ephemeral (NRETAS, 2009, although see Box et al., 2008, regarding the small
number of permanent water bodies), groundwater plays an important role in
maintaining ecosystem structure and function of terrestrial (especially
riparian) vegetation (Eamus et al., 2006). Owing to the remoteness of much of
Australia's<?pagebreak page4876?> interior, few studies have investigated groundwater use by
vegetation communities in these semi-arid regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e257">Stomatal conductance is regulated to maximize carbon gain whilst
simultaneously minimizing transpiration (Cowan and Farquhar, 1977; Medlyn et
al., 2011) and is sensitive to both soil and atmospheric water content (Prior
et al., 1997; Thomas and Eamus, 1999). Intrinsic water-use efficiency
(WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined by the ratio of carbon gain to stomatal
conductance, provides valuable insights into how vegetation responds to
variation in water availability (Beer et al., 2009). Declining water supply
results in increased WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as stomatal conductance declines (Eamus
et al., 2013). Discrimination against the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is commonly used to calculate WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provides a time-integrated measure of WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Cernusak et al., 2011); in this study we examined spatial and seasonal
patterns in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across three tree species in the Ti Tree
basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e351">The present study was undertaken in the Ti Tree basin, which is the location
of an important groundwater resource in central Australia (Cook et al.,
2008a). Rainfall occurs mostly in large events during the austral summer
(December–March); thus, there is minimal rainfall available for vegetation
use over prolonged periods. The dry season in this region is characterized by
declining soil water availability and high vapour pressure deficits (Eamus et
al., 2013). Previous studies have documented several surprising attributes
for a number of tree species in Ti Tree. O'Grady et al. (2009) observed that,
despite living in an extremely water-limited environment, the specific leaf
area (SLA) of <italic>Corymbia opaca</italic> and <italic>Eucalytptus camaldulensis</italic>
was similar more to those from highly mesic environments than to species from
arid environments. Similarly, Santini et al. (2016) observed that xylem wall
thickness and vessel implosion resistance were significantly smaller in
<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> than in shallow-rooted
<italic>Acacia aneura</italic>. Finally, differences in rates of water use and
changes in midday water potential between the end of the wet season and the
end of the dry season were minimal for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and
<italic>C. opaca</italic>, but were very large for <italic>Acacia aptaneura</italic> (which
was previously classified as <italic>Acacia aneura</italic>; Maslin and Reid, 2012;
Nolan et al., 2017). <italic>A. aneura</italic> and <italic>A. aptaneura</italic> often
intermix with other members of the large Mulga complex of closely related
<italic>Acacia</italic> species (Wright et al., 2016); thus, we will refer to
<italic>Acacia</italic> spp. in the Mulga complex by the primary type, <italic>A. aneura</italic>. <italic>A. aneura</italic> is shallow-rooted and associated with shallow
hard pans in this catchment (ca. 1 m below ground surface; Cleverly et
al., 2016a, b), which prevents access to the groundwater below. <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> is a riparian species, confined to narrow corridors along the
ephemeral streams in Ti Tree (the Woodforde River and Allungra Creek) where
groundwater depth is shallow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>); <italic>C. opaca</italic> is
deep-rooted and may access groundwater to depths of 8 m or more (O'Grady et
al., 2009). These observations lead to the first hypothesis tested in the
present study: that WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>A. aneura</italic> would be
significantly larger than that of <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and
<italic>C. opaca</italic> because reliance on shallow stores of water by
<italic>Acacia</italic> spp. imposes severe restrictions on water use, thus resulting
in a large WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e457">Vertical (i.e. elevation) and horizontal distance from rivers receiving
groundwater inflows in arid zones influences the degree to which trees access
groundwater (O'Grady et al., 2006a; Thorburn et al., 1994). Trees closest to
the river (i.e. elevationally and horizontally) have xylem water deuterium
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotope ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively) that are close to the ratios of river and groundwater; trees
further from the river have xylem water ratios increasingly different from
those of groundwater and the river (O'Grady et al., 2006a). In endorheic
basins like Ti Tree, evaporation of near-surface soil water imposes
additional fractionation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Craig,
1961) relative to groundwater; thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in xylem provide information on plant water source and
climate (Cullen and Grierson, 2007). Variation in plant water sources with
distance from the river can affect stomatal conductance and WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In this study we tested the hypothesis that WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would increase
with distance from the creek.</p>
      <p id="d1e567">Differential access to water among co-occurring species within a biome
results in variation of several morphological traits, including SLA (Warren
et al., 2005), Huber value (Eamus et al., 2000; Sperry, 2000), and wood
density (Bucci et al., 2004; Hacke et al., 2000). Leaf-vein density (LVD) is
a trait that influences whole-plant performance. From a resource investment
perspective, leaves are composed primarily of two components: mesophyll that
undertakes photosynthesis and a leaf-vein network which delivers water and
nutrients to the leaf. Investment in leaf veins is underpinned by resource
allocation strategies (Niinemets et al., 2006, 2007; Niklas et al., 2007).
Leaf-vein density is responsive to several environmental variables, but
especially aridity (Uhl and Mosbrugger, 1999). Furthermore, LVD is positively
correlated with leaf hydraulic conductance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, maximum
photosynthetic rate, and leaf-level gas-exchange rates (Brodribb et al.,
2007; Sack et al., 2003; Sack and Frole, 2006; Sack and Holbrook, 2006).
Consequently we investigate whether investment in LVD of three dominant
overstorey tree species was affected by increasing depth-to-groundwater
(DTGW).</p>
      <p id="d1e583">The propensity for leaves to lose water matches the capacity of xylem to
deliver the same volume of water (Brodribb and Holbrook, 2007; Meinzer and
Grantz, 1990; Sperry, 2000), and positive correlations consequently occur
between leaf-hydraulic conductance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and LVD (Brodribb et
al., 2007; Sack and Holbrook, 2006). LVD provides a direct estimate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because it correlates with the distance water must traverse
from termini of the xylem network to sites of evaporation (Brodribb et al.,
2010). Since transpiration is directly linked to availability of water to
roots, we hypothesized that LVD will be correlated with depth-to-groundwater
in plants for which groundwater is accessible; this correlation should be
absent in species with shallow roots which cannot access groundwater. Whilst
a number of studies have demonstrated increased LVD with increasing aridity
along rainfall<?pagebreak page4877?> gradients (Brodribb et al., 2010; Brodribb and Holbrook, 2003;
Sack and Holbrook, 2006), this relationship has not, to our knowledge, been
examined in relation to DTGW. Finally, because LVD is strongly correlated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and rates of leaf-scale gas exchange (Brodribb et al.,
2007; Sack et al., 2003; Sack and Frole, 2006), we hypothesize that LVD will
be significantly correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and hence
WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e646">To summarize, we address the following questions.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e651">Does access to groundwater by <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic>
result in significantly smaller WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to <italic>A. aneura</italic>?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e673">Does LVD correlate with DTGW in the three species examined?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e677">Is there a correlation between LVD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and hence
WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the three species examined?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e706">Does horizontal and vertical (i.e. elevational) distance from a known river
flood-out zone influence foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of
co-occurring species?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e732">Can foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be used as an indicator of utilization of
groundwater by vegetation of arid regions?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e749">Can foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be used to estimate rooting depth and upper
and lower bounds of rates of groundwater use?</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e776">The study was conducted in the Ti Tree basin, a 5500 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> basin located
approximately 200 km north of Alice Springs (NT) and 180 km north of the
Tropic of Capricorn (22.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 1933.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 549 m a.s.l.).
Climate is characterized as tropical and arid with hot summers and warm
winters. The nearest Bureau of Meteorology station (Territory Grape Farm; Met
Station 015643; within 25 km of all study sites) recorded mean and median
annual precipitation of 319.9 and 29 mm, respectively (1987–May 2016;
<uri>http://www.bom.gov.au/</uri>, last access: April 2018). Of
the annual median rainfall, 72 % falls during the summer months
(December–February) and 86 % falls during the monsoon season
(November–April). Mean minimum and maximum monthly temperatures range from 5
and 22.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July to 22 and 37.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January.</p>
      <p id="d1e828">The soil is a “red kandosol” (74 : 11 : 15, sand : silt : clay;
Eamus et al., 2013), typical of large portions of semi-arid Australia, and
has a high potential for drainage (Morton et al., 2011; Schmidt et al.,
2010). Patches of hard siliceous soil are often observed and are likely
surface expressions of the underlying hardpan (Cleverly et al., 2013), a
common formation in the top 1–1.5 m in this type of soil (Cleverly et al.,
2013, 2016a, b; Morton et al., 2011). The major potable source of water for
this region is a large underground reservoir, recharged mainly by seepage
from creek/river channels and their flood-out zones, “mountain” front
recharge, and occasional very heavy rainfall events (NRETAS, 2009; Calf et
al., 1991). The Ti Tree basin has a natural gradient in DTGW. The depth of
the water table below ground level is shallow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
northern part and groundwater is lost through evapotranspiration (Shanafield
et al., 2015), whereas DTGW reaches 60 m in the southern and western parts
of the basin and 20–40 m in the eastern region (NRETA, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e844">All study sites were characterized as being in one of three distinct
vegetation types (Nolan et al., 2017; Cleverly et al., 2016a): (1) riparian,
predominantly consisting of <italic>Eucalyptus camaldulensis var. obtusa</italic>,
which line the banks of the ephemeral streams in the Ti Tree basin (Woodforde
River and Allungra Creek); (2) low mixed woodland (<italic>A. aneura</italic>
F. Muell. ex Benth., <italic>A. aptaneura</italic> Maslin &amp; J. E. Reid, <italic>A. kempeana</italic> F. Muell.) with an understorey of shrubs, herbs, and C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> grasses; (3) tall, open <italic>Corymbia</italic> savanna with extensive
Spinifex grass (<italic>Triodia</italic> <italic>spp</italic>.), sparse <italic>Corymbia</italic>
<italic>opaca</italic> (D. J. Carr &amp; S. G. M.Carr) K. D. Hill &amp;
L. A. S. Johnson trees, and occasional <italic>Acacia</italic> spp. trees. The
Woodforde River and Allungra Creek are ephemeral streams that flow only after
large extensive rainfall events. Nonetheless, perched aquifers beneath their
riparian corridors are recharged by large storms (Villeneuve et al., 2015),
providing long-term access to groundwater near ephemeral streams. Allungra
Creek and its flood-out zone represent zones of local recharge (NRETAS,
2009). Overbank flooding and sheet flow occur in flood-outs where the
Woodforde River and Allungra Creek enter the basin and split into a network
of smaller channels (NRETA, 2007), resulting in an estimated 1.8 ML
(megaliters) of groundwater recharge per year (NRETAS, 2009).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e900">A summary of plots, transects, and spot measurements undertaken in
the present study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.9}[.9]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="99.584646pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plot/transect number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Depth to groundwater (m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Species sampled</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Replication</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Isotopes <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>analysed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plots 1–4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.4–13.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Acacia aneura (Mulga),</italic><?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Corymbia opaca</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 or 3 trees per species, 3–5 samples per tree per isotope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, deuterium of groundwater and xylem water; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of leaves/phyllodes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Transects 1–3 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Allungra Creek study)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Regional aquifer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 m<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>but shallow ephemeral GW present after flood-outs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Eucalyptus camaldulensis</italic> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Acacia aneura</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 or 3 trees per species, 3 or more samples per tree</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of leaves/ phyllodes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Additional spot measure-<?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>ments across the basin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20, 36, and 49.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Acacia aneura </italic> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <italic>Corymbia opaca</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2 or 3 trees per species, 3 or more samples per tree</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of leaves/phyllodes</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1075">Four sampling plots (see the map in the Supplement) were established for
determination of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for xylem water and groundwater from a nearby bore.
DTGW in each of the four plots was 4.4, 8.3, 8.8, and 13.9 m, respectively.
One of the four plots was located on the banks of the Woodforde River
(plot 1, DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.4 m). <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> is the dominant tree
species in plot 1, and <italic>C. opaca</italic> is also present. In the second plot,
<italic>A. aneura</italic> is the dominant species (plot 2, DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.3 m).
<italic>C. opaca</italic> is the dominant tree species in the two remaining plots
(plot 3, DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.8 m; plot 4, 13.9 m).</p>
      <p id="d1e1151"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic>, <italic>C. opaca</italic>, and
<italic>A. aneura</italic> were examined along three additional transects to
investigate the influence of topography and of
distance from a creek on WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The three transects were
established perpendicularly to the banks of Allungra Creek, which is in an
area of known groundwater recharge at the base of the hills that bound the
southern extent of the basin (NRETAS, 2009). One of the three transects was
located near a permanent water hole near the flood-out and the bottom of
Allungra Creek. Transects two and three were 1–2 km upstream of the water
hole.<?pagebreak page4878?> Transects extended from the creek bank within 1 m of the creek up to a
maximum of 1800 m from the creek (vertical, that is, elevational, distance
from the creek bed ranged from 0 to 4 m), across which vegetation graded
from riparian forest to <italic>Corymbia</italic> open savanna, with occasional
<italic>Acacia</italic> spp. trees interspersed throughout.</p>
      <p id="d1e1191">In addition to the four plots and three transects, “spot sampling” for
foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone was performed at three sites to extend the
examination of variation in WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to 20, 36, and 49.5 m DTGW for
<italic>A. aneura</italic> or 20 and 36 m for <italic>C. opaca</italic>. Finally,
continental sampling of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of multiple dominant tree
species was undertaken at seven sites distributed across Australia (Table S1
in the Supplement; Karan et al., 2016; Rumman et al., 2017) in order to allow
comparison of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of our three Ti Tree species with a
continental-scale regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with rainfall. A summary of
the isotopes analysed for each species and for each groundwater sampling
undertaken, for each site, is given in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Leaf sampling protocols and meteorology</title>
      <p id="d1e1264">Sampling was undertaken in April 2014 (end of the wet season) and
September 2013 (end of the dry season). Three mature, healthy leaves on each
of three branches from two or three replicate trees were sampled for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all plots, transects, and spot sampling sites. In
addition, terminal branches of the trees in the four plots were collected for
deuterium and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O analyses of xylem water. Bore water samples were
also collected in the four plots and the three spot sampling sites using
groundwater samples were also collected from the bores located at each site
using a HydraSleeve no-purge groundwater sampler (Cordry,
2003).
Sampling along the three transects occurred at three or four points along
each transect. The three trees of each of the dominant species at each
location were located within 50 m of the bore. Leaves for leaf-vein analysis
(see below) were collected during September 2013.</p>
      <p id="d1e1291">Climate conditions preceding and during the sampling periods were obtained
from two eddy-covariance towers (Fluxnet sites AU-ASM and AU-TTE; Cleverly et
al., 2016a; Cleverly, 2011, 2013). AU-ASM is located to the west of the Ti
Tree at the spot sampling site where DTGW is 49.5 m. AU-TTE is located near
the eastern edge of the Ti Tree in plot 3 where DTGW is 8.8 m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Stable isotope analyses: deuterium, {$\chem{\delta^{{18}}O}$} and foliar {$\chem{Delta^{{13}}C}$}}?><title>Stable isotope analyses: deuterium, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Delta</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e1326">Branch xylem water was extracted by cryogenic vacuum distillation (whereby
samples are subject to a vacuum and water vapour is frozen using liquid
nitrogen, as described in Ingraham and Shadel, 1992; West et al., 2006).
Water from each branch sample was extracted for a minimum of 60–75 min
(West et al., 2006). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses of
branch water and groundwater were performed using a Picarro L2120-i Analyser
for Isotopic H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O. Five laboratory standards were calibrated against IAEA
VSMOW2 – SLAP2 scale (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water 2, VSMOW2:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰;
Standard Light Antarctic Precipitation 2, SLAP2: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">427.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and
Greenland Ice Sheet Precipitation (GISP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">189.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,‰) as quality
control references (IAEA, 2009). The standard deviation of the residuals
between the VSMOW2 – SLAP2 value of the internal standards and the
calculated values based on best linear fits was ca. 0.2 ‰ for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ca. 1.0 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Carbon isotope ratios of leaves</title>
      <?pagebreak page4879?><p id="d1e1544">Leaf samples stored in paper bags were completely dried in an oven at
60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for 5 days. After drying, each leaf sample was finely ground
to powder with a Retsch MM300 bead grinding mill (Verder Group, Netherlands)
until homogeneous. Between 1 and 2 mg of ground material was sub-sampled in
3.5 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 mm tin capsules for analysis of the stable carbon
isotope ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), generating three representative
independent values per tree. All <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analyses were performed
in a Picarro G2121-i Analyser (Picarro, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for isotopic
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Atropine and acetanilide were used as laboratory standard
references. Results were normalized with the international standards sucrose
(IAEA-CH-6, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VPDB</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰), cellulose
(IAEA-CH-3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VPDB</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰) and
graphite (USGS24, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>VPDB</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰). The
standard deviation of the residuals between IAEA standards and calculated
values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C based on best linear fit was ca. 0.5 ‰.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1697">Mean daily meteorological conditions of daily precipitation,
cumulative precipitation, mean air temperature, and vapour pressure deficit
in January 2013–June 2014. Red lines show sampling periods in September 2013
(late dry season) and April 2014 (late wet season). On the left are data from
the western EC tower (DTGW 49.4 m), and the other side shows data for the
eastern EC tower (DTGW 8.8 m).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1708">Comparison of xylem and bore water
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O plots for <italic>Acacia aneura</italic> sampled
from 8.3 and 20 m DTGW <bold>(a)</bold> and <italic>Eucalyptus camaldulensis</italic>
and <italic>Corymbia opaca</italic> sampled from 4.4, 8.8, and 13.9 m
DTGW <bold>(b)</bold>. Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard error.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Calculation of WUE${}_{\mathrm{i}}$ from {$\chem{\delta^{{13}}C}$} and hence $\Delta^{{13}}$C}?><title>Calculation of WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C</title>
      <p id="d1e1805">WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> discrimination
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is calculated from the bulk-leaf carbon isotope
ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), using the following equations (Werner et al.,
2012):

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mtext>WUE</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>Leaf-vein density</title>
      <p id="d1e2007">A small sub-section (approximately 1 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all leaves sampled for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were used for LVD analysis, providing three leaf sub-sections
per tree (nine samples per species). Due to the small size of <italic>A. aneura</italic> phyllodes, several phyllodes were combined and ground for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis and one whole phyllode was used for LVD analysis. Each
leaf section was cleared and stained following the approach described in
Gardner (1975). A 5 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NaOH solution was used as the principal
clearing agent. Leaf sections were immersed in the NaOH solution and placed
in an oven at 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C overnight (Gardner, 1975). Phyllodes of
<italic>Acacia</italic> proved difficult to clear effectively and were kept in the
oven longer than overnight to aid clearing. Once cleared, the partially
translucent leaf sections were stained with a 1 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> safranin
solution. Most leaf sections were stained for up to 3 min and then soaked
with a 95 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ethanol solution until the vein network was
sufficiently stained and the majority of colour was removed from the lamina.
After staining, the cuticle was removed to aid in identifying the vein
network. Following cuticle removal, leaf sub-sections were photographed using
a Nikon microscope (model: SMZ800) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnification. Finally,
minor veins were traced by hand and LVD was calculated as total vein length
per unit area (mm mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using ImageJ version 1.48 (National Institutes
of Health, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS7">
  <title>Data and statistical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2141">Species-mean values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the dominant overstorey species at each
location were calculated for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and LVD. Relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with DTGW were tested using regression analysis after
testing for non-normality (Shapiro–Wilk test, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
homogeneity of variances (Bartlett test). A Tukey post hoc test for
multiple comparisons across sites was used to test for significance of
variation as a function of DTGW. Breakpoints in functions with DTGW were
determined using segmented regression analyses whereby the best fitting
function is obtained by maximizing the statistical coefficient of
explanation. The least squares method was applied to each of the two segments
while minimizing the sum of squares of the differences between observed and
calculated values of the dependent variables. Next, one-way ANOVA was applied
to determine significance of regressions and breakpoint estimates within a
given season. We fully acknowledge that the number of plots with shallow DTGW
was sub-optimal, but constraints arising from species distribution across the
Ti Tree precluded additional sampling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2232">Carbon isotope discrimination in leaf dry matter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
plotted as a function of depth-to-groundwater (DTGW) in the Ti Tree basin.
Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are data for <italic>A. aneura</italic> only; in
panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> <italic>C. opaca</italic> (black symbols) and
<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> (red symbols) are presented. Left and right panels
show September 2013 and April 2014 sampling, respectively. Lines in
panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are from segmented regression of the
combined data. Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard error.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Meteorological conditions during the study period</title>
      <p id="d1e2299">Mean daily temperature and mean daily vapour pressure deficit (VPD) were
largest in summer (December–February) and smallest in winter (June–August)
(Fig. 1). Daily sums of rainfall showed that the DTW 8.8 and 49.4 m sites
received 265 and 228 mm rainfall, respectively, between the
September 2013 and April 2014 sampling dates, representing more than 73 %
and 60 % of the total respective rainfall received from January 2013 to
June 2014 at these sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Variation in source-water uptake</title>
      <p id="d1e2308">Xylem water isotope ratios for <italic>A. aneura</italic> were widely divergent from
the bore water stable isotope ratios (Fig. 2a) in both wet and dry seasons,
indicative of a lack of access to groundwater. In contrast,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of xylem water in <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> were predominantly (with two exceptions)
tightly clustered around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O of groundwater
in the bores located within 50 m of the trees (Fig. 2b). There was little
variation in xylem water composition between the end of the dry season and
end of the wet season for either species, reflecting the consistent use of
groundwater by these two species.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2371">Leaf intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) calculated
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in shallow-rooted <italic>A. aneura</italic> <bold>(a)</bold>
and deep-rooted <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> <bold>(b)</bold>
across study sites for September 2013 (patterned column) and April 2014
(filled column). Bars within a season with the same letter are not
significantly different across the depth-to-groundwater gradient (Tukey HSD,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard error.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2439"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>
of deep-rooted species sampled across the Ti Tree basin plotted as functions
of distance from Allungra Creek bed. Striped triangles represent <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and blue squares represent <italic>C. opaca</italic>. Error bars
represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard error<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> The regression is fitted only to the
<italic>E. camuldulensis</italic> data. Note that the largest value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the lowest value of WUE for <italic>C. opaca</italic> are
three overlapping samples.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2518">Leaf-vein density (LVD) of <italic>A. aneura</italic> <bold>(a)</bold> or
<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> (red symbols) and <italic>C. opaca</italic> (blue symbols)
<bold>(b)</bold> as a function of depth-to-groundwater. Each symbol represents
mean LVD calculated from three individual leaves. Error bars represent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard error. A statistically significant correlation derived from
segmented linear regression of leaf-vein density, for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> data combined, with depth-to-groundwater
(DTGW) is shown in panel <bold>(b)</bold>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard deviation
slope of the regression below the breakpoint in <bold>(b)</bold> are 0.976 and
0.0031, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2575">Relationships of leaf-vein density of <bold>(a)</bold> <italic>A. aneura</italic> and <bold>(b)</bold> <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> (red symbols) and
<italic>C. opaca</italic> (blue symbols) with bulk-leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each
symbol represents mean LVD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with both variables
measured on the same leaf. Error bars represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard error. A
statistically significant correlation of LVD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> is plotted with a dashed
line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p id="d1e2654">Relationships of discrimination against carbon-13 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
with annual rainfall observed in different studies across Australia. The
diamonds represent observations made in eastern Australia (Stewart et al.,
1995), northern Australia (Miller et al., 2001), and sites in New South Wales
(Taylor, 2008). The red squares are data from a continental-scale assessment
of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rumman et al., 2017). The black circle is the
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and the black square is
the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>C. opaca</italic>, both of which were measured
in the current study. The 95 % CI for the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.403</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the s.e. of the slope is 0.000231. The black dashed arrows
indicate the rainfall that would be required to account for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> if these
two species relied only upon rainfall.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/22/4875/2018/hess-22-4875-2018-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page4882?><p id="d1e2760"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>A. aneura</italic>, sampled in the <italic>Corymbia</italic>
savanna and <italic>Acacia</italic> spp. plots, was not significantly correlated with
DTGW, in either season or across all values of DTGW (ANOVA F <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.78; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 3a, b). As a consequence of these patterns in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> did not vary significantly for
<italic>A. aneura</italic> across sites differing in DTGW (Fig. 4a) despite the large
variability in WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ranging from 62 to
92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across sites and seasons. By contrast, foliar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic>
declined significantly with increasing DTGW in both seasons at the sites
where DTGW was relatively shallow (DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ca. 12 m). Segmented
regression analysis shown in Fig. 3c and d yielded breakpoints at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in September (ANOVA F <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11.548; df <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2, 38; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.81</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m in April (ANOVA F <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14.67; df <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2, 47; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which represent the seasonal maximum depths from which groundwater can be
extracted by these species. Thus, WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> was significantly smaller at the
shallowest site than at sites with DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.9 m (Fig. 4b), but did not
differ significantly across the deeper DTGW range (13.9–49.5 m; Fig. 4b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2987">As distance from Allungra Creek increased, foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
both <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> declined significantly
(Fig. 5a), with concomitant increases in WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5b). There
was no significant relationship for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C or WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with
distance from the creek for <italic>A. aneura</italic> (data not shown).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Leaf-vein density</title>
      <p id="d1e3048">LVD did not vary significantly with increasing DTGW for <italic>A. aneura</italic>
(Fig. 6a), but a significant increase in LVD with increasing DTGW was
observed for DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ca. 10 m in the two deep-rooted species (Fig. 6b).
The breakpoint for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> (Fig. 6b;
9.36 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 m; ANOVA F <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.38; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) agreed well with the
two previous estimates (cf. Figs. 3 and 6), although again, constraints
imposed by species distributions severely limited the number of samplings
available at shallow DTGW sites. As with LVD and DTGW, no relationship was
observed between LVD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C for <italic>A. aneura</italic> (Fig. 7a), but
a significant linear decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C with increasing LVD was
observed for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> (Fig. 7b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3134">Analyses of stable isotopes of bore water (i.e. groundwater) and xylem water
across a DTGW gradient established that <italic>A. aneura</italic> adopted an
“opportunistic” strategy of water use and was dependent on rainfall stored
within the soil profile. This is consistent with previous studies, where
<italic>Acacia</italic> spp. was shown to be very responsive to changes in upper soil
moisture content, as expected given their shallow rooting depth and the
presence of a shallow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 m) hardpan below stands of <italic>Acacia</italic>
spp. (Eamus et al., 2013; Pressland, 1975). Furthermore, very low predawn
leaf-water potentials (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MPa; Eamus et al., 2016) and very high
sapwood density (0.95 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eamus et al., 2016) in <italic>A. aneura</italic> of Ti Tree, and which are strongly correlated with aridity, confirm
that they rely on soil water without access to groundwater, consistent with
the findings of Cleverly et al. (2016b). By contrast, analyses of stable
isotopes in groundwater and xylem water of <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and
<italic>C. opaca</italic> established their access to groundwater, as has been
inferred previously because of their large rates of transpiration in the dry
season and consistently high (close to zero) predawn water potentials (Howe
et al., 2007; O'Grady et al., 2006a, b). Importantly, we observed no
significant change in xylem isotope composition for these two deep-rooted
species (<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic>) between the end of
the wet season and the end of the dry season, further evidence of year-round
access to groundwater at the shallowest DTGW sites.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4883?><p id="d1e3193">One specific aim of the present study was to determine whether discrimination
against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and resultant intrinsic water-use
efficiency (WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be used to identify access to
groundwater. An increase in foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents decreased
access to water and increasing WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Leffler and Evans, 1999;
Zolfaghar et al., 2014, 2017). The shallow-rooted <italic>A. aneura</italic> did not
show any significant relationship of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with DTGW during
either season. Consequently mean WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> showed no significant trend
with increasing DTGW, consistent with the conclusion that <italic>A. aneura</italic>
only accessed soil water during either season. In contrast, a breakpoint in
the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DTGW was apparent between
9.4 m (derived from LVD results) and 11.2 m (derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C
analyses) when data for the two species were combined. Where DTGW was larger
than a threshold (DTGW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ca. 12 m), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became
independent of DTGW. Consequently, WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased significantly as
DTGW increased to these thresholds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but did not vary with
further increases in DTGW. We therefore suggest that foliar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used as an indicator of
groundwater access by vegetation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C is less expensive and easier
to measure than stable isotope ratios of water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in groundwater, soil water, and xylem water.
Furthermore, canopies are generally more accessible than groundwater.
Globally, identification of groundwater-dependent ecosystems has been
hindered by the lack of a relatively cheap and easy methodology (Eamus et
al., 2015); thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows great promise for identifying
groundwater-dependent vegetation and ecosystems.</p>
      <p id="d1e3426">Whilst acknowledging the sub-optimal distribution of samples across the
shallow DTGW range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) from which breakpoints in regressions were
calculated (Figs. 3 and 6), which arose because of the natural distribution
of trees across the basin, we can ask the question: are the speculated depths
beyond which groundwater appears to become inaccessible supported by other
independent studies of Australian trees? Several analyses support our
suggestion of a lower limit of approximately 12 m beyond which groundwater
is inaccessible to vegetation in this basin. Eamus et al. (2015) present the
results of a seven-site (seven sites across the range 2.4–37.5 m DTGW),
18-trait, five-species study and identify a breakpoint between 7 and 9 m.
Similarly, two recent reviews identify lower limits to root extraction<?pagebreak page4884?> of
groundwater of 7.5 m (Benyon et al., 2006) and 8–10 m (O'Grady et al.,
2010), while Cook et al. (1998b) established a limit of 8–9 m for a
Eucalypt savanna. We therefore conclude that our estimates of the limits to
groundwater accessibility appear reasonable.</p>
      <p id="d1e3439">Figure 8 shows combined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from four Australian studies
(Miller et al., 2001; Stewart et al., 1995; Taylor, 2008; Rumman et al.,
2017), including one continental-scale study of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Rumman et al., 2017). A single regression describes the data of all four
independent studies. Thus, when rainfall is the sole source of water for
vegetation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly correlated with annual rainfall.
In contrast, the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and
<italic>C. opaca</italic> do not conform to the regression (Fig. 8). It appears that
<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> in Ti Tree “behaves” as though it were receiving
approximately 1700 mm of rainfall, despite growing at a semi-arid site (ca.
320 mm average annual rainfall). This represents the upper limit to
groundwater use by this species, assuming a zero contribution from rainfall
(which is clearly very unlikely). The upper limit to annual groundwater use
for <italic>C. opaca</italic> was similarly estimated to be 837 mm (Fig. 8). If all
of the water from rainfall is used by these two species (which is also very
unlikely), then the lower limit to groundwater use is the difference between
rainfall and the estimates derived from Fig. 8, about 1380 mm for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and 517 mm for <italic>C. opaca</italic>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4885?><p id="d1e3514">There are several independent estimates of annual tree water use for these
two species which provide a valuable comparison to the estimates made above.
O'Grady et al. (2009) showed that annual water use by riparian <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> in Ti Tree was approximately
1642.5 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sapwood year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming an average tree
radius of 20 cm, a sapwood depth of 2 cm, and an average canopy ground
cover of 25 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> per tree yields an annual water use of
1568 mm year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, encouragingly close to the estimate (1700 mm) derived
from Fig. 8. The estimate for annual water use by <italic>C. opaca</italic> from
O'Grady et al. (2009) is 837 mm, in reasonable agreement with the estimate
from the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of <italic>C. opaca</italic> and the regression in
Fig. 8 (ca. 900 mm). Because depth-to-groundwater for <italic>C. opaca</italic> is
significantly larger (ca. 8–10 m) than that for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic>
(ca. 2–4 m), the resistance to water flow imposed by the xylem's path
length is larger for <italic>C. opaca</italic> than <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and
therefore water use may be expected to be smaller in the former than the
latter, as observed.</p>
      <p id="d1e3605">Using an entirely different methodology from that used here, O'Grady et
al. (2006c) estimated annual groundwater use by riparian vegetation on the
Daly River in northern Australia to be between 694 and 876 mm, while O'Grady
and Holland (2010) showed annual groundwater use to range from 2 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm in their continental-scale review of Australian vegetation.
Therefore our estimates based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appear reasonable. We
conclude that (a) <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> are
accessing groundwater (because annual water use greatly exceeded annual
rainfall); (b) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used as an indicator of groundwater
use by vegetation; and (c) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can provide estimates of upper
and lower bounds for the rate of groundwater use by vegetation.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Patterns of carbon isotope discrimination and intrinsic water-use
efficiency along Allungra Creek transects</title>
      <p id="d1e3669">For the two deep-rooted species (<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and
<italic>C. opaca</italic>), a significant decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C (and hence an
increase in WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed with increasing distance from the
creek (Fig. 5a, b). In contrast to the results of O'Grady et al. (2006c) for
a steeply rising topography in the Daly River, this is unlikely to be
attributable to increased elevation since the change in elevation was minimal
across each entire transect (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m), and even smaller near Allungra Creek
where most of the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was recorded. Therefore the
cause of the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with distance from the creek was
most likely to be a function of the frequency with which trees receive flood
water and hence the amount of recharge into the soil profile (Ehleringer and
Cooper, 1988; Thorburn et al., 1994; Villeneuve et al., 2015; Singer et al.,
2014). We therefore further conclude that foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
used as an indicator of access to additional water to that of rainfall,
regardless of the source of that additional water (e.g. groundwater, flood
recharged soil water storage, irrigation).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Leaf-vein density across the depth-to-groundwater gradient</title>
      <p id="d1e3757">In our study, LVD was independent of DTGW for <italic>A. aneura</italic>, but a
breakpoint (9.4 m) was apparent across the combined data of the two
deep-rooted species. Increased DTGW reflects a declining availability of
water resources (Zolfaghar et al., 2015), especially in arid zones. Uhl and
Mosbrugger (1999) concluded that water availability is the most important
factor determining LVD. Sack and Scoffoni (2013) also showed LVD to be
negatively correlated with mean annual precipitation in a 796-species
meta-analysis. Therefore increasing LVD with increasing DTGW is consistent
with an increased LVD with a declining water supply, despite similar amounts
of rainfall being received along the DTGW gradient.</p>
      <p id="d1e3763">Both <italic>A. aneura</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> in the present study showed
LVDs close to the higher end of the global spectrum (Sack and Scoffoni,
2013), consistent with larger LVDs observed in “semi-desert” species.
Higher LVDs allow for a more even spatial distribution of water across the
phyllode or lamina during water stress, which contributes to a greater
consistency of mesophyll hydration in species of arid and semi-arid regions
(Sommerville et al., 2012). In turn, this allows continued photosynthetic
carbon assimilation during water stress (Sommerville et al., 2010).
Presumably, a large LVD also decreases the resistance to water flow from
minor veins to mesophyll cells, which is likely to be beneficial for leaf
hydration as water availability declines while also facilitating rapid
rehydration following rain in these arid-zone species. Large LVDs for
<italic>A. aneura</italic> of semi-arid regions in Australia have been associated
with rapid up-regulation of phyllode function with the return of
precipitation following drought (Sommerville et al., 2010), and such rapid
up-regulation is crucial for vegetation in regions with unpredictable and
pulsed rainfall like Ti Tree (Byrne et al., 2008; Grigg et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e3775">LVD was negatively correlated with bulk-leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and thus
positively correlated with WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in <italic>C. opaca</italic> and the
data for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> appeared to conform to the regression for
<italic>C. opaca</italic> (Fig. 7b). What mechanism can explain the significant
relationship observed between a structural leaf trait (LVD) and a functional
trait (WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>? The stomatal optimization model (Medlyn et al.,
2011) is based on the fact that transpiration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
assimilation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are linked via stomatal function. In order to gain carbon
most economically while minimizing water loss (i.e. optimization of the ratio
A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> E), stomata should function such that the marginal water cost of
carbon assimilation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains
constant (Cowan and Farquhar, 1977; Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982). This aspect
of stomatal control couples the structural traits involved with water flow
with traits associated with primary production (Brodribb and Holbrook, 2007)
and explains observed correlations between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in a number of studies (Brodribb et al., 2007, 2010, 2005; Brodribb and
Jordan, 2008; Sack and Holbrook, 2006; Sack and Scoffoni, 2013). The length
of the hydraulic pathway is directly proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Brodribb et al., 2007) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio determines foliar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signatures in leaves. Thus, the
constraint on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">leaf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by LVD affects the coordination between the
processes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and thereby might explain significant relationships
between structural (LVD) and functional (WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> traits. For the
two deep-rooted species, having access to groundwater resulted in convergence
to a common solution for optimizing water supply through veins with respect
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Brodribb and Holbrook, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e3992">Several robust and testable predictions arise from the conclusion that
<italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> are functioning at a
semi-arid site as though they have access to ca. 1700 or 900 mm rainfall,
respectively. Species growing in high-rainfall zones possess a suite of
traits, including low-density sapwood, large-diameter xylem vessels, small
resistance to<?pagebreak page4886?> vessel implosion, large SLA, and a large maximum stomatal
conductance, compared to species growing in arid regions (O'Grady et al.,
2006b, 2009; Wright et al., 2004). Therefore, these attributes should be
present in <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> if they are
functioning as though they are growing in a mesic environment. We have
previously established (Eamus et al., 2016; Santini et al., 2016) that these
predictions are confirmed by field data and therefore conclude that analyses
of foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have global application to the preservation and
understanding of GDEs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4027">We posed five questions regarding depth-to-groundwater (DTGW), foliar
discrimination against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and leaf-vein
density (LVD) as underpinning the rationale for this study. We confirmed that
access to shallow groundwater by <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic> (DTGW ca. 0–11 m) resulted in smaller WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> than
<italic>A. aneura</italic>. We also demonstrated that LVD correlated with DTGW for
the shallower depths (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) in <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic>, but not in <italic>A. aneura</italic>. We further demonstrated that there was
correlation between LVD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and hence WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic>, but not in <italic>A. aneura</italic>. Similarly, as distance increased from a creek near a flood-out
associated with aquifer recharge, foliar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C decreased and
WUE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> increased for <italic>E. camaldulensis</italic> and <italic>C. opaca</italic>, but not for <italic>A. aneura</italic>. Finally, we conclude that foliar
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used as an indicator of utilization of groundwater
or stored soil water by vegetation in arid regions, providing an inexpensive
and rapid alternative to the stable isotopes of water that have been used in
many previous studies. The observation that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
two groundwater-using species was distant from the continental regression of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against rainfall (Fig. 8) is strong evidence of the value
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an indicator of utilization of water that is
additional to rainfall, and this supplemental water can be derived from
either groundwater or soil recharge arising in flood-out zones of creeks.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e4212">The underlying research data are all available on the
following permanent link: <uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/102763</uri> (UTS
library, 2018).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4218">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4875-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4875-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e4227">All the authors contributed to field data sampling. RR undertook all the isotope
analyses and statistical analyses and wrote the thesis that formed the basis
of this paper. DE oversaw the design and implementation of the entire
project. All the authors contributed to writing this paper and interpreting
the data.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e4234">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4240">The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Australian
Research Council for a Discovery grant awarded to Derek Eamus.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Theresa Blume<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Beer, C., Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Baldocchi, D., Law, B. E., Papale, D.,
Soussana, J. F., Ammann, C., Buchmann, N., Frank, D., Gianelle, D., Janssens,
I. A., Knohl, A., Kostner, B., Moors, E., Roupsard, O., Verbeeck, H., Vesala,
T., Williams, C. A., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Temporal and among-site variability
of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 23, GB2018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GB003233</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Benyon, R. G., Theiveyanathan, S., and Doody, T. M.: Impacts of tree
plantations on groundwater in south-eastern Australia, Aust. J. Bot., 54,
181–192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/bt05046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/bt05046</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Box, J. B., Duguid, A., Read, R. E., Kimber, R. G., Knapton, A., Davis, J., and
Bowland, A. E.: Central Australian waterbodies: The importance of permanence
in a desert landscape, J. Arid Environ., 72, 1395–1413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.02.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.02.022</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J., Feild, T. S. and Jordan, G. J.: Leaf maximum photosynthetic
rate and venation are linked by hydraulics, Plant Phys., 144, 1890–1898,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J., Feild, T. S., and Sack, L.: Viewing leaf structure and
evolution from a hydraulic perspective, Funct. Plant Biol., 37, 488-498,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J. and Holbrook, N. M.: Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance
during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical forest, New Phytol., 158,
295–303, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J. and Holbrook, N. M.: Forced depression of leaf hydraulic
conductance in situ: effects on the leaf gas exchange of forest trees, Func.
Ecol., 21, 705–712, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J., Holbrook, N. M., Zwieniecki, M. A., and Palma, B.: Leaf
hydraulic capacity in ferns, conifers and angiosperms: impacts on
photosynthetic maxima, New Phytol., 165, 839–846, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J. and Jordan, G. J.: Internal coordination between hydraulics and
stomatal control in leaves, Plant Cell Environ., 31, 1557–1564, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bucci, S., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F., Scholz, F., Franco, A., and Bustamante,
M.: Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of
tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant, Tree Physiol., 24,
891–899, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Budyko, M. I.: Climate and Life, Academic Press, New York, 508 pp., 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Byrne, M., Yeates, D. K., Joseph, L., Kearney, M., Bowler, J., Williams,
M. A. J., Cooper, S., Donnellan, S. C., Keogh, J. S., and Leys, R.: Birth of a
biome: insights into the assembly and maintenance of the Australian arid zone
biota, Molec. Ecol., 17, 4398–4417, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Calf, G. E., McDonald, P. S., and Jacobson, G.: Recharge mechanism and
groundwater age in the Ti-Tree basin, Northern Territory, Aust. J. Earth
Sci., 38, 299–306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099108727974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/08120099108727974</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cernusak, L. A., Hutley, L. B., Beringer, J., Holtum, J. A., and Turner, B. L.:
Photosynthetic physiology of eucalypts along a sub-continental rainfall
gradient in northern Australia, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1462–1470,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, R.: Water: the international crisis, Earthscan, London, UK,
1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J.: Alice Springs Mulga OzFlux site, TERN OzFlux: Australian and
New Zealand Flux Research and Monitoring Network,
hdl:102.100.100/14217, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J.: Ti Tree East OzFlux Site, TERN OzFlux: Australian and New
Zealand Flux Research and Monitoring Network,
hdl:102.100.100/11135, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Cleverly, J., Boulain, N., Villalobos-Vega, R., Grant, N., Faux, R., Wood,
C., Cook, P. G., Yu, Q., Leigh, A., and Eamus, D.: Dynamics of component carbon
fluxes in a semi-arid <italic>Acacia</italic> woodland, central Australia, J.
Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 118, 1168–1185, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Van Gorsel, E., Chen, C., Rumman, R., Luo, Q.,
Coupe, N. R., Li, L., Kljun, N., and Faux, R.: Productivity and
evapotranspiration of two contrasting semiarid ecosystems following the 2011
global carbon land sink anomaly, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 220, 151–159, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Restrepo Coupe, N., Chen, C., Maes, W., Li, L.,
Faux, R., Santini, N. S., Rumman, R., Yu, Q., and Huete, A.: Soil moisture
controls on phenology and productivity in a semi-arid critical zone, Sci. Total Environ.,
568, 1227–1237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142</ext-link>,
2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G., O'Grady, A. P., Wischusen, J. D. H., Duguid, A., Fass, T.,
Eamus, D., and Palmerston, N. T.: Ecohydrology of sandplain woodlands in
central Australia, Department of Natural Resources, Environment and The Arts,
Northern Territory Government, Darwin, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cook, P. G., Hatton, T. J., Pidsley, D., Herczeg, A. L., Held, A., O'Grady,
A., and Eamus, D.: Water balance of a tropical woodland ecosystem, northern
Australia: a combination of micro-meteorological, soil physical and
groundwater chemical approaches, J. Hydrol. 210, 161–177,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00181-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00181-4</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cordry, K.: HydraSleeve: A new no-purge groundwater sampler for all
contaminants, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Fall Conference,
Monterey, California, USA, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Cowan, I. R. and Farquhar, G. D.: Stomatal function in relation to leaf
metabolism and environment: Stomatal function in the regulation of gas
exchange, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 31, 471–505,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, H.: Isotopic variations in meteoric waters, Science, 133, 1702–1703,
1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Cullen, L. E. and Grierson, P. F.: A stable oxygen, but not carbon, isotope
chronology of <italic>Callitris columellaris</italic> reflects recent climate change
in north-western Australia, Clim. Change, 85, 213–229,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9206-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-006-9206-3</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Donohue, R. J., McVicar, T., and Roderick, M. L.: Climate-related trends in
Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations,
1981–2006, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 1025–1039, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., O'Grady, A. P., and Hutley, L.: Dry season conditions determine
wet season water use in the wet–tropical savannas of northern Australia,
Tree Physiol., 20, 1219–1226, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., Hatton, T., Cook, P., and Colvin, C.: Ecohydrology: vegetation
function, water and resource management, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne,
348 pp., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., Cleverly, J., Boulain, N., Grant, N., Faux, R., and
Villalobos-Vega, R.: Carbon and water fluxes in an arid-zone Acacia savanna
woodland: An analyses of seasonal patterns and responses to rainfall events,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 182, 225–238, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Eamus, D., Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., and Huete, A.:
Groundwater-dependent ecosystems: recent insights from satellite and
field-based studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4229–4256,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4229-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-4229-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Eamus, D., Huete, A., Cleverly, J., Nolan, R. H., Ma, X., Tarin, T., and
Santini, N. S.: Mulga, a major tropical dry open forest of Australia: recent
insights to carbon and water fluxes, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 125011,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ehleringer, J. R. and Cooper, T. A.: Correlation between carbon isotope ratio
and microhabitat in desert plants, Oecologia, 76, 562–566, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Farquhar, G. D. and Sharkey, T. D.: Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis,
Ann. Rev. Plant Physio., 33, 317–345, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, R. O.: An overview of botanical clearing technique, Stain Tech., 50,
99–105, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Grigg, A. M., Lambers, H., and Veneklaas, E. J.: Changes in water relations
for <italic>Acacia ancistrocarpa</italic> on natural and mine-rehabilitation sites in
response to an experimental wetting pulse in the Great Sandy Desert, Plant
Soil, 326, 75–96, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Hacke, U. G., Sperry, J. S., Ewers, B. E., Ellsworth, D. S., Schäfer, K.
V. R., and Oren, R.: Influence of soil porosity on water use in <italic>Pinus taeda,</italic> Oecologia, 124, 495–505, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Howe, P., O'Grady, A. P., Cook, P. G., and Fas, T.: Project REM1 – A
Framework for Assessing Environmental Water Requirements for Groundwater
Dependent Ecosystems Report-2 Field Studies, Land and Water Australia, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>IAEA: Reference Sheet for VSMOW2 and SLAP2 international measurement
standards, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, available at:
<uri>http://nucleus.iaea.org/rpst/document/vsmow2_slap2.pdf</uri> (last access:
April 2018), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ingraham, N. L. and Shadel, C.: A comparison of the toluene distillation and
vacuum/heat methods for extracting soil water for stable isotopic analysis,
J. Hydrol., 140, 371–387, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Karan, M., Liddell, M., Prober, S., Arndt, S., Beringer, J., Boer, M.,
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Grace, P., van Gorsel, E., Hero, J.-M., Hutley, L.,
Macfarlane, C., Metcalfe, D., Meyer, W., Pendall, E., Sebastian, A., and
Wardlaw, T.: The Australian SuperSite Network: a continental, long-term
terrestrial ecosystem observatory, Sci. Total Environ., 568, 1263–1274,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.170" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.170</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Leffler, A. J. and Evans, A. S.: Variation in carbon isotope composition
among years in the riparian tree <italic>Populus fremontii</italic>, Oecologia, 119,
311–319, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Maslin, B. R. and Reid, J. E.: A taxonomic revision of Mulga (<italic>Acacia aneura</italic> and its close relatives: Fabaceae) in Western Australia, Nuytsia, 22,
129–167, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4888?><ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., Eamus, D., Ellsworth, D. S., Prentice, I. C.,
Barton, C. V. M., Crous, K. Y., De Angelis, P., Freeman, M., and Wingate, L.:
Reconciling the optical and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal
conductance, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 2134–2144, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Meinzer, F. C. and Grantz, D. A.: Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in
growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity, Plant
Cell Environ., 13, 383–388, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Miller, J. M., Williams, R. J., and Farquhar, G. D.: Carbon isotope
discrimination by a sequence of <italic>Eucalyptus</italic> species along a
subcontinental rainfall gradient in Australia, Func. Ecol., 15, 222–232,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Morton, S., Smith, D. S., Dickman, C. R., Dunkerley, D., Friedel, M.,
McAllister, R., Reid, J., Roshier, D., Smith, M., and Walsh, F.: A fresh
framework for the ecology of arid Australia, J. Arid Environ., 75, 313–329,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Niinemets, Ü., Portsmuth, A., and Tobias, M.: Leaf size modifies support
biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants,
New Phytol., 171, 91–104, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Niinemets, Ü., Portsmuth, A., Tena, D., Tobias, M., Matesanz, S., and
Valladares, F.: Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant
economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of
leaf physiognomy, Ann. Bot., 100, 283–303, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Niklas, K. J., Cobb, E. D., Niinemets, Ü., Reich, P. B., Sellin, A.,
Shipley, B., and Wright, I. J.: “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of
functional leaf traits across and within species groups, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
104, 8891–8896, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Nolan, R. H., Fairweather, K. A., Tarin, T., Santini, N. S., Cleverly, J.,
Faux, R., and Eamus, D.: Divergence in plant water-use strategies in semiarid
woody species, Funct. Plant Biol., 44, 1134–1146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/FP17079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/FP17079</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>NRETA: The Ti Tree Basin Aquifer. Department of Natural Resources,
Environment and the Arts, Water Resources Branch, Land and Water Division,
available at:
<uri>https://supersites.tern.org.au/images/resource/TiTree_Basin_Groundwater.pdf</uri>
(last access: April 2018), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
NRETAS: Ti Tree Basin Water Resource Report, Department of Natural Resources,
Environment, the Arts and Sport, Natural Resource Management Division, Water
Management Branch Document No. 04/2009A, ISBN:978-1-921519-21-5, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>O'Grady, A. P. and Holland, K.: Review of Australian groundwater discharge
studies of terrestrial systems, CSIRO National Water Commission, Report,
60 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5852dc73abbe4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4225/08/5852dc73abbe4</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Cook, P. G., Howe, P., and Werren, G.: Groundwater use by
dominant tree species in tropical remnant vegetation communities, Aust. J.
Bot., 54, 155–171, 2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>O'Grady, A. P., Eamus, D., Cook, P. G., and Lamontagne, S.: Comparative water
use by the riparian trees <italic>Melaleuca argentea</italic> and <italic>Corymbia bella</italic> in the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia, Tree Phys., 26,
219–228, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Eamus, D., Cook, P. G., and Lamontagne, S.: Groundwater use
by riparian vegetation in the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia, Aust.
J. Bot., 54, 145–154, 2006c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Cook, P. G., Eamus, D., Duguid, A., Wischusen, J. D. H.,
Fass, T., and Worldege, D.: Convergence of tree water use within an arid-zone
woodland, Oecologia, 160, 643–655, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>O'Grady, A. P., Carter, J. L., and Bruce, J.: Can we predict groundwater
discharge from terrestrial ecosystems using existing eco-hydrological
concepts?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3731–3739,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3731-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-15-3731-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pressland, A. J.: Productivity and management of mulga in south-western
Queensland in relation to tree structure and density, Aust. J. Bot., 23,
965–976, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Prior, L. D., Eamus, D., and Duff, G. A.: Seasonal and diurnal patterns of
carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential in
<italic>Eucalyptus tetrodonta</italic> saplings in a wet–dry savanna in northern
Australia, Aust. J. Bot., 45, 241–258, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J. F., Smith, D. M. S., Lambin, E. F., Turner, B., Mortimore, M.,
Batterbury, S. P., Downing, T. E., Dowlatabadi, H., Fernández, R. J., and
Herrick, J. E.: Global desertification: building a science for dryland
development, Science, 316, 847–851, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Rumman, R., Atkin, O. K., Bloomfield, K. J., and Eamus, D.: Variation in
bulk-leaf <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C discrimination, leaf traits and water use efficiency –
trait relationships along a continental-scale climate gradient in Australia,
Glob. Change Biol., 24, 1186–1200, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L. and Frole, K.: Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic
capacity in tropical rain forest trees, Ecology, 87, 483–491, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L. and Holbrook, N. M.: Leaf hydraulics, Ann. Rev. Plant Biol., 57,
361–381, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L. and Scoffoni, C.: Leaf venation: structure, function, development,
evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future, New
Phytol., 198, 983–1000, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L., Cowan, P., Jaikumar, N., and Holbrook, N.: The “hydrology” of
leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species,
Plant Cell Environ., 26, 1343–1356, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Santini, N. S., Cleverly, J., Faux, R., Lestrange, C., Rumman, R., and Eamus,
D.: Xylem traits and water-use efficiency of woody species co-occurring in
the Ti Tree Basin arid zone, Trees, 30, 295–303, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, S., Lamble, R. E., Fensham, R. J., and Siddique, I.: Effect of woody
vegetation clearing on nutrient and carbon relations of semi-arid dystrophic
savanna, Plant Soil, 331, 79–90, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Shanafield, M., Cook, P. G., Gutiérrez-Jurado, H. A., Faux, R., Cleverly,
J., and Eamus, D.: Field comparison of methods for estimating groundwater
discharge by evaporation and evapotranspiration in an arid-zone playa, J.
Hydrol., 527, 1073–1083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.003</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Singer, M. B., Sargean, C. I., Piegay, H., Riquier, J., Wilson, R. J. S., and
Evans, C. N.: Floodplain ecohydrology: Climatic, anthropogenic, and local
physical controls on partitioning of water sources to riparian trees, Water
Resour. Res., 50, 4490–4513, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Sommerville, K. E., Gimeno, T. E., and Ball, M. C.: Primary nerve (vein)
density influences spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic response to
drought in two <italic>Acacia</italic> species, Funct. Plant Biol., 37, 840–848,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Sommerville, K. E., Sack, L., and Ball, M. C.: Hydraulic conductance of
<italic>Acacia</italic> phyllodes (foliage) is driven by primary nerve (vein)
conductance and density, Plant Cell Environ., 35, 158–168, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Sperry, J. S.: Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 104, 13–23, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4889?><ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Stewart, G. R., Turnbull, M., Schmidt, S., and Erskine, P.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
natural abundance in plant communities along a rainfall gradient: a
biological integrator of water availability, Funct. Plant Biol., 22, 51–55,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, D.: Tree, leaf and branch trait coordination along an aridity
gradient, PhD Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, D. S. and Eamus, D.: The influence of predawn leaf water potential on
stomatal responses to atmospheric water content at constant C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and on stem hydraulic conductance and foliar ABA concentrations, J. Exp.
Bot., 50, 243–251, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Thorburn, P. J., Mensforth, L. J., and Walker, G. R.: Reliance of creek-side
river red gums on creek water, Mar. Freshwater Res., 45, 1439–1443, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Uhl, D. and Mosbrugger, V.: Leaf venation density as a climate and
environmental proxy: a critical review and new data, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl.,
149, 15–26, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>UTS library: Application of stable isotope analyses to examine patterns of
water uptake, water use strategies and water use efficiency on contrasting
ecosystems in Australia, available at:
<uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/102763</uri>, last access: August 2018</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Villeneuve, S., Cook, P. G., Shanafield, M., Wood, C., and White, N.:
Groundwater recharge via infiltration through an ephemeral riverbed, central
Australia, J. Arid Environ., 117, 47–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.009</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Warren, C. R., Tausz, M., and Adams, M. A.: Does rainfall explain variation
in leaf morphology and physiology among populations of red ironbark
(<italic>Eucalyptus sideroxylon</italic> subsp. <italic>tricarpa</italic>) grown in a common
garden?, Tree Physiol., 25, 1369–1378, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Werner, C., Schnyder, H., Cuntz, M., Keitel, C., Zeeman, M. J., Dawson, T.
E., Badeck, F.-W., Brugnoli, E., Ghashghaie, J., Grams, T. E. E., Kayler, Z.
E., Lakatos, M., Lee, X., Máguas, C., Ogée, J., Rascher, K. G.,
Siegwolf, R. T. W., Unger, S., Welker, J., Wingate, L., and Gessler, A.:
Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and
water relations across scales, Biogeosciences, 9, 3083–3111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012</ext-link>, 2012. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
West, A. G., Patrickson, S. J., and Ehleringer, J. R.: Water extraction times
for plant and soil materials used in stable isotope analysis, Rapid Comm.
Mass Spec., 20, 1317–1321, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Wright, I. J., Groom, P. K., Lamont, B. B., Poot, P., Prior, L. D., Reich, P.
B., Schulze, E. D., Veneklaas, E. J., and Westoby, M.: Leaf trait
relationships in Australian plant species, Funct. Plant Biol., 31, 551–558,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/fp03212" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/fp03212</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Wright, B. R., Latz, P. K., and Zuur, A. F.: Fire severity mediates seedling
recruitment patterns in slender mulga (<italic>Acacia aptaneura</italic>), a
fire-sensitive Australian desert shrub with heat-stimulated germination,
Plant Ecol., 217, 789–800, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0550-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11258-015-0550-0</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., Zeppel, M., Rumman, R., and
Eamus, D.: The influence of depth-to-groundwater on structure and
productivity of <italic>Eucalyptus</italic> woodlands, Aust. J. Bot., 62, 428–437,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., and Eamus, D.:
Co-ordination among leaf water relations and xylem vulnerability to embolism
of Eucalyptus trees growing along a depth-to-groundwater gradient, Tree
Physiol., 35, 732–743, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv039" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpv039</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Zeppel, M., Cleverly, J., Rumman, R.,
Hingee, M., Boulain, N., Li, Z., Eamus, D., and Tognetti, R.: Transpiration
of <italic>Eucalyptus</italic> woodlands across a natural gradient of
depth-to-groundwater, Tree Physiol., 37, 961–975,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/treephys/tpx024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Speculations on the application of foliar <sup>13</sup>C discrimination to reveal groundwater dependency of vegetation and provide estimates of root depth and rates of groundwater use</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Groundwater-dependent vegetation is globally distributed, having important
ecological, social, and economic value.
Along with the groundwater resources upon which it depends, this vegetation
is under increasing threat through excessive rates of groundwater extraction.</p><p>In this study we examined one shallow-rooted and two deep-rooted tree species
at multiple sites along a naturally occurring gradient in
depth-to-groundwater. We measured (i) stable isotope ratios of leaves
(<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C), xylem, and groundwater (<i>δ</i><sup>2</sup>H and
<i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O); and (ii) leaf-vein density. We established that foliar
discrimination of <sup>13</sup>C (Δ<sup>13</sup>C) is a reliable indicator
of groundwater use by vegetation and can also be used to estimate rooting
depth. Through comparison with a continental-scale assessment of foliar
Δ<sup>13</sup>C, we also estimated the upper limits to annual rates of
groundwater use. We conclude that maximum rooting depth for both deep-rooted
species ranged between 9.4 and 11.2&thinsp;m and that annual rates of groundwater
use ranged from ca. 1400 to 1700&thinsp;mm for <i>Eucalyptus camaldulensis</i>
and from 600 to 900&thinsp;mm for <i>Corymbia opaca</i>. Several predictions
about hydraulic and leaf traits arising from the conclusion that these two
species made extensive use of groundwater were supported by additional
independent studies of these species in central Australia.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, C., Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Baldocchi, D., Law, B. E., Papale, D.,
Soussana, J. F., Ammann, C., Buchmann, N., Frank, D., Gianelle, D., Janssens,
I. A., Knohl, A., Kostner, B., Moors, E., Roupsard, O., Verbeeck, H., Vesala,
T., Williams, C. A., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Temporal and among-site variability
of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level, Global Biogeochem.
Cy., 23, GB2018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003233" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003233</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Benyon, R. G., Theiveyanathan, S., and Doody, T. M.: Impacts of tree
plantations on groundwater in south-eastern Australia, Aust. J. Bot., 54,
181–192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/bt05046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/bt05046</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Box, J. B., Duguid, A., Read, R. E., Kimber, R. G., Knapton, A., Davis, J., and
Bowland, A. E.: Central Australian waterbodies: The importance of permanence
in a desert landscape, J. Arid Environ., 72, 1395–1413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.02.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.02.022</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J., Feild, T. S. and Jordan, G. J.: Leaf maximum photosynthetic
rate and venation are linked by hydraulics, Plant Phys., 144, 1890–1898,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J., Feild, T. S., and Sack, L.: Viewing leaf structure and
evolution from a hydraulic perspective, Funct. Plant Biol., 37, 488-498,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J. and Holbrook, N. M.: Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance
during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical forest, New Phytol., 158,
295–303, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J. and Holbrook, N. M.: Forced depression of leaf hydraulic
conductance in situ: effects on the leaf gas exchange of forest trees, Func.
Ecol., 21, 705–712, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J., Holbrook, N. M., Zwieniecki, M. A., and Palma, B.: Leaf
hydraulic capacity in ferns, conifers and angiosperms: impacts on
photosynthetic maxima, New Phytol., 165, 839–846, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brodribb, T. J. and Jordan, G. J.: Internal coordination between hydraulics and
stomatal control in leaves, Plant Cell Environ., 31, 1557–1564, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bucci, S., Goldstein, G., Meinzer, F., Scholz, F., Franco, A., and Bustamante,
M.: Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of
tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant, Tree Physiol., 24,
891–899, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Budyko, M. I.: Climate and Life, Academic Press, New York, 508 pp., 1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Byrne, M., Yeates, D. K., Joseph, L., Kearney, M., Bowler, J., Williams,
M. A. J., Cooper, S., Donnellan, S. C., Keogh, J. S., and Leys, R.: Birth of a
biome: insights into the assembly and maintenance of the Australian arid zone
biota, Molec. Ecol., 17, 4398–4417, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Calf, G. E., McDonald, P. S., and Jacobson, G.: Recharge mechanism and
groundwater age in the Ti-Tree basin, Northern Territory, Aust. J. Earth
Sci., 38, 299–306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099108727974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/08120099108727974</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Cernusak, L. A., Hutley, L. B., Beringer, J., Holtum, J. A., and Turner, B. L.:
Photosynthetic physiology of eucalypts along a sub-continental rainfall
gradient in northern Australia, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1462–1470,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Clarke, R.: Water: the international crisis, Earthscan, London, UK,
1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J.: Alice Springs Mulga OzFlux site, TERN OzFlux: Australian and
New Zealand Flux Research and Monitoring Network,
hdl:102.100.100/14217, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J.: Ti Tree East OzFlux Site, TERN OzFlux: Australian and New
Zealand Flux Research and Monitoring Network,
hdl:102.100.100/11135, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J., Boulain, N., Villalobos-Vega, R., Grant, N., Faux, R., Wood,
C., Cook, P. G., Yu, Q., Leigh, A., and Eamus, D.: Dynamics of component carbon
fluxes in a semi-arid <i>Acacia</i> woodland, central Australia, J.
Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci., 118, 1168–1185, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Van Gorsel, E., Chen, C., Rumman, R., Luo, Q.,
Coupe, N. R., Li, L., Kljun, N., and Faux, R.: Productivity and
evapotranspiration of two contrasting semiarid ecosystems following the 2011
global carbon land sink anomaly, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 220, 151–159, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Restrepo Coupe, N., Chen, C., Maes, W., Li, L.,
Faux, R., Santini, N. S., Rumman, R., Yu, Q., and Huete, A.: Soil moisture
controls on phenology and productivity in a semi-arid critical zone, Sci. Total Environ.,
568, 1227–1237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.142</a>,
2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G., O'Grady, A. P., Wischusen, J. D. H., Duguid, A., Fass, T.,
Eamus, D., and Palmerston, N. T.: Ecohydrology of sandplain woodlands in
central Australia, Department of Natural Resources, Environment and The Arts,
Northern Territory Government, Darwin, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, P. G., Hatton, T. J., Pidsley, D., Herczeg, A. L., Held, A., O'Grady,
A., and Eamus, D.: Water balance of a tropical woodland ecosystem, northern
Australia: a combination of micro-meteorological, soil physical and
groundwater chemical approaches, J. Hydrol. 210, 161–177,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00181-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00181-4</a>, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cordry, K.: HydraSleeve: A new no-purge groundwater sampler for all
contaminants, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Fall Conference,
Monterey, California, USA, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Cowan, I. R. and Farquhar, G. D.: Stomatal function in relation to leaf
metabolism and environment: Stomatal function in the regulation of gas
exchange, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 31, 471–505,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Craig, H.: Isotopic variations in meteoric waters, Science, 133, 1702–1703,
1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Cullen, L. E. and Grierson, P. F.: A stable oxygen, but not carbon, isotope
chronology of <i>Callitris columellaris</i> reflects recent climate change
in north-western Australia, Clim. Change, 85, 213–229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9206-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9206-3</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Donohue, R. J., McVicar, T., and Roderick, M. L.: Climate-related trends in
Australian vegetation cover as inferred from satellite observations,
1981–2006, Glob. Change Biol., 15, 1025–1039, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., O'Grady, A. P., and Hutley, L.: Dry season conditions determine
wet season water use in the wet–tropical savannas of northern Australia,
Tree Physiol., 20, 1219–1226, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., Hatton, T., Cook, P., and Colvin, C.: Ecohydrology: vegetation
function, water and resource management, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne,
348 pp., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., Cleverly, J., Boulain, N., Grant, N., Faux, R., and
Villalobos-Vega, R.: Carbon and water fluxes in an arid-zone Acacia savanna
woodland: An analyses of seasonal patterns and responses to rainfall events,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 182, 225–238, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., and Huete, A.:
Groundwater-dependent ecosystems: recent insights from satellite and
field-based studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4229–4256,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4229-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4229-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Eamus, D., Huete, A., Cleverly, J., Nolan, R. H., Ma, X., Tarin, T., and
Santini, N. S.: Mulga, a major tropical dry open forest of Australia: recent
insights to carbon and water fluxes, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 125011,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125011</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Ehleringer, J. R. and Cooper, T. A.: Correlation between carbon isotope ratio
and microhabitat in desert plants, Oecologia, 76, 562–566, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Farquhar, G. D. and Sharkey, T. D.: Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis,
Ann. Rev. Plant Physio., 33, 317–345, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, R. O.: An overview of botanical clearing technique, Stain Tech., 50,
99–105, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Grigg, A. M., Lambers, H., and Veneklaas, E. J.: Changes in water relations
for <i>Acacia ancistrocarpa</i> on natural and mine-rehabilitation sites in
response to an experimental wetting pulse in the Great Sandy Desert, Plant
Soil, 326, 75–96, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Hacke, U. G., Sperry, J. S., Ewers, B. E., Ellsworth, D. S., Schäfer, K.
V. R., and Oren, R.: Influence of soil porosity on water use in <i>Pinus
taeda,</i> Oecologia, 124, 495–505, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Howe, P., O'Grady, A. P., Cook, P. G., and Fas, T.: Project REM1 – A
Framework for Assessing Environmental Water Requirements for Groundwater
Dependent Ecosystems Report-2 Field Studies, Land and Water Australia, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
IAEA: Reference Sheet for VSMOW2 and SLAP2 international measurement
standards, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, available at:
<a href="http://nucleus.iaea.org/rpst/document/vsmow2_slap2.pdf" target="_blank">http://nucleus.iaea.org/rpst/document/vsmow2_slap2.pdf</a> (last access:
April 2018), 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ingraham, N. L. and Shadel, C.: A comparison of the toluene distillation and
vacuum/heat methods for extracting soil water for stable isotopic analysis,
J. Hydrol., 140, 371–387, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Karan, M., Liddell, M., Prober, S., Arndt, S., Beringer, J., Boer, M.,
Cleverly, J., Eamus, D., Grace, P., van Gorsel, E., Hero, J.-M., Hutley, L.,
Macfarlane, C., Metcalfe, D., Meyer, W., Pendall, E., Sebastian, A., and
Wardlaw, T.: The Australian SuperSite Network: a continental, long-term
terrestrial ecosystem observatory, Sci. Total Environ., 568, 1263–1274,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.170" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.170</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Leffler, A. J. and Evans, A. S.: Variation in carbon isotope composition
among years in the riparian tree <i>Populus fremontii</i>, Oecologia, 119,
311–319, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Maslin, B. R. and Reid, J. E.: A taxonomic revision of Mulga (<i>Acacia
aneura</i> and its close relatives: Fabaceae) in Western Australia, Nuytsia, 22,
129–167, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., Eamus, D., Ellsworth, D. S., Prentice, I. C.,
Barton, C. V. M., Crous, K. Y., De Angelis, P., Freeman, M., and Wingate, L.:
Reconciling the optical and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal
conductance, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 2134–2144, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Meinzer, F. C. and Grantz, D. A.: Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in
growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity, Plant
Cell Environ., 13, 383–388, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, J. M., Williams, R. J., and Farquhar, G. D.: Carbon isotope
discrimination by a sequence of <i>Eucalyptus</i> species along a
subcontinental rainfall gradient in Australia, Func. Ecol., 15, 222–232,
2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Morton, S., Smith, D. S., Dickman, C. R., Dunkerley, D., Friedel, M.,
McAllister, R., Reid, J., Roshier, D., Smith, M., and Walsh, F.: A fresh
framework for the ecology of arid Australia, J. Arid Environ., 75, 313–329,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Niinemets, Ü., Portsmuth, A., and Tobias, M.: Leaf size modifies support
biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants,
New Phytol., 171, 91–104, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Niinemets, Ü., Portsmuth, A., Tena, D., Tobias, M., Matesanz, S., and
Valladares, F.: Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant
economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of
leaf physiognomy, Ann. Bot., 100, 283–303, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Niklas, K. J., Cobb, E. D., Niinemets, Ü., Reich, P. B., Sellin, A.,
Shipley, B., and Wright, I. J.: “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of
functional leaf traits across and within species groups, P. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
104, 8891–8896, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Nolan, R. H., Fairweather, K. A., Tarin, T., Santini, N. S., Cleverly, J.,
Faux, R., and Eamus, D.: Divergence in plant water-use strategies in semiarid
woody species, Funct. Plant Biol., 44, 1134–1146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/FP17079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/FP17079</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
NRETA: The Ti Tree Basin Aquifer. Department of Natural Resources,
Environment and the Arts, Water Resources Branch, Land and Water Division,
available at:
<a href="https://supersites.tern.org.au/images/resource/TiTree_Basin_Groundwater.pdf" target="_blank">https://supersites.tern.org.au/images/resource/TiTree_Basin_Groundwater.pdf</a>
(last access: April 2018), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
NRETAS: Ti Tree Basin Water Resource Report, Department of Natural Resources,
Environment, the Arts and Sport, Natural Resource Management Division, Water
Management Branch Document No. 04/2009A, ISBN:978-1-921519-21-5, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P. and Holland, K.: Review of Australian groundwater discharge
studies of terrestrial systems, CSIRO National Water Commission, Report,
60 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5852dc73abbe4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5852dc73abbe4</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Cook, P. G., Howe, P., and Werren, G.: Groundwater use by
dominant tree species in tropical remnant vegetation communities, Aust. J.
Bot., 54, 155–171, 2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Eamus, D., Cook, P. G., and Lamontagne, S.: Comparative water
use by the riparian trees <i>Melaleuca argentea</i> and <i>Corymbia
bella</i> in the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia, Tree Phys., 26,
219–228, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Eamus, D., Cook, P. G., and Lamontagne, S.: Groundwater use
by riparian vegetation in the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia, Aust.
J. Bot., 54, 145–154, 2006c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Cook, P. G., Eamus, D., Duguid, A., Wischusen, J. D. H.,
Fass, T., and Worldege, D.: Convergence of tree water use within an arid-zone
woodland, Oecologia, 160, 643–655, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
O'Grady, A. P., Carter, J. L., and Bruce, J.: Can we predict groundwater
discharge from terrestrial ecosystems using existing eco-hydrological
concepts?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3731–3739,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3731-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3731-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pressland, A. J.: Productivity and management of mulga in south-western
Queensland in relation to tree structure and density, Aust. J. Bot., 23,
965–976, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Prior, L. D., Eamus, D., and Duff, G. A.: Seasonal and diurnal patterns of
carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential in
<i>Eucalyptus tetrodonta</i> saplings in a wet–dry savanna in northern
Australia, Aust. J. Bot., 45, 241–258, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Reynolds, J. F., Smith, D. M. S., Lambin, E. F., Turner, B., Mortimore, M.,
Batterbury, S. P., Downing, T. E., Dowlatabadi, H., Fernández, R. J., and
Herrick, J. E.: Global desertification: building a science for dryland
development, Science, 316, 847–851, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Rumman, R., Atkin, O. K., Bloomfield, K. J., and Eamus, D.: Variation in
bulk-leaf <sup>13</sup>C discrimination, leaf traits and water use efficiency –
trait relationships along a continental-scale climate gradient in Australia,
Glob. Change Biol., 24, 1186–1200, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L. and Frole, K.: Leaf structural diversity is related to hydraulic
capacity in tropical rain forest trees, Ecology, 87, 483–491, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L. and Holbrook, N. M.: Leaf hydraulics, Ann. Rev. Plant Biol., 57,
361–381, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L. and Scoffoni, C.: Leaf venation: structure, function, development,
evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future, New
Phytol., 198, 983–1000, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Sack, L., Cowan, P., Jaikumar, N., and Holbrook, N.: The “hydrology” of
leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species,
Plant Cell Environ., 26, 1343–1356, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Santini, N. S., Cleverly, J., Faux, R., Lestrange, C., Rumman, R., and Eamus,
D.: Xylem traits and water-use efficiency of woody species co-occurring in
the Ti Tree Basin arid zone, Trees, 30, 295–303, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, S., Lamble, R. E., Fensham, R. J., and Siddique, I.: Effect of woody
vegetation clearing on nutrient and carbon relations of semi-arid dystrophic
savanna, Plant Soil, 331, 79–90, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Shanafield, M., Cook, P. G., Gutiérrez-Jurado, H. A., Faux, R., Cleverly,
J., and Eamus, D.: Field comparison of methods for estimating groundwater
discharge by evaporation and evapotranspiration in an arid-zone playa, J.
Hydrol., 527, 1073–1083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.003</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Singer, M. B., Sargean, C. I., Piegay, H., Riquier, J., Wilson, R. J. S., and
Evans, C. N.: Floodplain ecohydrology: Climatic, anthropogenic, and local
physical controls on partitioning of water sources to riparian trees, Water
Resour. Res., 50, 4490–4513, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sommerville, K. E., Gimeno, T. E., and Ball, M. C.: Primary nerve (vein)
density influences spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic response to
drought in two <i>Acacia</i> species, Funct. Plant Biol., 37, 840–848,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Sommerville, K. E., Sack, L., and Ball, M. C.: Hydraulic conductance of
<i>Acacia</i> phyllodes (foliage) is driven by primary nerve (vein)
conductance and density, Plant Cell Environ., 35, 158–168, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Sperry, J. S.: Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 104, 13–23, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Stewart, G. R., Turnbull, M., Schmidt, S., and Erskine, P.: <sup>13</sup>C
natural abundance in plant communities along a rainfall gradient: a
biological integrator of water availability, Funct. Plant Biol., 22, 51–55,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Taylor, D.: Tree, leaf and branch trait coordination along an aridity
gradient, PhD Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, D. S. and Eamus, D.: The influence of predawn leaf water potential on
stomatal responses to atmospheric water content at constant C<sub>i</sub>
and on stem hydraulic conductance and foliar ABA concentrations, J. Exp.
Bot., 50, 243–251, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Thorburn, P. J., Mensforth, L. J., and Walker, G. R.: Reliance of creek-side
river red gums on creek water, Mar. Freshwater Res., 45, 1439–1443, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Uhl, D. and Mosbrugger, V.: Leaf venation density as a climate and
environmental proxy: a critical review and new data, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl.,
149, 15–26, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
UTS library: Application of stable isotope analyses to examine patterns of
water uptake, water use strategies and water use efficiency on contrasting
ecosystems in Australia, available at:
<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/102763" target="_blank">http://hdl.handle.net/10453/102763</a>, last access: August 2018
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Villeneuve, S., Cook, P. G., Shanafield, M., Wood, C., and White, N.:
Groundwater recharge via infiltration through an ephemeral riverbed, central
Australia, J. Arid Environ., 117, 47–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.009</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, C. R., Tausz, M., and Adams, M. A.: Does rainfall explain variation
in leaf morphology and physiology among populations of red ironbark
(<i>Eucalyptus sideroxylon</i> subsp. <i>tricarpa</i>) grown in a common
garden?, Tree Physiol., 25, 1369–1378, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Werner, C., Schnyder, H., Cuntz, M., Keitel, C., Zeeman, M. J., Dawson, T.
E., Badeck, F.-W., Brugnoli, E., Ghashghaie, J., Grams, T. E. E., Kayler, Z.
E., Lakatos, M., Lee, X., Máguas, C., Ogée, J., Rascher, K. G.,
Siegwolf, R. T. W., Unger, S., Welker, J., Wingate, L., and Gessler, A.:
Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and
water relations across scales, Biogeosciences, 9, 3083–3111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3083-2012</a>, 2012. 
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
West, A. G., Patrickson, S. J., and Ehleringer, J. R.: Water extraction times
for plant and soil materials used in stable isotope analysis, Rapid Comm.
Mass Spec., 20, 1317–1321, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, I. J., Groom, P. K., Lamont, B. B., Poot, P., Prior, L. D., Reich, P.
B., Schulze, E. D., Veneklaas, E. J., and Westoby, M.: Leaf trait
relationships in Australian plant species, Funct. Plant Biol., 31, 551–558,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/fp03212" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/fp03212</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Wright, B. R., Latz, P. K., and Zuur, A. F.: Fire severity mediates seedling
recruitment patterns in slender mulga (<i>Acacia aptaneura</i>), a
fire-sensitive Australian desert shrub with heat-stimulated germination,
Plant Ecol., 217, 789–800, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0550-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-015-0550-0</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., Zeppel, M., Rumman, R., and
Eamus, D.: The influence of depth-to-groundwater on structure and
productivity of <i>Eucalyptus</i> woodlands, Aust. J. Bot., 62, 428–437,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Cleverly, J., and Eamus, D.:
Co-ordination among leaf water relations and xylem vulnerability to embolism
of Eucalyptus trees growing along a depth-to-groundwater gradient, Tree
Physiol., 35, 732–743, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv039</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Zolfaghar, S., Villalobos-Vega, R., Zeppel, M., Cleverly, J., Rumman, R.,
Hingee, M., Boulain, N., Li, Z., Eamus, D., and Tognetti, R.: Transpiration
of <i>Eucalyptus</i> woodlands across a natural gradient of
depth-to-groundwater, Tree Physiol., 37, 961–975,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx024</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
