<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-20-2169-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Dynamic changes in terrestrial net primary production <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> and their effects on evapotranspiration</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Dynamic changes in terrestrial net primary production and their effects on evapotranspiration}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z.~Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Zhi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yaning</given-names></name>
          <email>chenyn@ms.xjb.ac.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-1641</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Gonghuan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-1835</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>College of Pratacultural and Environmental Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yaning Chen (chenyn@ms.xjb.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>20</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2169</fpage><lpage>2178</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>17</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The dramatic increase of global temperature since the year 2000 has a
considerable impact on the global water cycle and vegetation dynamics.
Little has been done about recent feedback of vegetation to climate in
different parts of the world, and land evapotranspiration (ET) is the means
of this feedback. Here we used the global 1 km MODIS net primary production (NPP)
and ET data sets (2000–2014) to investigate their temporospatial
changes under the context of global warming. The results showed that global
NPP slightly increased in 2000–2014 at a rate of 0.06 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. More
than 64 % of vegetated land in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) showed
increased NPP (at a rate of 0.13 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), while 60.3 % of vegetated
land in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) showed a decreasing trend (at a rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Vegetation greening and climate change promote rises of
global ET. Specially, the increased rate of land ET in the NH
(0.61 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is faster than that in the SH (0.41 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Over the same
period, global warming and vegetation greening accelerate evaporation in
soil moisture, thus reducing the amount of soil water storage. Continuation
of these trends will likely exacerbate regional drought-induced disturbances
and point to an increased risk of ecological drought, especially during
regional dry climate phases.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) have reported that the past
decade was the warmest on record. Global warming indicates a general
acceleration or intensification of the global hydrological cycle and thus an
alteration in the process of evapotranspiration (ET) (Wentz et al., 2007;
Douville et al., 2013), with implications for the response and mutual
feedback of ecosystem services (Field et al., 2007; Jung et al., 2010; Davie
et al., 2013). Yet how global vegetation is responding to the changing
climate is not well established.</p>
      <p>Terrestrial net primary production (NPP) can be defined as the amount of
photosynthetically fixed carbon available to the first heterotrophic level
in an ecosystem, and links terrestrial biota with atmospheric systems (Beer
et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012; Potter et al., 2012; Pan et al., 2014).
From 1982 to 1999, climatic changes enhanced plant growth globally,
especially in the northern middle and high latitudes (Nemani et al., 2003); this was
followed in 2000–2009 by a drought-induced reduction in global NPP (Zhao
and Running, 2010). Gang et al. (2015) projected the dynamics of NPP in
response to future anticipated climate changes in the 2030s, 2050s, and 2070s,
and found that global NPP would show an increasing trend. In
particular, NPP at high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) would
likely be more sensitive to future climate change. The interaction of water,
temperature, and radiation has imposed complex and varying limitations on
vegetation activities in different regions of the world. Several studies
have indicated that climate constraints (e.g., increasing temperatures and
solar radiation) are relaxing (Nemani et al., 2003). However, clear data on
spatiotemporal variations and attributes in global terrestrial NPP within
the context of high variability warming are still lacking.</p>
      <p>Meanwhile, little has been done about recent feedback of vegetation to
climate in different parts of the world (Zhi et al., 2009), and ET is the
means of this feedback. A recent study suggested that vegetation
productivity influences albedo and emissivity, which then strongly regulate
global climate (Chapin et al., 2011). Shen et al. (2015) reported
that, in contrast to the Arctic region (i.e., positive feedback to warming),
increased vegetation activity may attenuate daytime warming by enhancing ET
as a cooling process on the Tibetan Plateau. Zhang et al. (2015)
investigated how climate change and recent vegetation greening promote
multidecadal rises of global ET (1982–2013), while an anomalous drought
between 2000 and 2009 led to reduced NPP in the Southern Hemisphere (SH)
(Zhao and Running, 2010). However, little observational evidence exists to
demonstrate vegetation feedback on climate across different global
geographical units.</p>
      <p>Having a clear understanding of the land's biophysical feedback to the
atmosphere is crucial if we are to simulate regional climate accurately
(Tian et al., 2000). In our study, we investigated the following three
major points of interest: (1) whether the high variability temperature of the
past decade continued to increase NPP, or if different climate constraints
were at play; (2) why NPP variations in the Northern and Southern hemispheres
respond differently to climate changes; and (3) what the spatiotemporal
variation of NPP is, and what its effects are on ET.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p>The monthly grid data of the temperature and precipitation series from 2000 to 2014,
with a spatial resolution of 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were collected from the
Climatic Research Unit (Univertisy of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, 2015). The radiation and
soil moisture data series were issued by the Global Land Data Assimilation
System (GLDAS-1), with a spatial resolution of 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<uri>http://gdata1.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/G3/gui.cgi?instance_id=GLDAS025_M</uri>). The
depths of the four soil layers are 0–10, 10–40, 40–100, and
100–200 cm. The quality of the GLDAS data set was assessed against available
observations from multiple sources (Zhang et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The monthly data of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), with a spatial
resolution of 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, was available at
<uri>http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/catalog/climind/pdsi.html</uri>. As an indicator of
land-surface moisture conditions, PDSI has been widely used for the routine
monitoring and assessment of global and regional drought conditions.
Generally, a lower PDSI implies a drier climate. The global dry areas were
defined as PDSI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0, while the wet areas were defined as PDSI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0
(Dai et al., 2004).</p>
      <p>We used the Global Land Cover Characterization data from the International
Geosphere–Biosphere Program (IGBP) in 2000
(<uri>http://nsidc.org/data/ease/ancillary.html#igbp_classes</uri>), along with MODIS in 2000 and 2013
(<uri>http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod12.php</uri>). From these data, a
routinely integrated classification of land use/cover change (LUCC)
characteristics was obtained based on the feature fusion processes.</p>
      <p>The global 1 km NPP data sets (2000–2014) are from MOD17. NPP estimations are
typically model-based and biogeochemical, and are generated from a larger
set of simulated C fluxes between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems
(Ito, 2011). A better agreement of MODIS and terrestrial NPP
estimates allows the use of MODIS in large-scale estimates (Neumann et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>The MODIS evapotranspiration data sets (2000–2014) from MOD16 are estimated
using the Mu et al. (2011) improved ET algorithm over Mu et al.'s (2007)
previous paper. Based on the energy-balance theory and the
Penman–Monteith equation, the required MODIS data inputs for the ET
algorithms include daily meteorology (temperature, actual vapor pressure,
and incoming solar radiation) remotely sensed land cover, FPAR/LAI, and
albedo (Friedl et al., 2010; Myneni et al., 2002).</p>
      <p>We unified the spatiotemporal resolution of these data from different
sources, based on resampling (nearest neighbor interpolation) and
reclassification techniques, and combined the data from the different
source data sets to form comprehensive records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>NPP algorithm</title>
      <p>Net primary production estimations are typically model-based and biogeochemical,
generated from a larger set of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems
(Ito, 2011). The global 1 km MODIS NPP data sets from 2000 to 2014 are from MOD17. A better
agreement of MODIS and terrestrial NPP estimates allows for the use of MODIS in large-scale
estimates (Neumann et al., 2015). The algorithm calculates annual NPP as

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Similarly, the algorithm calculates daily GPP as

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SW</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>FPAR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>VPD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maintenance respiration, which is a function of daily
average temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>):
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-8mm}}?>

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.046</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avg</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              Therefore,

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NPP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              which means

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>where</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>where</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>365</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mtext>GPP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum light use efficiency, SW<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>rad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
is shortwave downward solar radiation (of which 45 % is photosynthetically
active radiation – PAR), FPAR is the fraction of PAR being absorbed
by the plants, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>VPD and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the reduction scalar from high
daily time vapor pressure deficit and low daily minimum temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
respectively, and annual growth respiration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a function of
annual maximum leaf area index (LAI). Zhao and Running (2010) modified the
calculations by assuming that growth respiration is approximately 25 % of NPP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>ET and PET algorithm</title>
      <p>The MODIS evapotranspiration data sets are estimated using the Mu et al. (2011)
improved ET algorithm over Mu et al.'s (2007) previous paper. Based on the
energy-balance theory and the Penman–Monteith equation, the required MODIS data
inputs ET algorithms, including daily meteorology (temperature, actual vapor
pressure, and incoming solar radiation) remotely sensed land cover, FPAR/LAI,
and albedo (Friedl et al., 2010; Myneni et al., 2002).
The output variables include evapotranspiration (ET), latent heat flux (LE),
potential ET (PET), potential LE (PLE), and quality control (ET_QC).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Trend analysis</title>
      <p>To further discern the trends of yearly NPP and ET, we examined linear
trend estimations on a per-pixel basis to establish a linear regression
relationship between variables (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and time (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The regression
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{-8mm}}?>

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS4">
  <title>Partial correlation analysis</title>
      <p>This method is used to describe the relationship between two variables while
removing the effects of several other variables. The partial correlation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is adjusted for a third variable of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, at a
significance level of 0.05 by the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Spatiotemporal variations in global terrestrial NPP and their effects on ET</title>
      <p>The spatial patterns of global NPP from 2000 to 2014 showed a steadily
decreasing trend from the equator to the Arctic and Antarctic (Fig. 1c).
Overall, the interannual series of NPP increased moderately at a rate of
0.06 PgC yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over the past 15 years, and also shows different changes
in the Northern and Southern hemispheres. While NPP in most parts of the NH
increased (Fig. 1a), it decreased in most parts of the SH (Fig. 1b).
Specifically, in the NH, 64 % of vegetated land area experienced increased
NPP, including large areas of North America, western Europe, India, and
eastern China. Regions with decreased NPP include eastern Europe and higher
latitudes of central and west Asia. In the SH, decreased NPP accounted for
about 60.3 % of vegetated land area, mainly concentrated in South America,
south Africa, and western Australia. Furthermore, in the equatorial regions,
Amazon rainforests had significantly decreased NPP, whereas African
rainforests experienced an increasing trend (Fig. 1c). Because tropical
rainforest NPP accounts for a large proportion of global NPP, decreases in
SH NPP partially counteracted the increases in NH NPP.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Temporospatial variations in global terrestrial NPP and ET from
2000 to 2014. <bold>(a)</bold> Interannual variations of NPP and ET in the Northern
Hemisphere (NH). <bold>(b)</bold> Interannual variations of NPP and ET in the Southern
Hemisphere (SH). <bold>(c)</bold> Spatial pattern of NPP trend from 2000 to 2014.
<bold>(d)</bold> Spatial pattern of ET trend from 2000 to 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>When we combined global LUCC characteristics, the results showed that
shrubland has the greatest potential increasing trend of NPP (16.5 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
compared to other biomes, followed by grassland (12.5 gC m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
This may be related to the expansion of woody vegetation
over the past 15 years. In the Arctic tundra (Hughes et al., 2006) and lower
latitudes in arid environments (Chen et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015),
experimental studies provided clear evidence that climate warming is
sufficient to account for the expansion of shrubs.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Changes in vegetation albedo and emissivity exert feedback on climate, which
is especially obvious in ET (Field et al., 2007). The viability of
vegetation cover can substantially modulate available surface energy and
partition that energy into sensible and latent heat fluxes (Matsui et al.,
2005). Increased vegetation productivity and climate change may promote the
rises of global ET. The average mean of estimated global annual ET is
518.6 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an interannual trend of 0.46 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 1 shows that
the spatiotemporal changes of global ET are consistent with NPP variations,
especially in the NH. Furthermore, where their association is less than that
in the NH, NPP and ET in the SH have much higher variability. Specially, the
increased rate of land ET in the NH (0.61 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is faster than that
in the SH (0.41 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Anomalous warming indicates a general
prospective acceleration or intensification of the global hydrological cycle
and thus an alteration in the process of ET, but dry conditions have caused
a reduction in vegetation productivity and a near cessation of ET growth in
the SH. The spatial inconsistency in the SH mainly occurred near the
equator, e.g., southern African rainforests (Fig. 1b and d). These
regions have high values of average annual precipitation and stronger
variability of precipitation than elsewhere, causing greater changes to ET
and its components (land-surface evaporation, canopy evaporation, and
transpiration). In the context of warming, places where the interannual
variability of NPP is small, the ET component of land-surface evaporation
will increase. In contrast, in areas with large interannual variability of
NPP, such as shrubland and grass-dominant regions, the ET components of
land-surface evaporation will decline and transpiration increase. Vegetation
generally promotes land–atmosphere water exchange via transpiration through
a biological process, changing soil moisture conditions and affecting the
land–atmosphere feedback.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Trends of air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), net
radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) from 2000 to 2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Controlling factors for NPP variations</title>
      <p>Water, temperature, and radiation interact to impose complex and varying
limitations on vegetation activities in different parts of the world, thus
also affect ET partly. To understand why NPP variations in the Northern and
Southern hemispheres respond differently to climates, we first estimated the
spatial trends of climatic control factors and then analyzed the complex
multiple climatic constraints to plant growth. A comprehensive
interpretation of interactive climatic controls on plant productivity showed
that water, temperature, and radiation are the key factors affecting
vegetation growth. Globally, growth was most strongly limited by water
availability on 40 % of the Earth's vegetated surface, while temperature
limitations exerted the main controlling influence on 33 % of the surface,
and radiation on 27 % (Nemani et al., 2003).</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>From 2000 to 2014, overall trends of average annual temperature
(0.007 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and precipitation (0.84 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) experienced
worldwide increases while showing different temporal change patterns
(Fig. 2a and b). Eastern Europe, South America, southern Africa, and western
Australia experienced warming combined with decreased precipitation, whereas
southeast North America, western Europe, east Russia, and African
rainforests experienced warming combined with increased precipitation.
Meanwhile, net radiation increased in the equatorial tropics and arid
regions in northwestern China, but decreased in the Arctic and Antarctic
(Fig. 2c). The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) is a widely used index
that correlates with soil moisture during warm seasons (Palmer, 1965; Dai,
2013). Global PDSI decreased at a rate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04 yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2000 to 2014,
suggesting an increased risk of drought in the 21st century. Drought
develops with periods of low-accumulated precipitation and is exacerbated by
high temperatures. Warming-induced drying resulted from increased ET and was
most prevalent. The spatial trend of PDSI shows that the eastern and
northern coasts of North America, along with the African continent, Eurasia,
and southern South America, exhibited obvious drought trends in 2000–2014.
Northern China, parts of Mongolia, and western Russia near Lake Baikal also
experienced a drying trend (Fig. 2d).</p>
      <p>We analyzed partial correlations between NPP and temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>),
precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), net radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and PDSI during growing seasons to
determine their respective contributions across different regions (Fig. 3, Table 1).</p>
      <p>In high latitudes of the NH (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N), temperature
has a positive correlation with NPP (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6). Significant warming generally
lengthens growing seasons for vegetation and promotes plant growth in tundra
regions, so the recent warming in this region has increased NPP (Fig. 3a).
In areas of high elevation such as the Tibetan Plateau (which is similar to
high latitudes), temperature is the dominant control factor in vegetation
growth. Climate changes have eased multiple climatic constraints to plant
growth through earlier springs in some high latitudes, somewhat beneficial
to plant growth, but the continuous warming may offset these benefits. For
northern middle and low latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N), where large
areas are classified as having an arid climate, vegetation is short-rooted.
NPP has a significant correlation with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)
(Fig. 3b) and is also correlated to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3c).</p>
      <p>Equatorial Amazon rainforests experienced significantly decreased NPP,
whereas African rainforests exhibited an increasing trend. These changes in
equatorial regions are mainly related to the warming in the Amazon along
with increasing precipitation in African rainforests. High temperatures
caused higher rates of ET, generally reducing soil water availability for
vegetation in the Amazon.</p>
      <p>In the SH, we noted a significant correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05)
between NPP and PDSI (Fig. 3d). The warming trend induced a much higher
evaporative demand and led to a drying trend, except for the aforementioned
increased precipitation in African rainforests. The PDSI in African
rainforests also showed a slight increasing trend. A high <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value can
increase both vapor pressure deficiency and moisture deficit and lead to a
dryer environment. The general drought event across the SH, which was
induced by extreme heat and a precipitation deficit, has resulted in a net
water availability reduction, ultimately reducing NPP. Hence,
warming-associated drying directly caused the significant decreasing trend
of NPP in the SH.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correlations between NPP and climatic variables for both hemispheres.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zones</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NPP trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PDSI trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH high latitudes</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.51</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.021 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.75</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.104 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>453.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.005 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.29</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH mid/low</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.009 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.341 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.239 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>105.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.46</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">latitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 47.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Southern Hemisphere</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>78.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.010 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.074 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>116.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.455 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>129.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.042 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.37</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Significant at 0.05 level; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> significant at 0.01 level.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Partial correlations between NPP and <bold>(a)</bold> temperature,
<bold>(b)</bold> precipitation, <bold>(c)</bold> net radiation, or <bold>(d)</bold> PDSI
in growing season.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Continued effects of NPP on evapotranspiration likely to exacerbate regional ecological droughts</title>
      <p>With respect to the impact of drought on the world's ecosystems, studies
have been limited regarding the contribution of vegetation and terrestrial
water cycle components to drought variations (Falloon et al., 2012; Teuling
et al., 2013). However, the present lack of high-quality and long-term
records of ET limit the forecasting of drought under climate change circumstances.</p>
      <p>We used potential evapotranspiration (PET) as a surrogate measure of
atmospheric moisture demand. PET is defined as the maximum quantity of water
capable of being evaporated from soil and transpired from vegetation,
whereas ET is the actual evaporation from water and soil, as well as
transpiration from vegetation. Penman (1948) stated that ET had a
proportional relationship with PET, and Bouchet (1963) hypothesized that a
complementary feedback mechanism exists between ET and PET in water-limited
regions. Overall, our investigation indicated that there is a proportional
relationship between ET and PET in humid regions and a complementary one in
arid regions (Figs. 1d and 4a). PET, as a surrogate measure of
atmospheric moisture demand, has combined impacts of temperature, solar
radiation, vapor pressure, and wind speed on its interaction with NPP (Fig. 4b). Over
the past 15 years, global PET showed an increasing trend of 1.72 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
while global <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased at a rate of 0.84 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
However, precipitation increases cannot offset evaporative demand,
indicating a potential moisture deficit for water supplies constrained by
ET. In other words, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is mostly being lost to ET rather than being allocated
to other components of the energy and water cycles (Zhang et al., 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Spatial pattern of PET trend. <bold>(b)</bold> Partial correlations between
NPP and PET.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016-f04.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Various factors, including vegetation, affect the intensity and spatial
variation of drought. Vegetation generally promotes land–atmosphere water
exchange via transpiration, changing soil moisture conditions and affecting
the land–atmosphere feedback. Available soil moisture is defined as the
amount of water a plant can access in its root zone. Thus, spatial and
temporal variations in soil moisture are closely related to vegetation
growth (Davis and Pelsor, 2001; Yang et al., 2010). Figure 5 illustrates the
worldwide decrease in soil moisture of four layers (0–10, 10–40, 40–100,
and 100–200 cm). Soil moisture is an important sensor for measuring
superficial wetness and dryness levels, and generally reflects the dryness
and wetness of climate. Water vapor via transpiration can lead to increased
regional atmospheric humidity over the short term, but preserve less water
in the soil. Vegetation growth causes increased soil moisture evaporation,
thus reducing the amount of soil water storage. This, in turn, accelerates
reductions in soil moisture caused by warming. Especially in the areas where
with less moisture conditions, as land-surface temperatures rise, increases
in precipitation are insufficient to offset increases in evaporative demand,
indicating a potential moisture deficit for water supplies constrained by
ET. If low levels of soil moisture persist for long enough, reductions in
vegetation cover and vigor can occur. This leads to soil water loss and
reduced vegetation growth, along with higher risk of ecological drought
(Meng et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015). Once vegetation suffers persistent
drought, the vegetation biomass will rapidly decline and further intensify
the ecological drought.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Since the beginning of the 21st century, The Earth has experienced
dramatic environmental changes. Strong variations in NPP and its effects on
ET have been found worldwide in relation to significant alterations in
climate. There are some uncertainties in the feedback of ecosystem responses
to ET, but understanding the land-surface ecological feedback to atmospheric
processes is necessary if we are to simulate climate change accurately.
Several studies showed that relaxed climate constraints with increasing
temperature and solar radiation sparked an increasing trend in global NPP in 1982–1999
(Nemani et al., 2003). This was followed by a drought-induced
reduction in global NPP in 2000–2009 (Zhao and Running, 2010). Our study
showed that within the context of the past 15-year timeframe (which, as
mentioned, was the warmest on record), the slightly increased interannual
series of NPP and climate change promoted rises in global ET, thereby
accelerating soil moisture loss. Weather systems can lead to droughts by
suppressing precipitation (Beaumont et al., 2011) and by warming and drying
soil via soil–temperature feedback (Seneviratne et al., 2010; Sheffield et
al., 2012; Orlowsky and Seneviratne, 2013; Williams et al., 2014). Drought
indices and precipitation-minus-evaporation readings suggest an increased
risk of drought in the present century.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Trends of soil moisture in layers with different depths in 2000–2014.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/20/2169/2016/hess-20-2169-2016-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>As noted previously, vegetation feeds back to the spatiotemporal
characteristics of climate through ET. ET is a key process that dissipates
the energy and water absorbed by vegetation and determines the diurnal cycle
of near-surface temperature. It is limited mostly by energy in humid and
semi-humid areas, whereas low-value ET is limited mostly by water in arid
and semi-arid areas. Different values in climate conditions and variability
as well as different land types will cause diverse changes in ET and its
components (land surface evaporation, canopy evaporation, and transpiration).
There are still major gaps in our understanding of how the responses of
terrestrial ecosystems eliminate or increase the risk of dangerous climate
change, and these gaps need to be filled. Steps towards better understanding
the influence of human actions on terrestrial vegetation, e.g., differences
in regional management for cropland and pastures are also needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The dramatic increase of global temperature since the year 2000 has a
considerable impact on the global water cycle and rapidly alters the
terrestrial vegetation dynamics. At the same time, vegetation variations
also feedback to climate, and land ET is the means of this feedback.</p>
      <p>The interannual series of global NPP slightly increased since 2000, but
exhibited different changes in the Northern and Southern hemispheres. Over
64 % of vegetated land areas experienced increased NPP in the NH, while
60.3 % showed decreased NPP in the SH. In the NH, temperature was the
dominant control factor for vegetation growth at high latitudes, and net
radiation was the main factor affecting NPP at middle latitudes, while arid and
semi-arid biomes were mostly driven by precipitation. In the SH, NPP
decreased due to warming-associated drying trends.</p>
      <p>Vegetation greening and climate change promote rises of global ET. The rate
of NPP to actual ET is likely to remain variable, specially, the increased
rate of land ET in the NH (0.61 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is faster than that in the SH
(0.41 mm yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Over the same period, global warming and vegetation
greening accelerate evaporation in soil moisture, thus reducing the amount
of soil water storage. Continuation of these trends will likely exacerbate
regional drought-induced disturbances and point to an increased risk of
ecological drought, especially during regional dry climate phases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The monthly grid data of the temperature and precipitation series were
collected from the Climatic Research Unit (CRUTS v3.23)
(<uri>https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/cru_ts_3.23/cruts.1506241137.v3.23/</uri>).
The radiation and soil moisture data series were issued by the Global Land
Data Assimilation System (GLDAS-1)
(<uri>http://gdata1.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/G3/gui.cgi?instance_id=GLDAS025_M</uri>).
The monthly data of the Palmer Drought Severity Index was available at
<uri>http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/catalog/ climind/pdsi.html</uri>. Global Land
Cover Characterization data in 2000 was available at
<uri>http://nsidc.org/data/ease/ancillary.html#igbp_classes</uri>, along with
MODIS in 2000 and 2013
(<uri>http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod12.php</uri>). The global 1 km
NPP datasets were available at
<uri>http://www.ntsg.umt.edu/project/mod17#data-product</uri>. And the MODIS
evapotranspiration datasets were available at <uri>http://www.ntsg.umt.edu/project/mod16</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Zhi Li and Yaning Chen wrote the main manuscript text,
Yang Wang and Gonghuan Fang prepared Figs. 4 and 6. All authors reviewed the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The research is supported by the CAS “Light of West China” Program (2015-XBQN-B-17)
and the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology (Y471166). <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Q. Chen</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Beaumont, L. J., Pitman, A., Perkins, S., Zimmermann, N. E., Yoccoz, N. G., and
Thuiller, W.: Impacts of climate change on the world's most exceptional
ecoregions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 108, 2306–2311, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007217108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1007217108</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais,
N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., Bondeau, A.,
Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M., Luyssaert, S., Margolis,
H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veenendaal, E., Viovy, N., Williams, C.,
Woodward, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake:
global distribution and covariation with climate, Science, 329, 834–838,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1184984" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1184984</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bouchet, R. J.: Evapotranspiration reele et potentielle, signification climatique,
General Assembly of Berkeley, Red Book, 62, IAHS, Gentbrugge, Belgium, 134–142, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., and Vitousek, P. M.: Principles of terrestrial
ecosystem ecology, Springer, New York, 32 pp., 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chen, G. S., Tian, H. Q., Zhang, C., Liu, M. L., Ren, W., Zhu, W. Q., Chappelka,
A. H., Prior, S. A., and Lockaby, G. B.: Drought in the Southern United States
over the 20th century: Variability and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem
productivity and carbon storage, Climatic Change, 114, 379–397, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0410-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-012-0410-z</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Chen, L. Y., Li, H., Zhang, P. J., Zhao, X., Zhou, L. H., Liu, T. Y., Hu, H. F.,
Bai, Y. F., Shen, H. H., and Fang, J. Y.: Climate and native grassland
vegetation as drivers of the community structures of shrub-encroached
grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China, Landscape Ecol., 30, 1627–1641,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0044-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10980-014-0044-9</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Y. K., Yang, J., Qin, L., Tang, W. Z., and Han, M.: Evaluation of
AMSR-E retrievals and GLDAS simulations against observations of a soil
moisture network on the central Tibetan Plateau, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
4466–4475, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50301</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A. G.: Increasing drought under global warming in observations and
models, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 52–58, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1633</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Dai, A. G., Trenberth, K. E., and Qian, T. T.: A global dataset of Palmer
Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and
effects of surface warming, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 1117–1130, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-386.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-386.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Davie, J. C. S., Falloon, P. D., Kahana, R., Dankers, R., Betts, R., Portmann,
F. T., Wisser, D., Clark, D. B., Ito, A., Masaki, Y., Nishina, K., Fekete, B.,
Tessler, Z., Wada, Y., Liu, X., Tang, Q., Hagemann, S., Stacke, T., Pavlick,
R., Schaphoff, S., Gosling, S. N., Franssen, W., and Arnell, N.: Comparing
projections of future changes in runoff from hydrological and biome models
in ISI-MIP, Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 359–374, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-4-359-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Davis, M. A. and Pelsor, M.: Experimental support for a resource-based
mechanistic model of invisibility, Ecol. Lett., 4, 421–428, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00246.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00246.x</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Douville, H., Ribes, A., Decharme, B., Alkama, R., and Sheffield, J.:
Anthropogenic influence on multidecadal changes in reconstructed global
evapotranspiration, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 59–62, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1632" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NCLIMATE1632</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Falloon, P. D., Dankers, R., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Booth, B. B. B., and
Lambert, F. H.: Role of vegetation change in future climate under the
A1B scenario and a climate stabilisation scenario, using the HadCM3C Earth
system model, Biogeosciences, 9, 4739–4756, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4739-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-9-4739-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Field, C. B., Lobell, D. B., Peters, H. A., and Chiariello, N. R.: Feedbacks of
terrestrial ecosystems to climate change, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32,
1–29, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141119</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N.,
Sibley, A., and Huang, X. M.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm
refinements and characterization of new datasets, Remote Sens. Environ.,
114, 168–182, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gang, C. C., Wang, Z. Q., Zhou, W., Chen, Y. Z., Li, J. L., Cheng, J. M., Guo,
L., Odeh, I., and Chen, C.: Projecting the dynamics of terrestrial net
primary productivity in response to future climate change under the RCP2.6
scenario, Environ. Earth Sci., 74, 5949–5959, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4618-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12665-015-4618-x</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hughes, R. F., Archer, S. R., Asner, G. P., Wessman, C. A., McMurtry, C.,
Nelson, J., and Ansley, R. J.: Changes in aboveground primary production and
carbon and nitrogen pools accompanying woody plant encroachment in a
temperate savanna, Global Change Biol., 12, 1733–1747, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01210.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01210.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Ito, A.: A historical meta-analysis of global terrestrial net primary
productivity: Are estimates converging, Global Change Biol., 17, 3161–3175,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02450.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02450.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Seneviratne, S. I., Sheffield, J.,
Goulden, M. L., Bonan, G., Cescatti, A., Chen, J. Q., de Jeu, R., Dolman,
A. J., Eugster, W., Gerten, D., Gianelle, D., Gobron, N., Heinke, J.,
Kimball, J., Law, B. E., Montagnani, L., Mu, Q. Z., Mueller, B., Oleson, K.,
Papale, D., Richardson, A. D., Roupsard, O., Running, S., Tomelleri, E.,
Viovy, N., Weber, U., Williams, G., Wood, E., Zaehle, S., and Zhang, K.:
Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited
moisture supply, Nature, 467, 951–954, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature09396</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Li, Z., Chen, Y. N., Li, W. H., Deng, H. J., and Fang, G. H.: Potential impacts of
climate change on vegetation dynamics in Central Asia, J. Geophys. Res., 120,
12345–12356, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023618</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Matsui, T., Lakshmi, V., and Small, E. E.: The effects of satellite-derived
vegetation cover variability on simulated land–atmosphere interactions in
the NAMS, J. Climate, 18, 21–40, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3254.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3254.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Meng, X. H., Evans, J. P., and McCabe, M. F.: The impact of observed vegetation
changes on land–atmosphere feedbacks during drought, J. Hydrometeorol., 15,
759–776, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0130.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-13-0130.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Mu, Q., Heinsch, F. A., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Development of a global
evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data,
Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 519–536, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ., 115,
1781–1800, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Myneni, R. B., Hoffman, S., Knyazikhin, Y., Privette, J. L., Glassy, J., Tian,
Y., Wang, Y., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Smith, G. R., Lotsch, A., Friedl, M.,
Morisette, J. T., Votava, P., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W.: Global
products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of
MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 214–231, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Nemani, R. R., Keeling, C. D., Hashimoto, H., Jolly, W. M., Piper, S. C.,
Tucker, C. J., Myneni, R. B., and Running, S. W.: Climate-driven increases in
global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999, Science, 300,
1560–1563, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1082750" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1082750</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Neumann, M., Zhao, M. S., Kindermann, G., and Hasenauer, H.: Comparing MODIS
net primary production estimates with terrestrial national forest inventory
data in Austria, Remote Sens., 7, 3878–3906, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs70403878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs70403878</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Orlowsky, B. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Elusive drought: uncertainty in
observed trends and short- and long-term CMIP5 projections, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 17, 1765–1781, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1765-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-1765-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Pan, S. F., Tian, H. Q., Dangal, S. R., Zhang, C., Yang, J., Tao, B., Ouyang,
Z. Y., Wang, X. K., Lu, C. Q., Ren, W., Banger, K., Yang, Q. C., Zhang, B. W., and
Li, X.: Complex spatiotemporal responses of global terrestrial primary
production to climate change and increasing atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
21st century, PloS One, 9, e112810, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112810" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0112810</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, W. C.: Meteorological Drought, US Dep. of Commer., Weather Bur.,
Washington, D.C. 6–8, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bare and grass, P. Roy.
Soc. Lond., 193, 120–145, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Potter, C. S., Klooster, S., and Genovese, V.: Net primary production of
terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2009, Climatic Change, 115, 365–378,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0460-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-012-0460-2</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B.,
Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil
moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Sci.
Rev., 99, 125–161, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Roderick, M. L.: Little change in global drought
over the past 60 years, Nature, 491, 435–438, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature11575</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Shen, M. G., Piao, S. L., Jeong, S. J., Zhou, L. M., Zeng, Z. Z., Ciais, P.,
Chen, D. L., Huang, M. T., Jin, C. S., Li, L. Z. X., Li, Y., Myneni, R. B.,
Yang, K., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y. J., and Yao, T. D.: Evaporative cooling over the
Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
9299–9304, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504418112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1504418112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Teuling, A. J., van Loon, A. F., Seneviratne, S. I., Lehner, I., Aubinet, M.,
Heinesch, B., Bernhofer, C., Grünwald, T., Prasse, H., and Spank, U.:
Evapotranspiration amplifies European summer drought, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
40, 2071–2075, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50495" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50495</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Tian, H., Melillo, J., Kicklighter, D., McGuire, A. D., Iii, J. H., Iii, B. M.,
and Vörösmarty, C. J.: Climatic and biotic controls on annual carbon
storage in Amazonian ecosystems, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 9, 315–335,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00198.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00198.x</ext-link>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, Harris, I., and Jones, P. D.:
Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time-Series (TS) Version 3.23 of High Resolution
Gridded Data of Month-by-month Variation in Climate (Jan. 1901–Dec. 2014),
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5285/4c7fdfa6-f176-4c58-acee-683d5e9d2ed5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/4c7fdfa6-f176-4c58-acee-683d5e9d2ed5</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Wentz, F. J., Ricciardulli, L., Hilburn, K., and Mears, C.: How much more
rain will global warming bring?, Science, 317, 233–235, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1140746</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Williams, I. N., Torn, M. S., Riley, W. J., and Wehner, M. F.: Impacts of
climate extremes on gross primary production under global warming, Environ.
Res. Lett., 9, 094011, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094011</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. H., Fang, J. Y., Ma, W. H., Smith, P., Mohammat, A., Wang, S. P., and
Wang, W.: Soil carbon stock and its changes in northern China's grasslands
from 1980s to 2000s, Global Change Biol., 16, 3036–3047, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02123.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02123.x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Wang, W. C., and Wei, J.: Assessing land-atmosphere coupling using
soil moisture from the Global Land Data Assimilation System and observational
precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D17119, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009807</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Nemani, R. R., Running, S. W., Hong, Y., Gourley,
J. J., and Yu, Z. B.: Vegetation greening and climate change promote
multidecadal rises of global land evapotranspiration, Sci. Rep., 5, 15956,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep15956</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, M. S. and Running, S. W.: Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial
net primary production from 2000 through 2009, Science, 329, 940–943,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1192666" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1192666</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Zhi, H., Wang, P. X., Dan, L., Yu, Y. Q., Xu, Y. F., and Zheng, W. P.:
Climate-vegetation interannual variability in a coupled atmosphere–ocean–land
model, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 599–612, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0599-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-009-0599-6</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Dynamic changes in terrestrial net primary production  and their effects on evapotranspiration</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">The dramatic increase of global temperature since the year 2000 has a
considerable impact on the global water cycle and vegetation dynamics.
Little has been done about recent feedback of vegetation to climate in
different parts of the world, and land evapotranspiration (ET) is the means
of this feedback. Here we used the global 1 km MODIS net primary production (NPP)
and ET data sets (2000–2014) to investigate their temporospatial
changes under the context of global warming. The results showed that global
NPP slightly increased in 2000–2014 at a rate of 0.06 PgC yr<sup>−2</sup>. More
than 64 % of vegetated land in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) showed
increased NPP (at a rate of 0.13 PgC yr<sup>−2</sup>), while 60.3 % of vegetated
land in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) showed a decreasing trend (at a rate of
−0.18 PgC yr<sup>−2</sup>). Vegetation greening and climate change promote rises of
global ET. Specially, the increased rate of land ET in the NH
(0.61 mm yr<sup>−2</sup>) is faster than that in the SH (0.41 mm yr<sup>−2</sup>). Over the same
period, global warming and vegetation greening accelerate evaporation in
soil moisture, thus reducing the amount of soil water storage. Continuation
of these trends will likely exacerbate regional drought-induced disturbances
and point to an increased risk of ecological drought, especially during
regional dry climate phases.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Beaumont, L. J., Pitman, A., Perkins, S., Zimmermann, N. E., Yoccoz, N. G., and
Thuiller, W.: Impacts of climate change on the world's most exceptional
ecoregions, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 108, 2306–2311, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007217108" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1007217108</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais,
N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., Bondeau, A.,
Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M., Luyssaert, S., Margolis,
H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veenendaal, E., Viovy, N., Williams, C.,
Woodward, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake:
global distribution and covariation with climate, Science, 329, 834–838,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1184984" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1184984</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bouchet, R. J.: Evapotranspiration reele et potentielle, signification climatique,
General Assembly of Berkeley, Red Book, 62, IAHS, Gentbrugge, Belgium, 134–142, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A., and Vitousek, P. M.: Principles of terrestrial
ecosystem ecology, Springer, New York, 32 pp., 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, G. S., Tian, H. Q., Zhang, C., Liu, M. L., Ren, W., Zhu, W. Q., Chappelka,
A. H., Prior, S. A., and Lockaby, G. B.: Drought in the Southern United States
over the 20th century: Variability and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem
productivity and carbon storage, Climatic Change, 114, 379–397, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0410-z" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0410-z</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, L. Y., Li, H., Zhang, P. J., Zhao, X., Zhou, L. H., Liu, T. Y., Hu, H. F.,
Bai, Y. F., Shen, H. H., and Fang, J. Y.: Climate and native grassland
vegetation as drivers of the community structures of shrub-encroached
grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China, Landscape Ecol., 30, 1627–1641,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0044-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0044-9</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Y. K., Yang, J., Qin, L., Tang, W. Z., and Han, M.: Evaluation of
AMSR-E retrievals and GLDAS simulations against observations of a soil
moisture network on the central Tibetan Plateau, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
4466–4475, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50301" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrd.50301</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, A. G.: Increasing drought under global warming in observations and
models, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 52–58, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1633" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nclimate1633</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, A. G., Trenberth, K. E., and Qian, T. T.: A global dataset of Palmer
Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and
effects of surface warming, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 1117–1130, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-386.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JHM-386.1</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Davie, J. C. S., Falloon, P. D., Kahana, R., Dankers, R., Betts, R., Portmann,
F. T., Wisser, D., Clark, D. B., Ito, A., Masaki, Y., Nishina, K., Fekete, B.,
Tessler, Z., Wada, Y., Liu, X., Tang, Q., Hagemann, S., Stacke, T., Pavlick,
R., Schaphoff, S., Gosling, S. N., Franssen, W., and Arnell, N.: Comparing
projections of future changes in runoff from hydrological and biome models
in ISI-MIP, Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 359–374, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-359-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/esd-4-359-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Davis, M. A. and Pelsor, M.: Experimental support for a resource-based
mechanistic model of invisibility, Ecol. Lett., 4, 421–428, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00246.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00246.x</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Douville, H., Ribes, A., Decharme, B., Alkama, R., and Sheffield, J.:
Anthropogenic influence on multidecadal changes in reconstructed global
evapotranspiration, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 59–62, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1632" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1632</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Falloon, P. D., Dankers, R., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Booth, B. B. B., and
Lambert, F. H.: Role of vegetation change in future climate under the
A1B scenario and a climate stabilisation scenario, using the HadCM3C Earth
system model, Biogeosciences, 9, 4739–4756, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-4739-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-9-4739-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Field, C. B., Lobell, D. B., Peters, H. A., and Chiariello, N. R.: Feedbacks of
terrestrial ecosystems to climate change, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32,
1–29, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141119" target="_blank">doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141119</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N.,
Sibley, A., and Huang, X. M.: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm
refinements and characterization of new datasets, Remote Sens. Environ.,
114, 168–182, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gang, C. C., Wang, Z. Q., Zhou, W., Chen, Y. Z., Li, J. L., Cheng, J. M., Guo,
L., Odeh, I., and Chen, C.: Projecting the dynamics of terrestrial net
primary productivity in response to future climate change under the RCP2.6
scenario, Environ. Earth Sci., 74, 5949–5959, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4618-x" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4618-x</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hughes, R. F., Archer, S. R., Asner, G. P., Wessman, C. A., McMurtry, C.,
Nelson, J., and Ansley, R. J.: Changes in aboveground primary production and
carbon and nitrogen pools accompanying woody plant encroachment in a
temperate savanna, Global Change Biol., 12, 1733–1747, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01210.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01210.x</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Ito, A.: A historical meta-analysis of global terrestrial net primary
productivity: Are estimates converging, Global Change Biol., 17, 3161–3175,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02450.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02450.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., Seneviratne, S. I., Sheffield, J.,
Goulden, M. L., Bonan, G., Cescatti, A., Chen, J. Q., de Jeu, R., Dolman,
A. J., Eugster, W., Gerten, D., Gianelle, D., Gobron, N., Heinke, J.,
Kimball, J., Law, B. E., Montagnani, L., Mu, Q. Z., Mueller, B., Oleson, K.,
Papale, D., Richardson, A. D., Roupsard, O., Running, S., Tomelleri, E.,
Viovy, N., Weber, U., Williams, G., Wood, E., Zaehle, S., and Zhang, K.:
Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited
moisture supply, Nature, 467, 951–954, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09396" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature09396</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Chen, Y. N., Li, W. H., Deng, H. J., and Fang, G. H.: Potential impacts of
climate change on vegetation dynamics in Central Asia, J. Geophys. Res., 120,
12345–12356, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023618" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/2015JD023618</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Matsui, T., Lakshmi, V., and Small, E. E.: The effects of satellite-derived
vegetation cover variability on simulated land–atmosphere interactions in
the NAMS, J. Climate, 18, 21–40, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3254.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI3254.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Meng, X. H., Evans, J. P., and McCabe, M. F.: The impact of observed vegetation
changes on land–atmosphere feedbacks during drought, J. Hydrometeorol., 15,
759–776, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0130.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-0130.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q., Heinsch, F. A., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Development of a global
evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data,
Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 519–536, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ., 115,
1781–1800, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Myneni, R. B., Hoffman, S., Knyazikhin, Y., Privette, J. L., Glassy, J., Tian,
Y., Wang, Y., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Smith, G. R., Lotsch, A., Friedl, M.,
Morisette, J. T., Votava, P., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W.: Global
products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of
MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 214–231, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Nemani, R. R., Keeling, C. D., Hashimoto, H., Jolly, W. M., Piper, S. C.,
Tucker, C. J., Myneni, R. B., and Running, S. W.: Climate-driven increases in
global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999, Science, 300,
1560–1563, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1082750" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1082750</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Neumann, M., Zhao, M. S., Kindermann, G., and Hasenauer, H.: Comparing MODIS
net primary production estimates with terrestrial national forest inventory
data in Austria, Remote Sens., 7, 3878–3906, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs70403878" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/rs70403878</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Orlowsky, B. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Elusive drought: uncertainty in
observed trends and short- and long-term CMIP5 projections, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 17, 1765–1781, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1765-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/hess-17-1765-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, S. F., Tian, H. Q., Dangal, S. R., Zhang, C., Yang, J., Tao, B., Ouyang,
Z. Y., Wang, X. K., Lu, C. Q., Ren, W., Banger, K., Yang, Q. C., Zhang, B. W., and
Li, X.: Complex spatiotemporal responses of global terrestrial primary
production to climate change and increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in the
21st century, PloS One, 9, e112810, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112810" target="_blank">doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112810</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, W. C.: Meteorological Drought, US Dep. of Commer., Weather Bur.,
Washington, D.C. 6–8, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bare and grass, P. Roy.
Soc. Lond., 193, 120–145, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Potter, C. S., Klooster, S., and Genovese, V.: Net primary production of
terrestrial ecosystems from 2000 to 2009, Climatic Change, 115, 365–378,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0460-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0460-2</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B.,
Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil
moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review, Earth-Sci.
Rev., 99, 125–161, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2010.02.004</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Roderick, M. L.: Little change in global drought
over the past 60 years, Nature, 491, 435–438, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11575" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/nature11575</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Shen, M. G., Piao, S. L., Jeong, S. J., Zhou, L. M., Zeng, Z. Z., Ciais, P.,
Chen, D. L., Huang, M. T., Jin, C. S., Li, L. Z. X., Li, Y., Myneni, R. B.,
Yang, K., Zhang, G., Zhang, Y. J., and Yao, T. D.: Evaporative cooling over the
Tibetan Plateau induced by vegetation growth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112,
9299–9304, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504418112" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.1504418112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Teuling, A. J., van Loon, A. F., Seneviratne, S. I., Lehner, I., Aubinet, M.,
Heinesch, B., Bernhofer, C., Grünwald, T., Prasse, H., and Spank, U.:
Evapotranspiration amplifies European summer drought, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
40, 2071–2075, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50495" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/grl.50495</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Tian, H., Melillo, J., Kicklighter, D., McGuire, A. D., Iii, J. H., Iii, B. M.,
and Vörösmarty, C. J.: Climatic and biotic controls on annual carbon
storage in Amazonian ecosystems, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 9, 315–335,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00198.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00198.x</a>, 2000.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, Harris, I., and Jones, P. D.:
Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time-Series (TS) Version 3.23 of High Resolution
Gridded Data of Month-by-month Variation in Climate (Jan. 1901–Dec. 2014),
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5285/4c7fdfa6-f176-4c58-acee-683d5e9d2ed5" target="_blank">doi:10.5285/4c7fdfa6-f176-4c58-acee-683d5e9d2ed5</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Wentz, F. J., Ricciardulli, L., Hilburn, K., and Mears, C.: How much more
rain will global warming bring?, Science, 317, 233–235, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140746" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1140746</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, I. N., Torn, M. S., Riley, W. J., and Wehner, M. F.: Impacts of
climate extremes on gross primary production under global warming, Environ.
Res. Lett., 9, 094011, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094011" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094011</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y. H., Fang, J. Y., Ma, W. H., Smith, P., Mohammat, A., Wang, S. P., and
Wang, W.: Soil carbon stock and its changes in northern China's grasslands
from 1980s to 2000s, Global Change Biol., 16, 3036–3047, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02123.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02123.x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, J., Wang, W. C., and Wei, J.: Assessing land-atmosphere coupling using
soil moisture from the Global Land Data Assimilation System and observational
precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D17119, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009807" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008JD009807</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Nemani, R. R., Running, S. W., Hong, Y., Gourley,
J. J., and Yu, Z. B.: Vegetation greening and climate change promote
multidecadal rises of global land evapotranspiration, Sci. Rep., 5, 15956,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15956" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep15956</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, M. S. and Running, S. W.: Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial
net primary production from 2000 through 2009, Science, 329, 940–943,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1192666" target="_blank">doi:10.1126/science.1192666</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Zhi, H., Wang, P. X., Dan, L., Yu, Y. Q., Xu, Y. F., and Zheng, W. P.:
Climate-vegetation interannual variability in a coupled atmosphere–ocean–land
model, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 599–612, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0599-6" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00376-009-0599-6</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
