<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-19-3807-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Influence of solar forcing, climate variability and modes of
low-frequency atmospheric variability on summer floods in Switzerland</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Variability of summer floods in Switzerland}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~C.~Pe\~{n}a et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Peña</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8784-6142</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Schulte</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          <email>schulte@ub.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-3166</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Badoux</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-4613</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Barriendos</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Barrera-Escoda</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-4030</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Meteorological Service of Catalonia, Barcelona,
Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Physical and Regional Geography and ICREA,
University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Mountain Hydrology and Mass Movements Research unit, Swiss
Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf,
Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Catalan Institute of Climate Sciences (IC3) and Department
of Modern History, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">L. Schulte (schulte@ub.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>3807</fpage><lpage>3827</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The higher frequency of severe flood events in Switzerland in recent decades
has given fresh impetus to the study of flood patterns and their possible
forcing mechanisms, particularly in mountain environments. This paper
presents a new index of summer flood damage that considers severe and
catastrophic summer floods in Switzerland between 1800 and 2009, and
explores the influence of external forcings on flood frequencies. In
addition, links between floods and low-frequency atmospheric variability
patterns are examined. The flood damage index provides evidence that the
1817–1851, 1881–1927, 1977–1990 and 2005–present flood clusters occur mostly
in phase with palaeoclimate proxies. The cross-spectral analysis documents
that the periodicities detected in the coherency and phase spectra of 11
(Schwabe cycle) and 104 years (Gleissberg cycle) are related to a high
frequency of flooding and solar activity minima, whereas the 22-year
cyclicity detected (Hale cycle) is associated with solar activity maxima and
a decrease in flood frequency. The analysis of low-frequency atmospheric
variability modes shows that Switzerland lies close to the border of the
principal summer mode. The Swiss river catchments situated on the centre and
southern flank of the Alps are affected by atmospherically unstable areas
defined by the positive phase of the pattern, while those basins located in
the northern slope of the Alps are predominantly associated with the
negative phase of the pattern. Furthermore, a change in the low-frequency
atmospheric variability pattern related to the major floods occurred over
the period from 1800 to 2009; the summer principal mode persists in the negative
phase during the last cool pulses of the Little Ice Age (1817–1851 and
1881–1927 flood clusters), whereas the positive phases of the mode prevail
during the warmer climate of the last 4 decades (flood clusters from 1977 to
present).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The response of floods to global changes is complex and can vary on a
regional scale. Extreme flood event frequency can be highly sensitive to
modest environmental and climate changes (Knox, 2000), so much so, in fact,
that these changes might not be recorded by mean hydrological values but
rather by a changing pattern in the magnitude and frequency of extreme
events (Benito et al., 2005). Moreover, these changes often occur during
transitional stages of climatic pulses (Knox, 2000; Glaser and Stangl, 2004;
Schulte et al., 2009a) and may respond to complex exogenic, endogenic and
autogenic climate forcing mechanisms (Versteegh, 2005). Yet, the debate
concerning the factors and trends that might influence flood dynamics, such
as the rise in temperature, river management and other human activities,
remains a controversial one (Brázdil et al., 2006).</p>
      <p>In high mountain catchments, major flood events are determined by the
intensity and frequency of extreme precipitation events, high discharge
rates provoked by the melting of glacial ice and snow cover, the outburst
flood of lakes dammed by landslides as well as by other phenomena. The Alps
are highly sensitive to changes in atmospheric circulation and environmental
perturbations that influence the hydrological regime and flooding patterns
reconstructed from instrumental data and documentary sources
(Hächler-Tanner, 1991; Röthlisberger, 1991; Gees, 1997; Pfister,
1999; Luterbacher et al., 2004; Weingartner and Reist, 2004; ALP-IMP, 2006;
Burger, 2008; Schmocker-Fackel and Naef, 2010a, b; Wetter et al., 2011) and,
regarding longer time series, from natural proxies such as lacustrine
records, glaciers, dendrochronology and isotopic studies of speleothems
(Tinner et al., 2003; Casty et al., 2005; Holzhauser et al., 2005; Boch and
Spötl, 2008; Wilhelm et al., 2012). Referring to the last three
millennia, solar activity may be an important driver of alpine floods as
indicated by the periodicities (Gleissberg solar cycles) of geochemical and
pollen proxies of alluvial plain sediments in the Swiss Alps (Schulte et
al., 2008, 2015) and by their correlation with climate proxies.</p>
      <p>During the last 500 years, periods of large floods have been reported by
detailed documentary inventories and instrumental series compiled by
Röthlisberger (1991), Hächler-Tanner (1991), Gees (1997), Pfister
(1999), Lehmann and Naef (2003), Vischer (2003), Burger (2008) and Hilker et
al. (2009). According to the annual number of floods used by
Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010a, b) as a parameter for the evaluation of
the climate and hydric variability of catchments in Switzerland, increased
flooding occurred during four main periods: 1560–1590, 1740–1790, 1820–1940
and 1970–2007. Since the second half of the 19th century, river correction
and embankment may have influenced the frequency of flooding in the Swiss
catchments. Other studies discuss the possible links between hydrological
extreme events and low-frequency atmospheric variability patterns (Pfister,
1999; Jacobeit et al., 2006; Knox, 2000; Glaser and Stangl, 2004; Mudelsee
et al., 2004; Schmocker-Fackel and Naef, 2010b; Wilhelm et al., 2012), such
as the North Atlantic Oscillation. However, in the Swiss Alps, floods show a
strong seasonal distribution recording highest frequencies during the summer
months. Summer climate in the North Atlantic-European sector possesses a
principal pattern of year-to-year variability which is defined as the main
empirical orthogonal function (EOF1) of the standardized anomalies of the
European mean sea level pressure (EMSLP) during July and August. The
location of the action centres shows strong positive anomalies (high
pressure centre) between the Scandinavia Peninsula and Great Britain, while
the Mediterranean region is dominated by light negative anomalies (low
pressure centre). The EOF1 exerts a strong influence on rainfall,
temperature and cloud cover through changes in the position of storm tracks
in the North Atlantic region (Folland et al., 2009), but also in many areas
of southern Europe (Bladé et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>Our study aims to investigate the possible links between flood frequency in
Switzerland and solar forcing, volcanic eruptions, climate variability and
the North Atlantic dynamics over the last two centuries. A study of summer
flood frequencies in Switzerland has been conducted for the period
1800–2009, based on the calculation of a flood damage index (henceforth INU)
from existing flood inventories for Switzerland, summarizing both the
severity of these events and their spatial extent. Special attention will be
focused also on the possible different evolution between flood dynamics at
the northern and southern slopes of the Alps during the last two centuries.
The influence of solar forcing on flood frequencies is investigated, applying
a cross-spectral analysis to the sunspot record and INU to determine the
common periodicities, and we used temperature reconstructions, volcanic
eruptions, beryllium-10 records (solar activity) and oxygen isotope data
(Greenland climate proxies) for finding links. Finally, the analysis of the
possible links between floods and North Atlantic dynamics is focused on the
low-frequency atmospheric variability pattern (EOF1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Historical flood data</title>
      <p>Historical descriptions of flood events are reported in the Alps by local
monographies, chronicles, Council minutes, manuscript sources and
specialized literature, and from the 18th century onwards, by press and expert
reports (Pfister, 1999). Instrumental discharge measurements of gauge
stations started in Switzerland mostly at the beginning of the 20th century.</p>
      <p>To explain the variability and frequency of floods in Switzerland between
1800 and 2009, an integrated flood damage index (INU) was calculated from
two data sources: a flood database, provided by Gees (1997) for the period
1800–1994, which were developed from the historical records compiled by
Röthlisberger (1991), Pfister and Hächler (1991) and further
historical investigation; and selected flood damage data extracted from the
Swiss flood and landslide damage database of the Swiss Federal Institute for
Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, WSL for the period 1972–2009 (Hilker et
al., 2009). The contemporary flood series of the WSL, generated from damage
events reported by the local, regional and national press and websites
(police, fire department, etc.), were transformed according to the database
structure of Gees (1997) to extend the flood index.</p>
      <p>Both sources (Gees, 1997 and WSL) report the flood damage expressed by the
equivalent of present economic loss. In general, the information included in
the database is structured as follows: the municipality, river or canton
affected by the hazard, the date, the type of process (flood, debris flow,
landslide or rockfall), the triggering weather conditions and a description
of the damage, including the number of people affected, killed and injured
(Hilker et al., 2009). However, the INU considers only flooding, floods and
debris flows. Based on this information, we built a database with a matrix
structure, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rows state the event date and each of the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns reports the flood information for each of the Swiss cantons. The
cells from which the matrix is comprised then either bear a code or are left
empty, depending on the incidence of a flood event on the given date and in
the specific canton. The code reports the flood category, based on the
damage in Switzerland quantified in millions of Swiss francs (CHF) taking
inflation into account (Gees, 1997; Hilker et al., 2009). A flood is
considered a low-damage event (L) if the damage is calculated at less than
CHF 0.2 million; a medium-damage event (M) if the damage is between 0.2 and
2 million; a severe-damage event (S) if the damage is between 2 and 20
million; a very severe-damage event (VS) if the damage is between 20 and 100
million; and a catastrophic-damage event (C) when the damage caused by the
flood event exceeds CHF 100 million.</p>
      <p>Difficulties with regard to the homogeneity of historical flood time series
are expected due to the lower precision and possible data gaps of flood
records from earlier periods. However, Gees (1997) showed that this
heterogeneity mostly affects the small and medium category floods, whereas
the very severe and catastrophic events have not shown this effect since the
increased sensibility of the population caused by the increased floods
during the first half of the 19th century, the application of the Swiss
Federal Law on River Correction since 1854 and the improved information
transmission by the press. Moreover, flood mitigation management such as
levee construction, retention reservoirs and river detour into large lakes
may have had an influence on flood frequency since the 18th century and improved since 1900
(Wetter et al., 2011). Other factors such as ground sealing, canalizing
riverbeds and exposure of public infrastructure increased runoff, discharge
and economic losses during the 20th century. It is difficult to estimate how
these opposite effects partially compensate for each other (Pfister, 1999).
It is important to state that the improved river regulation in Switzerland,
conducted from 1850 onwards, may mitigate the damage caused by low, medium
and major floods, but cannot prevent completely the total impact of category
VS and C floods as occurred for example during the 1987 and 2005 events.
From our research on flood dynamics and evolution of delta morphology of the
Lütschine and Hasli Aare rivers starting from 1480 (Schulte et al., 2015), we
observe the same trend: the frequency of very severe and catastrophic floods
does not show a substantial change, whereas small and medium floods are
recorded with improved precision after 1800. Therefore, we use only the very
severe (VS) and catastrophic (C) flood events to generate the flood damage
index (INU). To validate the historical flood data, in order to build the INU index, all events of category
VS and C were checked if they were cited by different sources and if damage occurred simultaneously in different sites.
From 91 events, only the event of 4 August 1868 was excluded. The
flood database of the WSL (1972–2009) is considered to be complete.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Instrumental and proxy data</title>
      <p>Solar forcing is considered an external driver of climate dynamics
(Stuiver et al., 1997; Versteegh, 2005) and may influence flood frequency
(Benito et al., 2003; Schulte et al., 2008, 2015). Average annual sunspot
numbers (SN) for the period 1700-2011 were downloaded from the online
catalogue of the sunspot index provided by the SIDC team (World Data Center
for the Sunspot Index, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Monthly Report on the
International Sunspot Number). To complete this analysis, we used a solar
proxy, the annual mean values of the beryllium-10 records (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be)
measured in the ice core from the NGRIP site in Greenland (Berggren et al.,
2009). Deposition of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be into polar ice sheets is a
natural archive with annual resolution about past solar activity and
constitutes a proxy for understanding possible connections between solar
variability and past climate change (Beer et al., 2000; Berggren et al.,
2009).</p>
      <p>Volcanic eruptions are investigated by mean volcanic sulphate deposition and
converted to stratospheric volcanic sulphate injection (in Tg units) for the
Northern Hemisphere over the past 200 years (1800–2000). These measures have
been extracted from 32 ice core records that cover a major part of the
Greenland ice sheet (Gao et al., 2008).</p>
      <p>Climate variability is analysed from a climate proxy, the annual mean values
of the oxygen isotope record <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O for the period 1800–1987 from
the Greenland ice core GISP 2 (Stuiver and Grootes, 2000). This core
provides climate information based on conversion of isotope values to mean
annual temperature in Greenland. Furthermore, we determined the average
annual temperature for Switzerland from 1800 to 2006 based on data obtained
from the EC project: multi-centennial climate variability in the Alps
(ALP-IMP, 2006). This data set is based on instrumental data, model
simulations and proxy data, with the purpose of creating a spatial grid of
several climate variables. The average temperature was obtained by
calculating the arithmetic mean of the grid points corresponding to Swiss
territory.</p>
      <p>The low-frequency atmospheric variability modes were inferred from the daily
EMSLP grid taken from the 20th Century V2 Reanalysis Project (20CRP). These
data were provided by NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado (Compo et al.,
2011) and extend the temporal coverage of the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Project
(Kalnay et al., 1996). The 20CRP is a mission to produce reanalyses of
weather maps covering the period from 1871 onwards with a horizontal spatial
resolution of 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To complete the period covered by the flood
data (from 1800 to 2009) and to obtain a continuous time series of
low-frequency atmospheric variability indices, the reconstructed monthly sea
level pressure fields over the North Atlantic and Europe, generated by
Luterbacher et al. (2002) for the years 1659–2000, were also integrated.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A complete reference list of web links to the different data sets used in the
analysis is given at the end of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p>Given the hydro-climatic differences according to the singular orographic
configuration of Switzerland, the trigger processes of floods, especially
rainfall generation processes, are different between the northern and
southern flank of the Alps (Schmocker-Fackel and Naef, 2010). Although there
are several Swiss climatologic and hydrologic regionalization studies (e.g.
Kirchhofer, 2000), we conducted a regionalization of the Swiss territory
based on a multivariate data analysis. The input data were performed by the
matrix of INU (see Sect. 2.1.1). To identify the principal hydro-climatic
regions, we applied principal component analysis (PCA) to the flood matrix
in S mode using the correlation matrix. The critical assumptions underlying
PCA are more conceptual than statistical. Only normality is necessary if a
statistical test is applied to the significance of the factors. The data
matrix should ensure that sufficient correlations exist to justify the
application of factor analysis (Hair et al., 1998). Two tests were used to
evaluate the model: the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy
(KMO) and Bartlett's sphericity test. The KMO statistic varies between 0
and 1. A value close to 1 indicates that patterns of correlations are
compact and therefore PCA should yield distinct and reliable factors.
According to Kaiser (1974) the recommended acceptable values should be
greater than 0.5. If the KMO value is less than 0.5 we can evaluate the
anti-image correlation matrix to delete redundant variables (that is to say,
those variables that have values less than 0.5 in the principal diagonal) to
improve the results of PCA. Bartlett's sphericity test checks the
presence of correlations among the variables. It tests the null hypothesis
that the correlation matrix is an identity matrix, i.e. all diagonal
elements are 1 and all off-diagonal elements are 0, implying that all of the
variables are uncorrelated. If the significance value (sig. value) for this
test is less than our alpha level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we reject the null
hypothesis. Finally, we used the scree test to extract the most relevant
components and the equamax normalized rotation for a straightforward
interpretation of the model output. This rotation is a compromise between
varimax and quartimax. Specifically, it maximizes the sum of variances of
the squared raw factor loadings across factors and the same process across
variables. This is equivalent to simultaneously maximizing the variances in
the rows and columns of the matrix of the squared raw factor loadings.</p>
      <p>INU is calculated separately for each of the regions determined from the PCA
by evaluating the different spatial and temporal patterns that account for
the variability in the frequency of floods. The INU is estimated taking a
risk (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) approach, whereby the concept of risk (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is considered to be the
product of hazard (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and vulnerability (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The variable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated from the damage and economic losses caused by
floods. The categories of damage are as defined in Sect. 2.1.1. To each
category an arbitrary magnitude is attributed: floods classified as VS are
given a value of 50, while C floods are assigned a value of 100. Thus, each
flood event is defined by a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value that indicates the intensity of the
phenomenon. The estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the spatial distribution of the
phenomenon, is based on the number of cantons affected by a flood episode.
Finally, by applying Eq. (1) we obtain an R value for each flood event.
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the flood number (ordinal 1 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of
floods), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of the cantons concerned in the flood number <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the hazard of the flood number <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the canton <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
vulnerability of the flood number <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In our case <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 always. The
INU is calculated from the integration of all the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values on an annual
resolution:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>INU</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the INU value for a given year, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of the
months (1 to 12) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of events in a given month <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Finally,
each INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is standardized, based on the mean and standard
deviation; both parameters are calculated for the period 1800–2009.</p>
      <p>The periodicities of the time series were determined by conducting analyses
in the frequency domain. Spectral analysis is a useful tool for examining
the information inherent in a time series (Schulz and Statteger, 1997;
Schulz and Mudelsee, 2002; Borgmark, 2005). In this study, we used a
harmonic analysis to detect periodic signals in the records with presence of
noise (Percival and Walden, 1993). The time series were processed using the
program SPECTRUM (Schulz and Statteger, 1997), which is based on a
periodogram calculated from the Lomb–Scargle Fourier transform, with a
rectangular window, and using a significance level of 0.05 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05) and a lambda of 0.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4). This configuration detects
a false-alarm level of 99.6 % for white noise assessment through the
Siegel (Siegel, 1979) test. The red noise spectrum of the records is
estimated with the REDFIT software (Schulz and Mudelsee, 2002). This program
estimates the autoregressive first-order parameter for unevenly spaced time
series and transforms this model into the time domain frequency. To assess,
validate and explain the common cyclicities detected in the time series from
the harmonic analysis, a cross-spectral analysis (Schulz and Statteger,
1997) was performed using the bivariate spectral analysis module of the
program SPECTRUM. This program analyses the coherency and phase spectra to
summarize the co-variation of the time series particularly in palaeoclimatic
records (Shackleton, 2000).</p>
      <p>A further methodology is concerned with the definition of low-frequency
atmospheric variability modes. Several authors use the main EOF calculated
from principal component analysis (PCA) in S mode applied to the grid of
EMSLP using the covariance matrix (Hurrell et al., 2003; Folland et al.,
2009; Bladé et al., 2011) and the scree test (Cattell, 1966) to extract
the most relevant components without applying any kind of rotation. The
analysis was conducted for the domain from 30 to 70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and from 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E for the period 1800–2009. To
cover the entire period, we used the reconstruction of sea level pressure
fields, weighted by the square root of the latitude over the eastern North
Atlantic and Europe, generated by Luterbacher et al. (2002) and the 20CRP
(Compo et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Regionalization of Switzerland and INU as a flood damage index </title>
      <p>A total of 90 category VS and C floods were recorded in Switzerland in the
period 1800–2009. The regionalization of Switzerland is based on the
application of a PCA to the flood matrix. The KMO measure of sampling
adequacy is 0.82, which would be labelled as very good. Since this measure
meets the minimum criteria to evaluate the correlation patterns of the data
set, we do not have a problem that requires us to examine the anti-image
correlation matrix to delete the redundant variables of the analysis. The
result of Bartlett's sphericity test shows that sig. value <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.000 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 (chi-square <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2128.42,
degrees of freedom <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 325). The sig. value for this analysis leads us to reject the null
hypothesis and conclude that there is no evidence that the correlation
matrix is an identity matrix and the data set is appropriate for the
application of the PCA. The 2-D plot of the two principal components (not
rotated; see Fig. 1a) accounts for 22 % of the total variance. When the
factors are inverted and rotated by 90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, they display
the geographic location of the cantons approximately. This two principal
components can be interpreted as the two principal moisture sources that
affect Switzerland. Factor 1 is related to a disposition north/south of
the cantons, indicating a lower/greater influence of the Mediterranean Sea.
The second factor is explained by the west/east cross section, suggesting the
higher/lower influence of the Atlantic moisture source.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Factor loadings of factor 1 versus factor 2 after the
application of the PCA to the flood matrix without rotation.
<bold>(b)</bold> Scree test and number of components selected.
<bold>(c)</bold> Regionalization of Switzerland according to the PCA, applying
the equamax rotation. The dotted lines show the limits of the regions (DEM
from Atlas of Switzerland, 2004; map modified).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>We used the scree test to extract the most relevant components (see Fig. 1b)
and we performed an equamax rotation in order to achieve the final
regionalization of Switzerland considering the two cross sections. The
analysis revealed five principal components accounting for 45 % of the
total variance. Each region is defined by a component (see Fig. 1c): the
region 1 is composed of the Valais and the western cantons, region 2 is
defined by the western part of the northern slope of the Alps and the
western Swiss Plateau, region 3 represents the south-eastern cantons
Grisons, Uri and Ticino, region 4 is the Swiss Jura and the eastern
Swiss Plateau and finally, region 5 is the eastern part of the northern
flank of the Alps. Thus, the rotation improves the division of regions that
appear vaguely defined in Fig. 1a. For instance, Uri (UR) marks the
transition between regions 3 and 5 and finally is added to region 3.
Moreover, the cantons located in northern and north-western Switzerland,
which in Fig. 1a apparently define a single cluster, are split into two
areas (region 1 and region 4) after the rotation. This separation
probably distinguishes between the flows from the west-northwest and those
from the north.</p>
      <p>Figure 2 shows the monthly and seasonal distribution of VS and C events for
the period 1800–2009. The monthly (Fig. 2a) and seasonal (Fig 2b) flood
cycles are heavily pronounced: 65 % of these events are concentrated in
the summer season (June, July and August), rising to 82 % if September is
included (extended summer). Furthermore, the monthly distribution presents a
peak in August with 37 % of all events. It should also be noted that
during the months of March, April and December, no major floods were
recorded. Recall, however, that the flood damage index only considers the
events recorded during the high summer months (July and August). We proceed
in this way for two main reasons: first, this is the time window considered
by the EOF1, which is the principal pattern for explaining rainfall patterns
in terms of large-scale atmospheric phenomena; and, second, most of the
catastrophic floods (C; 60 %) reported during the time span of this study
occurred during this 2-month period.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Monthly distribution of major floods in Switzerland for
the period 1800–2009 for very severe (VS) and catastrophic
<bold>(c)</bold> flood categories. <bold>(b)</bold> Seasonal distribution of VS and C
floods. DJF: December-January-February; MAM: March-April-May; JJA:
June-July-August; SON: September-October-November.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 3a shows the annual flood damage index according to the contribution
of each region. The INU captures the high temporal variability of floods
showing the alternation of high-frequency periods of major flood events and
periods of very low frequency or flood gaps. The advantage afforded by the
INU is that we are able to process the time series statistically. Figure 3b
shows the total annual INU values of the Switzerland and indicates periods
with high frequency of flooding (grey shaded). Each column summarizes the
information shown in Fig. 3a by using the following expression:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>INU</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mtext>INU</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where for a determined year, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the region number, INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the region <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 (total number of regions). Finally,
the new data set is normalized by the mean and the standard deviation of the
period 1800–2009. The major flood periods can be identified with respect to
INU values that exceed the mean plus 1.5 times the standard deviation. The
first period marked by a high frequency of major floods (Fig. 3b) extends
from 1817 to 1851; the second period from 1881 to 1927, although some
flooding did continue to occur, albeit less frequently, up to 1951 (Fig. 3a); the last two periods were recorded from 1977 to 1990 and 2005 to
present. Since that date, the 2005 flood event has caused the most severe damage
(CHF 3.1 billion) followed by the 1987 flood (CHF 1.77 billion).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Regional flood damage index INU for the period
1800–2009. <bold>(b)</bold> Values of INU that exceed 1.5 times the standard
deviation. The periods with a high frequency of flooding are shaded grey.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Spectral analysis of large floods</title>
      <p>Figure 4a plots the harmonic analysis of the INU undertaken to detect
periodicities in the records in the presence of noise (Schulz and Statteger,
1997; Schulz and Mudelsee, 2002; Borgmark, 2005). The analysis identifies
periodic signals that are above the 99.6 % false-alarm level using the
Siegel test, in an interval of frequencies (fs) ranging between 0.005 and
0.011 with a maximum peak at 0.009, at 0.082, between 0.103 and 0.105 with a
maximum peak at 0.105 and between 0.391 and 0.413 with a maximum peak at
0.393. A red noise in the signal (Fig. 4b) was not detected. Thus, the
harmonic analysis indicates spectral peaks between 92 and 184 years with a
maximum spectral peak at 110 years, between 10 and 12 years with a maximum
spectral peak at 10 years and between 2 and 3 years with a maximum spectral
peak located at 2 years. In summary, significant spectral peaks were detected
around 2, 10 and 110 years. These latter two may correspond, respectively, to
the Schwabe (11.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.02 years) and Gleissberg cycles
(88.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 21 years); such secular periodic processes have been reported
in a broad variety of solar, solar–terrestrial, and terrestrial climatic
phenomena (Peristykh and Damon, 2003), whereas the first one might correspond
to the quasi-biennial oscillation (Baldwin et al., 2001), that it affects the
stratospheric flow from pole to pole by modulating the effects of
extratropical waves. The spectral analysis therefore seems to provide
evidence that solar forcing is a significant factor with regard to the timing
of floods in Switzerland.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Harmonic analysis for the summer flood damage index
INU. The dotted line represents critical level for the Siegel test and
significant frequencies are shown in years. <bold>(b)</bold> Red noise AR1
spectra of INU. The dotted line shows false-alarm level. <bold>(c)</bold> Harmonic
analysis for the average annual number of sunspots. The dotted horizontal lines
represent critical levels for the Siegel test. Significant frequencies are
shown in years. The principal solar cycles are highlighted.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Cross-spectral analysis between sunspot numbers and large floods</title>
      <p>To compare the periodicities identified in the INU with cycles of solar
activity, a harmonic analysis of the annual average sunspot number for the
period 1700–2011 was conducted. The results show the main solar cycles on
decadal and centennial scales (Fig. 4c) and are consistent with the results
of solar periodicities reported by Rogers et al. (2006). The INU shows
common periodicities with solar cycles at 0.010 and 0.090, corresponding to
104 and 11 years, respectively.</p>
      <p>To consider the significance of the common spectral peaks of INU and the
sunspot record, a cross-spectral analysis was undertaken to obtain the
coherency and phase spectra (Fig. 5). Since maximum values in the INU are
expected to correlate with minimum solar activity values, as pointed out in
a number of studies (e.g. Pfister, 1999; Magny et al., 2003; Schulte et al.,
2009a, b), the sign of the INU data was changed prior to cross-spectral
analysis to prevent an artificial phase offset by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The coherency spectrum (Fig. 5a) suggests the
presence of periodic components at 104, 22 and 11 years, setting the
false-alarm level at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1. The phase spectrum (Fig. 5b)
identifies negative angles of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>117<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.010 (104 years), and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>98<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0.090 (11 years). These results show that the maximum
INU values are related to solar activity minima. However, the angle is
positive (132<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 19<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at fs <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.045
(22 years). Therefore, the cross-spectral analysis provides evidence that
the common and significant periodicities detected in the coherency spectrum
at 11 (Schwabe cycle) and 104 years (Gleissberg cycle) are related to a high
frequency of flooding and minimum solar activity (negative angles in the
phase spectrum, Fig. 5b), whereas the 22-year cyclicity detected (Hale
cycle) is associated with maximum solar activity and a decrease in the flood
frequency (positive angles in the phase-spectrum).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Cross-spectral analysis between the index of summer flood damage INU
and annual number of sunspots: <bold>(a)</bold> Coherency spectrum. Dashed line
indicates false-alarm level for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1. <bold>(b)</bold> Phase spectrum.
The sign of the INU data was changed prior to cross-spectral analysis in
order to prevent an artificial phase offset by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Negative
angles indicate that the maximum frequency in the floods occurs during a
solar activity minimum and vice versa.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Comparison between modes of low-frequency atmospheric variability and large
floods</title>
      <p>The INU index provides an excellent tool to explore the space-time
dependence between major floods in Switzerland and low-frequency atmospheric
variability patterns. During the high summer, the climate variability in the
North Atlantic-European sector is synthesized by a major annual variability
pattern identified as the EOF1. This pattern was detected by the first
covariance eigenvector of EMSLP computed from a PCA in S mode, over the
domain 30–70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
with a monthly resolution for the two reanalysis grids used: 20CRP (Compo et
al., 2011) for the period 1871–2009 (Fig. 6a), and the sea level pressure
fields over the North Atlantic and Europe for the period 1659 to 1999
(Luterbacher et al., 2002; Fig. 6b). The low-frequency atmospheric
variability pattern obtained separately from both grids is quite similar,
explaining roughly 40 % of the EMSLP variance. Both models are comparable
to those presented by Folland et al. (2009, see Fig. 1, pp. 1085).
Furthermore, the coefficients of the scores matrix report the temporal
evolution of the EOF1. The Pearson temporal correlation coefficient between
the scores of both time series has a value of 0.89. This level of
association has allowed us to create the EOF1 index for the period from 1800
to 2009 (see Fig. 6c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Principal mode of low-frequency atmospheric variability
based on principal eigenvector extracted from PCA in S mode, using the
covariance matrix of monthly EMSLP for the period 1871–2009 (EOF1). This has
been applied to the grid extracted of the 20th Century Reanalysis project
(Compo et al., 2011). The red (blue) contours show positive (negative) anomalies.
<bold>(b)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold> but applied to the monthly EMSLP of the
Luterbacher reanalysis grid (Luterbacher et al., 2002) for the period
1800–1999. <bold>(c)</bold> Time series of the EOF1 pattern for the period
1800–2009 (thin black line) smoothed by a low-pass Gaussian filter of
11 years (black line). The red line shows the trend of the EOF1 time series
(significant and positive trend at a 95 % confidence level, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.006).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=264.61063pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The temporal evolution of EOF1 (Fig. 6c) shows three periods dominated by
positive phases: the first between 1741 and 1783, the second, more
intermittently, between 1867 and 1918, and the third since 1967. The temporal
evolution is very similar to that presented by Folland et al. (2009, see
Fig. 3, p. 1087). The second and third phases coincide with the last three
phases of high-frequency flooding in Switzerland. In addition, the positive
phase of EOF1 detected in the 18th century coincides with the flood cluster
between 1740 and 1790 reconstructed by Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010b).
Only the high-frequency phase of major floods that was recorded during the
first half of the 19th century (cf. Fig. 3b) is not reflected in the temporal
evolution of the EOF1 data.</p>
      <p>The increase in flood frequency occurs mostly in the positive phases in the
large-scale variability pattern for the high summer period. Flood events
with INU &gt; 5 SD (Fig. 7a) correlate with positive EOF1 values
(Pearson's temporal correlation coefficient is 0.45, significant at the
95 % confidence level). However, the study of the complete amplitude of
the INU and EOF1 signals (Fig. 7b) indicates a second flood pattern during
negative phases of EOF1. Table 1 shows the mean values of EOF1 for the years
assigned to four categories of the INU whose thresholds were defined
according to the standard deviation (from INU &gt; 0 SD for at least
one major flood to INU &gt; 5 SD for highest flood impacts). The 33
summers with very severe or catastrophic floods in Switzerland
(INU &gt; 0 SD) show a weak positive value of EOF1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.90), which increases to 0.45 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.90) when considering only those
summers that have recorded a flood with a large impact (INU &gt; 5 SD). The number of years involved in INU &gt; 0 with positive phase
of EOF1 is also higher than the years associated with a negative phase (20
and 13, respectively), noting that the 4 years involved in the major
floods all have a positive value of EOF1. However, with regard to a
reliable explanation of the triggering processes for floods in Switzerland
which are based on large-scale atmospheric patterns, we also observe a
significant number of years in the negative EOF1 phase. In addition, this is
shown by the second percentile (see Table 1) indicating negative values of
EOF1 up to INU &gt; 2.5 SD. In Sects. 5.1 and 5.4 we focus on
the issue of whether the observed differences in the behaviour of the positive and
negative EOF1 phases are linked to the two spatial patterns associated with
the hydro-climatic regionalization (see Sect. 5.1 and Fig. 8). Moreover,
we briefly analyse whether there have been changes in low-frequency
atmospheric variability patterns associated with major floods during the last
200 years.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Summer flood damage index INU (bars) versus positive
phase of EOF1 (red dots) for values of INU 5 times greater than the
standard deviation (INU &gt; 5 SD). <bold>(b)</bold> As in <bold>(a)</bold>
but for the complete signal of the INU. Blue dots represents negative EOF
phase.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Cumulative number of floods (in %) versus time, for each region:
the cumulative frequencies are obtained by adding the absolute frequencies of
all years up to the year referred to. Black line: Bisector of the quadrant
where the distribution of the floods is perfect.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Principal statistical parameters of EOF1 for each of the categories
of the flood damage index INU whose thresholds were defined according to the
standard deviation (SD).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 0 SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 1.0 SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 2.5 SD</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">INU<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 5.0 SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Average</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EOF1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (years)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EOF1 – (years)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Max</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.41</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.84</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.81</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.83</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">P2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.76</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Hydro-climatic regionalization and flood periods in Switzerland </title>
      <p>The hydro-climatic regionalization performed by the PCA shows two patterns
of spatial variability related to the two principal moisture sources that
affect Switzerland: Mediterranean and Atlantic humidity supplies. The first
pattern is related to the north–south cross section while the second pattern
is defined by the west–east cross section (see Fig. 1a). Taking into account
these findings, the final classification presents five different regions
(see Fig. 1b and c). The two cross sections stress the regionalization
based on the INU index. The three physiographic units, the Jura, Swiss
Plateau and Alps are related to different sources of humidity. The northern
slope of the Alps and the Swiss Plateau are divided into three regions
linked to the proximity to the Atlantic fluxes. In addition, the region 2
(particularly the Bernese Alps) marks the intersection of both patterns: on
one hand the Atlantic flux and on the other hand the moist Mediterranean air
masses that flow across the Alps and encounter the cooler Atlantic air at
the northern Alpine slope (Pfister, 1999).</p>
      <p>The regional distribution is consistent with other classifications of
Switzerland (e.g. Kirchhofer, 2000) that have been widely used such as for
weather forecast and warnings for heavy rain (Schmocker-Fackel, 2010a). A
major drawback of our classification is that regions have been constructed
from administrative units (cantons) that in some cases may include different
physiographic units. For example region 2 includes the canton Berne which
range from the northern Alps to the Swiss Plateau and the southern slopes of
the Jura Massif. However, the classification avoids the overestimation of
the small Swiss cantons.</p>
      <p>The temporal evolution of the regional INU shown in Fig. 8 indicates two
spatial flood patterns: during phase A from 1820 to 1910 flood numbers
increased in the basins of the west and northern flank of the Alps (region
1, 4 and 5), whereas during phase B from 1970 to the present floods
increased in the centre and south of the Alps (regions 2 and 3). This
decadal variability might be linked to changes in patterns of extreme
precipitation and large-scale atmospheric variability (Frei et al., 2000).
Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010a) suggest that this changing atmospheric
pattern is not well defined for Switzerland yet.</p>
      <p>The total INU index, summarizing the temporal distribution of the frequency
of very severe and catastrophic floods in Switzerland, presents four major
flood periods: the first extends from 1817 to 1851, the second from 1881 to
1927, the third encompasses 1977 to 1990 and the fourth was initiated in
2005 (Figs. 3b and 9). These periods largely coincide with those reported in
other studies for Switzerland (Hächler-Tanner, 1991; Röthlisberger,
1991; Gees, 1997; Pfister, 1999; Schmocker-Fackel and Naef, 2010b) and,
furthermore, with the periods identified in Spain, Italy and the Czech
Republic (Barriendos and Rodrigo, 2006; Camuffo and Enzi, 1996; Brázdil
et al., 2006). Our study shows that periods of high-frequency flooding have
a period around 90 years. This range is very similar to that observed in
Germany: for instance, Glaser and Stangl (2004) report flood clusters that
range between 30 and 100 years during the last millennium, whereas in
northern Switzerland these periods have a duration of between 30 and 120 years (Schmocker-Fackel and Naef, 2010b). In our opinion, the INU provides a
robust index, which captures the variability in major flood frequency,
although the distribution of the clusters is not homogeneous in time.</p>
      <p>Pfister (1999) who reconstructed the floods of the Rhine, Rhone and Reuss
rivers and of Lake Maggiore from documentary sources and instrumental data
for the past 500 years found that major flood clusters occurred during cold
periods of the Little Ice Age. The last flood pulse from 1827 to 1875
corresponds to the first period identified in our study (1817–1851).
However, the Little Ice Age also included periods with no flood activity in
alpine basins and which coincided with periods of decreased solar activity,
such as the Maunder Minimum (Pfister, 1999). As for the flood analysis
undertaken by Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010b) in Swiss catchments, the
alternation of periods of high and low flood frequencies coincides with
those reported in our study.</p>
      <p>The single high flood frequency period between 1820 and 1940 identified by
Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010b) appears in our INU index as two flood
pulses separated by a short flood gap (1851–1881; Fig. 3b). The results
compiled by Pfister (1999) from the Rhone, Reuss/Linth and Alpenrhein basins
show a high flood frequency from 1860 to 1875. This discrepancy can be
explained in part by the different statistical processing methods applied to
the flood data categories and by differences in the number of catchments
studied (number of samples). In addition, the INU index only considers the
very severe and catastrophic floods that occurred during the high summer
months (July and August), whereas Pfister (1999) includes the total number
of events in all seasons. However, all authors (Röthlisberger, 1991;
Gees, 1997; Pfister, 1999) rule out any possible data incompleteness with
regard to very severe and catastrophic floods on the grounds that the local
press and administration paid considerable attention to extreme hydrological
events following the application of the Swiss federal law, providing
river correction subsidies in 1848. However, there is a consensus in the
literature that the older the event (and, hence, the associated damage) is,
the less clear the definition of the thresholds between the loss
categories is.</p>
      <p>A second flood gap is recorded from 1944 to 1972 by the INU reflecting the
absence of extreme weather conditions (predominance of negative EOF1; Fig. 6c) that might trigger major floods. Pfister (1999) argues that
anthropogenic influence (land use, deforestation) in the major floods is not
the dominant driving factor, but rather the long-term summer precipitation
minima between 1935 and 1975. According to Gees (1997), river regulation
and the building of embankments and reservoirs substantially reduced the
damage caused by smaller and medium floods after 1854, whereas the
mitigation of the impact of very severe and catastrophic floods showed only
limited success, particularly in the upper alpine catchments. Nevertheless,
the more intensive land use in former flood areas protected by river
embankments contributed to increased losses (Gees, 1997). Moreover, it is
important to bear in mind that the general increase in population, exposure
values (due to the increase in the gross domestic product) and urban
agglomeration (e.g. Zurich) have contributed to higher flood damage indices,
particularly in recent decades. A decrease in the number of floods is also
reported by Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010b) for northern Switzerland
between 1940 and 1970, and Wetter et al. (2011) observe a period of very low-frequency
flooding in the city of Basel (Rhine river) for the period
1877–1999 and in Lindau (Lake Constance) for the 1910–1999 time interval.</p>
      <p>Finally, the increase in flood events since 1977 recorded by the INU seems
to have resulted from both increasing vulnerability and from changes in climate
signal. With regard to this first factor, Glaser et al. (2010) found that
even though the number of extreme hydrological events decreased compared
to the 19th century, estimations of overall losses are substantially higher.
This is related to the increased vulnerability and exposure values in flood
prone areas as a consequence of the expansion of urban areas. As for the
influence of climate variability on flooding in recent decades, Knox (2000)
stated that the unusually high frequency of large floods which has been observed in many
regions since the early 1950s occurred during a period of global temperature
increase, and that the occurrence of extreme floods during the Holocene is
often associated with rapid climate changes. In Switzerland, the flood
frequency in many basins has increased since the 1970s (Gees, 1997; Pfister,
1999). However, Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010a) consider that the flood
frequencies observed during the past 4 decades do not exceed the range
recorded during the last five centuries.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Possible control of solar variability</title>
      <p>In recent decades, the sun–climate relation has been analysed (Solanki
and Fligge, 2000; Versteegh, 2005; Gray et al., 2005), with solar
variability being proposed as a possible driving force of flood events
(Benito et al., 2003; Vaquero, 2004). Schulte et al. (2008, 2015) consider
the impact of solar activity on the regional hydrological regime (e.g.
Gleissberg cycle) to have been one of the main factors triggering the major
floods in the Lütschine and Lombach catchments in Switzerland over the
last 3200 years.</p>
      <p>By undertaking spectral analyses of the INU and the sedimentary proxies of
the northern slopes of the Alps (Schulte et al., 2015), we are able to
identify common flood cycles with a variation ranging between 70 and 150
years. The periodicities of so-called “100-year events” (according to
Glaser et al., 2010) could be explained by centennial-scale solar cycles,
which have also been identified in other sedimentary records, including
those in eastern France, Switzerland, Netherlands, the UK, Spain and
California (see, for example, Magny et al., 2003; Versteegh, 2005).
Cross-spectral analysis between the INU and sunspot numbers suggests that
the common and significant periodicities detected in the coherency spectrum
of 11 (Schwabe cycle) and 100 years (Gleissberg cycle) coincide with the
relation between a high flooding frequency and minimum solar activity
(negative angles in the phase spectrum). This fact is supported by the
findings of Wirth et al. (2013a) in the reconstruction of the summer floods
in the southern European Alps. Furthermore, the 22-year cyclicity detected
(Hale cycle) includes the link between solar activity maxima and decreased
flood frequency (positive angles in the phase spectrum). This bi-decadal
frequency of the INU “flood minima” is confirmed by climate proxies in the
western United States where droughts occurred with a 22-year periodicity
from 1700 onwards (Cook and Stockton, 1997; Briffa, 2000).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Short-term external forcing on flooding</title>
      <p>To evaluate possible links between flooding and short-term external forcing
fluctuations, the volcanic eruptions, EOF1, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be and
sunspot number have been plotted alongside the INU index for Switzerland
(Fig. 9). All the proxy series are plotted as normalized values smoothed with
an 11-year low-pass Gaussian filter, except the sunspot number record
smoothed with a 22-year filter, while volcanic eruptions and INU time series
are not filtered. It should be noted that the links with solar and climate
proxies can generate two types of problem: first, the time lags between
sunspot numbers (SN), production and the deposition of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be (1–2 years)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O (from years to decades; e.g. the reconstructed time lags
between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O records during the Wolf and Maunder
Minimum rise up to 40 years; Stuiver et al., 1997; Vonmoos et al., 2006;
Abreu et al., 2012) in the natural archives have to be considered; and,
second, the significance of the signal of the palaeoclimate proxies on the
regional and global scale has to be interpreted. Despite these uncertainties,
comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be concentration, sunspot numbers and temperature
records from Greenland ice shows fairly good correlation from the 17th
century onwards (Stuiver et al., 1995; Beer et al., 2000). However, other proxies
such as the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O are influenced by the oceanic thermohaline
circulation besides solar activity. However, it must be taken into
account that the length of INU time series is relative short, covering 200
years, and linkages are based on only four flood periods and three flood
gaps. Therefore, the relation between INU and the different climate proxies
must be interpreted with caution and simple associations must not explain
causal mechanism. Furthermore, it should be stressed that the INU signal
includes uncertainties due to the integration of natural and anthropogenic
variables. These reasons have to be borne in mind before discussing the
following results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Temporal evolution of INU (INU &gt; 1.5 SD), the volcanic
eruptions and the standardized anomalies of EOF1, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
and sunspots for the period 1800–2009. All series are plotted as normalized
values smoothed with an 11-year low-pass Gaussian filter, except the sunspot
number record smoothed with a 22-year filter. The volcanic eruptions and INU
index are unsmoothed. Periods of high flood frequency are marked on the
chart. Note that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and sunspot scales are reversed.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Three periods of low solar activity (low number of sunspots, positive
anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) have been recorded during the last 200 years (Fig. 9; cf. Solanki and Fligge, 2000; Berggren et al., 2009): the first period
covers the years leading up to 1840, and corresponds to the final stages of
the Dalton Minimum; the second period lasts from 1880 to 1910 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be)
and 1935 (SN), corresponding to the solar minimum of 1900; and a third
period begins after 2005, reaching minimum values in 2009. Figure 9 provides
evidence that the periods marked by a high flood frequency typically
correspond to periods characterized by a predominance of positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
anomalies and, therefore, associated with episodes of low solar activity.
This pattern was particularly strong during the solar minimum of 1900. The
period of high flood frequency between 1817 and 1855 largely corresponds to
a period characterized by positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be anomalies, although the flood
peaks occurred in the transition between a solar minimum and a solar
maximum. During this period an extra cooling occurred which was associated
with the eruption of Tambora (1814) plus two eruptions in the years 1831 and
1835 (Fig. 9). Considering both forcings (solar and volcanic), the
temperature anomaly for this period compared to the 1961–1990 mean was
around <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the Northern Hemisphere (Gao et al., 2008) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the Swiss Alps (Büntgen et al., 2006).
Finally, the maximum of the last flood cluster corresponds to a short period
of low solar activity after 2005.</p>
      <p>Several authors (Pfister, 1999; Knox, 2000; Magny et al., 2003; Benito et
al., 2003; Schulte et al., 2012; Ortega and Garzón, 2009) contend that
the most significant variations in the frequency of flooding have occurred
during cold climate phases, particularly during transitional stages of
climatic pulses. This pattern has also been observed in Switzerland during
the last 500 years (Schmocker-Fackel and Naef, 2010b; Glur et al., 2013;
Wirth et al., 2013a, b), although after the 1970s the climate and flood
pattern changed. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O record GISP2 from Greenland (Stuiver
and Grootes, 2000), influenced by North Atlantic dynamics, provides a proxy
of the temperature variability in the middle and high latitudes of the
Northern Hemisphere. The peak clusters of the flood damage index INU
(Fig. 9) can be related to periods dominated by negative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O
anomalies (bearing in mind that the axis is inverted), principally to the
cooler pulses from 1830 to 1845, from 1880 to 1930 and during the 1980s.</p>
      <p>To corroborate these results obtained from large-scale proxies, in Fig. 10
we plotted the normalized annual average temperature of Switzerland for the
period 1800–2009 vs. the INU. The first two flood clusters occurred
during a period of negative temperature anomalies between 1825 and 1935. In
addition, these two flood clusters are related to pulses of marked
temperature decreases separated by a flood gap which corresponds to a period
of temperature recovery (slightly negative temperature anomalies
&gt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and solar activity (Fig. 9). The flood
peak of summer 1987 occurs in a period in which temperature anomalies in
Switzerland were slightly positive, but <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O was negative in
Greenland, indicative as such of the influence of North Atlantic dynamics.
The 2005 and 2007 floods occurred in a clearly warm phase in Switzerland,
corresponding to a contemporary maximum. However, the climatic
interpretation of these events should be undertaken with caution because the
final temperature data once again present a slight fall and sunspot numbers
clearly decrease. Yet, these data represent the end of the time series. As
for the pattern of flood gaps, Fig. 10 provides clear evidence: gaps of
floods (1852–1880; 1928–1976) are related to positive temperature trends.
Moreover, the contemporary flood cluster is divided by the positive trend
towards the temperature maximum.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Temporal evolution of the standardized anomalies of INU (full line;
INU &gt; 1.5 SD) and the annual average temperature for Switzerland
(dashed line) for the period 1800–2009. Both series are plotted as
normalized values and temperature data are smoothed with an 11-year low-pass
Gaussian filter.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>From the analyses of the various proxies, we infer that periods of decreased
solar activity and low-frequency cold climate pulses (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O)
have a significant impact on major summer floods in Switzerland.
Nevertheless, the non-linear pattern of flood occurrences (e.g. since 1977)
needs to be related to the complex relationship between exogenic, endogenic
and autogenic climate forcing mechanisms. Therefore, hemispheric or global
changes that occur in the atmospheric general variability or in ocean
currents, and that affect storm tracks and air mass limits (Hirschboeck,
1988; Knox, 2000), should be considered when investigating periods of high
flood frequency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <title>Principal low-frequency atmospheric mode and flood variability</title>
      <p>The reanalysis of weather maps is a scientific method for obtaining an
atmospheric data set to evaluate the spatial variability of climate over
time. Several methods merge observations and numerical models to study the
atmospheric conditions. Depending on the nature of original data, the
temporal resolution can be seasonal, monthly, daily or 6-hourly. Normally,
these reanalyses encompass several decades or centuries, covering different
atmospheric levels. Reanalysis products are also used in climate research
for identifying the causes of climate variability. However, atmospheric
field reconstructions up to several centuries back in time may include
caveats that should be considered when low-frequency atmospheric summer
modes are interpreted to understand flooding in Switzerland. For example,
differences can be assumed between the two reanalysis data sets used in our
study.</p>
      <p>The 20CRP is based on the combination of surface and sea level pressure
observations with a short-term forecast from an ensemble of integrations of
an NCEP numerical weather prediction model. The ensemble Kalman filter
technique is applied to produce an estimate of the complete state of the
atmosphere (Compo et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>In return, the monthly reconstructed SLP anomaly maps by Luterbacher et al. (2002) were developed using principal component regression analysis based on
the combination of early instrumental station series (pressure, temperature
and precipitation) and documentary proxy data from Eurasian sites. The
relationships were determined over the 1901–1960 calibration period and
verified over 1961–1990. Under the assumption of stationarity in the
statistical relationships, a transfer function derived over the 1901–1990
period was used to reconstruct the 500-year large-scale SLP fields
(Luterbacher et al., 2002). Three principal difficulties can emerge in the
reconstructed SLP maps: (1) the stationary assumption, (2) no observations
over the sea (Küttel et al., 2009) and (3) statistical reconstructions
are not necessarily related to physical phenomena.</p>
      <p><list list-type="order">
            <list-item>

      <p>In respect to the problem of stationary assumption, we emphasize that meaningful
monthly reconstructions were available from around 1700 onwards, when station
pressure series became available (Luterbacher et al., 2002). Furthermore, the
uncertainty is lower after 1780 when meteorological observations were
conducted (early instrumental period). For instance, the Meteorological
Society of the Palatinate performed a catalogue of weather data (including
pressure) for the period 1781–1792. These data were recorded by weather
observers in 18 countries on both sides of the North Atlantic
realm. Moreover, the number of predictors for the transfer function used in
our reconstructed period (1800–2009) is around 50 in 1800 and approximately
100 in 1871 (more information: Fig. 1, p. 548 in Luterbacher et al., 2002).</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p>In contrast to the lower number of observations over the Atlantic Ocean, the
reconstruction skill is good over western Europe. Küttel et al. (2009)
suggest that this fact might be attributed to the inclusion of the western
Baltic sea-ice index (Koslowski and Glaser, 1999) and the reconstructed
precipitation from Andalusia by Rodrigo et al. (1999). These indices
contribute very valuable information to the reconstruction of the entire area
(Luterbacher et al. 2002).</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>

      <p>Finally, physical interpretation from statistical artefacts can be
controversial because climate is characterized by non-linearity and high
dimensionality. Consequently, the statistical relationships are not
necessarily indicative of the understanding of any physical mechanisms
involved (Switanek and Troch, 2011).</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>The summer climate in western Europe can be synthesized by the EOF1 and we
have identified a qualitative relationship between this pattern and the
summer flood damage index INU (Sect. 3.4). Figure 9 shows that the second,
third and fourth clusters of major floods in Switzerland coincide mostly with
positive phases of EOF1, whereas the first flood cluster is not in phase with
this atmospheric variability pattern. However, we suggest that the origin of
the flood clusters might be attributed to the location of the atmospheric
action centres during the positive (or negative) phase. The variability of
the EOF1 pattern is associated with changes in the storm track of the North
Atlantic-European sector. Positive (negative) values of EOF1 are related to
the northward (or southward) shift of the storms and thus they become
stronger over Iceland and the Norwegian Sea during a positive phase and
weaken towards the south. This pattern generates dry, warm weather,
especially in central and western Europe due to strong anticyclonic
conditions (Folland et al., 2009). In southern Europe, the climate becomes
more humid during these positive phases (Bladé et al., 2011). This
atmospheric dynamics is illustrated in Fig. 6. We should emphasize that
negative anomalies are observed in lower and middle atmospheric levels over
the Mediterranean area. Switzerland lies on the northern boundary of this
negative domain. This pattern promotes atmospheric instability in these areas
and leads to positive precipitation anomalies. The enhanced precipitation is
related to the presence of a strong upper level trough over the south-west of
the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean area that generates a cooling of
the air in middle atmospheric levels and an increased potential for
instability. Thus, EOF1 acts as a major control of climate variability during
the high summer, not only in north-western Europe, but also in southern areas
(Bladé et al., 2011). In this sense, this explains the qualitative link
between the high summer large-scale variability pattern and the frequency of
major flooding in Switzerland. Additionally, the analysis of the different
categories of the INU in relation to EOF1 (Table 1) shows that the positive
phase of the pattern explains large impact flood events (INU
&gt; 5 SD; 4 of 33 episodes), but only part of the variability of
the signal of INU (20 of 33 events). By contrast, the negative phase of EOF1
is associated with the remaining 11 events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Left: composites of monthly EMSLP extracted from 20CRP
plus the Luterbacher reanalysis grids of the years with EOF1 in the positive
phase and INU &gt; 0. The units are expressed in hPa. Red (blue)
contours show positive (negative) anomalies. Right: number of floods in
percentage by region. <bold>(b)</bold> is as <bold>(a)</bold> but for the years with
INU &gt; 2.5 SD. Region 1 encompasses Valais and western cantons,
region 2 the western part of the northern slope of the Alps and the Swiss
Plateau, region 3: Grisons plus the southern flank of the Alps, region 4
eastern Jura and the Swiss Plateau and region 5 encompasses the eastern part
of the northern flank of the Alps.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Based on the relationship between the North Atlantic dynamics and the INU
index, two patterns might be proposed to explain the flooding in Swiss
catchments since 1800.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>As in Fig. 11 but for EOF1 negative phase. Region 1 encompasses
Valais and western cantons, region 2 the western part of the northern slope
of the Alps and the Swiss Plateau, region 3 Grisons plus the southern flank
of the Alps, region 4 eastern Jura and the Swiss Plateau and region 5
encompasses the eastern part of the northern flank of the Alps.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/19/3807/2015/hess-19-3807-2015-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The first flood pattern is associated with positive EOF1 phases (mean values
vary between 0.04 and 0.45; Table 1; see Fig. 11). The INU
&gt; 5 SD category includes the four most catastrophic floods that
have affected Switzerland in the last 200 years: 1831, 1834, 1846 and 2005. These
events occurred during periods of low solar activity (positive values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) and, with the exception of the 2005 flood, during episodes of cold
climate pulses in Greenland (negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and in the
north-western Alps (temperature anomalies; Figs. 9 and 10). During these cold
pulses the accumulation of snow and ice in the headwaters is significant,
increasing the flood risk during warm years when melting processes contribute
markedly to summer discharge. This flood pattern occurs in years, dominated by
positive EOF1 phases when depressions are usually associated with the
Atlantic cyclones that become more intense over the Mediterranean Sea, and
follow a north-east to north-northeast track over the Alps (Blöschl et
al., 2013). This path is known as Vb (van Bebber, 1891) and produces
long-lasting, intense rainfall due to (1) the high water vapour content from
the Mediterranean, (2) the orographic uplift of air masses and (3) the
reinforcement suffered by negative anomalies of temperature and geopotential
height that occurs at the lower and middle levels of the atmosphere. The most
affected regions in Switzerland are regions 2 (western part of the
northern flank of the Alps), 3 (Grisons plus southern flank of the Alps) and
5 (eastern part of the northern flank of the Alps); this accounts for
70 % of the total of floods with INU &gt; 2.5 and EOF1 in the
positive phase (see Fig. 11). Similar findings have been reported by Grebner
(1997) and Pfister (1999). They report that this atmospheric configuration
causes catastrophic floods, especially in the greater Alpine region. Mudelsee
et al. (2004) applied  a point-wise biserial correlation coefficient between
the flood events and sea level pressure and the 500 hPa geopotential height for the summer flooding of the river Oder and Elbe in
eastern central Europe, obtaining a pattern that is very similar to the large-scale atmospheric
variability mode of positive EOF1 proposed herein. Müller and Kaspar
(2011) obtained similar results for the summer floods in the Mura and Drava
(south-eastern Alps) catchments, typical transboundary rivers of the eastern
slopes of the Alps. The floods in these rivers were frequently connected with
moisture fluxes from the east or the north at the 850 hPa level. This
configuration is associated with cyclones that are intensified over the
Mediterranean Sea that affect central Europe as they move to the north-east
along the Vb track. These results are also in agreement with the findings
reported by Schmocker-Fackel and Naef (2010b), to the effect that the periods
of high flood frequency in Switzerland are in phase with the summer floods of
the Czech Republic (Brázdil et al., 2006), Italy (Camuffo and Enzi, 1996)
and the eastern half of the Iberian Peninsula (Barriendos and Rodrigo, 2006),
while the relationship is not so significant when compared with the flood
occurrences observed in Germany (Glaser and Stangl, 2004).</p>
      <p>The second flood pattern is determined by INU values linked to periods of low
solar activity (positive values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be) and episodes that are
climatically cold (negative values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O), but unlike the first
pattern, the EOF1 is in the negative phase. The number of years related to
INU &gt; 0 is less than the pattern described above (13 of 33
events) and it is noteworthy that there are no EOF1 negative values for the
category of INU &gt; 5. The synoptic configurations related to this
large-scale atmospheric variability mode (Fig. 12) are characterized by cold
fronts originating over the Atlantic, tracing a north-west to south-east path,
funnelled by a low located at the latitude of Scandinavia and a high over the
Atlantic Ocean. This configuration is very similar to that of the synoptic
patterns defined by Jacobeit et al. (2006) and which are associated with the
large summer floods in eight central European catchments (Rhine, Main, Mosel,
Danube, Weser, Elbe, Spree and Oder). The persistence of this situation
produces significant rainfall over Switzerland and, consequently, floods that
can have a considerably detrimental impact on the territory, its property and
people (Pfister, 1999). The most affected regions in Switzerland are
regions 2 (western part of the northern flank of the Alps) and 4 (eastern
Jura mountains and Swiss Plateau); this accounts for 62 % of the total
of floods with INU &gt; 2.5 and EOF1 in the negative phase (see
Fig. 12).</p>
      <p>Thus, the EOF1 defines the sensitivity of the Swiss river systems to extreme
hydrological events controlled by the atmospheric processes operating in the
Mediterranean area (disturbance over the gulfs of Genoa and Venice) and in
the North Atlantic (cold fronts channelled between the Scandinavian low and
the Atlantic anticyclone). Finally, the series shows differences and changes
in the temporal and spatial distribution of floods numbers (see Fig. 8) and
related phases of EOF1 (see Figs. 11 and 12). We have evidence that the
positive phase of EOF1 strongly influences the floods in central, eastern and
southern Switzerland, while the negative phase affects the central, western
and northern Switzerland. From Fig. 8, we can infer a spatial flood pattern
for the late pulses of the Little Ice Age (Phase A, cool period) which mainly
affects the northern and western part of Switzerland, while a second pattern
influences the central and southern part during the last 4 decades of the
period of study (Phase B, warm period). From this spatial distribution of
floods, it is possible to identify a change of the atmospheric patterns that
affects the frequencies of floods in Switzerland during the last 200
years: the EOF1 persists in the negative phase during the last cool pulses of the
Little Ice Age (1817–1851 and 1881–1927 flood clusters), whereas the
positive phases of EOF1 prevail during the warmer climate of the last 4
decades (flood clusters from 1977 to present). These findings are consistent
with the trend of the EOF1 time series for the period 1800–2009 (see Fig. 6;
Mann–Kendall trend test shows a significant and positive trend at a 95 %
confidence level). Based on the obtained results, future research should
focus on how these atmospheric mechanisms control the onset of high-frequency
periods of major flooding.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We presented a new flood damage index (INU) for Switzerland
between 1800 and 2009, exploring the influence of external forcings on flood
frequencies and with the principal low-frequency atmospheric variability mode
in summer (EOF1). Our major findings are presented below.</p>
      <p><list list-type="order">
          <list-item>

      <p>The hydro-climatic regionalization shows two patterns of spatial variability
related to the principal moisture sources that affect Switzerland:
Mediterranean and Atlantic humidity supplies. The first pattern is defined by
a north–south cross section, while the second is linked to a west–east cross
section. Taking these findings into account, the final classification
presents five different regions that are consistent with other hydrographic
classifications developed for Switzerland.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>Despite regional climate differences within Switzerland, INU provides
evidence that the 1817–1851, 1881–1927, 1977–1990 and 2005–present flood
clusters are mostly in phase with palaeoclimate proxies and North Atlantic
dynamics. Moreover, these periods coincide with those identified in a range
of studies concerned with the occurrence of floods in Switzerland and in the
other river systems of eastern central Europe. The 20th century flood gap
identified by the INU, reflecting the absence of extreme weather conditions,
contrasts with the higher flood frequency of the last 3 to 4 decades,
which has contributed to the increased perception of flood events.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>The cross-spectral analysis shows that the periodicities detected in the
coherency and phase spectra of 11 (Schwabe cycle) and 104 years (Gleissberg
cycle) are related to a high flooding frequency and solar activity minima,
whereas the 22-year cyclicity detected (Hale cycle) is associated with solar
activity maxima and a decrease in flood frequency. We suggest that changes in
large-scale atmospheric variability (autogenic forcing) and solar activity
(exogenic forcing) influence the occurrence of flood periods, although there
is no general consensus as to how solar forcing has affected climate and
flood dynamics in recent centuries.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p>The analysis of the modes of low-frequency atmospheric variability based on
the standardized daily anomalies of sea level pressure shows that Switzerland
is located close to the border of the principal mode of summer atmospheric
variability (EOF1) that is controlled by North Atlantic dynamics. Small
shifts of this system border may introduce atmospherical instability over the
Swiss river catchments. Very severe and catastrophic flood episodes are
influenced strongly by positive (mostly central and southern basins) and
negative EOF1 (mostly the northern basins) mode, which include a range of
synoptic patterns that generate severe floods. Finally we can state that the
EOF1 in the negative phase controlled notably major floods during the last stages
of the Little Ice Age (1817–1851 and 1881–1927 flood clusters), while the
positive EOF1 prevailed during the last 4 warmer decades (flood clusters from
1977 to present).</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The work of the Fluvalps Research Group (PaleoRisk; 2014 SGR 507) was funded
by the Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA Academia
2011) and the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (CGL2009–0111;
CGL2013-43716-R). The flood damage data for the period 1972–2010 were
provided by the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape
Research WSL (Swiss flood and landslide damage database). The authors wish to
thank the SIDC team, the World Data Center for the Sunspot Index of the Royal
Observatory of Belgium and the ALP-IMP project for the Annual Temperature of
Switzerland. The authors are also grateful to the DOE INCITE program, the
Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) and to the NOAA, which
provided the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project data set. The authors thank
Nadine Hilker for preparation of flood damage data (1972–2009) and Norina
Andres for her helpful comments. We thank the two anonymous referees for
useful comments and suggestions on improving the
manuscript.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: A. Kiss</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abreu, J. A., Beer, J., Steinhilber, F., Christl, M., and Kubik, P. W.: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be
in Ice Cores and 14C in Tree Rings: Separation of Production and Climate
Effects, Space Sci. Rev., 176, 343–349, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
ALP-IMP: Multi-centennial climate variability in the Alps based on
Instrumental data, Model simulations and Proxy data, Final report for
RTD-project ALP-IMP (EVK-CT-2002-00148), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Annually resolved <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be data (Berggren et al., 2009) are available from
Greenland, available at:
<uri>ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/ngrip/ngrip-10be.txt</uri>,
last access: 12 September 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Annually resolved <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O data (Stuiver and Grootes, 2000), available
at: <uri>http://depts.washington.edu/qil/datasets/gisp2_main.html</uri>, last
access: 21 January 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Baldwin, M. P., Gray, L. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Hamilton, K., Haynes, P. H.,
Randel, W. J, Holton, J. R., Alexander, M. J., Hirota, I., Horinouchi, T.,
Jones, D. B. A., Kinnersley, J. S., Marquardt C., Sato, K., and Takahashi, M.: The
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 39, 179–229, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Barriendos, M. and Rodrigo, F. S.: Study of historical flood events on Spanish
rivers using documentary data, Hydrol. Sci. J., 51, 765–783, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Beer, J., Mende, W., and Stellmacher, R.: The role of the sun in climate forcing,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19, 403–415, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Benito, G., Díez-Herrero, A., and de Villalta, M.: Magnitude and frequency
of flooding in the Tagus River (Central Spain) over the last millennium,
Clim. Change, 58, 171–192, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Benito, G., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., and Bárdossy, A.: Applications of Palaeoflood
hydrology and historical data in flood risk analysis, in: Palaeofloods, historical data and climate
variability, edited by: Benito, G., Ouarda,
T. B. M. J., and Bárdossy, A., J. Hydrol., 313, 1–2, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Berggren, A. M., Beer, J., Possnert, G., Aldahan, A., Kubik, P., Christl, M.,
Johnsen, S. J., Abreu, J., and Vinther, B. M.: A 600-year annual <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be record
from the NGRIP ice core, Greenland, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11801,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038004</ext-link>, 2009</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bladé, I., Liebmann, B., Fortuny, D., and van Oldenborgh, G. J.: Observed
and simulated impacts of the summer NAO in Europe: Implications for projected
drying in the Mediterranean region, Clim. Dynam., 39, 709–727, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Boch, R. and Spötl, C.: The origin of lamination in stalagmites from
Katerloch Cave, Austria: Towards a seasonality proxy, PAGES News, 16,
21–22, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Borgmark, A.: Holocene climate variability and periodicities in south-central
Sweden, as interpreted from peat humification analysis, The Holocene, 15,
387–395, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Blöschl, G., Nester, T., Komma, J., Parajka, J., and Perdigão, R. A.
P.: The June 2013 flood in the Upper Danube Basin, and comparisons with the
2002, 1954 and 1899 floods, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5197–5212,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5197-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-5197-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Brázdil, R., Dobrovolný, P., Kakos, V., and Kotyza, O.: Historical
and recent floods in the Czech Republic. Causes, seasonality, trends,
impacts, in: Floods risk management. Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation
measures, edited by: Schanze, J., Zeman, E., and Marsalek, J., NATO Science
Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 247–259, 2006.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Briffa, K. R.: Annual climate variability in the Holocene: interpreting the
message of ancient trees, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19, 87–105, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Büntgen, U., Frank, D., Nievergelt, D., and Esper, J.: Summer temperature
variations in the European Alps, A.D. 755-2004, J. Climate, 19, 5606–5623,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Burger, L.: Informationsbeschaffung bei Hochwassersituationen –
Dokumentation der grössten überregionalen Hochwasserkatastrophen der
letzten 200 Jahre in der Schweiz, Diplomarbeit, Bern, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Camuffo, D. and Enzi, S.: The analysis of two bi-millennial series. Tiber and
Po river floods, in: Climate variations and forcing mechanisms of the last
2000 years, edited by: Jones, P. D., Bradley, R. S., and Jourzel, J., NATO
Science Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 141, 433–450, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Casty, C., Wanner, H., Luterbacher, J., Esper, J., and Böhm, R.:
Temperature and precipitation variability in the European Alps since 1500,
Int. J. Climatol., 25, 1855–1880, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Cattell, R. B.: The scree test for the number of the factors, Multivar.
Behav. Res., 1, 245–276, 1966</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Brunet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman, P.
Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri, M., Mok,
H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L., Woodruff, S.
D., and Worley, S. J.: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, E. R. and Stockton, C. W.: A new assessment of possible solar and lunar
forcing of the bidecadal drought rhythm in the western United States, J.
Climate, 10, 1343–1356, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Folland, C. K., Knight, J., Linderholm, H. W., Fereday, D., Ineson, S., and
Hurrell, J. W.: The summer North Atlantic Oscillation: past, present, and
future, J. Climate, 22, 1082–1103, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Frei, C., Davis, H. C., Gurtz, J., and Schär, C.: Climate dynamics and
extreme precipitation and flood events in central Europe, Intergraded
Assessment, 1, 281–299, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Ch., Robock, A., and Ammann, C.: Volcanic forcing of climate over the
past 1500 years: An improved ice-core-based index for climate models, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D23111, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010239" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010239</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gees, A.: Analyse historischer und seltener Hochwasser in der Schweiz.
Bedeutung für das Bemessungshochwasser, Geographica Bernensia G53, Bern,
Switzerland, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Glaser, R. and Stangl, H.: Climate and floods in Central Europe since AD
1000: Data, methods, results and consequences, Surv. Geophys., 25, 485–510,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Glaser, R., Riemann, D., Schönbein, J., Barriendos, M., Brazdil, R.,
Bertolin, C., Camuffo, D., Deutsch, M., Dobrovolný, P., van Engelen, A.,
Enzi, S., Halíčková. M., Koenig, S. J., Kotyza, O.,
Limanówka, D., Macková, J., Sghedoni, M., Martin, B., and
Himmelsbach, I.: The variability of European floods since AD1500, Clim.
Change, 101, 235–256, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Glur, L., With, S., Büntgen, U., Gili, A., Haug, G., Schär, Ch.,
Beer, J., and Anselmetti, F.: Frequent floods in the Europeans Alps coincide
with cooler periods of the past 2500 years, Scientific Reports, 3, 2770,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02770" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep02770</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Gray, L. J., Beer, J., Geller, M., Haigh, J. D., Lockwood, M., Matthes, K.,
Cubasch, U., Fleitmann, D., Harrison, G., Hood, L., Luterbacher, J., Meehl,
G. A., Shindell, D., van Geel B., and White W.: Solar influences on climate,
Rev. Geophys., 48, RG4001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000282" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009RG000282</ext-link>, 2010</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Grebner, D.: Meteorologische Verhältnisse und Starkniederschläge im
Alpenraum. In: Recherche dans le domaine des barrages, Crues extrêmes,
Laboratoire de constructions hydrauliques, Département d'ingénierie
civil. Séminaire à l'Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne, Communication 5, 1–6, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hächler-Tanner, S.: Hochwasserereignisse im Schweizerischen Alpenraum
seit dem Spätmittelalter, Raum-zeitliche Rekonstruktion und
gesellschaftliche Reaktionen, Lizenziatsarbeit in Schweizergeschichte,
Historisches Institut der Uni Bern, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C.: Multivariate
Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hilker, N., Badoux, A., and Hegg, C.: The Swiss flood and landslide damage
database 1972–2007, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 913–925,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-913-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-9-913-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hirschboeck, K. K.: Flood hydroclimatology, in: Flood Geomorphology, edited
by: Baker, V. R., Kochel, R. C., and Patton, C., John Wiley, 27–49, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Holzhauser, H., Magny, M., and Zumbühl, H. J.: Glacier and lake-level
variations in west-central Europe over the last 3500 years, The Holocene, 15,
789–801, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir, Y., Ottersen, G., Visbeck, M.: An overview of the
North Atlantic Oscillation, in: The North Atlantic Oscillation: climatic
significance and environmental impact, edited by: Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir,
Y., Ottersen, G., and Visbeck, M., Geophysical Monograph Series, 134, 1–35,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Jacobeit, J., Philipp, A., and Nonnenmacher, M.: Atmospheric circulation
dynamics linked with prominent discharge events in Central Europe, Hydrolog.
Sci. J., 51, 946–965, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kaiser, H. F.: An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31–36,
1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J.,
Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year
reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kirchhofer, W.: Climatological atlas of Switzerland. Meteoswiss, Federal
Office of Topography swisstopo, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Knox, J. C.: Sensitivity of modern and Holocene floods to climate change,
Quaternary Sci. Rev., 19, 439–457, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Koslowski, G. and Glaser, R.: Variations in reconstructed ice winter severity
in the western Baltic from 1501 to 1995, and their implications for the North
Atlantic Oscillation, Clim. Change, 41, 175–191, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Küttel, M., Xoplaki, E., Gallego, D., Luterbacher, J.,
García-Herrera, R., Allan, R., Barriendos, M., Jones, P. D., Wheeler,
D., and Wanner, H.: The importance of ship log data: reconstructing North
Atlantic, European and Mediterranean sea level pressure fields back to 1750,
Clim. Dynam., 34, 1115–1128, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0577-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-009-0577-9</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lehmann, C. and Naef, F.: Die Größe der extremen Hochwasser der
Lütschine, Tiefbauamt des Kanton Bern, Bern, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Luterbacher, J., Xoplaki, E., Dietrich, D., Rickli, R., Jacobeit, J., Beck,
C., Gyalistras, D., Schmutz, C., and Wanner, H.: Reconstruction of sea level
pressure fields over the Eastern North Atlantic and Europe back to 1500,
Clim. Dynam., 18, 545–561, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Luterbacher, J., Dietrich, D., Xoplaki, E., Grosjean, M., and Wanner, H.:
European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends, and extremes
since 1500, Science, 303, 1499–1503, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Magny, M., Bégeot, C., Guiot, J., and Peyron, O.: Contrasting patterns of
hydrological changes in Europe in response to Holocene climate cooling
phases, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 22, 1589–1596 , 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mudelsee, M., Börngen, M., Tetzlaff, G., and Grünewald, U.: Extreme
floods in central Europe over the past 500 years: Role of cyclone pathway
“Zugstrasse Vb”, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 2156–2202, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Müller, M. and Kaspar, M.: Association between anomalies of moisture flux
and extreme runoff events in the south-eastern Alps, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst.
Sci., 11, 915–920, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-915-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-11-915-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, J. A. and Garzón, G.: A contribution to improved flood magnitude
estimation in base of palaeoflood record and climatic implications –
Guadiana River (Iberian Peninsula), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9,
229–239, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-229-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-9-229-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Percival, D. B. and Walden, A. T.: Spectral Analysis for physical
Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Peristykh, A. N. and Damon, P. E.: Persistence of the Gleissberg 88-year
solar cycle over the last <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12,000 years: Evidence from cosmogenic
isotopes, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1003, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002ja009390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002ja009390</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pfister, C.: Wetternachhersage: 500 Jahre Klimavariationen und
Naturkatastrophen, Paul Haupt Verlag, Bern, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pfister, C. and Hächler S.: Überschwemmungskatastrophen im Schweizer
Alpenraum seit dem Spätmittelalter. Raum-zeitliche Rekonstruktion von
Schadenmustern auf der Basis historischer Queilen, Würzburger
Geographische Arbeiten, 80, 127–148, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Reconstruction of Sea Level Pressure fields over the eastern North Atlantic
and Europe back to 1500 (Luterbacher et al., 2002) dataset, available at:
<uri>http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/luterbacher2002/luterbacher2002.html</uri>,
last access: 16 September 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Rodrigo, F. S., Esteban-Parra, M. J., Pozo-Vazquez, D., and Castro-Diez, Y.:
A 500-year precipitation record in Southern Spain, Int. J. Climatol., 19,
1233–1253, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Rogers, M. L., Richards, M. T., and Richards, D. St. P.: Long-term
variability in the length of the solar cycle, Astrophysics: arXiv:
astro-ph/0606426v3, p. 15, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Röthlisberger, G.: Chronik der Unwetterschäden in der Schweiz,
Berichte der Eidge-nössischen Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und
Landschaft, 330, 122 pp., 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schmocker-Fackel, P. and Naef, F.: More frequent flooding? Changes in flood
frequency in Switzerland since 1850, J. Hydrol., 381, 1–8, 2010a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Schmocker-Fackel, P. and Naef, F.: Changes in flood frequencies in
Switzerland since 1500, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1581–1594,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1581-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-1581-2010</ext-link>, 2010b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, L., Julià, R., Oliva, M., Burjachs, F., Veit, H., and Carvalho,
F.: Sensitivity of Alpine fluvial environments in the Swiss Alps to climate
forcing during the Late Holocene. Sediment Dynamics in Changing Environments,
International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publications, 325,
367–374, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, L., Veit, H., Burjachs, F., and Julià, R.: Lütschine fan
delta response to climate variability and land use in the Bernese Alps during
the last 2400 years, Geomorphology, 108, 107–121, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, L., Julià, R., Veit, H., and Carvalho, F.: Do high resolution
fan delta records provide a useful tool for hazard assessment in mountain
regions?, International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management,
1, 197–210, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, L., Carvalho, F., Peña, J.C., Baró, M., Julià, R.,
Burjachs F., Lomax J., Villanueva, I., Rubio, P., and Veit, H.: Trying to
understand mountain flood dynamics from multiproxy data: a 4600-year high
resolution record from the Swiss Alps, Quatern. Int., 439, 279–280, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Schulte, L., Peña, J.C., Julià, R., Carvalho, F., Llorca, J., Losada,
J., Burjachs, F., Schmidt, T., Rubio, P., and Veit, H.: Climate forcing of
paleofloods in the Swiss Alps, in: Avances de la Geomorfología en
España 2012–2014, edited by: Schnabel, S. and Gómez Gutiérrez,
A., XIII Reunión Nacional de Geomorfología, 143–146, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Schulte, L., Peña, J. C., Carvalho, F., Schmidt, T., Julià, R.,
Llorca, J., and Veit, H.: A 2600-year history of floods in the Bernese Alps,
Switzerland: frequencies, mechanisms and climate forcing, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 19, 3047–3072, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3047-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-3047-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, M. and Statteger, K.: SPECTRUM: Spectral analysis of unevenly spaced
paleoclimatic time series, Comput. Geosci., 23, 929–945, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Schulz, M., Mudelsee, M., and REDFIT: Estimating red-noise spectra directly
from unevenly spaced paleoclimatic time series, Comput. Geosci., 28,
421–426, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Shackleton, N. J.: The 100,000-year ice-age cycle identified and found to lag
temperature, carbon dioxide, and orbital eccentricity, Science, 289,
1897–1902, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Siegel, A. F.: The noncentral chi-squared distribution with zero degrees of
freedom and testing for uniformity, Biometrika, 66, 381–386, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Solanki, S. K. and Fligge, M.: Reconstruction of past solar irradiance, Space
Sci. Rev., 94, 127–138, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Stuiver, M. and Grootes, P. M.: GISP2 Oxygen Isotope Ratios, Quaternary Res.,
53, 277–284, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Stuiver, M., Braziunas, T. F., Grootes, P. M., and Zielinski, G. A.: Is there
evidence for solar forcing of climate in the GISP2 Oxygen Isotope record?,
Quaternary Res., 48, 259–266, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Switaneck, M. B. and Troch, P. A.: Decadal prediction of Colorado River
streamflow anomalies using ocean-atmosphere teleconnections, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 38, L23404, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049644</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>The annual average sunspot for the period between 1700 and 2011, available
at: <uri>http://www.sidc.be/sunspot-data/</uri>, last access: 7 October 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>The Annual Temperature of Switzerland (ALP-IMP, 2006), available at:
<uri>http://www.zamg.ac.at/ALP-IMP/</uri>, last access: 9 October 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Tinner, W., Lotterb, A. F., Ammann, B., Conederac, M., Hubschmida, P., van
Leeuwena, J. F. N., and Wehrlia, M.: Climatic change and contemporaneous
land-use phases north and south of the Alps 2300 BC to 800 AD, Quaternary
Sci. Rev., 22, 1447–1460, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project (Compo et al., 2011) dataset, available
at: <uri>http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.20thC_ReanV2.html</uri>,
last access: 5 July 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
van Bebber, W. J.: Die Zugstrassen der barometrischen Minima nach den
Bahnenkarten der Deutschen Seewarte für denZeitraum von 1870–1890,
Meteorol. Z., 8, 361–366, 1891.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Vaquero, J. M.: Solar signal in the number of floods recorded for the Tagus
river basin over the last millennium, Clim. Change, 66, 23–26, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Versteegh, G. J. M.: Solar Forcing of Climate. 2: Evidence from the Past,
Space Sci. Rev., 120, 243–286, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Vischer, D.: Die Geschichte des Hochwasserschutzes in Schweiz: von den
Anfängen bis ins 19. Jahrhundert, Bundesamt für Wasser und Geologie,
Bern, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Volcanic Eruptions for the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1800–2000,
available at: <uri>http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/IVI2/</uri>, last access: 9
February 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Vonmoos, M., Beer, J., and Muscheler, R.: Large variations in Holocene solar
activity: Constraints from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>Be in the Greenland Ice Core Project ice
core, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 111, A10105, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JA011500</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Weingartner, R., Reist, T.: Gotthelfs “Wassernot im Emmental” –
Hydrologische Simulation des Extremhochwassers vom 13. August 1837, in:
Katastrophen und ihre Bewältigung – Perspektiven und Positionen, edited
by: Pfister, Ch. and Summermatter, S., Berner Universitätsschriften, Band
49, Haupt-Verlag, 21–41, 2004.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Wetter, O., Pfister, Ch., Weingartner, R., Luterbacher, J., Reist, T., and
Trösch, J.: The largest floods in the High Rhine basin since 1268
assessed from documentary and instrumental evidence, Hydrol. Sci. J., 56,
733–758, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Wilhelm, B., Arnaud, F., Sabatier, P., Crouzet, Ch., Brisset, E.,
Chaumillion, E., Disnar, J. R., Guiter, F., Malet, E., Reyss, J. L.,
Tachikawa, K., Bard, E., and Delannoy, J. J.: 1400 years of extreme
precipitation patterns over the Mediterranean French Alps and possible
forcing mechanisms, Quaternary Res., 78, 1–12, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Wirth, S., Gilli, A., Simonneau, A., Ariztegui, D., Vannière, B., Glur,
L., Chapron, E., Magny, M., and Anselmetti, F.: A 2000 year long seasonal
record of floods in the southern European Alps, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40,
4025–4029, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/grl.50741" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50741</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Wirth, S., Glur, L., Gilli, A., and Anselmetti, F.: Holocene flood frequency
across the Central Alps – solar forcing and evidence for variations in North
Atlantic atmospheric circulation, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 80, 112–128, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
