<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-20-2691-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Contradictory hydrological impacts of afforestation in the <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> humid tropics
evidenced by long-term field monitoring and <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>simulation modelling</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Contradictory hydrological impacts of afforestation in the humid tropics}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G. Lacombe et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lacombe</surname><given-names>Guillaume</given-names></name>
          <email>g.lacombe@cgiar.org</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ribolzi</surname><given-names>Olivier</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>de Rouw</surname><given-names>Anneke</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Pierret</surname><given-names>Alain</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Latsachak</surname><given-names>Keoudone</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Silvera</surname><given-names>Norbert</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Pham Dinh</surname><given-names>Rinh</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Orange</surname><given-names>Didier</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-1778</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Janeau</surname><given-names>Jean-Louis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Soulileuth</surname><given-names>Bounsamai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Robain</surname><given-names>Henri</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Taccoen</surname><given-names>Adrien</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Sengphaathith</surname><given-names>Phouthamaly</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Mouche</surname><given-names>Emmanuel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Sengtaheuanghoung</surname><given-names>Oloth</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Tran Duc</surname><given-names>Toan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Valentin</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Southeast Asia Regional Office, Vientiane, Lao PDR</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), GET, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>IRD, IEES-Paris UMR 242, Université Pierre et Marie-Curie, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>IRD, IEES-Paris UMR 242, c/o National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), Vientiane, Lao PDR</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute (SFRI), Hanoi, Vietnam</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>IRD, Eco&amp;Sols UMR 210, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>IRD, IEES-Paris UMR 242, c/o SFRI, Hanoi, Vietnam</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>AgroParisTech, Laboratoire d'étude des ressources Forêt Bois LERFoB, ENGREF, UMR1092, Nancy, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>University of Arizona, Graduate College, Tucson, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), UMR 8212, C.E. de Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Agriculture Land-Use Planning Center (ALUPC), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Lao PDR</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Guillaume Lacombe (g.lacombe@cgiar.org)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>2691</fpage><lpage>2704</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The humid tropics are exposed to an unprecedented modernisation of
agriculture involving rapid and mixed land-use changes with contrasted
environmental impacts. Afforestation is often mentioned as an unambiguous
solution for restoring ecosystem services and enhancing biodiversity. One
consequence of afforestation is the alteration of streamflow variability
which controls habitats, water resources, and flood risks. We demonstrate that
afforestation by tree planting or by natural forest regeneration can induce
opposite hydrological changes. An observatory including long-term field
measurements of fine-scale land-use mosaics and of hydrometeorological
variables has been operating in several headwater catchments in tropical
southeast Asia since 2000. The GR2M water balance model, repeatedly calibrated
over successive 1-year periods and used in simulation mode with the same
year of rainfall input, allowed the hydrological effect of land-use change to
be isolated from that of rainfall variability in two of these catchments in
Laos and Vietnam. Visual inspection of hydrographs, correlation analyses, and
trend detection tests allowed causality between land-use changes and changes
in seasonal streamflow to be ascertained. In Laos, the combination of
shifting cultivation system (alternation of rice and fallow) and the gradual
increase of teak tree plantations replacing fallow led to intricate
streamflow patterns: pluri-annual streamflow cycles induced by the shifting
system, on top of a gradual streamflow increase over years caused by the
spread of the plantations. In Vietnam, the abandonment of continuously
cropped areas combined with patches of mix-trees plantations led to the
natural re-growth of forest communities followed by a gradual drop in
streamflow. Soil infiltrability controlled by surface crusting is the
predominant process explaining why two modes of afforestation (natural
regeneration vs. planting) led to opposite changes in streamflow regime.
Given that commercial tree plantations will continue to expand in the humid
tropics, careful consideration is needed before attributing to them positive
effects on water and soil conservation.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Although the humid tropics exhibit the highest rate of deforestation and
biodiversity losses globally (Keenan et al., 2015; Hansen et al., 2013;
Bradshaw et al., 2009), new forests are regenerating on former agricultural
and degraded lands, and tree plantations are being established for commercial
and restoration purposes (Miura et al., 2015). Forest regrowth is either
cyclic like in shifting cultivation systems (Ziegler et al., 2011; Hurni et
al., 2013) or more permanent. The latter, afforestation, is the production of
forest over an area of open land either by planting or by allowing natural
regeneration. If appropriately managed, forest restoration, or afforestation,
can lead to biodiversity enhancement (Chazdon, 2008), not only in the
forested area but also farther downstream, in response to modified
hydrological processes at the hillslope and catchment levels (Konar et al.,
2013). Although important for a sustainable management of headwater
catchments, the current understanding of hydrological processes altered by
land-use changes remains limited in the tropics (Sidle et al., 2006). Reasons
include the scarcity of long-term field monitoring (Douglas, 1999; Wohl et
al., 2012) and several factors confounding causalities between land use and
hydrological changes: mixed land-use patterns, climate variability, and
catchment size (Beck et al., 2013; van Dijk et al., 2012). While it is widely
and independently recognised that evapotranspiration is a central driver of
basin annual water yield (Brown et al., 2005), changes in soil infiltrability
also control groundwater recharge and water uptake by roots (Beck et al.,
2013; Bruijnzeel, 2004). While in most cases, afforestation will reduce
streamflow (Brown et al., 2005; Calder, 2007), the opposite or the absence of
significant hydrologic changes are observed in some instances (Wilcox and
Huang, 2010; Hawtree et al., 2015). The lack of an unequivocal hydrological
response to afforestation feeds controversies around the role of forests in
controlling river flows (Andréassian, 2004) and highlights the need for
further research (Calder, 2007). A few studies have attempted to predict the
catchment-scale hydrological effects of land-cover changes on streamflow in
the humid tropics, mainly from model-based simulations of land-use change
scenarios (Thanapakpawin et al., 2006; Guardiola-Claramonte et al., 2010;
Homdee et al., 2011). Hydrological assessments based on actual data are rare
in the humid tropics (Wohl et al., 2012) and often confined to the plot level
(Ziegler et al., 2004; Podwojewski et al., 2008; Valentin et al., 2008a;
Patin et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Two main approaches are usually deployed to assess how land-use changes alter
hydrology. Paired catchment studies establish statistical relationships for
outflow variables, during a calibration period, between two neighbouring
catchments ideally similar in geomorphology, area, land use, and climate.
Following this calibration, land-use treatments are applied to one catchment
and changes in the statistical relationships are indicative of the land
treatment effect on hydrology. Important limitations of this approach are the
relatively few samples used for model development, and the spatial
variability of rainfall events between the two catchments (Zégre et al.,
2010). A second approach involves the calibration of a rainfall–runoff model
in one single catchment. The model is first calibrated before a land-cover
treatment occurred. The model is then used as a virtual control catchment
along with rainfall observed after the land-cover treatment, in order to
reconstitute runoff as if no change in the catchment had occurred. An
underlying assumption for this approach is that the catchment behaviour is
stationary in both the pre-treatment and post-treatment periods. This
assumption is seldom tested. In addition, very few studies have tested the
statistical significance of changes in the relationship between rainfall and
runoff (Zégre et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>The objectives of our research were to
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>Monitor inter-annual and long-term changes in land use and hydrology in
two headwater catchments in tropical southeast Asia, one exposed to a
gradual conversion of rainfed rice-based shifting cultivation to teak
plantations in Laos, and one subject to natural forest regrowth following
the abandonment of intensively cultivated hillslopes with cash crops and
patches of mixed-trees plantations in Vietnam.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Use a conceptual monthly lumped water balance model repeatedly
calibrated over successive 1-year periods and used in simulation mode with
specific rainfall input to generate cross simulation matrices
(Andréassian et al., 2003). These matrices are used to isolate the
hydrological effect of rainfall variability from that of other environmental
changes (e.g. land-use change, in this article) in each study catchment.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Apply correlation analyses and a non-parametric trend detection test to
streamflow reported in the cross simulation matrices, to investigate and
quantify causal relationships between land-use changes and changes in the
hydrological behaviour of the study catchments, and assess whether the
hydrological changes are statistically significant over the whole study
period.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Compare the effects of forest plantations and natural forest regrowth on
streamflow in the two study catchments.</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The two study catchments of the MSEC network and their land use in
2013.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Monthly rainfall, runoff, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the study
periods in Laos and Vietnam.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Study sites</title>
      <p>The two study catchments (Fig. 1) are part of a regional monitoring network
named “Multi-Scale Environmental Change” (MSEC,
<uri>http://msec.obs-mip.fr/</uri>), located in southeast Asia (Valentin et al.,
2008b). They are exposed to a tropical climate influenced by the southwest
monsoon bringing warm and humid air masses during the wet season
(April–September), and by the northeast monsoon bringing colder dry air
during the dry season (October–March). Rainfall is highly seasonal with more
than 80 % of annual rainfall occurring during the wet season (Fig. 2).
Averaged throughout the period (April 2001–March 2014), annual runoff
amounts to about 26–27 % of annual rainfall in both catchments. The two
catchments, located in upland rural areas, have similar size, elevations
ranges, mean slopes, mean annual rainfall, and mean annual streamflow
(Table 1). Both were cultivated by smallholder farmers when the monitoring
network started operating in the early 2000s.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Catchments characteristics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Country</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Laos</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Vietnam</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Catchment name</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Houay Pano</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dong Cao</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Province</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Luang Prabang</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Hoa Binh</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Latitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>57<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Longitude</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">102<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">105<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Catchment size</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">60.2 ha</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.7 ha</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elevation range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">430–718 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">130–482 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean slope</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48 %</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean annual rainfall</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1585 mm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1556 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean annual streamflow</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">418 mm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">415 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Geology</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shale, schist</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Schist</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Soils</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Alfisol, Entisol, Ultisol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ultisol</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The Houay Pano catchment in Laos is located about 10 km south of Luang
Prabang city. It is representative of a landscape dominated by shifting
cultivation, the principal activity in the uplands of northern Laos. The
catchment was first cleared of semi-deciduous forest in the late 1960s (Huon
et al., 2013) and used for shifting cultivation (crop–fallow rotation). In
this system, one annual crop comprising mainly rainfed rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic>) with Job's tears (<italic>Coix lacryma-Jobi</italic>) and maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>) as secondary crops, is followed by several years of natural vegetation
regrowth (woody fallow). On average, about 30 % of the land is cropped in
a given year in this shifting system. The duration of the fallow period has
declined from an average of 8.6 years in 1970 to 3.2 years in 2003 (de Rouw
et al., 2015). At the onset of the land-use monitoring, the shifting
cultivation system expanded over about 80 % of the catchment area.
Non-farmed areas, about 15 % of the catchment surface area, were split
between patches of mixed deciduous and dry Dipterocarp forest, paths, and the
village. About 5 % were occupied by banana trees (<italic>Musa spp.</italic>) and
teak tree plantations (<italic>Tectona grandis L.</italic>). <italic>Tectona grandis L.</italic> is an endemic species planted with an average density of
1500 trees ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a typical rotation length of 25–30 years. It is
fully deciduous with total defoliation lasting 2–3 months during the dry
season. Canopy typically closes after 3–5 years depending on the plantation
density. In northern Laos, teak plantations have expanded quickly over the
last decade (Newby et al., 2014), and specifically from 3 to 35 % of the
catchment area in Houay Pano between 2006 and 2013, encroaching into the area
used for shifting cultivation. In this catchment, agriculture has remained
largely no-till with very limited external inputs such as fertilisers and
pesticides.</p>
      <p>The Dong Cao catchment is located in northern Vietnam, about 50 km southwest
of Hanoi, along the eastern side of the Annamite Mountain range. The
catchment was covered by lowland primary forest prior to 1970. Paddy rice and
arrowroot (<italic>Colocasia esculenta</italic>) were cultivated only on the
foothills and along the main stream. After 1970, because of population
growth, greater food demand, and market demand, the forest was cut on the
slopes and replaced by continuous cropping of annual crops without external
inputs: initially upland rice, and more recently maize and cassava
(<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic>). By 1980, all remaining forest had been cut.
After 2000, due to soil exhaustion and erosion, declining yields, and
governmental incentives, cassava on the steep slopes was rapidly replaced by
evergreen tree plantations (with an average density of about
1600 trees ha<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), including acacia (<italic>Acacia mangium</italic>)
(Clément et al., 2007, 2009), eucalyptus (several species), Cinnamomum
(several species), and fruit trees (Podwojewski et al., 2008). On less steep
slopes, livestock was introduced, replacing cassava. Available land was used
either for pasture and partly planted with grass fodder (<italic>Bracharia ruziziensis</italic>) (Podwojewski et al., 2008), or for expanding existing tree
plantations in low densities. Following the recent conversion of the main
land owner to off-farm activities, most of the tree plantations and annual
crops were finally abandoned, leading to the natural re-growth of forest
communities whose percentage area over the Dong Cao catchment nearly
doubled between 2001 (45 %) and 2013 (84 %). Grazing and other
activities linked to husbandry continue on a small area in the catchment.
Water discharged from the main stream irrigates about 10 ha of paddy rice
located downstream of the catchment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Data collection</title>
      <p>Data were collected by IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement)
and the national agricultural research institutions from April 2001 to March
2014 in Laos, and from April 2000 to March 2014 in Vietnam. They include
records of daily rainfall, reference evapotranspiration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), streamflow, and
annual land-use maps. Stream water level was measured at the outlet of each
catchment within a V-notch weir, by a water level recorder (OTT, Thalimedes)
equipped with a data logger, with 1 mm vertical precision at 3 min time
interval. A control rating curve (the relationship between water level and
discharge) was determined using the velocity–area method at each station. In
general, streamflow data quality is very good with rare interruptions in the
measurements (August–November 2001 in Vietnam) caused by flood destruction of
the measurement devices. Daily areal rainfall was computed using data
collected by manual rain gauges (one in Vietnam, seven in Laos).
Catchment-scale daily areal rainfall was derived from the point measurements
using the Thiessen polygons method. Daily <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated following the
Penman–Monteith FAO method applied to meteorological variables (air
temperature, 2 m high wind speed, relative air humidity, and global solar
radiation) collected by a weather station (CIMEL, ENERCO 404) installed at
mid-hillslope in each catchment (Fig. 1). Mean monthly rainfall, runoff, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
averaged over the study period, are displayed in Fig. 2.</p>
      <p>Land use was mapped annually for 13 years (April 2001–March 2014) from
detailed field surveys undertaken each year in October–November, after the
harvests of annual crops, when fields are clearly marked and easily
accessible without damaging crops. A combination of GPS and theodolite survey
points were used in the field to map boundaries between land-use units.
ArcMap 10.0 was used to estimate the proportion of each land-use unit in each
catchment. The mapping accuracy of land-use boundaries is estimated to be
within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 m (Chaplot et al., 2005). Land-use units covering less
than 1 % of the catchment areas are not reported here. In the Houay Pano
catchment in Laos, distinction was made between fallow of different ages
varying between 1 and 12 years. Some of the land-use units correspond to the
aggregation of several land uses observed in the field, as detailed
thereafter.</p>
      <p>In Laos, the unit “Annual crops” includes rainfed upland rice,
Job's tears and maize; “Forest” includes patches of remaining
forest, either mixed deciduous or dry Dipterocarp; “1-year fallow”
and “2- to 12-year fallow” form two distinct land-use units due to
differences in soil surface crusting rates and associated hydrodynamic
conductivity (Ziegler et al., 2004); Teak plantations are often associated
with annual crops during the first 2 years after planting
(“Teak <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> annual crops”) and become a monoculture
after canopy closure (“Teak”). “Banana” corresponds to
small banana plantations.</p>
      <p>In Vietnam, the unit “Forest communities” combines abandoned
farmland that has developed into an open forest, usually after 5 years of
undisturbed growth, and patches of more developed secondary forest;
“Mixed-trees plantations” includes acacia, eucalyptus, cinnamon,
and fruit trees, both young and mature. These plantations have developed an
understorey of natural vegetation; “Forbs” are abandoned farm
lands covered by a dense herbaceous cover of perennial dicots and grasses,
usually developed within 5 years since the last cropping; “Annual
crops” include cassava and maize; “Fodder” corresponds to the
planted exotic grass <italic>Bracharia ruziziensis</italic> mixed with local grasses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Assessment of hydrological changes</title>
      <p>The two-parameter monthly lumped water balance model GR2M was used to
investigate changes in the hydrological behaviour of the two study
catchments. This model was empirically developed by Mouelhi et al. (2006)
using a sample of 410 basins under a wide range of climate conditions. GR2M
includes a production store and a routing store. The model estimates monthly
streamflow from monthly areal rainfall and monthly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The two
parameters of the model determine the capacity of the production store and
the flow of underground water exchange. Compared with several widely used
models, GR2M ranks amongst the most reliable and robust monthly lumped water
balance models (Mouelhi et al., 2006). For this analysis, like in most
hydrological analyses performed in the Mekong Basin, each hydrological year
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> starts in April of year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ends in March of year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lacombe et
al., 2010). The model was repeatedly calibrated over 12 successive 1-year
periods from April 2002 to March 2014, thus allowing an initial warm-up
period for the initiation of the water level in the two model reservoirs of
at least 1 year. The Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency criteria calculated on flow
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and calculated on the logarithm of flow
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were used for the evaluation of wet and dry season
streamflow simulations, respectively. While each of these two efficiency
criteria are calculated with the 12 monthly flow values of each 1-year
calibration period (including wet and dry season streamflow),
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> give more weight to high- and low-flow
values, respectively. Therefore, the former and the latter are suitable for
evaluating high- and low-flow simulations, respectively (Pushpalatha et al.,
2012). The nonlinear generalized reduced gradient (GRG) method (Lasdon and
Warren, 1979) was used to determine the values of the two model parameters
that maximise the efficiency criteria. A constraint of a less than 10 %
bias on annual streamflow over each year was applied to all calibrations
using a branch-and-bound method that runs the GRG method on a series of
subproblems. This constraint was achieved for all calibrations. For each of
the two objective functions, each of the 12 sets of model parameters were
used to perform simulations over the other 11 1-year periods (cf. generalized
split-sample test from Coron et al., 2012). The annual variables “wet season
streamflow” and “dry season streamflow” were defined as the sum of monthly
simulated streamflow over the wet and the dry season, respectively. This
procedure resulted in two 12-by-12 cross-simulation matrices of hydrological
variables <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each study catchment (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>In a given matrix, each column <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="|" close=""><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
corresponds to a set of model parameters M<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> capturing the hydrological
conditions of the catchment that prevailed during year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In each row <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="" open="|"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), streamflow was simulated with
rainfall from year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Flow variations between columns for a given row are
not rainfall-related and reflect other environmental changes (e.g. land-use
change). Flow variations between rows for a given column result from
inter-annual rainfall variability. Variations in simulated streamflow between
the columns of the matrices were plotted against time. In these simulations,
rainfall input to the model is similar each year and corresponds to the year
with actual rainfall exhibiting median annual depth over the study period
(year 2004 in Laos and year 2012 in Vietnam, cf. Fig. 4). The inter-annual
variations in simulated streamflow illustrate changes in the hydrological
behaviour of the study catchments under stable rainfall conditions (Houay
Pano catchment in Fig. 5a, b and Dong Cao catchment in Fig. 6a, b). The
objective of this simulation framework is to isolate the hydrological effect
of rainfall variability from that of other environmental disturbances and
verify the hydrological influence of actual land-use changes by comparing
Figs. 5a, b, and 6a, b with Figs. 5c and 6c, respectively, showing inter-annual
variations in the cumulative percentage areas of the land-use units.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Cross-simulation matrix. Here, <italic>i</italic> is the row index and <italic>j</italic>
is the column index; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="|" close=""><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) defines the set of
model parameters calibrated over year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as input; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="|" close=""><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) defines the rainfall that
occurred over year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Following the approach proposed by Andréassian et al. (2003), the statistical
significance of gradual changes in catchment behaviour was calculated using
cross-simulation matrices similar to the one illustrated in Fig. 3.
Each of the two original matrices was resampled 10 000 times by permuting
columns. For each original and permuted matrix, the statistic <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was
calculated using Eq. (1).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the streamflow value found in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th row and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th column of the matrix. Under the null hypothesis
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of absence of unidirectional trend in the hydrological behaviour of
the catchment, the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> associated to the original matrix should be
close to zero. A negative (respectively, positive) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value corresponds to a
decrease (respectively, increase) trend in basin water yield. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of
a negative (respectively, positive) trend is equivalent to the non-exceedance
(respectively, exceedance) frequency of the original <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value compared to the
range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values derived from the permuted matrices.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Annual rainfall, runoff, and runoff coefficient measured in Houay
Pano <bold>(a)</bold> and Dong Cao <bold>(b)</bold> catchments. Runoff values are not available in
Vietnam in 2001 (cf. Sect. 2.2). Arrows point to rainfall years used in model
simulations displayed in Figs. 5 and 6.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Hydrological changes according to measured variables and cross-simulation
test</title>
      <p>Annual rainfall and runoff variations are consistently correlated in Laos
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001) and Vietnam (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04). Rainfall and runoff tend to decrease from 2001 to 2009 and
to increase from 2009 to 2013 in the two catchments, with a few singular
 years (e.g. lower rainfall and runoff in Vietnam in 2002; higher runoff in
Laos in 2011) (Fig. 4). In Laos, the annual runoff coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>annual runoff/annual rainfall) gradually declines from 2001 (34.5 %)
to 2009 (13.5 %) and then increases until 2013 (31.1 %), with local
peaks in 2003 (34.5 %), 2008 (28.8 %), and 2011 (58.9 %). In
Vietnam, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits greater inter-annual variability than in Laos with an
overall declining trend, from about 48.5 % over the years 2002 and 2003
to 19.2 % over the years 2012 and 2013 (Fig. 4). Consistently, the
non-parametric cross-simulation test applied to wet and dry season streamflow
did not reveal any significant trend in catchment behaviour in Laos over the
simulation period 2002–2013: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 0.48 and 0.33 for the wet and dry
season streamflow, respectively. In contrast, a highly significant reduction
of the basin water yield was observed in Vietnam over the same period:
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were 0.03 and 0.01 for the wet and dry season streamflow, respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Houay Pano catchment, Laos. Wet season <bold>(a)</bold> and dry season
<bold>(b)</bold>  streamflow simulated with GR2M calibrated each year (indicated on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) and
ran with the same rainfall input. Cumulative percentage area of the land-use units <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Simulated streamflow and land-use changes in the Houay Pano catchment,
Laos</title>
      <p>Annual values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the
whole study periods are high: 89.9 % and 86.6 %, respectively. The
lowest annual values were obtained in 2008 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>74.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 2009
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>69.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure 5 shows that the cumulative percentage
area including annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak plantations
(materialised by the black solid-bold curve) is positively correlated to the
variations in simulated wet and dry season streamflow (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00, respectively). Any
other combinations of land-use units led to lower correlation between
the corresponding cumulative percentage areas and seasonal simulated streamflow.
Quantitatively, between 2002 and 2003, simulated wet and dry season
streamflow increased by 21 and 29 mm, respectively. Over the same period,
the cumulative percentage area including annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak
plantations increased from 45.2 to 61.7 % of the catchment area.
From 2003 to 2006, the cumulative percentage area including annual crops, 1-year
fallow, and teak plantations decreased to 18.3 % while simulated wet and
dry season streamflow decreased by 129 and 64 mm, respectively. The main
land-use changes that occurred during the first sub-period (2002–2006)
involve cyclic alternations between rainfed rice that is cropped one year,
and fallow (up to 6 consecutive years), which are typical land uses of the
shifting cultivation system that prevails in the uplands of Laos. The second
sub-period (2006–2013) is characterized by a continuation of the same
shifting cultivation dynamic, yet with cycles of slightly lower magnitude.
The main change observed over this second sub-period is a gradual spread of
teak plantations, with their total surface area increasing from 3.3 to
35.1 % of the catchment, with a corresponding decline in the area of
shifting cultivation. From 2006 to 2008, the cumulative percentage area including
annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak plantations increased from 18.3 to
54.0 % while simulated wet and dry season streamflow increased by 115
and 36 mm, respectively. Between 2008 and 2009, the cumulative percentage area
including annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak plantations decreased from 54.0
to 44.2 % while simulated wet and dry season streamflow decreased by
113 and 28 mm, respectively. Consistently, from 2010 to 2011, the cumulative
percentage area including the same land-use units increased from 51.0 to 67.6 %
while simulated wet and dry season streamflow increased by 442 and 72 mm,
respectively. Conversely, from 2011 to 2013, this cumulative percentage area
decreased to 54.5 % while wet and dry season streamflow decreased by
356 and 50 mm, respectively (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Dong Cao catchment, Vietnam. Wet season <bold>(a)</bold> and dry season
<bold>(b)</bold> streamflow simulated with GR2M calibrated each year (indicated on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) and
ran with the same rainfall input. Cumulative percentage area of the land-use units <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlations between simulated streamflow and land-use types.
Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show the Houay Pano catchment, Laos. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the
Dong Cao catchment, Vietnam. Percentage areas of year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="" open="|"><mml:mn>2001</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn> 2012</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are correlated to seasonal streamflow of
year <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Vietnam.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2691/2016/hess-20-2691-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Over the first sub-period (2002–2006), on average, an increase (decrease) of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the cumulative percentage area including annual crops and 1-year fallow
induces an increase (decrease) of 2.90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and 1.48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mm in wet and dry
season streamflow, respectively. Over the second sub-period (2007–2013), on
average, the magnitude of the flow response to an increase (decrease) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the cumulate percentage of area under annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak
plantations is greater: 11.72<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and 3.31<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> mm in wet and dry season
streamflow, respectively (Fig. 7a, b).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Simulated streamflow and land-use changes in the Dong Cao catchment,
Vietnam</title>
      <p>Annual values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaged over the
whole study periods are high: 89.0 and 88.0 %, respectively. The
lowest annual values were obtained in 2008 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>57.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 2010
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>69.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Figure 6 shows that the cumulative percentage area
including annual crops, forbs, and fodder (materialised by the black
solid-bold curve) is positively correlated to the variations in simulated wet
and dry season streamflow time-lagged by 1 year (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.00, respectively) (Fig. 7c, d).
Like in Laos, any other combinations of land-use units led to lower
correlation between the corresponding cumulative percentage areas and seasonal
simulated streamflow. It is interesting to note that these land-use units are
all herbaceous covers, in contrast with the tree-based land-use units “Mixed-trees
plantations” and “Forest communities” appearing above the black solid-bold
curve in Fig. 6c. Quantitatively, Fig. 6a, b show an overall reduction of
simulated wet and dry season streamflow from 2002–2003 to 2012–2013 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>435
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>53 mm, respectively). From 2002 to 2004, simulated wet and dry season
streamflow reduced by 272 and 44 mm, respectively, following the reduction
of herbaceous vegetation cover from 40 to 29 % between 2001 and
2003. From 2004 to 2006, simulated streamflow is relatively stable, in
accordance with the relative stability in the percentage area of herbaceous
cover over the period (2003–2005). The drop in simulated wet and
dry streamflow in 2007 (down to 275 and 15 mm, respectively) follows a drop
in the percentage area of herbaceous cover to 11 % in 2006. The
period (2008–2010), exhibiting slightly greater simulated wet and dry season
streamflow, up to 504 and 28 mm, respectively, follows a period (2007–2009)
with a greater percentage area of herbaceous cover (up to 24 %).
Afterwards, the percentage area of herbaceous cover and simulated wet
and dry season streamflow decline again, to 11 %, and 161 and 10 mm,
respectively. Over the study period, the year 2009 exhibits the lowest annual
rainfall depths (Fig. 4), possibly explaining the discordance between
land-uses changes and simulated wet season streamflow in this particular year
(cf. Fig. 6 and Sect. 4.4).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Land-use changes and hydrological processes in the Houay Pano catchment,
Laos</title>
      <p>Figures 5 and 7a, b indicate that catchment streamflow is predominantly produced
by the following land-use units: annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak
plantations while 2- to 12-year fallow, forest, and banana plantations make a
comparatively lower contribution to annual streamflow production. In
agreement with these observations, Ribolzi et al. (2008) determined a
negative correlation between the percentage area of total fallow and
annual runoff coefficients in the same catchment over the period 2002–2006.
However, the authors could not ascertain the causality between these two
variables because the possible effect of rainfall variability (gradual
decline of annual rainfall from 2002 to 2006, cf. Fig. 4a) on streamflow was
not isolated from that of land-use change (gradual increase of total fallow
areas from 2002 to 2006, cf. Fig. 5c).</p>
      <p>The contrasting hydrological behaviour of areas under annual crops and 1-year
fallow, on the one hand, and areas under 2- to 12-year fallow, on the other
hand, observed at the catchment level, are consistent with local
observations. Using several 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> microplot experiments in the Houay Pano
catchment, Patin et al. (2012) showed that soil under annual crops (rice)
exhibit rates of soil surface crusting that are much higher (about 50 %
of the microplot area) than those observed under old fallow (about
10 % of the microplot area). The authors showed that soil
infiltrability decreases as the soil surface crusting rate increases, thus
explaining the lower overland flow productivity of 2- to 12-year fallow,
compared to that of annual crops. Due to the low faunal activity and the
absence of tillage in the upland rice-based cultivation systems, the high
rates of crusting rate persist during the first year of fallow (Ziegler et
al., 2004), thus explaining similar hydrological behaviours of annual crops
and 1-year fallow. While infiltrability increased as fallow aged, its
developing leaf area and root system also contributed to lower streamflow at
the catchment outlet (cf. period 2003–2006 in Fig. 5). The fraction of
incident rainfall intercepted by the canopy and subsequently evaporated
increased while larger volumes of infiltrated water were redirected by
transpiration. The increased root water uptake reduced groundwater recharge
and subsurface water reserves; it also lowered the water table, hence
limiting stream feeding by shallow groundwater. This groundwater depletion
led to a drop in the annual stream water yield due to a decrease in wet
season inter-storm flow and dry season base flow (Ribolzi et al., 2008).</p>
      <p>The hydrological processes involved in the conversion of the rice-based
shifting cultivation system to teak plantations are less intuitive. Teak
trees can develop relatively high leaf area index (Vyas et al., 2010), deep
and dense root systems (Calder et al., 1997; Maeght, 2014), i.e. traits
consistent with a high water uptake by evapotranspiration. To that extent,
their hydrological impact should be similar to that of 2- to 12-year fallow during the wet
season. However, (1) under young teak trees, the inter-row area
is cultivated with annual crops with high rate of soil surface crusting; (2) the
large leaves of mature teak trees concentrate rainfall into big drops
that hit the soil with increased kinetic energy hence forming surface crusts;
and (3) most farmers intentionally keep the soil bare under mature teak trees
by recurrent burning of the understorey. These three facts create the conditions for intense
erosion that induces features such as gullies, raised pedestals, and root
exposure. Suppression of the understorey led to the formation of impervious
crusts that limited infiltration and in turn increased Hortonian overland
flow and erosion, as typically observed in teak plantations where fires are a
common phenomenon (Fernández-Moya et al., 2014). These processes were
quantified at the 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> microplot level by Patin et al. (2012) in the
Houay Pano catchment. Median infiltrability measured in teak plantations
(18 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was nearly 4 times lower than that measured in fallow
(74 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and equivalent to that measured in rice fields
(19 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Compared to the dense fallow vegetation that remains
green during the dry season, teak trees shed their leaves during the dry
season, primarily in response to the gradual drop in precipitations and
temperature (Abramoff and Finzi, 2015), thus reducing transpiration and
increasing dry season streamflow. The low infiltrability throughout the year and the limited root
water uptake during the dry season both explain the increasing wet and dry season
streamflow as teak plantations expanded over the catchment between 2006 and
2013 (Figs. 5 and 7a, b).</p>
      <p>No local measurement of infiltrability and soil surface crust was performed
under the natural forest in the Houay Pano catchment. Therefore, it is
not possible to conclusively prove their contribution to the catchment
outflows. However, correlation analyses showed that this land-use unit
behaves hydrologically like 2- to 12-year fallow (cf. the position of this
land-use unit above the black solid-bold curve in Fig. 5c). This is in
accordance with Brown et al. (2005) and with our findings in Vietnam (cf.
Sect. 4.2, Figs. 6 and 7c, d), showing that sparser (denser) natural
vegetation cover increases (reduces) streamflow. Finally, it should be noted
that the area covered with banana trees remained stable over the study period
and had no discernable effect on streamflow variations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Land-use changes and hydrological processes in the Dong Cao catchment,
Vietnam</title>
      <p>Figures 6 and 7c, d indicate that catchment streamflow is predominantly
produced over herbaceous land-use units (annual crops, forbs, and fodder),
while tree-based land-use units (mixed-trees plantations and forest
communities) make a comparatively lower contribution to streamflow (cf. the
location of these groups of land-use units below and above the black solid-bold
curve in Fig. 6c, respectively). These differences are consistent with local observations. Deploying
several 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> microplot experiments in the Dong Cao catchment in 2004
and 2005, Podwojewski et al. (2008) showed that mean annual surface runoff
coefficients under annual crops (10.8 %), fodder (5.9 %), and forbs
(referred to as “fallow” in Podwojewski et al., 2008) (5.1 %), were
higher than those of eucalyptus (2.0 %) and other tree-based covers
(1.4 %) including mixed-trees plantations and forest communities.
Applying controlled artificial rainfall (two events of 90 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
40 min each) on several 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> microplots in the Dong Cao catchment,
Janeau et al. (2014) showed that the accumulation of litter under an
<italic>Acacia mangium</italic> planted forest cover decreased the runoff coefficient
by 50 %.</p>
      <p>Two types of land-use successions occurred in the Dong Cao catchment: (i) from
annual crops and fodder to forbs and finally to forest communities and (ii) from
mixed-trees plantations to forest communities (Fig. 6c). These land-use
changes are the result of afforestation by natural regeneration in both
abandoned fields and neglected tree plantations, respectively. As indicated
in Podwojewski et al. (2008), these natural successions are converging on
lower surface runoff coefficients caused by increased infiltrability,
allowing the evapotranspiration of larger volumes of sub-surface and ground
water through denser and deeper root systems and denser tree canopy (Dunin et
al., 2007; Ribolzi et al., 2008). This explains the decrease in simulated wet
and dry season streamflow at the catchment level (Fig. 6a, b) from 2002 to
2013. The visual comparison of the simulated streamflow time series (Fig. 6a,
b) with the time series of the cumulative percentage area of the herbaceous
land-use units (e.g. the black solid-bold curve in Fig. 6c) indicates a 1-year delay in the
response of seasonal streamflow to land-use changes, which is confirmed by
correlation analyses (Fig. 7c, d). This delay is already known from a number
of catchment experiments globally. Brown et al. (2005) showed that annual
water yield altered by forest regrowth experiments takes more time to reach a
new equilibrium, compared to deforestation experiments that usually induce
quicker hydrological responses. In Laos, no time lag was observed between
land-use changes and changes in simulated streamflow (Fig. 5) because this
temporality was already accounted for in the difference made between 1-year
fallow and 2- to 12-year fallow exhibiting contrasting soil surface crusting
rates and infiltrability.</p>
      <p>The reduction of the Dong Cao catchment water yield over the full study
period is equivalent to a reduction of about 165 000 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (330 mm) during
the wet season and 30 300 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (60 mm) during the dry season. While the dry
season streamflow reduction may have negative consequences on irrigated rice
located downstream of the catchment, the reduction in wet season streamflow
is expected to contribute to decreased flood risk. The overall reduction in
streamflow over the study period could be interpreted as a recovery of
hydrological status prevailing prior to 1970 when the catchment was covered
by lowland primary forest with evapotranspiration likely greater and
streamflow production likely lower than that observed in the early 2000s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Comparison of the relationships between land-use changes and changes in
hydrological behaviour in the two study catchments</title>
      <p>The dynamics of land-use changes in the Houay Pano catchment, Laos, involved
cyclic patterns (landscape dominated by shifting cultivation and teak
plantation expansion) whose hydrological effects would remain undetected if
we had restricted our analysis to the statistical detection of gradual and
unidirectional change in the rainfall–runoff relationship
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values &gt; 0.3, cf. Sect. 3.1) over the whole study period, as it
is often done in hydrological impact assessments. In contrast, the same test
applied over the same period has resulted in highly significant changes in
the Dong Cao catchment, Vietnam (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values &lt; 0.03) because the
land-use transition to forest was unidirectional over the whole study
period. These results highlight the need to measure and assess the
inter-annual co-variability of land use and streamflow at the finest
temporal scale when assessing changes in catchment behaviour.</p>
      <p>Two main types of land-use change at the scale of the Houay Pano catchment had different
hydrological impacts: (i) the transition from (2- to 12-year fallow and
forest) to (annual crops and 1-year fallow); (ii) the transition from (2- to
12-year fallow and forest) to (annual crops, 1-year fallow, and teak
plantations). The first (observed over 2001–2006) induced increases in
simulated seasonal streamflow lower than those induced by the second
(observed over 2006–2013), as illustrated by the different slopes of the
regression lines in Fig. 7a, b. Thus, teak plantations, recently introduced
to replace traditional rice-based shifting cultivation systems, are
generating more runoff than was generated by annual crops and 1-year fallow.
This difference did not appear in the average values of infiltrability
obtained by Patin et al. (2012) at the microplot level: 18 and 19 mm h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for
teak plantations and rice fields, respectively. The microplot measurements
were performed before 2010, while the major catchment-wide hydrological
effects of the spread of teak plantations occurred in 2011 (Fig. 5),
suggesting that Hortonian overland flow has increased over recent years in
the teak plantations, in response to increased erosion processes and soil
losses caused by the recurrent burning and clearing of the plantation
understorey. This effect of land-use conversion on the hydrology of headwater
catchment is expected to have detrimental effects on downstream river
ecosystems and related biodiversity, not only through a change in streamflow
variability but also with the enhanced erosion and flow sediment transport.</p>
      <p>The hydrological effect of this modern land conversion in Laos is of the same
magnitude (but in the opposite direction) as that caused by the conversion of
herbaceous cover (annual crops, forbs, and fodder) to naturally
regenerating tree-based covers in Vietnam (mixed-trees plantations and forest
communities). In the two countries, the switch from herbaceous cover
(including teak tree plantations in Laos) to old fallow and/or forest over
1 % of the catchment area translates into reductions of wet and dry
seasons' streamflow of about 10–12 mm and 1.5–3.5 mm, respectively (cf. the
coefficients of the linear regressions in Fig. 7a, c and b, d, respectively).
Assuming the linearity of these relationships, the average difference between actual annual
evapotranspiration of the herbaceous cover (including teak trees in Laos) and natural tree-based cover ranges
between 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5) and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (12 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5) mm, i.e. 1150–1550 mm,
which is of the same order of magnitude as typical evapotranspiration of
tropical forests in continental southeast Asia (Tanaka et al., 2008). This
comparison indicates that the evapotranspiration of the studied teak tree
plantations in Laos (which could theoretically surpass that of the herbaceous
cover because of potentially deeper root system and denser leaf area index)
is likely limited by the soil water availability in accordance with the low
infiltrability rates previously measured at the microplot level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Reliability of the results</title>
      <p>A two-parameter monthly lumped water balance model was used to investigate
the relationship between land use and catchment hydrology. This approach
presents some limitations. For instance, land-use changes occurring within or
outside of the riparian area and their hydrological effects were not
differentiated. The spatial patterns of the land-use mosaics (e.g. area,
layout, and connectivity of the patches) were not accounted. This
simplification limits our understanding of the processes underlying the
rainfall–runoff transformation. However, the model efficiently captured the
gradual changes in the catchments' behaviour (mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SEQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SElnQ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 86 %) which proved to be
significantly (0.00 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values &lt; 0.08) and consistently
correlated to highly variable land-use patterns.</p>
      <p>It could be argued that 1-year calibrations are too short for the model to
accurately capture the hydrological behaviour of the catchment. This
statement would be valid in the context of a more classical split-sample test
including a calibration and a validation period where the model is used as a
predictor. This procedure assumes that the catchment is hydrologically stable
over these two sub-periods. In our approach, the water balance model was
used to capture gradual changes in hydrological behaviour in order to verify
if these changes are caused by actual changes in land-use conditions. With
this aim, minimising the duration of the calibration periods to 1 year
allowed maximising the dependency between the model parameters and the
corresponding land-use patterns mapped annually. This approach proved to be
appropriate given the high inter-annual variability of land use (Figs. 5c and
6c), and the significance of the correlations between land use and streamflow
simulated with the different calibrated models (Figs. 5, 6, and 7). However, a
1-year calibration may result in a model that performs well under the
specific climate conditions of the calibration year only. Simulation biases
usually increase when the model is run under climate conditions different
from calibration conditions (Coron et al. 2012), thus possibly hampering the
detection of the hydrological changes illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6. To
quantify this bias, GR2M was calibrated over the 2-year period (2012–2013)
in the Dong Cao catchment where land use remained relatively stable between
2011 and 2013 (Fig. 6c). The rainfall years 2012 and 2013 correspond to the
median (1421 mm) and the wettest (1938 mm) years, respectively, of the study
period (2002–2013) (Fig. 4). Therefore, this two-year period exhibiting
stable land use but contrasting rainfall conditions is well suited to
investigate the effect of rainfall variability and calibration duration on
model efficiency. The mean relative difference between streamflow simulated
by this model and by the models calibrated over the 1-year periods 2012 and
2013 (the three models use the same 2012 year as rainfall input) approximates
this simulation bias which was found to be higher for the wet season
(20 %) than for the dry season (2 %). Overall, these biases are
negligible compared to the major hydrological changes observed in the two
study catchments: 67 % wet season streamflow reduction and 84 % dry
season streamflow reduction over the study period in the Dong Cao catchment;
100 % wet season streamflow increase and 650 % dry season streamflow
increase in the Houay Pano catchment between 2007 and 2011. In contrast, wet
season streamflow over the period 2002–2006 in the Houay Pano catchment
(Fig. 5a) exhibits the lowest inter-annual variations for a 5-year period in
the study catchments, with a coefficient of variation (11 %) lower than
the 20 % bias estimated for the wet season simulations, indicating a
possibly significant modelling artefact. However, these streamflow variations
are significantly and consistently correlated to land-use change over this
short period (Fig. 7a), suggesting negligible biases even for these slightest
streamflow variations. The main discrepancy between simulated streamflow and
land use was observed during the 2009 wet season in the Dong Cao catchment (Fig. 6).
In 2009, simulated streamflow is equivalent to about one-third of that in
2008 and 2010, while no major change in land use apparently explains this
drop. This discrepancy could originate from a simulation bias because 2009
was the driest year of the study period (Fig. 4).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Our results show that the land-use effects on soil surface properties and
infiltrability, previously quantified in 1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> microplots, are
reconcilable with the hydrological behaviour of the study catchments, at a
scale 6 orders of magnitude larger. These findings indicate that land use
– i.e. the way the vegetation cover is managed (e.g. recurrent burning of
the understorey of teak tree plantations) – exerts a control on streamflow
production greater than land cover (i.e. theoretical evapotranspiration
characteristics of the vegetation). Another approach to assess the
hydrological impacts of land-use changes typically involves physically based
and distributed hydrologic models. Our analysis demonstrates that this other
category of models necessarily needs to account for changes in soil
properties following land conversions in order to efficiently simulate the
hydrological effects of land-use changes.</p>
      <p>According to the most recent Global Forest Resources Assessment (FAO, 2015),
Laos and Vietnam are listed among the 13 countries globally which were
likely to have passed through a national forest transition between 1990 and
2015, with a switch from net forest loss to net forest expansion (Keenan et
al., 2015). Our analysis exemplifies the diverse impacts this forest
expansion can have on streamflow, and how it can lead to extreme, yet
opposite, hydrological changes, depending on how the newly established
tree-based cover is managed. The conversion of rice-based shifting
cultivation to teak plantations in Laos led to increased seasonal
streamflow. The conversion of annual crops and mixed-trees plantations to
naturally re-growing forest in Vietnam led to decreased seasonal streamflow.
Considering that commercial tree plantations will continue to expand in the
humid tropics, careful consideration is needed before attributing to them
positive effects on water and soil conservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data set used in this analysis,
including hydro-meteorological records and land-use maps, is available at
<uri>http://msec.obs-mip.fr/</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the French watershed network SOERE-RBV (réseau
des bassins versants), the French Observatory for Sciences of Universe
(Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers), the CGIAR research program on
Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics, and the French ANR TECITEASY
(ANR-13-AGRO-0007). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Institute of
Research for Development, the International Water Management Institute, the
Soils and Fertilizers Research Institute (Vietnam), and the Agriculture
Land-Use Planning Center (Laos).<?xmltex \hack{\\\\}?>Edited by: G. Jewitt</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abramoff, R. Z. and Finzi, C.: Are above- and below-ground phenology in
sync?, New Phytol., 205, 1054–1061, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andréassian, V.: Waters and forests: from historical controversy to
scientific debate, J. Hydrol., 291, 1–27, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Andréassian, V., Parent, E., and Michel, C.: A distribution-free test to
detect gradual changes in watershed behaviour. Water Resour. Res., 39, 1252,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003WR002081</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Beck, H. E., Bruijnzeel, L. A., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., McVicar, T. R.,
Scatena, F. N., and Schellekens, J.: The impact of forest regeneration on
streamflow in 12 mesoscale humid tropical catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 17, 2613–2635, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2613-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-2613-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, C. J. A., Sodhi, N. S., and Brook, B. W.: Tropical turmoil: a
biodiversity tragedy in progress, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 79–87, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, A. E., Zhang, L., McMahon, T. A., Western, A. W., and Vertessy, R. A.:
A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield
resulting from alterations in vegetation, J. Hydrol., 310, 28–61, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the
soil for the trees?, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 1004, 185–228, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Calder, I. R.: Forests and water – Ensuring forest benefits outweigh water
costs, Forest Ecol. Manag., 251, 110–120, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Calder, I. R., Rosier, P. T. W., Prasanna, K. T., and Parameswarappa, S.:
Eucalyptus water use greater than rainfall input – a possible explanation
from southern India. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 249–256,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-1-249-1997" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-1-249-1997</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chaplot, V., Coadou le Brozec, E., Silvera, N., and Valentin, C.: Spatial and
temporal assessment of linear erosion in catchments under sloping lands of
Northern Laos, Catena, 63, 167–184, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chazdon, R. L.: Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem
services on degraded lands. Science, 320, 1458, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155365" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1155365</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Clément, F., Amezaga, J. M., Orange, D., and Tran Duc, T.: The impact of
government policies on land use in Northern Vietnam: an institutional
approach for understanding farmer decisions, IWMI Research Report,
112, 31 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Clément, F., Orange, D., Williams, M., Mulley, C., and Epprecht, M.:
Drivers of afforestation in Northern Vietnam: Assessing local variations
using geographically weighted regression, Appl. Geogr., 29, 561–576, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Coron, L., Andreassian, V., Perrin, C., Lerat, J., Vaze, J., Bourqui, M., and
Hendrickx, F.: Crash testing hydrological models in contrasted climate
conditions: An experiment on 216 Australian catchments, Water Resour. Res.,
48, W05552, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011WR011721</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
de Rouw, A., Soulileuth, B., and Huon, S.: Stable carbon isotope ratios in
soil and vegetation shift with cultivation practices (Northern Laos), Agr.
Ecosyst. Environ., 200, 161–168, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Douglas, I.: Hydrological investigations of forest disturbance and land cover
impacts in South-East Asia: a review, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 354, 1725–1738,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dunin, F. X., Smith, C. J., and Denmead, O. T.: Hydrological change:
reaping prosperity and pain in Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11,
77–95, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-77-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-11-77-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
FAO: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. FAO Forestry Paper No. 1**. UN
Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome,  56 pp., 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fernández-Moya, J., Alvarado, A., Forsythe, W., Ramírez, L.,
Algeet-Abarquero, N., and Marchamalo-Sacristán, M.: Soil erosion under teak
(<italic>Tectona grandis</italic> L.f.) plantations: General patterns, assumptions
and controversies. Catena, 123, 236–242, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Guardiola-Claramonte, M., Troch, P. A., Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W.,
Durcik, M., Vogler, J. B., and Nullet, M. A.: Hydrologic effects of the
expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in a tropical catchment,
Ecohydrology, 3, 306–314, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R. G.:
High-resolution global maps of 21st century forest cover change. Science,
342, 850-853, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hawtree, D., Nunes, J. P., Keizer, J. J., Jacinto, R., Santos, J.,
Rial-Rivas, M. E., Boulet, A.-K., Tavares-Wahren, F., and Feger, K.-H.: Time
series analysis of the long-term hydrologic impacts of afforestation in the
Águeda watershed of north-central Portugal, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19,
3033–3045, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3033-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-3033-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Homdee, T., Pongput, K., and Kanae, S.: Impacts of land cover changes on
hydrologic responses. A case study of Chu River Basin, Thailand, Ann. J. Hydr. Eng.-JSCE, 55, 31–36, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Huon, S., de Rouw, A., Bonté, P., Robain, H., Valentin, C., Lefèvre,
I., Girardin, C., Le Troquer, Y., Podwojewski, P., and Sengtaheuanghoung, O.:
Long-term soil carbon loss and accumulation in a catchment following the
conversion of forest to arable land in Northern Laos, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.,
160, 43–57, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hurni, K., Hett, C., Heinimann, A., Messerli, P., and Wiesmann, U.: Dynamics
of shifting cultivation landscapes in Northern Lao PDR between 2000 and 2009
based on an analysis of MODIS time series and Landsat images. Hum. Ecol., 41,
21–36, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Janeau, J. L., Gillard, L. C., Grellier, S., Jouquet, P., Le, Q. T. P., Luu,
M. N. T., Ngo, A. Q., Orange, D., Pham, R. D., Tran, T. D., Tran, H. S., Trinh,
D. A., Valentin, C., and Rochelle-Newall, E.: Soil erosion, dissolved organic
carbon and nutrient losses under different land use systems in a small
catchment in northern Vietnam, Agr. Water Manage., 146, 314–323, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Keenan, R. J., Reams, G. A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J. V., Grainger, A., and
Lindquist, E.: Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global
Forest Resources Assessment 2015, Forest Ecol. Manag., 352, 9–20, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Konar, M., Todd, M. J., Muneepeerakul, R., Rinaldo, A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe,
I.: Hydrology as a driver of biodiversity: controls on carrying capacity,
niche formation, and dispersal, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 317–325, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lacombe, G., Pierret, A., Hoanh, C. T., Sengtaheuanghoung, O., and Noble, A.:
Conflict, migration and land-cover changes in Indochina: a hydrological
assessment, Ecohydrology, 3, 382–391, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lasdon, L. S. and Warren, A. D.: Generalized reduced gradient software for
linear and nonlinear constrained problems, edited by: Greenberg, H., Design
and Implementation for Optimization Software, Sijthoff/Noordhoff, The
Netherlands, 363–397, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Maeght, J. L.: Effects of climate variability on shallow and deep root growth
of mature rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and teak (Tectona grandis) trees in
South East Asian plantations, PhD Thesis, Montpellier II
University, France, 204 pp., 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Miura, S., Amacher, M., Hofer, T., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Ernawati, and
Thackway, R.: Protective functions and ecosystem services of global forests
in the past quarter-century, Forest Ecol. Manag., 352, 35–46, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mouelhi, S., Michel, C., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.: Stepwise
development of a two-parameter monthly water balance model, J. Hydrol.,
318, 200–214, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Newby, J., Cramb, R., and Sakanphet, S.: Forest transitions and rural
livelihoods: multiple pathways of smallholder teal expansion in Northern
Laos. Land, 3, 482–503, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Patin, J., Mouche, E., Ribolzi, O., Chaplot, V., Sengtahevanghoung, O.,
Latsachak, K. O., Soulileuth, B., and Valentin, C.: Analysis of runoff
production at the plot scale during a long-term survey of a small
agricultural catchment in Lao PDR, J. Hydrol., 426–427, 79–92, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Podwojewski, P., Orange, D., Jouquet, P., Valentin, C., Nguyen, V. T., Janeau,
J. L., and Tran, D. T.: Land-use impacts on surface runoff and soil detachment
within agricultural sloping lands in Northern Vietnam, Catena, 74,
109–118, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Pushpalatha, R., Perrin, C., Le Moine, N., and Andréassian, V.: A review
of efficiency criteria for evaluating low-flow simulations, J. Hydrol.,
420–421, 171–182, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ribolzi, O., Thiebaux, J. P., Bourdon, E., Briquet, J. P., Chaplot, V., Huon,
S., Marchand, P., Mouche, E., Pierret, A., Robain, H., de Rouw, A.,
Sengtahevanghoung, O., Soulileuth, B., and Valentin, C.: Effect of fallow
regrowth on stream water yield in a headwater catchment under shifting
cultivation in Northern Lao PDR, Lao J. Agr. Forest.,
Management of Soil Erosion Consortium special, 52–71, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Sidle, R. C., Tani, M., and Ziegler, A. D.: Catchment processes in Southeast
Asia: Atmospheric, hydrologic, erosion, nutrient cycling, and management
effects, Forest Ecol. Manag., 224, 1–4, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, N., Kume, T., Yoshifuji, N., Tanaka, K., Takizawa, H., Shiraki, K.,
Tantasirin, C., Tangtham, N., and Suzuki, M.: A review of evapotranspiration
estimates from tropical forests in Thailand and adjacent regions, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 148, 807–819, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Thanapakpawin, P., Richey, J., Thomas, D., Rodda, S., Campbell, B., and
Logsdon, M.: Effects of land-use change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae
Chaem river basin, NW Thailand, J. Hydrol., 334, 215–230, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Valentin, C., Agus, F., Alamban, R., Boosaner, A., Bricquet, J. P., Chaplot,
V., de Guzman, T., de Rouw, A., Janeau, J. L., Orange, D., Phachomphonh, K.,
Phai, D. D., Podwojewski, P., Ribolzi, O., Silvera, N., Subagyono, K.,
Thiébaux, J. P., Toan, T. D., and Vadari, T.: Runoff and sediment losses
from 27 upland catchments in Southeast Asia: Impact of rapid land use changes
and conservation practices. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 128, 225–238, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Valentin, C., Lestrelin, G., Chanthavongsa, A., Phachomphon, K., De Rouw, A.,
Chanhphengxay, A., Chaplot, V., Bourdon, E., Bricquet, J. P., Marchand, P.,
Pierret, A., Ribolzi, O., and Thiebaux, P.: The MSEC project in the Lao PDR
at a glance: biophysical and socio-economic background and project
experimental set up, Lao J. Agr. Forest., Management of
Soil Erosion Consortium special, 31–50, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., and (Sampurno) Bruijnzeel, L. A.:
Land cover and water yield: inference problems when comparing catchments
with mixed land cover, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3461–3473, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3461-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-16-3461-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Vyas, D., Mehta, N., Dinakaran, J., and Krishnayya, N. S. R.: Allometric
equations for estimating leaf area index (LAI) of two important tropical
species (Tectona grandis and Dendrocalamus strictus), J. Forest Res., 21,
197–200, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Wilcox, B. P. and Huang, Y.: Woody plant encroachment paradox: rivers rebound
as degraded grasslands convert to woodlands, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L07402, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL041929</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wohl, E., Barros, A., Brunsell, N., Chappell, N. A., Coe, M., Giambelluca, T.,
Goldsmith, S., Harmon, R., Hendrickx, J. M. H., Juvik, J., McDonnell, J., and
Ogden, F.: The hydrology of the humid tropics, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 655–662,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Zégre, N., Skaugset, A. E., Som, N. A., McDonnell, J. J., and Ganio, L. M.:
In lieu of the paired catchment approach: hydrologic model change detection
at the catchment scale, Water Resour. Res., 46, W11544, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009WR008601</ext-link>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W., and Tran, L. T.: Hydrological consequences
of landscape fragmentation in mountainous northern Vietnam: evidence of
accelerated overland flow generation, J. Hydrol., 287, 124–146, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M., and Webb, E. L.: Recognizing contemporary roles of
swidden agriculture in transforming landscapes of Southeast Asia, Conserv.
Biol., 25, 846–848, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Contradictory hydrological impacts of afforestation in the  humid tropics
evidenced by long-term field monitoring and simulation modelling</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The humid tropics are exposed to an unprecedented modernisation of
agriculture involving rapid and mixed land-use changes with contrasted
environmental impacts. Afforestation is often mentioned as an unambiguous
solution for restoring ecosystem services and enhancing biodiversity. One
consequence of afforestation is the alteration of streamflow variability
which controls habitats, water resources, and flood risks. We demonstrate that
afforestation by tree planting or by natural forest regeneration can induce
opposite hydrological changes. An observatory including long-term field
measurements of fine-scale land-use mosaics and of hydrometeorological
variables has been operating in several headwater catchments in tropical
southeast Asia since 2000. The GR2M water balance model, repeatedly calibrated
over successive 1-year periods and used in simulation mode with the same
year of rainfall input, allowed the hydrological effect of land-use change to
be isolated from that of rainfall variability in two of these catchments in
Laos and Vietnam. Visual inspection of hydrographs, correlation analyses, and
trend detection tests allowed causality between land-use changes and changes
in seasonal streamflow to be ascertained. In Laos, the combination of
shifting cultivation system (alternation of rice and fallow) and the gradual
increase of teak tree plantations replacing fallow led to intricate
streamflow patterns: pluri-annual streamflow cycles induced by the shifting
system, on top of a gradual streamflow increase over years caused by the
spread of the plantations. In Vietnam, the abandonment of continuously
cropped areas combined with patches of mix-trees plantations led to the
natural re-growth of forest communities followed by a gradual drop in
streamflow. Soil infiltrability controlled by surface crusting is the
predominant process explaining why two modes of afforestation (natural
regeneration vs. planting) led to opposite changes in streamflow regime.
Given that commercial tree plantations will continue to expand in the humid
tropics, careful consideration is needed before attributing to them positive
effects on water and soil conservation.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abramoff, R. Z. and Finzi, C.: Are above- and below-ground phenology in
sync?, New Phytol., 205, 1054–1061, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andréassian, V.: Waters and forests: from historical controversy to
scientific debate, J. Hydrol., 291, 1–27, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Andréassian, V., Parent, E., and Michel, C.: A distribution-free test to
detect gradual changes in watershed behaviour. Water Resour. Res., 39, 1252,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002081" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003WR002081</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Beck, H. E., Bruijnzeel, L. A., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., McVicar, T. R.,
Scatena, F. N., and Schellekens, J.: The impact of forest regeneration on
streamflow in 12 mesoscale humid tropical catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 17, 2613–2635, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2613-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-17-2613-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, C. J. A., Sodhi, N. S., and Brook, B. W.: Tropical turmoil: a
biodiversity tragedy in progress, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 79–87, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, A. E., Zhang, L., McMahon, T. A., Western, A. W., and Vertessy, R. A.:
A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield
resulting from alterations in vegetation, J. Hydrol., 310, 28–61, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the
soil for the trees?, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 1004, 185–228, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Calder, I. R.: Forests and water – Ensuring forest benefits outweigh water
costs, Forest Ecol. Manag., 251, 110–120, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Calder, I. R., Rosier, P. T. W., Prasanna, K. T., and Parameswarappa, S.:
Eucalyptus water use greater than rainfall input – a possible explanation
from southern India. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 1, 249–256,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-1-249-1997" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-1-249-1997</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chaplot, V., Coadou le Brozec, E., Silvera, N., and Valentin, C.: Spatial and
temporal assessment of linear erosion in catchments under sloping lands of
Northern Laos, Catena, 63, 167–184, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chazdon, R. L.: Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem
services on degraded lands. Science, 320, 1458, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155365" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1155365</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Clément, F., Amezaga, J. M., Orange, D., and Tran Duc, T.: The impact of
government policies on land use in Northern Vietnam: an institutional
approach for understanding farmer decisions, IWMI Research Report,
112, 31 pp., 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Clément, F., Orange, D., Williams, M., Mulley, C., and Epprecht, M.:
Drivers of afforestation in Northern Vietnam: Assessing local variations
using geographically weighted regression, Appl. Geogr., 29, 561–576, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Coron, L., Andreassian, V., Perrin, C., Lerat, J., Vaze, J., Bourqui, M., and
Hendrickx, F.: Crash testing hydrological models in contrasted climate
conditions: An experiment on 216 Australian catchments, Water Resour. Res.,
48, W05552, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011721" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011WR011721</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
de Rouw, A., Soulileuth, B., and Huon, S.: Stable carbon isotope ratios in
soil and vegetation shift with cultivation practices (Northern Laos), Agr.
Ecosyst. Environ., 200, 161–168, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Douglas, I.: Hydrological investigations of forest disturbance and land cover
impacts in South-East Asia: a review, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 354, 1725–1738,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dunin, F. X., Smith, C. J., and Denmead, O. T.: Hydrological change:
reaping prosperity and pain in Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11,
77–95, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-77-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-11-77-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
FAO: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. FAO Forestry Paper No. 1**. UN
Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome,  56 pp., 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fernández-Moya, J., Alvarado, A., Forsythe, W., Ramírez, L.,
Algeet-Abarquero, N., and Marchamalo-Sacristán, M.: Soil erosion under teak
(<i>Tectona grandis</i> L.f.) plantations: General patterns, assumptions
and controversies. Catena, 123, 236–242, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Guardiola-Claramonte, M., Troch, P. A., Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W.,
Durcik, M., Vogler, J. B., and Nullet, M. A.: Hydrologic effects of the
expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in a tropical catchment,
Ecohydrology, 3, 306–314, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R. G.:
High-resolution global maps of 21st century forest cover change. Science,
342, 850-853, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hawtree, D., Nunes, J. P., Keizer, J. J., Jacinto, R., Santos, J.,
Rial-Rivas, M. E., Boulet, A.-K., Tavares-Wahren, F., and Feger, K.-H.: Time
series analysis of the long-term hydrologic impacts of afforestation in the
Águeda watershed of north-central Portugal, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19,
3033–3045, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3033-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-19-3033-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Homdee, T., Pongput, K., and Kanae, S.: Impacts of land cover changes on
hydrologic responses. A case study of Chu River Basin, Thailand, Ann. J. Hydr. Eng.-JSCE, 55, 31–36, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Huon, S., de Rouw, A., Bonté, P., Robain, H., Valentin, C., Lefèvre,
I., Girardin, C., Le Troquer, Y., Podwojewski, P., and Sengtaheuanghoung, O.:
Long-term soil carbon loss and accumulation in a catchment following the
conversion of forest to arable land in Northern Laos, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.,
160, 43–57, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Hurni, K., Hett, C., Heinimann, A., Messerli, P., and Wiesmann, U.: Dynamics
of shifting cultivation landscapes in Northern Lao PDR between 2000 and 2009
based on an analysis of MODIS time series and Landsat images. Hum. Ecol., 41,
21–36, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Janeau, J. L., Gillard, L. C., Grellier, S., Jouquet, P., Le, Q. T. P., Luu,
M. N. T., Ngo, A. Q., Orange, D., Pham, R. D., Tran, T. D., Tran, H. S., Trinh,
D. A., Valentin, C., and Rochelle-Newall, E.: Soil erosion, dissolved organic
carbon and nutrient losses under different land use systems in a small
catchment in northern Vietnam, Agr. Water Manage., 146, 314–323, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Keenan, R. J., Reams, G. A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J. V., Grainger, A., and
Lindquist, E.: Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global
Forest Resources Assessment 2015, Forest Ecol. Manag., 352, 9–20, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Konar, M., Todd, M. J., Muneepeerakul, R., Rinaldo, A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe,
I.: Hydrology as a driver of biodiversity: controls on carrying capacity,
niche formation, and dispersal, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 317–325, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Lacombe, G., Pierret, A., Hoanh, C. T., Sengtaheuanghoung, O., and Noble, A.:
Conflict, migration and land-cover changes in Indochina: a hydrological
assessment, Ecohydrology, 3, 382–391, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lasdon, L. S. and Warren, A. D.: Generalized reduced gradient software for
linear and nonlinear constrained problems, edited by: Greenberg, H., Design
and Implementation for Optimization Software, Sijthoff/Noordhoff, The
Netherlands, 363–397, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Maeght, J. L.: Effects of climate variability on shallow and deep root growth
of mature rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and teak (Tectona grandis) trees in
South East Asian plantations, PhD Thesis, Montpellier II
University, France, 204 pp., 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Miura, S., Amacher, M., Hofer, T., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Ernawati, and
Thackway, R.: Protective functions and ecosystem services of global forests
in the past quarter-century, Forest Ecol. Manag., 352, 35–46, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Mouelhi, S., Michel, C., Perrin, C., and Andréassian, V.: Stepwise
development of a two-parameter monthly water balance model, J. Hydrol.,
318, 200–214, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Newby, J., Cramb, R., and Sakanphet, S.: Forest transitions and rural
livelihoods: multiple pathways of smallholder teal expansion in Northern
Laos. Land, 3, 482–503, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Patin, J., Mouche, E., Ribolzi, O., Chaplot, V., Sengtahevanghoung, O.,
Latsachak, K. O., Soulileuth, B., and Valentin, C.: Analysis of runoff
production at the plot scale during a long-term survey of a small
agricultural catchment in Lao PDR, J. Hydrol., 426–427, 79–92, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Podwojewski, P., Orange, D., Jouquet, P., Valentin, C., Nguyen, V. T., Janeau,
J. L., and Tran, D. T.: Land-use impacts on surface runoff and soil detachment
within agricultural sloping lands in Northern Vietnam, Catena, 74,
109–118, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Pushpalatha, R., Perrin, C., Le Moine, N., and Andréassian, V.: A review
of efficiency criteria for evaluating low-flow simulations, J. Hydrol.,
420–421, 171–182, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Ribolzi, O., Thiebaux, J. P., Bourdon, E., Briquet, J. P., Chaplot, V., Huon,
S., Marchand, P., Mouche, E., Pierret, A., Robain, H., de Rouw, A.,
Sengtahevanghoung, O., Soulileuth, B., and Valentin, C.: Effect of fallow
regrowth on stream water yield in a headwater catchment under shifting
cultivation in Northern Lao PDR, Lao J. Agr. Forest.,
Management of Soil Erosion Consortium special, 52–71, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Sidle, R. C., Tani, M., and Ziegler, A. D.: Catchment processes in Southeast
Asia: Atmospheric, hydrologic, erosion, nutrient cycling, and management
effects, Forest Ecol. Manag., 224, 1–4, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, N., Kume, T., Yoshifuji, N., Tanaka, K., Takizawa, H., Shiraki, K.,
Tantasirin, C., Tangtham, N., and Suzuki, M.: A review of evapotranspiration
estimates from tropical forests in Thailand and adjacent regions, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 148, 807–819, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Thanapakpawin, P., Richey, J., Thomas, D., Rodda, S., Campbell, B., and
Logsdon, M.: Effects of land-use change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae
Chaem river basin, NW Thailand, J. Hydrol., 334, 215–230, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Valentin, C., Agus, F., Alamban, R., Boosaner, A., Bricquet, J. P., Chaplot,
V., de Guzman, T., de Rouw, A., Janeau, J. L., Orange, D., Phachomphonh, K.,
Phai, D. D., Podwojewski, P., Ribolzi, O., Silvera, N., Subagyono, K.,
Thiébaux, J. P., Toan, T. D., and Vadari, T.: Runoff and sediment losses
from 27 upland catchments in Southeast Asia: Impact of rapid land use changes
and conservation practices. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 128, 225–238, 2008a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Valentin, C., Lestrelin, G., Chanthavongsa, A., Phachomphon, K., De Rouw, A.,
Chanhphengxay, A., Chaplot, V., Bourdon, E., Bricquet, J. P., Marchand, P.,
Pierret, A., Ribolzi, O., and Thiebaux, P.: The MSEC project in the Lao PDR
at a glance: biophysical and socio-economic background and project
experimental set up, Lao J. Agr. Forest., Management of
Soil Erosion Consortium special, 31–50, 2008b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., and (Sampurno) Bruijnzeel, L. A.:
Land cover and water yield: inference problems when comparing catchments
with mixed land cover, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3461–3473, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3461-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-16-3461-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Vyas, D., Mehta, N., Dinakaran, J., and Krishnayya, N. S. R.: Allometric
equations for estimating leaf area index (LAI) of two important tropical
species (Tectona grandis and Dendrocalamus strictus), J. Forest Res., 21,
197–200, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Wilcox, B. P. and Huang, Y.: Woody plant encroachment paradox: rivers rebound
as degraded grasslands convert to woodlands, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37,
L07402, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041929" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009GL041929</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Wohl, E., Barros, A., Brunsell, N., Chappell, N. A., Coe, M., Giambelluca, T.,
Goldsmith, S., Harmon, R., Hendrickx, J. M. H., Juvik, J., McDonnell, J., and
Ogden, F.: The hydrology of the humid tropics, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 655–662,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Zégre, N., Skaugset, A. E., Som, N. A., McDonnell, J. J., and Ganio, L. M.:
In lieu of the paired catchment approach: hydrologic model change detection
at the catchment scale, Water Resour. Res., 46, W11544, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008601" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009WR008601</a>, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Ziegler, A. D., Giambelluca, T. W., and Tran, L. T.: Hydrological consequences
of landscape fragmentation in mountainous northern Vietnam: evidence of
accelerated overland flow generation, J. Hydrol., 287, 124–146, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Ziegler, A. D., Fox, J. M., and Webb, E. L.: Recognizing contemporary roles of
swidden agriculture in transforming landscapes of Southeast Asia, Conserv.
Biol., 25, 846–848, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
