<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-20-4469-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Downstream ecosystem responses to middle reach regulation of river discharge
in the Heihe River Basin, China</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Downstream ecosystem responses to middle reach regulation of river discharge}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Y. Zhao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Yongping</given-names></name>
          <email>yongping.wei@uq.edu.au</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4266-4433</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Shoubo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Bingfang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, the
University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Nanjing University of
Information Science and Technology,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Nanjing 210044, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Division of Digital Agriculture &amp; Disaster, Key Laboratory of
Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote sensing and digital earth,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China </institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yongping Wei (yongping.wei@uq.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>4469</fpage><lpage>4481</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Understanding the oasis ecosystem responses to upstream regulation is a
challenge for catchment management in the context of ecological restoration.
This empirical study aimed to understand how oasis ecosystems, including
water, natural vegetation and cultivated land, responded to the
implementation of the Ecological Water Diversion Project (EWDP) in the Heihe
River in China. The annual Landsat images from 1987 to 2015 were firstly used
to characterize the spatial extent, frequency index and fractional coverage
(for vegetation only) of these three oasis ecosystems and their relationships
with hydrological (river discharge) and climatic variables (regional
temperature and precipitation) were explored with linear regression models.
The results show that river regulation of the middle reaches identified by
the discharge allocation to the downstream basin experiences three stages,
namely decreasing inflow (1987–1999), increasing inflow (2000–2007) and
relative stable inflow (2008–2015). Both the current and previous years'
combined inflow determines the surface area of the terminal lake
(<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.841). Temperature has the most significant role in
determining broad vegetation distribution, whereas hydrological variables had
a significant effect only in near-river-channel regions. Agricultural
development since the execution of the EWDP might have curtailed further
vegetation recovery. These findings are important for the catchment managers'
decisions about future water allocation plans.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Rapid population growth and economic development over the past several
decades have led to overuse of water resources and serious ecological
degradation of water catchments worldwide. In arid and semiarid regions where
water is very scarce, oasis ecosystems in downstream floodplains are
particularly threatened by increasing upstream water diversion for
socio-economic development (Cochrane et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2015).
Understanding the oasis ecosystem responses to upstream regulation is a
challenge for catchment managers who wish to implement ecological restoration
efforts.</p>
      <p>Downstream ecosystem responses to regulation of upstream river discharge
involve complex processes which are influenced by many factors. Oasis
vegetation, the dominant component in the ecosystem, is sensitive to water
availability, which is in turn substantially influenced by regional
temperature, precipitation and hydrological variations. Therefore, vegetation
changes, along with presence of water bodies (Lu et al., 2011), are important
indicators for understanding oasis ecosystem changes. There have been a large
number of studies on understanding regional climatic and hydrological
variations and their interactions with vegetation, which are mainly aimed at improving the simulation of discharge generation. Such studies are based on either the
analysis of hydrologic alterations and the relationship with regional climate
variability (Chen et al., 2007; Seyedabbasi et al., 2011), on vegetation
dynamics at catchment scale (Tang et al., 2012; Tesemma et al., 2014), or on
human-induced land-use change and irrigation (Thanapakpawin et al., 2007; Yu
et al., 2015). An increasing number of studies on water allocation for human
use and the environment have been conducted to define optimal river flows for sustaining ecosystem integrity (Bunn and Angela, 2002; Pahl-Wostl et al., 2013;
X. Wang et al., 2015), and to identify trade-off relationships between competing
economic and environmental goals (Cheng et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2015a;
Schlüter et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2007) and between the upstream and
downstream areas of river basins (Barbier, 2003; Lu et al., 2015; Thevs et
al., 2015). However, the impact of upstream river regulation on oasis
ecosystems has received little attention. Considering its importance, it is
necessary to determine the interactions between upstream regulation and
downstream ecosystem responses. This requires systematic analysis of
temporal variations in upstream water-use records, as well as downstream
oasis development.</p>
      <p>An oasis is a specific ecosystem that exists within arid and semi-arid
catchments. Ejina Oasis is a typical oasis system that has suffered great
environmental degradation due to increased water scarcity and human
intervention. With its flat land, adequate sunlight and sufficient water
sources coming down from the Qilian Mountains, the Ejina Basin together with
the Hexi Corridor lies in middle reach. It has been an important grain
production region of China, which can be traced back over 2000 years. Since
the rapid population growth in 1949, the Heihe River Basin (HRB) has experienced water and
ecological stress. Increased water withdrawals for agricultural irrigation
and municipal water supplies in the Hexi Corridor have significantly reduced
the river flows to the lower reaches, which threatened large areas of
woodland and natural oases in the Ejina Basin and created visible signs of
ecological degeneration and desertification (Zhu et al., 2009). The decreased
water flows into the terminal lakes caused the West Juyan Lake to dry up in
1961 and the East Juyan Lake in 1992. Until the late 1990s, the Chinese
Government implemented a series of policies, including converting farmland
back to forest and grass and implementing Ecological Water Diversion Projects
(EWDPs), to ensure the delivery of minimum amounts of water to the lower
reaches of the Basin for the mitigation of ecosystem degradation in the
region. Specifically, water allocated to the downstream region should be over
950 million m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> once the streamflow at Yingluoxia exceeds
1580 million m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; according to the EWDP implemented in 2000, only about
630 million m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> could be retained for middle reach use. However, direct
water diversion from Heihe River in 2000 was reported to be
840 million m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Shi et al., 2014). The competing demands between
middle reach consumption and downstream environmental use lasted after
execution of the EWDP, and restoring the downstream ecosystem remained
challenging for the basin managers. The trajectory of river regulation and basin
development provided an ideal model to study arid oasis changes in response
to water exploitation activities.</p>
      <p>Long-term datasets are essential in determining environmental changes and
assessing rehabilitation efforts in regulated river basins. Along with the
available long-term hydrological and climatic records for the study area, we
utilized Landsat images with 30 m spatial resolution for the period
1987–2015. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to apply long term
high-resolution remote sensing derived land cover in Ejina Oasis. Several
previous studies have applied MODIS datasets, available from 2000, to detect
temporal variations in vegetation in similar arid ecosystems (Hu et al.,
2015a, b; Jia et al., 2011). Although MODIS has good temporal resolution, its
coarse spatial resolution may not allow accurate detection of small objects
and the capture of fine-scale details (Fensholt et al., 2009), especially in the
arid ecosystem of the Ejina Basin where the vegetation is mostly sparsely
distributed and major changes only occur 100–400 m away from the water
channels (Guo et al., 2008). The 30 m Landsat images used in this study
enable the capture of finer details and the better identification of
landscape changes, and therefore help the understanding of the underlying
causative factors.</p>
      <p>The primary goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the
downstream oasis ecosystem responses to middle reach river regulation in the
Ejina Basin over the past 30 years, during which significant alterations in
water policies and human intervention have occurred. The specific objectives
were to: (1) determine streamflow changes due to the regulation for human
water use in the middle reaches; (2) characterize the downstream ecosystems
using 30 m resolution Landsat images; (3) determine the relationship between
the downstream ecosystem change and middle reach river regulation in the
context of hydrological changes in both the middle reaches and further
downstream. It is expected that the findings from this study will help
understanding of how the basin ecosystem responds to water policy changes,
which has important implications for future management actions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Location of the Heihe River Basin and Ejina Oasis. The
enlarged land-use map was modified from Hu's results; Hu et al. (2015b).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study area</title>
      <p>The Ejina Oasis (99.7–101.7<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 40.45–42.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) is
located in the lower reaches of the HRB, the second largest inland river
basin of China, in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (Fig. 1). This area
is part of the Gobi Desert with a mean elevation of around 1000 m. The region
has a typical continental arid climate, with an annual average temperature of
8.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C over the last five decades. Annual precipitation in this
region is scarce, averaging 35 mm over the past 50 years, but varying widely
from 7 to 101 mm, whereas annual potential evaporation reaches 2300 mm.
With such a dry climate, surface runoff is rare in this region and therefore
discharge down the Heihe River is the major water resource for local economic
development. The headwaters of the rivers flowing into the Basin are in the
Qilian Mountains and flow to the middle reach plains between Yingluoxia
(YLX) and Zhengyixia (ZYX) Gauge Stations. The downstream oasis is fed by the
Heihe River and its tributaries, the most important of which are the Donghe
River and Xihe River (Fig. 1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Hydrological and climatic variables influencing the downstream
ecosystems</title>
      <p>This study focused on discharge at YLX and ZYX Gauge Stations to gain
insights into hydrological variations as well as the impacts of water
regulation in middle reach catchments on the streamflow flowing into the
downstream. The YLX station is located at the junction between upper and
middle reaches of the HRB and represents the major water resource for
sustaining consumption both in middle reach and downstream catchments. ZYX is
located at the junction of middle and lower HRB, and represents the
proportion of water allocated for downstream developments. The absolute value
of streamflow at ZYX (<italic>Qzyx</italic>), the streamflow consumed in the middle
reaches (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>Q</italic>, the difference in streamflow between YLX and
ZYX), and the percentage of water allocated for the downstream basin
<italic>Rzyx</italic> (<italic>Qzyx / Qylx</italic>) were used to understand the
interactions between the middle reach regulation and the consequential
changes in downstream hydrological conditions. Monthly discharge records
between 1987 and 2014 at the YLX and ZYX stations were collected from WestDC
(<uri>http://westdc.westgis.ac.cn/</uri>), maintained by the Cold and Arid Regions
Environmental and Engineering Research Institute of Chinese Academy of
Sciences (Li et al., 2011). Discharge records for the 1960s were also
included as baseline values, reflecting discharge levels with little human
intervention in the HRB.</p>
      <p>As well as this, precipitation and temperature were selected as two major
climatic variables to understand vegetation dynamics in this arid region.
Daily precipitation records at Ejina Meteorological Station from 1987 were
collected from WestDC to calculate the annual precipitation. Daily mean
temperature, which accompanies this dataset, was also processed to obtain
annual mean temperature to assist further analysis. Since the landscape in
lower HRB was dominated by desert, annual evapotranspiration (ET) in Ejina was usually less than 50 mm (Lian et al., 2015). Only
regions near the river showed relatively higher ET levels but they were also
supported by the river flows (Luo et al., 2012). Therefore, we excluded ET in
this analysis. Furthermore, although groundwater observations covering the
entire study period were not available, short term measurements (2010–2012)
at a transection located in the Ejina Oasis (Fig. 1) were collected from
WestDC to discuss the impact of groundwater on the downstream vegetation
dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Indicators for determining downstream ecosystem</title>
      <p>The Ejina Basin is an ecosystem consisting of a Gobi Desert zone, vegetation,
water-covered regions and cultivated lands. The Gobi Desert zones occupy
about 90 % of the region and, owing to the extremely low precipitation,
these areas are vulnerable to any climatic changes, especially the regions
further away from the river channels which are less affected by the river
discharge. Therefore, this study focused on the native vegetation,
water-covered regions and cultivated land. Native vegetation is important to
maintain series of ecosystem functions and services, including
soil/water/nutrient regulation, biological control, wildlife habitats and
the provision of food and water for local people. Local wetlands are vital to
support the survival of surrounding vegetation and habitats in this arid
region. Cultivated land in this study was represented by vegetated areas
resulting from human intervention. Although not a natural ecosystem, it can
be used to consider the impact of human activities on the vegetation
dynamics.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Selected metrics for presenting ecosystem dynamics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Components</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Metrics</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Description</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="3">Water</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" morerows="1">Spatial extent</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Regions with detectable water distribution, including inundated river</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">channels, ponds and terminal lakes.</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Frequency index</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of times a pixel is distributed with water for a specific period and</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">divided by the length of the period; Thomas et al. (2011).</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation (overall/100,</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Spatial extent</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Regions with detectable vegetation distribution.</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">400, 1000 m buffer zones)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" morerows="1">Frequency index</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of times a pixel is distributed with vegetation and divided by</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">the length of the period.</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fractional vegetation cover</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">The fraction of green vegetation within a pixel.</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">Cultivated lands</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2" morerows="1">Spatial extent</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Identified regions with sign of agro-activities (e.g. regions with periodic</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">high red and near infrared reflectance, and landscape with ridges)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Table 1 shows the metrics used to characterize the above three components.
The spatial extent of vegetation, water-covered regions and cultivated lands
were derived through image classification to identify distributions under
various levels of water availability. The frequency index for vegetation and
water-covered regions was introduced to illustrate their spatial distribution
during three identified periods with different flow regimes and to follow
their changes between the periods. The three periods were defined according
to a preliminary inspection of temporal variations in streamflow entering the
downstream catchment, namely: steadily decreasing (1987–1999), variably
increasing (2000–2007) and relatively stable (2008–2015). For
vegetation-covered regions only, fractional vegetation cover (FVC) was
calculated using a linear mixture model.</p>
      <p>To show the potential influence of different water availability in near-river
to distant regions, a series of buffer zones along river channels (100, 400
and 1000 m away from river channel) were introduced to detect the
interactions of vegetation dynamics and river flow. These three buffers were
determined from previous work illustrating that vegetation grew well within
400 m of the water channels, while the growth almost ceased beyond 1000 m
from the channels (Guo et al., 2008). Areas of vegetation-covered regions and
the corresponding mean FVC values for the selected buffer zones were
extracted for further analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>Landsat images collection, preprocessing, interpretation and
validation</title>
      <p>Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) or Operational Land Imager (OLI) imageries
(hereafter simply referred as “Landsat images”) were adopted to derive the
selected metrics. Processing of the datasets were detailed in the following
sections.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <title>Landsat images collection and preprocessing</title>
      <p>One Landsat scene (path/row of 134<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31) is required to cover the study area.
We acquired annual images for most years from 1987 to 2015 except for 1989
and 1997 (27 scenes in total). The cloud-free images were mainly taken during
June to October (except data from 1993, acquired in February), which would
represent the growing season for crops, grasses and forests with relative
high coverage. This period also covered the major water allocation events
within the HRB and could help to determine the maximum water surfaces. The
images were downloaded through USGS Earthexplorer
(<uri>http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/</uri>).</p>
      <p>Digital numbers (DN) of the Level-1T products were converted into
top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance using the radiometric gain and offset
values associated with each image. Then we adopted a QUick Atmosphere
Correction (QUAC) method to account for atmospheric scattering and deriving
land surface reflectance (Bernstein et al., 2012). Since the differences in
acquisition date might also contribute to variations in spectral signals due
to different atmosphere and ground conditions, we corrected by normalizing
all other images to a selected strictly cloud-free scene to minimize the
impact. The 2001 scene (DOY 224) was set as reference, a group of invariant
pixels were selected for each image pair (2001 and an extra year) and the
relative normalization was performed through linear regression analysis based
on the selected pixel values. The calibration and normalization procedures
were programmed and debugged with Interactive Data Language (IDL 8.2.3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <title>Image interpretation for determining the selected metrics</title>
      <p>Water and vegetation (including crops) distributions were determined through
an unsupervised classification approach. Each image was separately classified
using the ArcGIS (version 10.2) Iso cluster unsupervised classification
procedure to derive 20 spectral clusters. The clusters were then assigned to
three broad subclasses: (1) vegetation (crops, forests and grass land);
(2) water surfaces (inundated river channels, ponds and terminal lakes); and
(3) bare surfaces (Gobi Desert and residential areas) based on their spectral
similarity and surrounding clusters. Because the landscape composition in the
region was relatively simple, this classification procedure could effectively
determine the three subclasses with the spectral information of the
multispectral images.</p>
      <p>We then applied a knowledge-based classification method to deduct the
cultivated lands from the classification result. Briefly, with the most
recent available high-resolution Bing Aerial maps (mostly in 2013), we
firstly created a vector layer that maximally reflected cultivated land
distribution (including the lands under operation, fallow and abandoned
croplands) by digitizing on-screen patches through shape and texture
characters. The normalized differential vegetation indices (NDVI) were then
calculated using red and near infrared bands for each year and a threshold
analysis was applied to derive possible cultivated lands. The results were
then overlaid with the created vector layer and each corresponding Landsat
image to determine the final cultivated land distribution for each year. The
derived cultivated lands were then deducted from the previous obtained
vegetation results for native vegetation distribution maps.</p>
      <p>The per pixel frequency indices for water and vegetation were then calculated
by counting the times with water or vegetation distribution during each
period and dividing by eight (length of each period). For the first period,
classification results of 1987 and 1999 were neglected in this calculation to
assure the consistency of the results (no data available for 1989 and 1997,
result in 1993 excluded due to poor quality). The change in frequency index
between the periods was calculated by subtracting from one another and the
obtained change rates were further grouped into six levels to reflect minor,
moderate and significant changes. The levels were determined based on
standards from Thomas et al. (2011): significant decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.67),
moderate decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.67 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33), minor decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33 to 0), minor
increase (0 to 0.33), moderate increase (0.33 to 0.67) and significant
increase (0.67 to 1).</p>
      <p>The FVC values of each pixel were calculated using a commonly used
linear mixture model (Carlson and Ripley, 1997; Zeng et al., 2000). The
model was described as follows:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FVC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="/" close=""><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">veg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NDVI</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">veg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the NDVI value of fully vegetation-covered pixels, and
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the value of bare soil pixels in the image. To
determine NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">veg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we calculated the
accumulation percentage of the NDVI values for each year and chose the
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">veg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values according to the
following: the studied region is largely comprised of the Gobi Desert,
therefore we set the NDVI at 20 % of pixels as NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; when
there were very limited “pure” vegetation-covered pixels in this arid
region, we then set the value of the last 100 pixel as
NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">veg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <title>Validation of the derived metrics</title>
      <p>In this study, we used the high-resolution satellite and aerial imageries
from the Bing Aerial Maps service of ArcGIS online to validate the water and
vegetation classification results. Bing Aerial Maps offers a series of
orthographic aerial and satellite imagery from 1999 onwards at different
spatial resolutions (from 30 m to &lt; 1 m). The aerial map was
loaded in ArcGIS and the acquisition date of the displayed imagery was
determined with the Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OSM
(<uri>http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/</uri>). Then the classification
result for each year was visually checked, the vegetation and water patches
that failed to be characterized by the unsupervised classification were
manually digitized and added to the image, while the wrongly classified
patches were deleted. For all other years, a visual comparison of the class
distribution was made with each corresponding Landsat image (Thomas et al.,
2011). Classification anomalies (cloud contamination, mixed class pixels, and
so on) were removed manually. Accuracy of the established maps was further
assessed with existing land cover maps in 2000 and 2011 (Hu et al., 2015b).
The inter-comparison found that the two datasets presented substantial
consistency where kappa coefficients (<italic>k</italic>) were 0.7206 and 0.6731 for
2000 and 2011, respectively. Details about the comparison and the confusion
matrix were provided in Fig. S1 and Table S1 in the Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Comparison between the calculated and measured
FVC values in 54 sites within HRB in 2014.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>To verify the FVC results, we related our 2014 FVC estimation to 54
field-measured FVC values which were available in the WestDC database
(H. B. Wang et al., 2015). There was a good agreement between calculated and
field measurements, with a high correlation (Fig. 2,
<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.92, <italic>p</italic> value &lt; 0.001). Since it
was not practical to use the limited available high-resolution imagery to
validate the time series FVC results, we applied a compromised method to
assess the derived values in the desert, where FVC was supposed to be 0.
Specifically, a layer with 1000 randomly selected sampling points distributed
in absolute non-vegetation deserts was established. FVC values for each year
were extracted and analyzed. Mean FVC for the 1000 randomly selected points
ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 to 1.3 % and annual variation was less than 2 % for
most years. Therefore, we could infer that the selected NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">soil</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
and NDVI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">veg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for each year were rational and the calculated FVC
was capable of reflecting long-term changes in vegetation developments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Determination of the response of different downstream ecosystem components
to middle reach river regulation in the context of hydrological changes</title>
      <p>Linear stepwise regression models were applied to link the changes in
spatial extent of vegetation, surface water and derived FVC values with
regional climatic variables along with detected trends in hydrological
variables. The regression procedure can select the best-fit combination of
independent variables for dependent variable prediction with forward-adding
and backward-deleting variables using a critical <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value to check the
eligibility of the step forward added variables (Chen et al., 2013). A
general form of the model can be described as:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where T denotes transpose; <italic>y</italic> is the dependent variable; subscript
<italic>i</italic> denotes for vegetation area, lake surface area and cultivated land
area in this study; <italic>x</italic> represents the independent variables including
current year's discharge at ZYX (<italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), previous year's
annual discharge (<italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), total discharge of current year
and previous years' (<italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), regional average temperature
and precipitation; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a regression coefficient, where a positive
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>i</italic> indicates positive correlation and vice versa.</p>
      <p>Two-tailed Pearson correlation was also introduced to test the relationship
between total vegetation dynamics (in spatial extent and FVC) and
above-mentioned variables within the selected buffer zones.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Impact of middle reach river regulation on the streamflow downstream</title>
      <p>The streamflow at YLX and ZYX (Fig. 3) showed a synchronous increasing or
decreasing trend for most years during the study period, which indicated that
water flow in the Heihe River followed the regulation scheme. Overall, annual
river streamflow at both YLX and ZYX has increased for the past three
decades. However, the annual streamflow at ZYX decreased slightly before
2000, followed by a rapid increase from 2000 to 2007, and has been relatively
stable since 2008. Specifically, annual streamflow at YLX has increased by
40 % from about 15.74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1987 to
22.03 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2014. The average annual streamflow at
YLX for the study period (1987–2014) was 17.26 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which also increased by 17 % when compare with the level in the 1960s
(14.71 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Meanwhile, annual streamflow at ZYX
also increased by 34 % from 1987 to 2014, whereas the average annual
streamflow has decreased by 10 % since the 1960s: from
10.66 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 1960s to
9.63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the study period. Water consumption in
the middle reaches contributed most to this diverse variation.</p>
      <p>The water diverted from the middle reaches (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>Q</italic>) increased
from about 6.72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 1980s to
8.11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 1990s. A substantial decrease to
about 6.67 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed in the early 2000s and
this level remained fairly constant, until a slight uptrend started around
2007, reaching about 7.98 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the 2010s.
Accordingly, the ratio of streamflow allocated to Ejina Basin
(<italic>Qzyx / Qylx</italic>) also underwent three stage changes: an initial
decrease with variations (1987–1999), a substantial increase (2000–2007)
and then relative stability (2008–2015).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Linear regression models for determining the areas of vegetation
cover, cultivated lands and terminal lakes. <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stand for the
annual discharge of previous (p), current (c) years and sum of previous and
current years measured at ZYX station, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Linear regression models</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vegetation distribution</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area (veg) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.718 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>T</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2582.498 (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.526, <italic>F</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20.01, <italic>p</italic> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FVC</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(no statistically significant relationship with hydrological and climatic variables was found)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Terminal lake area</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area (lake) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.516 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.800 (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.365, <italic>F</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.178, <italic>p</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.038)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area (lake) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.731 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.532 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – 31.726 (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.841, <italic>F</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.545, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Or Area (lake) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.974 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> – 28.521 (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.825, <italic>F</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 37.746, <italic>p</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cultivated land</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area (agri) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.689 (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.530, <italic>F</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18.041, <italic>p</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Temporal changes of the downstream ecosystem indicators</title>
      <p>Vegetation distribution within Ejina Oasis between 1987 and 2015 was highly
variable, ranging from 528 to 1025 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. From 1987 to 1999, there was a
decreasing trend, as shown by the 5-year moving average, where annual
vegetation reduced by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %, from about 882.7 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in early
1990s to about 619.3 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the period from 2000 to 2007, the region
showed relative stable vegetation distribution, averaging about
701.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since 2007, Ejina has experienced a steady upward trend in
vegetation distribution, with an annual increase of 26.4 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Temporal variations of streamflow at YLX (circle) and ZYX
(star) and the difference between the two (cross). The 5-year moving average
annual discharge for YLX (dash) and ZYX (dash-dot) are presented to show
changing trends.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Temporal variations in river discharge at ZYX (triangle), annual
total vegetation-covered regions (circle), East Juyan Lake surface area
(square) and cultivated lands (cross) from 1987 to 2015. The dash line and
dash-dot line denote the 5-year moving average values for vegetation areas
and streamflow at ZYX respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Spatial distribution of vegetation-covered regions in
Ejina Oasis. The upper row shows the frequency of vegetation distribution
for the three periods: <bold>(a)</bold> period 1 (1988–1998, no data were available for
1989 and 1997, data for 1993 were excluded for their poor quality), <bold>(b)</bold> period
2 (2000–2007) and <bold>(c)</bold> period 3 (2008–2015). The lower row shows the
corresponding changes between the pairs of periods: <bold>(c)</bold> changes between
periods 1 and 2, <bold>(d)</bold> changes between periods 2 and 3 and <bold>(e)</bold> changes between
periods 1 and 3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Within the vegetation-covered regions, the overall mean FVC was 28 %
between 1987 and 2015, ranging from 22 to 35 %. The changes in FVC over
time shows a two-stage development, rather than three stages as previously
identified. A significant downward trend occurs until 2003, with an annual
decrease of 0.3 %. After 2003, a non-statistically significant upward
trend was observed, with a 0.2 % increase per year
(<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.379).</p>
      <p>Landsat images showed that East Juyan lake had dried up for most of the
 years between 1987 and 2001 (except 1988, 1989, 1993 and 1998, which had
relatively high discharge events, Fig. 4). Streamflow at ZYX for these  years
were 10.56 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 15.74 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
10.41 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 11.20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
respectively, while for the other years before 2000, the average discharge
was only 7.55 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since 2002, increased discharge
has caused steady flows into East Juyan Lake and the lake surface increased
from about 15.14 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2002 to 45.73 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2009. Thereafter,
the average lake surface area was about 39 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with little variation.
The situation was similar for the overall total surface water, which also
included the inundated river channels.</p>
      <p>Cultivated lands in the Ejina Oasis experienced constant expansion (Fig. 4),
even during the period of increased water stress, as demonstrated by
decreasing river discharge at ZYX (1987–1999). A more dramatic rise was
observed between 2000 and 2006, by which time the cultivated land has almost
doubled in area to about 84.3 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since 2007, the rate of increase
rate has been very low, with the average total area of cultivated lands at
87.5 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with little inter-annual variation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Frequency of inundation for <bold>(a)</bold> period 1 (1988–1998),
<bold>(b)</bold> period 2 (2000–2007) and <bold>(c)</bold> period 3 (2008–2015); <bold>(d)</bold> the change rate between periods 1 and 3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/4469/2016/hess-20-4469-2016-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Relationship between the downstream ecosystem changes and the
streamflow</title>
      <p>The linear models developed to demonstrate the relationship between the
change of area of vegetation, lake surface and cultivated land in the
downstream Ejina Oasis and hydrological and climatic variables are listed in
Table 2. None of the hydrological variables showed significant influence on
annual vegetation distribution, but regional temperature exerted significant
negative effects, and it alone could explain about 52.6 % of the
variations in the area of vegetation. No significant relationship was
obtained between mean FVC and hydrological or climatic variables.
The linear models for Juyan Lake indicates that area of the lake surface was
closely dependent on the combined previous and current year's discharge to
the downstream basin. Compare with the significant positive effect of
previous year's discharge (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.365), the combined river
discharge of the current plus previous year showed a more robust relationship
(<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.841), which might indicate the importance of
accumulated river flows. Agricultural activity relies on water, and this is
demonstrated in this region by a significant positive relationship between
current river discharge and detected cultivated lands
(<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.530).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Evidence from spatial variations of ecosystem indicators</title>
      <p>As indicated with the per pixel frequency index, most of the vegetation in
this area was concentrated in the entry side of the oasis and within the core
oasis area located along the lower Donghe River (Fig. 5). Although fed with increasing river discharge in
period 2 (2000–2007), there was still obvious signs of decreased frequency
of vegetation distribution for most of the areas when compared to period 1
(1987–2009). While for period 3 (2008–2015), increased frequency was
observed, especially along Xihe River and in the south part of the core oasis
area. More specifically, from period 1 to 2, about 74 % of the oasis
vegetation regions experienced some kind of decrease (minor 47 %,
moderate 24 % and significant 3 %). Most moderate decreases occurred
in the downstream reaches of the Donghe River, the upper reaches of the Nalin
River and the entrance of the Donghe River (Fig. 5a, d). Only 21 % of the
regions showed minor increases, which were mainly distributed along the river
channels. From period 2 to 3, over 75 % of the regions showed increased
frequency (Fig. 5b, e). About 30 % of the regions show moderate to
significant increase, which were mainly distributed along Xihe River and its
branches, around the Juyan Lake and outer circle of the core area of the
Ejina Oasis. Around 20 % of the regions experienced minor decreases
during this period, which were mostly distributed along the Donghe River
and within the core area of the oasis (Fig. 5e). For the whole study period
(period 1 to 3), about half (48 %) of the oasis regions experienced
decreased frequency of vegetation distribution, which were mainly distributed
along Nalin River and within the core oasis area (Fig. 5f). Meanwhile,
regions with increased frequency (52 %) were mainly distributed along the
Xihe River, around the Juyan Lake and in the southern part of the core area
of the Ejina Oasis (Fig. 5f).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Pearson correlation coefficients indicating relationship between
vegetation dynamics (spatial distribution and FVC) and variations in river
flows. “–” means no significant correlation was detected while
a and b denote that the detected correlation was
significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Buffer zone</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">Regions</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center">Area </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col11" align="center">FVC </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><italic>T</italic></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><italic>Q</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><italic>T</italic></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All regions</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.496<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.703<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.472<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.545<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.601<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xihe River</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.468<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.691<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Donghe River</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.455<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.471<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.571<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.663<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">400 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All regions</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.555<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.600<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.437<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.538<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xihe River</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.634<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.572<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Donghe River</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.598<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.775<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.830<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1000 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All regions</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.549<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.611<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.475<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.548<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xihe River</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.639<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.594<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Donghe River</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.612<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>

         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.806<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.857<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Change rates (%) within different buffer zones
(coefficient of determination (<italic>R</italic><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicated in parenthesis).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Buffer zone</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Trend before 2003 </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center">Trend after 2003 </oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">All regions</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Xihe</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Donghe</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">All regions</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Xihe</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Donghe</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 (0.20)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 (0.23)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03 (0.03)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.22 (0.47)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.28 (0.69)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.49 (0.65)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">400 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.19 (0.50)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.24 (0.59)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 (0.20)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25 (0.58)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.17 (0.40)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.36 (0.69)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1000 m</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.21 (0.54)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.26 (0.60)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.15 (0.30)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2 (0.47)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.11 (0.19)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.33 (0.72)</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Only one or two inundation events along Xihe River were detected in period 1
(Fig. 6a). After the water reform in 2000, the frequency did not show an obvious
increase but broader regions were inundated for two to three times in this
area (Fig. 6b, c). Meanwhile, the Donghe River and Juyan Lake experienced
more frequent inundation, especially during period 3. The difference in
frequency index between periods 1 and 3 also revealed that, during the whole
study period, most of the increased water inundation was concentrated along
the Donghe River channel and east Juyan Lake (Fig. 6d). The frequency maps
also indicated that the Donghe River was not connected with the terminal lake
for most years, which could be attributed to two possible reasons. The first
is that the width of the streams in lower river courses was below the
detection limit of Landsat, while the second is that water did not flow
constantly into the terminal lake, but depended on several drainage events
that were not captured by the Landsat images.</p>
      <p>Detailed correlation analysis within the buffer zones also demonstrated
different levels of response along the Xihe and Donghe Rivers. Specifically,
while temperature showed a similar negative relationship with vegetation
distribution in all three buffer zones, the correlation coefficient increased
as the distance to the river channel increased. Although none of the
hydrological variables (current and previous years' total discharge at ZYX)
showed any impact on total vegetation distribution in the Ejina Oasis, the
previous 3 to 5 years' total discharge showed significant positive effects
over the vegetation expansion in the selected buffer areas, especially along
Donghe River. Vegetation in near-river regions showed more significant
correlation with the previous year's discharge (Table 3).</p>
      <p>As for FVC within the buffer zones, temperature showed no impacts, but the
previous 3–5 years' water discharge at ZYX showed significant positive
correlation with the FVC values. According to the correlation coefficient
detailed in Table 3, vegetation distributed along Donghe River and its
tributaries seemed to be more responsive to flow variations. Furthermore, the
mean FVC in different buffer zones showed similar decreasing trends before
2003 but with different rates: in near-river regions (within 100 m) the
decreasing rate was <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> while this rate rose as distance
from the river channel increased, and the decreasing rates in all buffer zones
along Xihe River were about 0.1 % higher than those along the Donghe River
(Table 4). After 2003, an upward trend (rate &gt; 0.2 % per
year) was observed within the buffer zones and vegetation along Donghe River
showed about a 0.2 % higher increasing rate than that along the Xihe
River (Table 4). Near-river-channel vegetation with higher increasing rates
was also observed along both the Xihe River and the Donghe River.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>This paper comprises an empirical study on downstream oasis ecosystem
responses to water regulation in the middle reach catchment in the HRB over
the past 30 years. Changes in vegetation distribution, water bodies and
cultivated lands were quantified using 30 m Landsat imagery from 1987 to
2015. Linear models were established to understand the impacts of middle
reach regulation of streamflow on downstream oasis ecosystems. The major
research findings and their implications for future research and water
management practice are described below.</p>
      <p>This study revealed the controlling role of streamflow at ZYX station on
downstream water availability and its response to the middle reach
regulation. Water consumption in the middle reaches of the HRB has steadily
increased since the early 1980s and depleted the amount of water allocated to
ZYX. Consequently, most river channels and lakes in the Ejina Basin experienced
very few inundations before 2000, especially along the Xihe River and lower
Donghe River. After 2000, consumption in middle reaches was regulated to meet
the objective of downstream ecological water requirements (minimum of
9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Broader regions were subjected to
inundation after the execution of EWDP. The situation was similar for the
East Juyan Lake, which dried up in 1992, but was re-inundated in 2002 and has
been subjected to constant inundation since that time. It is noteworthy that
during 1992–2002 there were particular years with high discharge events
(&gt; 9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), but the lake system did not
show immediate sign of recovery. With this knowledge, we concluded that
repeated inflows in consecutive years are required to push water into the
terminal lake, and hence support the surrounding environment: it is not simply a
matter of setting a certain level of water allocation. This was further
supported by the significantly higher correlation between lake surface area
and total discharge of the current and previous years combined.</p>
      <p>Although synchronous trends were observed, water allocated to the Ejina Basin
did not have a statistically significant effect on overall vegetation
development. None of the hydrological variables we tested showed a
statistically significant contribution to total vegetation distribution within
the Ejina Oasis. Instead, the temperature seems to determine the spatial
extent of vegetation in this region. Considering the extremely dry conditions
in the region, increasing temperature would substantially deplete the already
limited water supply through evaporation. This would ultimately restrict
vegetation growth and expansion, especially in the regions away from river
channels, where the groundwater is too deep to sustain vegetation growth (Hu
et al., 2007). Observations in this area (Fig. 1 and Fig. S2 in the
Supplement) have found that the annual average groundwater depth alongside
the river (&lt; 300 m) was around 2 m, which increased to more than
3.5 m in remote regions (&gt; 4300 m away from river channels).
Water discharges would cause fluctuations in the groundwater depth only in
the near-river regions (&lt; 300 m) and would have no effect further
away. This explains why the only significant impacts of hydrologic variations
on vegetation were observed within the selected buffer zones. Within these
near-river regions, total streamflow from the previous 3–5 years had a
positive impact on vegetation distribution, although temperature was still an
important contributing factor. The time lag between streamflow changes and
vegetation responses could be attributed both to inherent phenology processes
and the time required for groundwater recharge (Jia et al., 2011; Wen et al.,
2005). This point is also supported by the moderate to significant drop in
frequency of vegetation distribution during 1987 to 2007, mainly along the
Nalin River and lower reaches of the Xihe and Donghe Rivers (Fig. 5), where the
river channel was rarely inundated or the depleted streamflow was
insufficient in the lower river reaches (Fig. 6). Such conditions could have
restricted the recharge process for the shallow aquifers within the region.</p>
      <p>Because vegetation does not respond quickly to streamflow changes, short-term
regulations to increase water allocation to the downstream basin for
particular years may fail to support ecosystem development. Before the
implementation of the EWDP in 2000 when there were years with high streamflow at
ZYX, vegetation did not show signs of recovery but continued to recede
because of the overall water scarcity (mean streamflow at
8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a decreasing trend). The situation did
not change until the mean streamflow reached
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in early 2000s, with little annual
variation, when the vegetation stabilized. A higher allocation for ecosystem
services is required to support sustained vegetation recovery in future. The
different responses of FVC to changes in water availability in the Xihe and
Donghe Rivers provided further evidence for this point. The Donghe River
experienced more frequent inundation, and therefore had higher water
availability, and significant correlation between FVC changes and streamflow
variations only detected in this river. Trend analysis also found that, when
compared with the Xihe River, vegetation along the Donghe River showed a lower FVC
decreasing rate under water-scarce conditions before the water reform and
presented higher recovering rates after the EWDP was fully in operation
(since 2002).</p>
      <p>The attenuated effect of allocated water over vegetation distribution could
be also attributed to agricultural development within the Ejina Basin.
Although small in scale, agriculture within the Ejina Basin still acts as a major
competitor for water with surrounding vegetation in this sparsely populated
arid area. Before execution of EWDP, expansion of agriculture in the Ejina Basin
was slow and concentrated in a much smaller range than the oasis regions with
decreasing vegetation distribution (Fig. 5), which indicated few local human
interventions during this period. However, over the whole study period, the
regions with decreasing natural vegetation cover corresponded closely with
the expansion of cultivated land, which shows that claiming land for
agricultural activities causes the oasis vegetation to recede in these areas.
Moreover, the spatial correlation between expanding cultivated lands and
regions with a trend of decreasing FVC may also indicate that
competition for water with agricultural activities may have limited the
recovery of the surrounding vegetation.</p>
      <p>According to the hydrological records and satellite-based observations in our
study, the implementation of EWDP since 2000 has stopped further ecological
degradation that had been occurring since the 1980s and positively influenced
the recovery of the ecosystems within the Ejina Oasis. The increased river
discharge supported the vegetation recovery in the near-river channel regions
(within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km) and maintained the terminal lake system. However, the
agricultural development stimulated by the additional water resource might
have obstructed further ecosystem recovery because large amounts of water
have been consumed by the agriculture sector. Therefore, if managers wish to
achieve a higher level of ecosystem recovery, the ecological water allocation
schemes need to be maintained or enhanced. Also, regulations and practices
such as “grain for green” and water-saving agriculture should be carried
out within the downstream basin to ensure the allocated water flows into the
ecosystem.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The satellite imagery used in this study is available at
<uri>http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/</uri>. The long term runoff observations at
Zhengyixia and Yingluoxia stations are available at
<uri>http://westdc.westgis.ac.cn/data/645ffaba-b32e-41f7-9046-a868a2157c07</uri>.
Climate data on precipitation and temperature can be downloaded from
<uri>http://westdc.westgis.ac.cn/data/b06212a7-72bd-4607-a413-3b09457c4398</uri>.
Land cover maps for validation in this study can be accessed through
<uri>http://westdc.westgis.ac.cn/data/b7ec37e6-339d-4777-80d3-bab18e6b7519</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4469-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/hess-20-4469-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the Australian Research Council (FT130100274) and
National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41301036). We thank Xiaoli
Hu from the Cold and Arid Environmental and Engineering Research Institute of
Chinese Academy of Sciences for providing land-use maps, and the two referees
as well as the editors for providing valuable comments.<?xmltex \hack{\\\\}?> Edited by:
L. Wang <?xmltex \hack{\\}?> Reviewed by: X. Li and D. Han</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Barbier, E. B.: Upstream dams and downstream water allocation: The case of
the Hadejia-Jama'are floodplain, northern Nigeria, Water Resour. Res., 39,
1311, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003WR002249</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bernstein, L. S., Jin, X., Gregor, B., and Adler-Golden, S. M.: Quick
atmospheric correction code: algorithm description and recent upgrades, Opt.
Eng., 51, 111719, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.51.11.111719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/1.OE.51.11.111719</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bunn, E. S. and Angela, A. H.: Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences
of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity, Environ. Manage., 30,
492–507, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Carlson, T. N. and Ripley, D. A.: On the relation between NDVI, fractional
vegetation cover, and leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ., 62, 241–252,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Li, W., Xu, C., and Hao, X.: Effects of climate change on water
resources in Tarim River Basin, Northwest China, J. Environ. Sci., 19,
488–493, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60082-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60082-5</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y., Shi, R., Shu, S., and Gao, W.: Ensemble and enhanced PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration forecast model based on stepwise regression and wavelet
analysis, Atmos. Environ., 74, 346–359, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.002</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, G., Li, X., Zhao, W., Xu, Z., Feng, Q., Xiao, S., and Xiao, H.:
Integrated study of the water–ecosystem–economy in the Heihe River Basin,
Nat. Sci. Rev., 1, 413–428, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwu017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/nsr/nwu017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cochrane, T. A., Arias, M. E., and Piman, T.: Historical impact of water
infrastructure on water levels of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap system,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4529–4541, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4529-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-4529-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Fensholt, R., Rasmussen, K., Nielsen, T. T., and Mbow, C.: Evaluation of
earth observation based long term vegetation trends – Intercomparing NDVI
time series trend analysis consistency of Sahel from AVHRR GIMMS, Terra
MODIS and SPOT VGT data, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 1886–1898, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.04.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.04.004</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Q., Feng, Q., and Li, J.: Environmental changes after ecological water
conveyance in the lower reaches of Heihe River, northwest China, Environ.
Geol., 58, 1387–1396, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1641-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00254-008-1641-1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Hu, L. T., Chen, C. X., Jiao, J. J., and Wang, Z. J.: Simulated groundwater
interaction with rivers and springs in the Heihe river basin, Hydrol.
Process., 21, 2794–2806, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6497" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6497</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Hu, X., Lu, L., Li, X., Wang, J., and Guo, M.: Land Use/Cover Change in the
Middle Reaches of the Heihe River Basin over 2000–2011 and Its Implications
for Sustainable Water Resource Management, PLoS ONE, 10, e0128960, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128960" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0128960</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Hu, X., Lu, L., Li, X., Wang, J., and Lu, X.: Ejin Oasis Land Use and
Vegetation Change between 2000 and 2011: The Role of the Ecological Water
Diversion Project, Energies, 8, 7040–7057, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en8077040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/en8077040</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Jia, L., Shang, H., Hu, G., and Menenti, M.: Phenological response of
vegetation to upstream river flow in the Heihe Rive basin by time series
analysis of MODIS data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1047–1064, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1047-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-15-1047-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Nan, Z. T., Cheng, G. D., Ding, Y. J., Wu, L. Z., Wang, L. X., Wang,
J., Ran, Y. H., Li, H. X., Pan, X. D., and Zhu. Z. M.: Toward an improved
data stewardship and service for environmental and ecological science data
in west China, Int. J. Digit. Earth, 4, 347–359, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Lian, J. and Huang, M.: Evapotranspiration estimation for an oasis area in
the Heihe River Basin using Landsat-8 images and the METRIC model, Water
Resour. Manage., 29, 5157–5170, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lu, S., Wu, B., Yan, N., and Wang, H.: Water body mapping method with
HJ-1A/B satellite imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 13, 428–434, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.006</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Lu, Z., Wei, Y., Xiao, H., Zou, S., Ren, J., and Lyle, C.: Trade-offs
between midstream agricultural production and downstream ecological
sustainability in the Heihe River basin in the past half century, Agr. Water
Manage., 152, 233–242, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.022</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, X., Wang, K., Jiang, H., Sun, J., and Zhu, Q.: Estimation of land surface
evapotranspiration over the Heihe River basin based on the revised
three-temperature model, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1263–1269, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Pahl-Wostl, C., Arthington, A., Bogardi, J., Bunn, S. E., Hoff, H., Lebel,
L., Nikitina, E., Palmer, M., Poff, L. N., Richards, K., Schlüter, M.,
Schulze, R., St-Hilaire, A., Tharme, R., Tockner, K., and Tsegai, D.:
Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses,
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 341–351, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Schlüter, M., Savitsky, A. G., McKinney, D. C., and Lieth, H.:
Optimizing long-term water allocation in the Amudarya River delta: a water
management model for ecological impact assessment, Environ. Modell. Softw.,
20, 529–545, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Seyedabbasi, M. A., Farthing, M. W., Imhoff, P. T., and Miller, C. T.:
WITHDRAWN: Influence of Porous Media Heterogeneity on NAPL Dissolution
Fingering and Upscaled Mass Transfer, Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–62, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010WR009138</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Shi, M. J., Wang, X. J., Yang, H., and Wang, T.: Pricing or Quota? A
Solution to Water Scarcity in Oasis Regions in China: A Case Study in the
Heihe River Basin, Sustainability, 6, 7601–7620, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6117601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/su6117601</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Tang, Q., Vivoni, E. R., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.:
Predictability of Evapotranspiration Patterns Using Remotely Sensed
Vegetation Dynamics during the North American Monsoon, J. Hydrometeorol.,
13, 103–121, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-032.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-11-032.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Tesemma, Z. K., Wei, Y., Western, A. W., and Peel, M. C.: Leaf Area Index
Variation for Crop, Pasture, and Tree in Response to Climatic Variation in
the Goulburn–Broken Catchment, Australia, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 1592–1606,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0108.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-13-0108.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Thanapakpawin, P., Richey, J., Thomas, D., Rodda, S., Campbell, B., and
Logsdon, M.: Effects of landuse change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae
Chaem river basin, NW Thailand, J. Hydrol., 334, 215–230, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.012</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Thevs, N., Peng, H., Rozi, A., Zerbe, S., and Abdusalih, N.: Water
allocation and water consumption of irrigated agriculture and natural
vegetation in the Aksu-Tarim river basin, Xinjiang, China, J. Arid Environ.,
112, 87–97, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.028</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, R. F., Kingsford, R. T., Lu, Y., and Hunter, S. J.: Landsat mapping
of annual inundation (1979–2006) of the Macquarie Marshes in semi-arid
Australia, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 4545–4569, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.489064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2010.489064</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H. B., Ma, M. G., Zhou, S. N., Li, Y. M., and Guo, D.: HiWATER
Observation dataset of fractional vegetation cover by digital camera in the
lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental
and Engineering Research Institute, Chin. Acad. Sci.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3972/hiwater.271.2015.db" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3972/hiwater.271.2015.db</ext-link>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J. F., Cheng, G. D., Gao, Y. G., Long, A. H., Xu, Z. M., Li, X., Chen,
H., and Barker, T.: Optimal Water Resource Allocation in Arid and Semi-Arid
Areas, Water Resour. Manage., 22, 239–258, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9155-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11269-007-9155-2</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Yang, H., Shi, M., Zhou, D., and Zhang, Z.: Managing stakeholders'
conflicts for water reallocation from agriculture to industry in the Heihe
River Basin in Northwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 505, 823–832, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.063</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Wen, X., Wu, Y., Su, J., Zhang, Y., and Liu, F.: Hydrochemical
characteristics and salinity of groundwater in the Ejina Basin, Northwestern
China, Environ. Geol., 48, 665–675, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0001-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00254-005-0001-7</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Lamačová, A., Duffy, C., Krám, P., Hruška, J.,
White, T., and Bhatt, G.: Modelling long-term water yield effects of forest
management in a Norway spruce forest, Hydrol. Sci. J., 60,
174–191, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.897406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2014.897406</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Walker, A., Shaikh, M., DeFries, R. S., and Qi,
J.: Derivation and Evaluation of Global 1-km Fractional Vegetation Cover
Data for Land Modeling, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 826–839,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039&lt;0826:DAEOGK&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039&lt;0826:DAEOGK&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y. H., Ren, L. L., Skaggs, T. H., Lu, H. S., Yu, Z. B., Wu, Y. Q., and
Fang, X. Q.: Simulation of Populus euphratica root uptake of groundwater in
an arid woodland of the Ejina Basin, China, Hydrol. Process, 23, 2460–2469,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Downstream ecosystem responses to middle reach regulation of river discharge
in the Heihe River Basin, China</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Understanding the oasis ecosystem responses to upstream regulation is a
challenge for catchment management in the context of ecological restoration.
This empirical study aimed to understand how oasis ecosystems, including
water, natural vegetation and cultivated land, responded to the
implementation of the Ecological Water Diversion Project (EWDP) in the Heihe
River in China. The annual Landsat images from 1987 to 2015 were firstly used
to characterize the spatial extent, frequency index and fractional coverage
(for vegetation only) of these three oasis ecosystems and their relationships
with hydrological (river discharge) and climatic variables (regional
temperature and precipitation) were explored with linear regression models.
The results show that river regulation of the middle reaches identified by
the discharge allocation to the downstream basin experiences three stages,
namely decreasing inflow (1987–1999), increasing inflow (2000–2007) and
relative stable inflow (2008–2015). Both the current and previous years'
combined inflow determines the surface area of the terminal lake
(<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>  =  0.841). Temperature has the most significant role in
determining broad vegetation distribution, whereas hydrological variables had
a significant effect only in near-river-channel regions. Agricultural
development since the execution of the EWDP might have curtailed further
vegetation recovery. These findings are important for the catchment managers'
decisions about future water allocation plans.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Barbier, E. B.: Upstream dams and downstream water allocation: The case of
the Hadejia-Jama'are floodplain, northern Nigeria, Water Resour. Res., 39,
1311, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002249" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003WR002249</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bernstein, L. S., Jin, X., Gregor, B., and Adler-Golden, S. M.: Quick
atmospheric correction code: algorithm description and recent upgrades, Opt.
Eng., 51, 111719, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.51.11.111719" target="_blank">doi:10.1117/1.OE.51.11.111719</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bunn, E. S. and Angela, A. H.: Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences
of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity, Environ. Manage., 30,
492–507, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Carlson, T. N. and Ripley, D. A.: On the relation between NDVI, fractional
vegetation cover, and leaf area index, Remote Sens. Environ., 62, 241–252,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Li, W., Xu, C., and Hao, X.: Effects of climate change on water
resources in Tarim River Basin, Northwest China, J. Environ. Sci., 19,
488–493, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60082-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60082-5</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y., Shi, R., Shu, S., and Gao, W.: Ensemble and enhanced PM<sub>10</sub>
concentration forecast model based on stepwise regression and wavelet
analysis, Atmos. Environ., 74, 346–359, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.002</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, G., Li, X., Zhao, W., Xu, Z., Feng, Q., Xiao, S., and Xiao, H.:
Integrated study of the water–ecosystem–economy in the Heihe River Basin,
Nat. Sci. Rev., 1, 413–428, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwu017" target="_blank">doi:10.1093/nsr/nwu017</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cochrane, T. A., Arias, M. E., and Piman, T.: Historical impact of water
infrastructure on water levels of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap system,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4529–4541, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4529-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-18-4529-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fensholt, R., Rasmussen, K., Nielsen, T. T., and Mbow, C.: Evaluation of
earth observation based long term vegetation trends – Intercomparing NDVI
time series trend analysis consistency of Sahel from AVHRR GIMMS, Terra
MODIS and SPOT VGT data, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 1886–1898, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.04.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.04.004</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, Q., Feng, Q., and Li, J.: Environmental changes after ecological water
conveyance in the lower reaches of Heihe River, northwest China, Environ.
Geol., 58, 1387–1396, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1641-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00254-008-1641-1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, L. T., Chen, C. X., Jiao, J. J., and Wang, Z. J.: Simulated groundwater
interaction with rivers and springs in the Heihe river basin, Hydrol.
Process., 21, 2794–2806, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6497" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/hyp.6497</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, X., Lu, L., Li, X., Wang, J., and Guo, M.: Land Use/Cover Change in the
Middle Reaches of the Heihe River Basin over 2000–2011 and Its Implications
for Sustainable Water Resource Management, PLoS ONE, 10, e0128960, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128960" target="_blank">doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128960</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, X., Lu, L., Li, X., Wang, J., and Lu, X.: Ejin Oasis Land Use and
Vegetation Change between 2000 and 2011: The Role of the Ecological Water
Diversion Project, Energies, 8, 7040–7057, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en8077040" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/en8077040</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Jia, L., Shang, H., Hu, G., and Menenti, M.: Phenological response of
vegetation to upstream river flow in the Heihe Rive basin by time series
analysis of MODIS data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1047–1064, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1047-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-15-1047-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Li, X., Nan, Z. T., Cheng, G. D., Ding, Y. J., Wu, L. Z., Wang, L. X., Wang,
J., Ran, Y. H., Li, H. X., Pan, X. D., and Zhu. Z. M.: Toward an improved
data stewardship and service for environmental and ecological science data
in west China, Int. J. Digit. Earth, 4, 347–359, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Lian, J. and Huang, M.: Evapotranspiration estimation for an oasis area in
the Heihe River Basin using Landsat-8 images and the METRIC model, Water
Resour. Manage., 29, 5157–5170, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, S., Wu, B., Yan, N., and Wang, H.: Water body mapping method with
HJ-1A/B satellite imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 13, 428–434, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jag.2010.09.006</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, Z., Wei, Y., Xiao, H., Zou, S., Ren, J., and Lyle, C.: Trade-offs
between midstream agricultural production and downstream ecological
sustainability in the Heihe River basin in the past half century, Agr. Water
Manage., 152, 233–242, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.022" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.022</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Luo, X., Wang, K., Jiang, H., Sun, J., and Zhu, Q.: Estimation of land surface
evapotranspiration over the Heihe River basin based on the revised
three-temperature model, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1263–1269, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Pahl-Wostl, C., Arthington, A., Bogardi, J., Bunn, S. E., Hoff, H., Lebel,
L., Nikitina, E., Palmer, M., Poff, L. N., Richards, K., Schlüter, M.,
Schulze, R., St-Hilaire, A., Tharme, R., Tockner, K., and Tsegai, D.:
Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses,
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 341–351, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Schlüter, M., Savitsky, A. G., McKinney, D. C., and Lieth, H.:
Optimizing long-term water allocation in the Amudarya River delta: a water
management model for ecological impact assessment, Environ. Modell. Softw.,
20, 529–545, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.005" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Seyedabbasi, M. A., Farthing, M. W., Imhoff, P. T., and Miller, C. T.:
WITHDRAWN: Influence of Porous Media Heterogeneity on NAPL Dissolution
Fingering and Upscaled Mass Transfer, Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–62, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009138" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010WR009138</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, M. J., Wang, X. J., Yang, H., and Wang, T.: Pricing or Quota? A
Solution to Water Scarcity in Oasis Regions in China: A Case Study in the
Heihe River Basin, Sustainability, 6, 7601–7620, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su6117601" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/su6117601</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, Q., Vivoni, E. R., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.:
Predictability of Evapotranspiration Patterns Using Remotely Sensed
Vegetation Dynamics during the North American Monsoon, J. Hydrometeorol.,
13, 103–121, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-032.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-032.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Tesemma, Z. K., Wei, Y., Western, A. W., and Peel, M. C.: Leaf Area Index
Variation for Crop, Pasture, and Tree in Response to Climatic Variation in
the Goulburn–Broken Catchment, Australia, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 1592–1606,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0108.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-0108.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Thanapakpawin, P., Richey, J., Thomas, D., Rodda, S., Campbell, B., and
Logsdon, M.: Effects of landuse change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae
Chaem river basin, NW Thailand, J. Hydrol., 334, 215–230, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.012</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Thevs, N., Peng, H., Rozi, A., Zerbe, S., and Abdusalih, N.: Water
allocation and water consumption of irrigated agriculture and natural
vegetation in the Aksu-Tarim river basin, Xinjiang, China, J. Arid Environ.,
112, 87–97, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.028" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.028</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, R. F., Kingsford, R. T., Lu, Y., and Hunter, S. J.: Landsat mapping
of annual inundation (1979–2006) of the Macquarie Marshes in semi-arid
Australia, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 4545–4569, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.489064" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/01431161.2010.489064</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H. B., Ma, M. G., Zhou, S. N., Li, Y. M., and Guo, D.: HiWATER
Observation dataset of fractional vegetation cover by digital camera in the
lower reaches of the Heihe River Basin, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental
and Engineering Research Institute, Chin. Acad. Sci.,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3972/hiwater.271.2015.db" target="_blank">doi:10.3972/hiwater.271.2015.db</a>, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J. F., Cheng, G. D., Gao, Y. G., Long, A. H., Xu, Z. M., Li, X., Chen,
H., and Barker, T.: Optimal Water Resource Allocation in Arid and Semi-Arid
Areas, Water Resour. Manage., 22, 239–258, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9155-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9155-2</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, X., Yang, H., Shi, M., Zhou, D., and Zhang, Z.: Managing stakeholders'
conflicts for water reallocation from agriculture to industry in the Heihe
River Basin in Northwest China, Sci. Total Environ., 505, 823–832, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.063" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.063</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Wen, X., Wu, Y., Su, J., Zhang, Y., and Liu, F.: Hydrochemical
characteristics and salinity of groundwater in the Ejina Basin, Northwestern
China, Environ. Geol., 48, 665–675, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0001-7" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00254-005-0001-7</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, X., Lamačová, A., Duffy, C., Krám, P., Hruška, J.,
White, T., and Bhatt, G.: Modelling long-term water yield effects of forest
management in a Norway spruce forest, Hydrol. Sci. J., 60,
174–191, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.897406" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.897406</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Walker, A., Shaikh, M., DeFries, R. S., and Qi,
J.: Derivation and Evaluation of Global 1-km Fractional Vegetation Cover
Data for Land Modeling, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 826–839,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039&lt;0826:DAEOGK&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039&lt;0826:DAEOGK&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y. H., Ren, L. L., Skaggs, T. H., Lu, H. S., Yu, Z. B., Wu, Y. Q., and
Fang, X. Q.: Simulation of Populus euphratica root uptake of groundwater in
an arid woodland of the Ejina Basin, China, Hydrol. Process, 23, 2460–2469,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7353" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/hyp.7353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
