<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-21-3417-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Temporal variations of groundwater tables and implications for submarine
groundwater discharge: a 3-decade case study<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in central Japan</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{A 3-decade case study in central Japan}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B. Zhang
et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Bing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-3107</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
          <email>jzhang@sci.u-toyama.ac.jp</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yoshida</surname><given-names>Takafumi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Northwest Pacific Region Environmental Cooperation Center, 930-0856,
Toyama, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Earth and Environmental System, Graduate School of Science and
Engineering, University of Toyama, 930-8555,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Toyama, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Tianjin Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Tianjin
Normal University, 300387, Tianjin, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jing Zhang (jzhang@sci.u-toyama.ac.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>3417</fpage><lpage>3425</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Fresh submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is the key pathway of flux and
nutrients for the groundwater from land to the ocean. SGD flux is a current
issue of discussion and a means to clarify the coastal marine system under
climate change. SGD flux accounts for about one-quarter of the river runoff
in the Katakai alluvial fan in Uozu, Toyama, Japan, which is an ideal area to
study SGD flux considering the need for a rapid response to climate change
and the prior research on SGD there. In this paper, the monthly groundwater
table's condition over 30 years is analyzed using monthly rainfall, snowfall,
and the climate change index. Rainfall has been on an upward trend, but the
snowfall has decreased over 40 years. Furthermore, the groundwater table at
monitoring wells in the coastal area increased, as a result of the increased
rainfall. However, the relationship between snowfall and groundwater is
negative. As expected by Darcy's law, SGD flux was controlled by the
hydraulic gradient of the coastal groundwater. The estimated historic SGD
flux by groundwater table variation shows an upward trend of SGD. Considering
the increase in precipitation and the groundwater table, SGD flux may
increase under climate change.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Fresh submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is the direct flow of groundwater
into the ocean. The groundwater flows down a gradient, and SGD occurs
wherever a coastal aquifer is connected to the sea (Chen et al., 2005; Zhang
and Mandal, 2012). SGD has been recognized as not only an important source of
freshwater discharge into the ocean, but also a valuable component of the
hydrological cycle between the terrestrial groundwater system and the marine
environment (Church, 1996; Taniguchi et al., 2002; Hatta and Zhang, 2013; Liu
et al., 2014). The estimation of global SGD varies from 0.2 to 10 % of
the river flow (Burnnet et al., 2001). SGD may be both volumetrically and
chemically important to coastal water and chemical budgets (Taniguchi et al.,
2002). Thus, an accurate estimate of SGD flux is essential to predict future
coastal environments under climate change conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Locations of groundwater wells in the Katakai River alluvial fan.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Toyama Bay is an ideal site to study SGD because it is easily accessible and
has been studied in previous reports on several SGD sites off the coastal
area (Fujii et al., 1986; Zhang and Satake, 2003; Nakaguchi et al., 2005;
Hatta and Zhang, 2013). The SGD flow rates in the Katakai alluvial fan
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 680 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Zhang et al., 2005) are greater than most of
those reported worldwide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 454 m yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Taniguchi et al., 2002).
The seepage water collected off Uozu is the potential type, which is the flow
of the groundwater controlled by the potential of the spring in terms of
conversion points of the geomorphologic gradient (Zhang and Satake, 2003).
The source of the freshwater is the precipitation in the Toyama region.
Furthermore, this area has shown a rapid response to climate change, with a
recent reduction in the year-round snow extent on the top of nearby
mountains, which is shown here to affect SGD flux into the coastal
environment (Hatta and Zhang, 2013).</p>
      <p>Groundwater is the linkage between precipitation and SGD. In this paper, we
describe the temporal variations in the monthly groundwater table, rainfall,
and snow from 1985 to 2015. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between
rainfall, snowfall, and El Niño and La Niña events. The relation
between SGD flux and the groundwater table was also studied. Finally, we
discuss the impact of climate change on rainfall, the coastal groundwater
system, and SGD.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Study area</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study site description</title>
      <p>Toyama Bay, a semi-enclosed bay in central Japan, connects to the Sea of
Japan at its northern boundary. There is buried forest and submarine
groundwater seepage off Uozu, on the eastern side of Toyama Bay (Zhang and
Satake, 2003). The Katakai River alluvial fan is located at Uozu, Toyama
prefecture (Fig. 1). The SGD area of the Katakai River alluvial fan occurs
150–200 m seaward of the coastline at water depths of 8 and 22 m. The
average fluxes were 0.8–1.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 8 m and
0.5–0.8 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 22 m from April to December 2003 (Zhang
et al., 2005).</p>
      <p>The Katakai River alluvial fan is a coastal well-watered fan into which the
Katakai River is deposited. The total area of the Katakai River catchment is
169 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The length of the main river is 27 km from the water source
in the Kekachi Mountains (2414 m). The average slope of the Katakai River
bed is 8.5 %, which is the most steeply sloped river of the seven rivers
in Japan. The average flux of the Katakai River is 10.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Annual precipitation is 2500 mm in Uozu, and it is about 4000 mm in the
mountainous area. The annual average temperature is 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The
annual potential evapotranspiration is 765 mm.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Description of groundwater monitoring wells.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Well</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Screen</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Data</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Groundwater</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Linear regression<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">period</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">table (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">m–m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(years)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shinkanaya</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72–94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shinkanaya</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">17–28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kichijima</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25–36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">171.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Higashiosaki</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">42.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9–20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kyoden</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56–67, 78–89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1985–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rokuromaru</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27–33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2004–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">42.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">780.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rokuromaru</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64–75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2004–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">683.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kitaonie</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">59–71</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2002–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Linear regression between groundwater table (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and month (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Hydrogeology setting</title>
      <p>The groundwater head at the top of the alluvial fan is about 120 m (Fig. 1).
The groundwater head gradient is high, due to the slope topography. The
aquifer of the Katakai River fan is gravel and sand sediments. There are four
ancient river courses in the central fan. The hydrogeological setting of Uozu
consists of three layers. Layer A (top layer) is alluvium at the Holocene,
consisting of gravel, sand, and clay layers. The thickness of layer A from
the hill area to the coastal fan area is from 20 to about 100 m,
respectively. Layer B (middle layer) is the deposit of the dissected fan at
the late and middle Pleistocene, including gravel, sand, and clay layers. The
thickness of layer B in the fan area is about 80 m. Layer C (bottom layer)
is the deposit of the dissected fan at the early Pleistocene. The bedrock is
sandstone and mudstone (Kokusai Kogyo Co. Ltd., 2002). There are artesian
wells along the coastal area, due to the existence of clay layers in the sand
aquifer.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Data source</title>
      <p>The groundwater table monitoring data (from 1985 to 2015) were obtained from
the Water Information Database, Uozu, Toyama Prefecture, Japan. The
precipitation data (from 1976 to 2015) and historical El Niño/La Niña
events were obtained from the website of the Japan Meteorological Agency
(<uri>http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/index.html</uri>). The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI)
was from the Center for Weather and Climate Prediction (CPC), National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce.
The ONI values are calculated by the monthly Niño 3.4 index. The
statistical characteristics and linear regression of the monthly groundwater
table, rainfall and snowfall were analyzed by SPSS software.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Analytical methods</title>
      <p>Wavelet transforms are a very powerful tool in which to analyze
non-stationary signals. It allows for the identification of the main
periodicity in a time series and the evolution at the time of each frequency
(Liang et al., 2011). The cross wavelet transform is used to examine
relationships in time frequency space between two time series (Labat, 2010).
Phase angle statistics can be used to gain confidence in causal
relationships between the time series (Grinsted et al., 2004; Zhang and
Wang, 2016).</p>
      <p>The methods of continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and cross wavelet transform
(XWT) provide the basis for wavelet coherence analysis (Grinsted et al.,
2004). The wavelet coherence (WTC) of two time series was defined as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a smoothing operator. The wavelet coherence is a localized
correlation coefficient in time frequency space (Grinsted et al., 2004). The
arrows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>←</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> in the WTC figures indicate the positive and
negative relationships between two time series, respectively. Meanwhile, the
arrows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> show that time series 1 is a one-quarter
period earlier and later, respectively, than time series 2 (Zhang and Wang,
2016).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Monthly groundwater table, rainfall, and snowfall from 1985 to
2014 <bold>(a)</bold>, and from 2010 to 2014 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Groundwater table variation</title>
      <p>There are six groundwater monitoring sites, including eight monitoring wells
in the Katakai River alluvial fan (Table 1). The average groundwater table
decreased from the mountain area to the coastal plain area; the groundwater
table of Rokuromaru is the highest, with average values of 42.72 and
40.96 m, respectively. The groundwater of Kichijima (24.96 m) is the second
highest, followed by that of Higashiosaki (19.77 m). The groundwater tables
of Shinkanaya and Kyoden are about 10 m. The groundwater level of Kitaonie,
which is the nearest to Toyama Bay, is the lowest (6.83 m). The range
variations of Rokuromaru and Kichijima are the largest, while that of Kyoden
is the smallest. The standard deviation of shallow groundwater is larger than
the deep groundwater at the same site.</p>
      <p>The groundwater table trends of the monitoring wells are similar (Fig. 2).
Linear regression was applied to analyze the trends of the groundwater
variation. The standardized coefficients of most groundwater wells are
significantly positive, indicating an increase in groundwater table
(Table 1). However, the groundwater table of Kichijima may decline, since the
standardized coefficient is significantly negative.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Description and prediction of rainfall, snow, and the water budget.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">Average (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD)  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col8" align="center">Water budget<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center" colsep="1">mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col8" align="center">10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Rainfall</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Snowfall</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Precipitation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Evapotranspiration</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">River runoff</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Groundwater usages</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SGD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1976–1996</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2311 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 616</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4492 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2629</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1997–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2652 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3282 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1346</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1976–2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2473 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 516</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3850 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2110</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2010–2030</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2949 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2573 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 987</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.73</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2030–2050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3147 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 695</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">970 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 387</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Water budget is calculated by percentage of
evapotranspiration (24 %), river runoff (60 %), groundwater usages
(4 %), and submarine groundwater discharge (SGD, 12 %) to
precipitation from 1976 to 2015 in Uozu.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Rainfall and snowfall variations</title>
      <p>The average rainfall and snowfall in Uozu were 2473 mm and 385 cm,
respectively, from 1976 to 2015 (Table 2). However, rainfall increased while
snowfall decreased during these years. Rain increased by 14.76 % and
snowfall decreased by 26.94 % over the past 20 years, compared to the
20 years from 1976 to 1996. The linear regression of annual rainfall is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.322</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34088.74</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating increased rainfall in the
future. However, the annual snowfall amount decreased, with a linear
regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.712</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13792.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Furthermore, the percentage
of snow in total precipitation was 19.44 % from 1976 to 1996, and this
declined to 12.38 % from 1997 to 2015.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Relationship between rainfall, snowfall, and groundwater</title>
      <p>The groundwater table in summer (June to August) is the highest, while the
groundwater table in early spring (March to May) is the lowest (Fig. 2a, b).
The groundwater table declined sharply during winter, especially after
snowfall. The groundwater table is the lowest 1 or 2 months after the end of
snowfall. Comparing the peaks of rainfall and the groundwater table, the
rainfall in August 2010 was the largest, and the highest groundwater table
occurred 2 months later. The groundwater table also increased to its peak 2
months after the peak rainfall in December 2012 and August 2013 (Fig. 2b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Squared wavelet coherence between rainfall and groundwater
table <bold>(a)</bold>, snowfall and groundwater table <bold>(b)</bold>, rainfall and
the ONI <bold>(c)</bold>, and snowfall and the ONI <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The relationships among rainfall, snowfall, and groundwater table were
analyzed by wavelet coherence. Taking the Shinkanaya (30 m) monitoring well
as an example, the relationship between groundwater table and rainfall was
positive from 1990 to 2010, with a period of 2–4 years (Fig. 3a), while the
groundwater lagged behind by about a quarter year from 1985 to 1995, 1998 to
2002, and 2003 to 2015, with a 1-year period. However, the groundwater table
is negatively correlated with snowfall from 1985 to 2015, with a 1-year
period (Fig. 3b). This result coincides with that in Fig. 2b. The groundwater
table decreased when snowfall began in winter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Relationships among rainfall, snowfall, and climate change index</title>
      <p>Wavelet coherence was used to analyze the relationships among rainfall,
snowfall, and climate change index (ONI). The relationship between rainfall
and ONI is significantly negative in 1- and 3–5-year periods (Fig. 3c),
indicating that the La Niña events may increase rainfall. The climate
change index was about a quarter year earlier than snowfall beginning in a
0.5-year period (Fig. 3d). The climate change index, associated with El
Niño and La Niña events, significantly influences rainfall and
snowfall.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>For the analysis of the relationship between climate change and rainfall,
snowfall is the basis used to determine the impact of climate change on
groundwater. We used the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) to estimate the
climate changes associated with the El Niño and La Niña events.</p>
      <p>There were six El Niño and six La Niña events from 1985 to 2015
(Fig. 4). The seasonal rainfall and snowfall during El Niño events were
642 mm and 155 cm, and those during La Niña events were 635 mm and
157 cm, respectively. The ratios of snowfall and rainfall during El Niño
and La Niña events were 1.17 and 1.39, respectively. The most extreme El
Niño event was from spring 1997 to spring 1998 (ONI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3). The most
extreme La Niña events occurred during spring 1988 to spring 1989
(ONI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.7). The La Niña events may have caused more snowfall and
more extreme monthly snowfall than El Niño.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Relationship between groundwater and SGD</title>
      <p>The submarine groundwater discharge off Uozu is controlled by the potential
of the geomorphologic gradient (Zhang and Satake, 2003). Darcy's law
describes the water flow through a porous medium (sand). The groundwater
aquifer in Uozu is sand. Thus, according to Darcy's law, the groundwater flow
rate is correlated with the hydraulic gradient (Mulligan and Charette, 2006).
The SGD flux is positive for the groundwater table. Using the monitoring SGD
flux over April to August 2003 (Zhang et al., 2005), we established the
relationship between monthly SGD flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, m month<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and groundwater
variation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, m month<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the summarized daily groundwater table variation (daily
groundwater table above 5.5 m).

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>For SGD flux at</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.819</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtext>For SGD flux at</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.819</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The monthly SGD flux may be estimated according to the monthly groundwater
table variation. Then, the annual SGD flux can be calculated based on the
monthly SGD flux. The estimated SGD flux off the Katakai River alluvial fan
is shown in Fig. 5. The estimated data show that the SGD flux is dominated by
the groundwater table variation. Furthermore, SGD flux increased as a
consequence of the groundwater table increasing. The SGD flux we estimated is
8 and 22 m off Uozu. However, the fresh SGD flux at 40–100 m is about 2 to
4 times 0–40 m (Hatta and Zhang, 2013). Compared to the results of the
water budget (Table 2), the fresh SGD may be underestimated. However, since
the groundwater table is easy to determine, the fresh SGD flux could be
estimated by Eqs. (2) and (3) in the coastal sand aquifer.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Rainfall (P), snowfall (Snow), Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), and El
Niño and La Niña events.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Impact of climate change on rainfall</title>
      <p>The annual precipitation at Uozu, Toyama prefecture, is about 2500 mm, and
it is in an increasing trend. The precipitation is 1.52 times the mean
precipitation (1634 mm) in Japan (Xu et al., 2003). This high precipitation
is caused by high seawater temperature, which is maintained by the warm
Tsushima current moving at 2.6 million m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the southwest
to the northeast along the Japan Sea coast (Zhang and Satake, 2003). The cold
northwesterly wind gathers much water vapor from the Sea of Japan, bringing
heavy snow to the Sea of Japan side (Kawase et al., 2013). Furthermore, the
precipitation patterns are dominated by shifts as sea-surface temperatures
change, e.g., El Niño and La Niña (Trenberth, 2011). Climate
change, with warming conditions and increased moisture, may produce more
intense precipitation events. More precipitation occurs as rain instead of
snow, and snow melts earlier (Emori, 2005; Trenberth, 2011; Fischer and
Knutti, 2015). The impact of climate change on precipitation is changing the
precipitation amount and type, causing an increase in precipitation (about
0.1 to 24.5 mm decade<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Wang et al., 2017) and a decrease in snow at
Toyama. The annual precipitation may increase to about 3000 mm by 2030; and
annual snowfall will decrease to less than 1000 mm by 2050 (Table 2).
Moreover, the El Niño and La Niña events influence regional anomalous
circulation features (Leung et al., 2017) and the frequency of extreme
precipitation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Estimated SGD flux by groundwater table.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3417/2017/hess-21-3417-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Implication for coastal groundwater systems</title>
      <p>The groundwater table variation is not only determined by precipitation, but
also by human activities. The utilization of snowmelt for groundwater may
cause the lowest groundwater table in winter at Uozu (Kokusai Kogyo Co. Ltd.,
2002). Moreover, climate change in combination with increased anthropogenic
activities will affect coastal groundwater systems (Oude Essink et al.,
2010). In a warmer world, less winter precipitation falls as snow, and the
melting of winter snow occurs earlier in spring. Meanwhile, much of the
winter runoff will immediately be lost to the oceans (Barnett et al., 2005).
Furthermore, the groundwater extraction may cause groundwater depletion. The
contribution of groundwater depletion to global sea-level rise amounted to
0.27 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2000 (Wada et al., 2016). The impact of groundwater
extraction on coastal aquifers was more significant than the impact of
sea-level rise on groundwater recharge (Ferguson and Gleeson, 2012). Due to
the increased precipitation, the groundwater recharge amount increased in
Uozu. With snowfall decreasing, the portion of groundwater provided by
snowmelt may decline. Furthermore, the El Niño and La Niña events
change the groundwater table pattern. The El Niño events increase the
groundwater table in winter, while the La Niña events increase the
groundwater table sharply in summer (Fig. 2). Under climate change and the
influence of human activities (Han et al., 2016), the groundwater table may
increase with an irregular pattern in the future.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Implication for submarine groundwater discharge</title>
      <p>According to the terrestrial water budget, an estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of groundwater discharged from the continental
shelf into Toyama Bay as fresh submarine groundwater discharge (Ito and Fuji,
1993; Zhang and Satake, 2003). The estimated submarine groundwater discharge
is approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is 20 % of
the river's outflow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Uozu (Kokusai
Kogyo Co. Ltd., 2002) (Table 2). However, the precipitation varies under
climate change, because the ratio of rainfall and snow would increase.
Furthermore, the variations of meteorological parameters, e.g., temperature
and humidity, may cause the changes in evapotranspiration (Cong et al., 2009;
Shimizu et al., 2015), as well as river runoff and groundwater discharge in
the water budget. Thus, the uncertainty of percentage of evapotranspiration,
river runoff, and groundwater discharge in the total water budget may exist.</p>
      <p>SGD is one of the indicators that reflect the effects of climate change on
the marine ecosystem. It has been reported that the SGD–sea level
correlation was high (Taniguchi and Iwakawa, 2004). However, the increased
head in the groundwater system at the coast can be easily produced, due to
the highly permeable Holocene and Pleistocene layers (Kokusai Kogyo Co. Ltd.,
2002; Oude Essink et al., 2010). The average concentration of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
fresh SGD (0.69 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is larger than riverine input
(0.18 mg L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Hatta and Zhang, 2013). The estimated SGD flux is
described in Table 2 and Fig. 5. The SGD flux increases over 3 decades; the
dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) flux in the SGD to
Toyama Bay may increase. Thus, the submarine groundwater discharge is a
significant source of nutrition, more than river water, to the coastal marine
ecosystem of Toyama Bay (Zhang and Satake, 2003; Lee et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>Moreover, SGD flux may affect the availability of planktonic food for fish
larvae. Fish production appears to be controlled by the climatic factors
governing the processes in upwelling systems (Walther et al., 2002). Due to
the increased precipitation and groundwater table, SGD flux may increase
under climate change in the future. However, the annual SGD flux may be
around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> by 2030 and
2050, respectively (Table 2), as a result of the increase in the groundwater
table (Table 3). The increased amount of SGD is less than river runoff, since
most increased precipitation changes into river runoff to the ocean.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Groundwater table, rainfall, and snowfall datasets from 1985 to 2015 were
collected to analyze their variations. The relationships among groundwater
table, rainfall, snow, and climate change events were analyzed by wavelet
coherence to discuss the implications for climate change. The results are
summarized as follows.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p>The groundwater table is the highest in summer and the lowest
in spring. The average groundwater table decreased from the mountainous area
to the coastal plain area. Linear regression reflected the increase in the
groundwater table in almost all monitoring wells. Rainfall increased and
snowfall declined over 40 years.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>The relationship between the groundwater table and rainfall is positive.
The groundwater tables increased to the peak 1 to 2 months after the peak
rainfall. The groundwater table is negatively correlated with snowfall. The
climate change index associated with El Niño and La Niña events,
especially La Niña, may cause extreme rainfall and snowfall.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p>SGD flux was controlled by the hydraulic gradient of the coastal
groundwater. The linear regression between SGD flux and the groundwater table
was established. The historic SGD flux was estimated by groundwater table
variation. The upward trend of the precipitation and groundwater table may
indicate an increase in SGD flux, although with some uncertainty.</p></list-item></list>
This study demonstrates that groundwater is the linkage between climate
change and submarine groundwater discharge with long time datasets. Due to
increases in precipitation and the groundwater table, the flux of submarine
groundwater discharge will increase under climate change. In addition, the
quality of submarine groundwater discharge should be clarified under climate
change conditions worldwide in the future.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The groundwater table data are available in the Annual
Groundwater Report
(<uri>http://www.pref.toyama.jp/cms_sec/1706/kj00000960.html</uri>, last access:
3 July 2017). The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) is shown on the website
(<uri>http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ensoyears.shtml</uri>,
last access: 3 July 2017). The detailed data source is explained in
Sect. 3.1.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on
Innovative Areas grant (25110505 and 15H00973), the JSPS KAKENHI grants
(JP26241009), and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund
(S-13) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Ying Fan<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous
referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a
warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438,
303–309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature04141</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Burnnet, W. C., Taniguchi, M., and Oberdorfer, J.: Measurement and
significance of the direct discharge of groundwater into the coastal zone, J.
Sea Res., 46, 109–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00075-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00075-2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A., Zhang, J., Peng, T.-R., and Hagiwara, T.: Exploratory
Sampling of Submarine Groundwater Discharge in Taiwan,
Chikyukagaku(Geochemistry), 39, 165–171, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Church, C. M.: An underground route for the water cycle, Nature, 380,
579–580, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/380579a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/380579a0</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cong, Z. T., Yang, D. W., and Ni, G. H.: Does evaporation paradox exist in
China?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 357–366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-357-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-13-357-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Emori, S.: Dynamic and thermodynamic changes in mean and extreme
precipitation under changed climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17706,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023272" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023272</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Ferguson, G. and Gleeson, T.: Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to
groundwater use and climate change, Nature Climate Change, 2, 342–345,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1413" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1413</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, E. M. and Knutti, R.: Anthropogenic contribution to global
occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes, Nature Clim.
Change, 5, 560–564, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2617" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2617</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fujii, S., Nasu, N., Smith, A. J., Fuji, N., Mizutani, Y., Shimakura, M.,
Konishi, K., Igarashi, C., Muramoto, J., Takemura, T., Shimoda, T., Boggs,
S., Jr., Fujioka, K., Mappa, H., Kawahata, H., Kong, Y. S., and Tanaka, T.:
Submerged forest off Nyuzen, Kurobegawa alluvial fan, Toyama Bay, Central
Japan, Boreas, 15, 265–277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1986.tb00931.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1502-3885.1986.tb00931.x</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross
wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series, Nonlin.
Processes Geophys., 11, 561–566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Han, D., Song, X., and Currell, M. J.: Identification of anthropogenic and
natural inputs of sulfate into a karstic coastal groundwater system in
northeast China: evidence from major ions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DIC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1983–1999,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1983-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-1983-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Hatta, M. and Zhang, J.: Temporal changes and impacts of submarine fresh
groundwater discharge to the coastal environment: A decadal case study in
Toyama Bay, Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 2610–2622,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrc.20184</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Fuji, S.: Water budget of groundwater in Toyama basin, Mem.
Toyama Geogr. Soc., 10, 3–14, 1993 (in Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kawase, H., Hara, M., Yoshikane, T., Ishizaki, N. N., Uno, F., Hatsushika,
H., and Kimura, F.: Altitude dependency of future snow cover changes over
Central Japan evaluated by a regional climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 12444–12457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD020429</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kokusai Kogyo Co. LTD: Report on the groundwater appropriate utilization in
Uozu, Uozu, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Labat, D.: Cross wavelet analyses of annual continental freshwater discharge
and selected climate indices, J. Hydrology, 385, 269–278,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.029</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lee, Y.-W., Kim, G., Lim, W.-A., and Hwang, D.-W.: A relationship between
submarine groundwater borne nutrients traced by Ra isotopes and the intensity
of dinoflagellate red-tides occurring in the southern sea of Korea, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 55, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0001</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Leung, M. Y.-T., Cheung, H. H. N., and Zhou, W.: Meridional displacement of
the East Asian trough and its response to the ENSO forcing, Clim. Dynam., 48,
335–352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3077-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-016-3077-8</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Liang, L., Li, L., and Liu, Q.: Precipitation variability in Northeast China
from 1961 to 2008, J. Hydrol., 404, 67–76,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.020</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Q., Charette, M. A., Henderson, P. B., McCorkle, D. C., Martin, W., and
Dai, M.: Effect of submarine groundwater discharge on the coastal ocean
inorganic carbon cycle, Limnol. Oceanogr., 59, 1529–1554,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1529" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1529</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Mulligan, A. E. and Charette, M. A.: Intercomparison of submarine groundwater
discharge estimates from a sandy unconfined aquifer, J. Hydrol., 327,
411–425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.056</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Nakaguchi, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Yamada, H., Zhang, J., Suzuki, M., Koyama, Y.,
and Hayashi, K.: Characterization and origin of chemical components in the
submarine groundwater discharge in Toyama Bay, Geochemistry, 39, 119–130,
2005 (in Japanese with English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Oude Essink, G. H. P., van Baaren, E. S., and de Louw, P. G. B.: Effects of
climate change on coastal groundwater systems: A modeling study in the
Netherlands, Water Resour. Res., 46, W00F04, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009WR008719</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Shimizu, T., Kumagai, T. O., Kobayashi, M., Tamai, K., Iida, S. I., Kabeya,
N., Ikawa, R., Tateishi, M., Miyazawa, Y., and Shimizu, A.: Estimation of
annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in
Japan (2): Comparison of eddy covariance, water budget and sap-flow plus
interception loss, J. Hydrol., 522, 250–264, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Taniguchi, M. and Iwakawa, H.: Submarine groundwater discharge in Osaka Bay,
Japan, Limnology, 5, 25–32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-003-0112-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10201-003-0112-3</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Taniguchi, M., Burnett, W. C., Cable, J. E., and Turner, J. V.: Investigation
of submarine groundwater discharge, Hydrol. Process., 16, 2115–2129,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.1145</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E.: Changes in precipitation with climate change, Clim. Res.,
47, 123–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/cr00953</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Wada, Y., Lo, M.-H., Yeh, P. J. F., Reager, J. T., Famiglietti, J. S., Wu,
R.-J., and Tseng, Y.-H.: Fate of water pumped from underground and
contributions to sea-level rise, Nature Clim. Change, 6, 777–780,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate3001</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J.
C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., and Bairlein, F.: Ecological
responses to recent climate change, Nature, 416, 389–395, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Wu, Z., He, H., Wang, F., Du, H., and Zong, S.: Changes in summer
extreme precipitation in Northeast Asia and their relationships with the East
Asian summer monsoon during 1961–2009, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 25–35,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.4683</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Z. X., Takeuchia, K., and Ishidaira, H.: Monotonic trend and step changes
in Japanese precipitation, J. Hydrol., 279, 144–150,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00178-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00178-1</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B. and Wang, Z.-L.: Trend and multi-time scale cross-wavelet analysis
on precipitation and temperature in Tianjin area, Journal of Tianjin Normal
University (Natural Science Edition), 36, 32–39, 2016 (in Chinese with
English abstract).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. and Mandal, A. K.: Linkages between submarine groundwater systems
and the environment, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4,
219–226, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cosust.2012.03.006</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. and Satake, H.: Chemical characteristics of submarine groundwater
seepage in Toyama Bay, Central Japan, Land and Marine Hydrogeology, edited
by: Taniguchi, M., Wang, K., and Gamo, T., Elsevier, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands, 2003.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J., Hagiwara, T., Koyama, Y., Satake, H., Nakamura, T., and Asai, K.:
A new flow rate measuring method – SGD (submarine groundwater discharge)
flux chamber and its approach off Katakai Alluvial Fan, Toyama Bay, Central
Japan, Chikyukagaku(Geochemistry), 39, 141–148, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Temporal variations of groundwater tables and implications for submarine groundwater discharge: a 3-decade case study in central Japan</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Fresh submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is the key pathway of flux and
nutrients for the groundwater from land to the ocean. SGD flux is a current
issue of discussion and a means to clarify the coastal marine system under
climate change. SGD flux accounts for about one-quarter of the river runoff
in the Katakai alluvial fan in Uozu, Toyama, Japan, which is an ideal area to
study SGD flux considering the need for a rapid response to climate change
and the prior research on SGD there. In this paper, the monthly groundwater
table's condition over 30 years is analyzed using monthly rainfall, snowfall,
and the climate change index. Rainfall has been on an upward trend, but the
snowfall has decreased over 40 years. Furthermore, the groundwater table at
monitoring wells in the coastal area increased, as a result of the increased
rainfall. However, the relationship between snowfall and groundwater is
negative. As expected by Darcy's law, SGD flux was controlled by the
hydraulic gradient of the coastal groundwater. The estimated historic SGD
flux by groundwater table variation shows an upward trend of SGD. Considering
the increase in precipitation and the groundwater table, SGD flux may
increase under climate change.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a
warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438,
303–309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Burnnet, W. C., Taniguchi, M., and Oberdorfer, J.: Measurement and
significance of the direct discharge of groundwater into the coastal zone, J.
Sea Res., 46, 109–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00075-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00075-2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-T. A., Zhang, J., Peng, T.-R., and Hagiwara, T.: Exploratory
Sampling of Submarine Groundwater Discharge in Taiwan,
Chikyukagaku(Geochemistry), 39, 165–171, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Church, C. M.: An underground route for the water cycle, Nature, 380,
579–580, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/380579a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/380579a0</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cong, Z. T., Yang, D. W., and Ni, G. H.: Does evaporation paradox exist in
China?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 357–366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-357-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-357-2009</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Emori, S.: Dynamic and thermodynamic changes in mean and extreme
precipitation under changed climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17706,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023272" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023272</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Ferguson, G. and Gleeson, T.: Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to
groundwater use and climate change, Nature Climate Change, 2, 342–345,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1413" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1413</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fischer, E. M. and Knutti, R.: Anthropogenic contribution to global
occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes, Nature Clim.
Change, 5, 560–564, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2617" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2617</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fujii, S., Nasu, N., Smith, A. J., Fuji, N., Mizutani, Y., Shimakura, M.,
Konishi, K., Igarashi, C., Muramoto, J., Takemura, T., Shimoda, T., Boggs,
S., Jr., Fujioka, K., Mappa, H., Kawahata, H., Kong, Y. S., and Tanaka, T.:
Submerged forest off Nyuzen, Kurobegawa alluvial fan, Toyama Bay, Central
Japan, Boreas, 15, 265–277, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1986.tb00931.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1986.tb00931.x</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., and Jevrejeva, S.: Application of the cross
wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series, Nonlin.
Processes Geophys., 11, 561–566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Han, D., Song, X., and Currell, M. J.: Identification of anthropogenic and
natural inputs of sulfate into a karstic coastal groundwater system in
northeast China: evidence from major ions, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>DIC</sub> and
<i>δ</i><sup>34</sup>S<sub>SO<sub>4</sub></sub>, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1983–1999,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1983-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1983-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Hatta, M. and Zhang, J.: Temporal changes and impacts of submarine fresh
groundwater discharge to the coastal environment: A decadal case study in
Toyama Bay, Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 2610–2622,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20184</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, T. and Fuji, S.: Water budget of groundwater in Toyama basin, Mem.
Toyama Geogr. Soc., 10, 3–14, 1993 (in Japanese).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Kawase, H., Hara, M., Yoshikane, T., Ishizaki, N. N., Uno, F., Hatsushika,
H., and Kimura, F.: Altitude dependency of future snow cover changes over
Central Japan evaluated by a regional climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 12444–12457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020429" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020429</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kokusai Kogyo Co. LTD: Report on the groundwater appropriate utilization in
Uozu, Uozu, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Labat, D.: Cross wavelet analyses of annual continental freshwater discharge
and selected climate indices, J. Hydrology, 385, 269–278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.029</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, Y.-W., Kim, G., Lim, W.-A., and Hwang, D.-W.: A relationship between
submarine groundwater borne nutrients traced by Ra isotopes and the intensity
of dinoflagellate red-tides occurring in the southern sea of Korea, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 55, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0001</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Leung, M. Y.-T., Cheung, H. H. N., and Zhou, W.: Meridional displacement of
the East Asian trough and its response to the ENSO forcing, Clim. Dynam., 48,
335–352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3077-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3077-8</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, L., Li, L., and Liu, Q.: Precipitation variability in Northeast China
from 1961 to 2008, J. Hydrol., 404, 67–76,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.020</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Q., Charette, M. A., Henderson, P. B., McCorkle, D. C., Martin, W., and
Dai, M.: Effect of submarine groundwater discharge on the coastal ocean
inorganic carbon cycle, Limnol. Oceanogr., 59, 1529–1554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1529" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1529</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Mulligan, A. E. and Charette, M. A.: Intercomparison of submarine groundwater
discharge estimates from a sandy unconfined aquifer, J. Hydrol., 327,
411–425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.056</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Nakaguchi, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Yamada, H., Zhang, J., Suzuki, M., Koyama, Y.,
and Hayashi, K.: Characterization and origin of chemical components in the
submarine groundwater discharge in Toyama Bay, Geochemistry, 39, 119–130,
2005 (in Japanese with English abstract).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Oude Essink, G. H. P., van Baaren, E. S., and de Louw, P. G. B.: Effects of
climate change on coastal groundwater systems: A modeling study in the
Netherlands, Water Resour. Res., 46, W00F04, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008719</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Shimizu, T., Kumagai, T. O., Kobayashi, M., Tamai, K., Iida, S. I., Kabeya,
N., Ikawa, R., Tateishi, M., Miyazawa, Y., and Shimizu, A.: Estimation of
annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in
Japan (2): Comparison of eddy covariance, water budget and sap-flow plus
interception loss, J. Hydrol., 522, 250–264, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Taniguchi, M. and Iwakawa, H.: Submarine groundwater discharge in Osaka Bay,
Japan, Limnology, 5, 25–32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-003-0112-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-003-0112-3</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Taniguchi, M., Burnett, W. C., Cable, J. E., and Turner, J. V.: Investigation
of submarine groundwater discharge, Hydrol. Process., 16, 2115–2129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1145</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Trenberth, K. E.: Changes in precipitation with climate change, Clim. Res.,
47, 123–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Wada, Y., Lo, M.-H., Yeh, P. J. F., Reager, J. T., Famiglietti, J. S., Wu,
R.-J., and Tseng, Y.-H.: Fate of water pumped from underground and
contributions to sea-level rise, Nature Clim. Change, 6, 777–780,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3001</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J.
C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., and Bairlein, F.: Ecological
responses to recent climate change, Nature, 416, 389–395, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, L., Wu, Z., He, H., Wang, F., Du, H., and Zong, S.: Changes in summer
extreme precipitation in Northeast Asia and their relationships with the East
Asian summer monsoon during 1961–2009, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 25–35,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4683</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, Z. X., Takeuchia, K., and Ishidaira, H.: Monotonic trend and step changes
in Japanese precipitation, J. Hydrol., 279, 144–150,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00178-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00178-1</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B. and Wang, Z.-L.: Trend and multi-time scale cross-wavelet analysis
on precipitation and temperature in Tianjin area, Journal of Tianjin Normal
University (Natural Science Edition), 36, 32–39, 2016 (in Chinese with
English abstract).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. and Mandal, A. K.: Linkages between submarine groundwater systems
and the environment, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4,
219–226, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.03.006</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J. and Satake, H.: Chemical characteristics of submarine groundwater
seepage in Toyama Bay, Central Japan, Land and Marine Hydrogeology, edited
by: Taniguchi, M., Wang, K., and Gamo, T., Elsevier, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands, 2003.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J., Hagiwara, T., Koyama, Y., Satake, H., Nakamura, T., and Asai, K.:
A new flow rate measuring method – SGD (submarine groundwater discharge)
flux chamber and its approach off Katakai Alluvial Fan, Toyama Bay, Central
Japan, Chikyukagaku(Geochemistry), 39, 141–148, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
