<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-18-5345-2014</article-id><title-group><article-title>Identification of catchment functional units by time series of thermal
remote sensing images</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Identification of catchment functional units}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~M\"{u}ller et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          <email>b.mueller@iggf.geo.uni-muenchen.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Bernhardt</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schulz</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-2876</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Water Management, Hydrology and Hydraulic
Engineering, University of Natural <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna,
Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Geography,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">B. Müller (b.mueller@iggf.geo.uni-muenchen.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>5345</fpage><lpage>5359</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>May</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>June</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>

      <self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
    <p>The identification of catchment functional behavior with regards to water and
energy balance is an important step during the parameterization of land
surface models.</p>
    <p>An approach based on time series of thermal infrared (TIR) data from remote
sensing is developed and investigated to identify land surface functioning
as is represented in the temporal dynamics of land surface temperature
(LST).</p>
    <p>For the mesoscale Attert catchment in midwestern Luxembourg, a time series
of 28 TIR images from ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and
Reflection Radiometer) was extracted and analyzed, applying a novel process
chain.</p>
    <p>First, the application of mathematical–statistical pattern analysis
techniques demonstrated a strong degree of pattern persistency in the data.
Dominant LST patterns over a period of 12 years were then extracted by a
principal component analysis. Component values of the two most dominant
components could be related for each land surface pixel to land
use data and geology, respectively. The application of a data condensation
technique (“binary words”) extracting distinct differences in the LST
dynamics allowed the separation into landscape units that show similar
behavior under radiation-driven conditions.</p>
    <p>It is further outlined that both information component values from principal component analysis (PCA), as
well as the functional units from the binary words classification, will
highly improve the conceptualization and parameterization of land surface
models and the planning of observational networks within a catchment.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Resolving the spatial variability of hydrological processes at the land
surface within spatially explicit physical-based models is, nowadays, still a
very time-consuming and expensive task that is not applicable for
operational purposes. Therefore, a large variety of hydrological models is
based on the delineation of spatially distributed hydrological functional
units that are assumed to behave or function in a similar way for some given
initial or boundary condition (Flügel, 1995a). They are often referred
to as hydrological response units (HRUs) and represent classes of
landscape entities that share common climate, land use and
underlying pedo-topo-geological characteristics.</p>
      <p>In this way, the number of computational units is significantly reduced, thus
facilitating an efficient parameterization and calculation process. Examples
of hydrological model systems following the HRU concept are the Soil Water
Assessment Tool (SWAT) (Arnold et al., 1998; Srinivasan et al., 1998), the
Cold Regions Hydrological Model (CRHM) (Pomeroy et al., 2007) or the
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System/Modular Modeling System (PRMS/MMS)
(Flügel, 1995b), amongst many others. While the HRU concept has been
criticized in the past for, e.g., often neglecting the lateral exchange
processes that are driven by inter-unit gradients (Neumann et al., 2010),
Zehe et al. (2014) have recently extended the original HRU concept by
“postulating a hierarchy of functional units, lead topologies and
elementary functional units compiling the main catchment functions in a
given hydrological setting by spatially organized interactions at and across
different scales”.</p>
      <p>In any of these concepts, the delineation of HRUs or functional units is
mainly based on information that is directly related to land and subsurface
characteristics that are well known to have some control on a wide range of
hydrological processes (such as geology on soil type, soil texture and
therefore hydraulic conductivity, or slope on the hydraulic gradient), but
that do not represent directly internal states or (water) fluxes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The location of the Attert catchment and its elevation. Catchment
boundaries are given for the Bissen gauge, Luxembourg.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In order to characterize this spatial (hydrological) functioning of the
landscape at larger scales, it would be beneficial to have relevant
information at hand that will be available routinely (and also at locations
that are ungauged) via remote sensing. Typical data parameters are digital
elevation models (DEMs) from radar missions (Farr et al., 2007; NASA, 2009),
land use–land cover data (EEA, 2014; EPA, 2007), as well as soil parameters
(Lagacherie et al., 2012; Mulder et al., 2011; Summers et al., 2011; Ladoni
et al., 2010; Kheir et al., 2010; Serbin et al., 2009a, b; Eldeiry et
al., 2010) from sensors within the visible and near-infrared spectrum.</p>
      <p>Other important spatial information that can be obtained from remote
sensing is land surface temperature (LST). It results from a complex balance
and interaction of incoming and outgoing short- and longwave radiation, as
well as sensible, latent and ground heat fluxes (Moran, 2004). Therefore,
LST is highly controlled by geographic location, atmospheric state, soil
(moisture) and vegetation conditions. The monitoring of LST at the catchment
scale via thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing from, e.g., Landsat (spatial
resolution: 4 and 5–120 m, 7–60 m and 8–100 m), ASTER (90 m) or MODIS (1 km) has been used in the past primarily to derive sensible and latent heat
fluxes (Bolle et al., 1993; Farah and Bastiaanssen, 2001). Given the control
of latent heat fluxes by the available water content (and therefore by
hydraulic properties of the soil, the location within the catchment – Beven
and Kirkby, 1979 – and the phenological and physiological states of the
plants – Taiz and Zeiger, 2010), TIR data have also been applied to estimate
soil hydraulic properties, bulk density or volumetric water content using
complex soil-vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes (e.g., Steenpass
et al., 2010).</p>
      <p>In this way, LST can be seen as a complex ecosystem state variable that
aggregates a variety of (micro-)meteorological and hydrological processes, as
well as land surface characteristics at each individual pixel in a
catchment. The spatio–temporal dynamics of LST are therefore important
information in order to distinguish spatially different functional behavior
of the landscape.</p>
      <p>In the following, the dynamic patterns of LST are investigated for the 288 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Attert catchment in Luxembourg using 28 ASTER (Advanced
Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) TIR remote sensing
images over a time period of 12 years. The persistency of the LST pattern
time series is analyzed in two different novel ways deriving summary
statistics of the correlation of shifted windows across the original or
recoded images and/or time steps (overall pattern persistency and pattern
dynamics persistency). The following principal component analysis (PCA) of
the LST pattern time series allows the identification of dominant
independent patterns within the time series, ranked by the ability to
explain the temporal variation in the LST time series. Relating the dominant
principal components to available land surface characteristics will allow one to
extract the most important controls of LST variation in the catchment under
study. Finally, a novel scheme is suggested to group pixels or sites into a
manageable number of functional units based on their “behavior” that is
expressed in a binarized form of LST dynamics for a representative subset of
images.</p>
      <p>The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2 will introduce the
test site, the data used and the preprocessing steps necessary. Section 3
will describe the methods applied, as well as results in a stepwise approach.
Finally, Sect. 4 summarizes and discusses main findings and gives an
outlook to future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and preprocessing</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Test site</title>
      <p>The study area is the Attert catchment, located in midwestern Luxembourg and
partially in Belgium (see Fig. 1). It is the main test site of the German
DFG research project CAOS (“Catchments as Organised Systems”; CAOS, 2014) with a total catchment area of 288 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the gauge in
Bissen. The undulating landscape with a mean slope of 8.4 % spans between
222 m and 535 m a.s.l. The northern slopes are geologically defined by
schists from the Ardennes massif, while the mainly southern slopes arise on
sandstones from the Paris basin Mesozoic deposits (compare Fig. 9). Soils
vary between sand and silty clay loam. The land cover of the catchment is predominantly cultivated; 4.8 %
of the area is accounted for settlements and rather impermeable surface, 65.4 % for agricultural used land,
located predominantly on the knolls, and 29.7 % for forests, located predominantly in the V-shaped valleys (compare Fig. 9). Climate is
characterized by mean monthly temperatures between 18 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in July
and 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in January (1971–2000). The mean annual precipitation
is 850 mm and the mean annual actual evapotranspiration is 570 mm
(1971–2000), resulting in a pluvial oceanic regime with low flows within July to
September due to high summer evapotranspiration, and high flows mainly from
December to February.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Spatial data</title>
      <p>The multispectral imaging system ASTER  on board the TERRA satellite, launched in
December 1999, orbits on a near circular, sun-synchronous path with a repeat
cycle of 4–16 days. The ASTER instrument consists of three sensors (VNIR –
visible-near infrared: 0.52–0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; SWIR – shortwave infrared:
1.6–2.43 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m; TIR – thermal infrared: 8.125–11.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) with four,
six and five bands, respectively (Fujisada, 1995). For this study, only the Level
1A (raw) TIR data band 13, within 10.25–10.95 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, with a spatial
resolution of 90 m, are used. This band is chosen due to the lowest
absorption of the atmosphere and therefore least altered thermal signals
(compare Elder and Strong, 1953). The local overpass time is around 11.40 a.m. CET. Between January 2001 and June 2012, a total of 28 snow-free images
(see Fig. 2, after preprocessing), with a maximum cloud cover of 15 %, were
extracted. In addition, Corine land cover (EEA, 1995) updated from 2006
(Fig. 9, upper right), and a geological map based on dominant rock
formations (SGL, 2003) (Fig. 9, lower right), are used for further analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Examples of single band top-of-atmosphere (TOA) temperature
time series covering winter (1), spring (2), summer (3) and autumn (4).
<bold>(b)</bold> Basic temporal and statistical information (mean, ranges) of the image time
series.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Preprocessing</title>
      <p>The used Level 1A (raw) TIR data product lacks a proper georeferencing.
This was applied manually with 60 to 70 ground control points (depending on
the cloud cover), achieving a mean accuracy of 40 m within the Attert
catchment. In this transformation step, the spatial resolution of the images
was adjusted from 90 m to 15 m by assigning the nearest neighbor values. The
geo-positioned images were then converted from unprocessed digital numbers
to top-of-atmosphere (TOA) temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with standard parameters, as given
by CESSLU (2009). Sensor decay was not taken into account as decay errors
due to spatially homogeneous and heterogeneous degradation of the sensor
(sensitivity) are a magnitude smaller than measurement accuracy, according
to Hook et al. (2007). Merely homogenous atmospheric conditions throughout
the catchment were assumed for each single time step and, as our focus is on
statistical pattern analysis rather than absolute LST values, atmospheric
correction was omitted here and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TOA</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used in the following.
Additionally, calculating cloud masks was omitted as heavy fragmentation of
the full time series would occur if masks were applied for even small
clouds in every affected image and cumulatively applied for the full series.
In the further statistical analysis, the distortion of results due to clouds is
negligibly small, as occurring clouds are neither repeating in certain areas
nor of large spatial extent per image. The time series of LST for individual
pixels in the data set hence include one outlier due to clouds at most. This
does not heavily influence further calculations on the full pattern. For
simplification reasons, the calculated data are further referred to as LST
time series.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods and analysis</title>
      <p>The general objective was to explore the relevance of the spatio–temporal
dynamics of land surface temperature as a determinant of the functional
behavior of the water and energy balance of a landscape unit in a given
watershed. In the first part of the analysis, the persistency of the LST
patterns, both in a temporal as well a spatio–temporal context, was
explored to analyze the existence of spatially and temporally consistent
patterns. The second part will analyze the most dominant structures and patterns
in the landscape that can be extracted from LST time series using PCA and
will also investigate the relationship between dominant structures from
LST–PCA and other landscape characteristics. In the third part, landscape
functional units will then be classified based on the PCA results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Analysis for the coefficient of correlation for a designed spatial
data set. We added small normal distributed noise to the concentric spatial
pattern <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to construct <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and show the correlation for an extracted
window <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (red) around the central pixel <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) in the same position
<bold>(a)</bold>, in different positions <bold>(b)</bold> and for the whole image <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the
maximum ranges <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Overall pattern persistency</title>
      <p>The first aim was to demonstrate that LST patterns, although changing
throughout time, persist to a certain degree and hence provide information
on the local organization of land surface energy and water balance within
the full catchment. The absence of persistency would imply competing
patterns within the time series and hence sever changes within the
controlling features or even oscillating states within the time series. A
further investigation of the timing of the pattern changes and appropriate
splitting of the time series would be imminent to a comprehensive pattern
analysis. In such a case, the following steps need to be executed for the
separated data sets. In order to analyze the overall pattern persistency
within the time series while retaining spatial patterns, a procedure similar
to that used for “co-referencing” different ASTER TIR bands is used
(Hirschmüller et al., 2002). The correlation of shifted windows within
two images indicates whether there is a clear shift within the overall
pattern in any spatial direction, or if “blurring” occurs and
persistency is then absent. Therefore, the square window <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of defined size (e.g., 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 pixel
(px)) around the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixel of the image <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (time
step 1) is selected and the correlation coefficient is calculated for the
same window (e.g., from 3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values) in the image <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at time step
2 (Fig. 3a). The window within the second image is now shifted within defined maximum ranges <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in N–S direction, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in E–W direction;
Fig. 3b), and correlation coefficients are assigned for any shifted position
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and they produce square fields of correlation coefficients (e.g., 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 px; Fig. 3c).</p>
      <p>The persistency of the patterns in the LST data within two time steps is
then assessed by calculating average correlation coefficient fields for a
sample of well distributed central pixels, depending on the ratio of window
and shift size to image size (to reduce the effort of calculating a shift
for the whole image). The overall persistency of the patterns is the average
of the correlation coefficients for all combinations of patterns within the
time series (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>28</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>28</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>756</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In case the maximum correlation
coefficient is within a shift of (0,0) and the decrease of the correlation
coefficients is large towards bigger shifts (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> no blurring of a single
peak), the persistency of the overall pattern over time is considered as
high.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Coefficient of correlation for the LST time series data. The mean
coefficient of correlation for all 756 combinations shows a centered
behavior (single peak area with maximum correlation of 0.47; green) with a
low shift (4,1) within a maximum range of  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction. The size of the correlation window is 51 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 51 px for 5
fixed, non-overlapping positions (<?xmltex \hack{\protect}?><?xmltex \igopts{width=11.381102pt}?><inline-graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-g01.pdf"/>)
throughout the images.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For our LST time series, the observed overall patterns are stationary
persistent in general. By calculating the mean correlation coefficient
within the full time series data set and a range of shifts of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
both directions (Fig. 4), it is shown that the peak correlation value is
within a shift of (4,1) px and hence within the range of the resolution of
one original ASTER pixel (4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 m <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 m). Also, the overall
positioning of temperature values within the patterns is correlated over
times, and, as a first result, it can be derived that temporal trends within
the thermal images of the Attert catchment can be considered as “spatially
stationary persistent”.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Pattern dynamics persistency</title>
      <p>In addition to the overall persistency, the temporal dynamics of local LST
patterns are investigated using a second type of “moving window” approach.
To analyze the spatial relationship of each pixel within its local
neighborhood, for each pixel <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within an image a square window <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the
environment) of a defined size (e.g., 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 px) around this central
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is compared to the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The environment information (ENV)
is summarized to statistical information in the form of percentages of
values within the square window that are bigger than, smaller than or equal
to the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 5a for an example analysis of values that are
bigger than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption content-type="subnumberedon"><p>Analysis of the coefficient of variation via an “environment
assessment” for a designed data set. The data are generated in the same way
as in the previous analysis (see Fig. 3). Subfigure <bold>(a)</bold> illustrates the
derivation of a single summary value for the central pixel <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue)
from the data of the surrounding environment <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (red). The example here
investigates how many values within the environment are larger than the
central value. This is repeated for all image pixels (except for boundary
pixels), resulting in the rightmost picture.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f05-part01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption content-type="subnumberedoff"><p>Subfigures <bold>(b–e)</bold> illustrate the procedure from data set
(<bold>b</bold>; left) to the environment measures (<bold>c–e</bold>; left), to the coefficients of
variation for different environments (<bold>c–e</bold>; right) and to the final
describing average pattern (<bold>b</bold>; right).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f05-part02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The variations of the ENV information over time were analyzed for the 28 LST
images via the spatial assessment of the coefficient of variation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each of the three setups (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
see example in Fig. 5c–d). The three spatially distributed
coefficients of variation are finally reduced to an average pattern of
coefficients of variation by taking the mean value of the three setups (Fig. 5b, right).</p>
      <p>Low coefficients of variation over time indicate a very “stable
positioning” or rank of that particular pixel within its local environment.
An extreme value of zero would mean no change of dynamics over time for the
pixel environments; for a value of 1, the standard deviation is as large as
the mean value, suggesting that the persistency of the local pattern is
rather low, and values larger than 1 have to be interpreted as
non-persistent. In this way, areas of low coefficients indicate stable,
persistent local patterns, and distinct varying behavior can be well
identified by areas of high coefficients of variation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Coefficient of variation for the LST time series data. The median
coefficient of variation is 0.34, the mean value 0.35. In all, 90 % of the
calculated values are within the range of 0.19 and 0.55 (red lines), 50 %
are within the range of 0.27 and 0.42 (red dashes) and 0.03 % of the values are
larger than 1 (blue arrow).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The analysis of the LST time series using a window size of 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 px <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 225 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 225 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> identifies relatively low coefficients of
variation (Fig. 6) with 90 % of the values between 0.19 and 0.55, 50 %
within the range of 0.27 and 0.42, and only 0.03 % of the values larger
than 1. This indicates a high local pattern persistency.</p>
      <p>Based on both, global and local persistency analysis, relatively stationary
patterns at the catchment scale, accompanied by stationary dynamics at the
scale of hill slopes throughout the catchment can be expected. The existence
of LST pattern persistence also suggests some structured control on LST by
some land surface characteristics. In the following section possible
controls will be extracted and analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Principle component analysis</title>
      <p>Applying principle component analysis (PCA; for a full mathematical description, see Richards and Jia (2006; chapter 6.1)), or empirical
orthogonal functions (EOFs; e.g., Denbo and Allen, 1984; Hamlington et al.,
2011; Lorenz, 1956) allows the assessment of independent structures within
complex data sets. Because both approaches share a similar methodology,
here, PCA is used to determine which spatial factors are controlling
patterns of LST within the time series. PCA uses orthogonal transformation
to calculate a composition of linearly uncorrelated values of decreasing
dominance from possibly correlated monitored variables. In remote sensing,
PCA is often applied to reduce the number of (correlated) variables within
classification procedures (see, e.g., Crósta et al., 2003; Moore et al.,
2008, for the analysis of multi-spectral, single temporal TIR data to assess
different geological structures).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Principle component analysis for a designed data set. The data are
the same as those for Fig. 5. The first row shows the pattern of the original data
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the second row shows the three resulting principle
components (PC1–PC3). The PCs are scaled to the same numeric domain as the
original data and colored alike (orange for low values; green for high values). PC1
shows the dominance of the concentric pattern, explaining 90.5 % of overall
variance of the data. PC2 and PC3 are more homogeneous and describe the
noise of the construction of the data set.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Here, the aim is to transform the observed 28 LST patterns into patterns of
virtual and independent principal components. These components represent the
most dominant controlling factors for the temporal dynamics of LST pattern
in decreasing order. An illustrative example for a PCA application in this
context is given in Fig. 7 for artificial data.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Overview on the 28 calculated principle components (PCs) regarding
their accounted proportion of variance. In each column, the components show their specific standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), proportion of
variance (prop.  of VAR) and cumulative proportion of variance
(cum. prop.).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PC1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PC2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PC3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PC4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PC5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">PC6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">PC7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.475</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.502</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.977</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.874</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.867</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">prop. of VAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.431</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.081</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.037</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.036</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.027</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.027</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">cum. prop.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.431</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.512</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.549</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.585</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.619</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.646</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.673</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PC8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PC9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PC10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PC11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PC12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">PC13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">PC14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.843</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.834</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.792</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.754</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.746</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.730</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.713</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">prop. of VAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.018</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">cum. prop.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.699</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.723</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.746</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.766</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.786</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.805</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.823</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PC15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PC16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PC17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PC18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PC19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">PC20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">PC21</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.712</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.694</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.671</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.669</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.646</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.619</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.598</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">prop. of VAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.017</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">cum. prop.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.841</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.858</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.875</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.891</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.905</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.919</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.932</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PC22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PC23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PC24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PC25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PC26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">PC27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">PC28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.589</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.575</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.555</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.535</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.525</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.483</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.357</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">prop. of VAR</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.005</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">cum. prop.</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.944</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.956</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.967</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.977</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.987</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.995</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The PCA application for the ASTER TIR time series produced 28 independent
components as summarized in Table 1. By construction, components with higher
(lower) degree show less (more) information and more (less) noise. 61.9 %
of the variation is cumulatively expressed via the first five components (third
row), while still more than 3 % of the variance are expressed by
particular components (second row). In the following, a focus is given to
the first five components (Fig. 9).</p>
      <p>Figure 8 illustrates a distinct degree of structured heterogeneity for these
five components. In principle the patterns of the PCs would allow to classify
the catchment or landscape into different functional units that, when using LST
images, would strongly reflect the functioning of the landscape related to
the water and energy balance under radiation driven conditions. The number
of PCs to be considered in such a classification would depend on the overall
number of units that should be differentiated (which will strongly depend on
computational resources available to explicitly represent within catchment
variability), but also on the (cumulative) percentage of explained variance
of the PCs, as well as on the distribution or, at least, range of the component values of
each individual PC.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Loadings of the first five components (rows) to reproduce the LST time
series (columns). The weights differ largely between the time steps. The
lowest coefficient of variation for the loadings is calculated for PC1
(0.195); the highest value for PC2 (136.996). PC3, PC4 and PC5 have
coefficients of variation of 80.131, 21.914 and 14.193.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Loading of</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 Feb 2001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23 Sep 2001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 Feb 2003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21 Mar 2003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3 Aug 2003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15 Apr 2004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17 May 2004</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.055</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.056</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.044</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.054</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.052</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.048</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.099</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.054</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.023</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.045</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.042</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.043</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.099</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.057</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.066</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.072</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.054</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.055</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.029</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.059</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.075</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.028</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.098</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24 May 2004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">27 May 2005</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 Sep 2006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1 May 2007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15 Jul 2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24 Jul 2008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26 Sep 2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.056</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.043</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.054</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.049</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.061</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.053</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.055</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.019</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.045</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.004</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.036</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.048</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.022</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.063</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.028</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.070</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.103</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.085</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.016</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.004</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21 Mar 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20 Apr 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22 May 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23 Jun 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2 Jul 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27 Jul 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">16 Apr 2010</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.059</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.050</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.043</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.042</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.049</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.034</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.028</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.037</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.033</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.098</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.004</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.067</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.052</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.010</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.091</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.061</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.078</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.112</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.008</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.020</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.042</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.075</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.049</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.104</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23 Apr 2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23 Sep 2010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 Apr 2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">30 May 2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6 Nov 2011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27 Mar 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14 May 2012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.037</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.059</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.059</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.028</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.032</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.048</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.070</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.057</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.024</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.117</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.066</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.017</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.056</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.128</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.035</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.026</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.069</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.027</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.061</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.031</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.041</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.025</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.044</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PC5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.022</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.014</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.043</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.038</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.058</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>However, while this is an important topic related to land surface
hydrological modeling, the focus here will be on the relationship of the
extracted PCs with other land surface characteristics. Given the controls of
LST as discussed in the introduction, it is expected to find some
relationship of the first dominant PCs with vegetation, soil, geology,
elevation, slope, aspect or others. A comparison of the PCs with available
data suggested a strong relationship between PC1 and land use
data, as well as PC2 with geological information. These relationships are
illustrated in Fig. 9, where maps of PC1 and Corine land cover as well as PC2
and a geological map of the Attert catchment are shown next to each other.</p>
      <p>A more detailed analysis is given by Fig. 10, where the distributions of
component values of PC1 for the individual Corine land use data (Fig. 10a)
and of PC2 for the individual geological classes (Fig. 10b) are plotted
separately. The diagrams underpin a strong relationship between both
components and suggested land surface characteristics. Concerning land
cover, low component values of PC1 are shown for artificial areas, medium
values for agricultural areas (arable, pastures, complex cultivation and
agricultural/natural) and high values for forests. In this way, PC1 might be
interpreted as related to similar dynamics in leaf area index (LAI; see Asner et al., 2003), and therefore the potential for water vapor and energy
exchange between the land surface and the atmosphere. The high values for
“mineral extraction” can be explained, as the single, relatively small
area is surrounded by forests and partially replanted with smaller
trees or shrubs during the observed time span.</p>
      <p>When analyzing the component values of PC2 for the different geological
classes, schist areas show distinct, different distributions compared to the
other (mainly) sandstone areas. Schists with a high proportion of fractures
are known for a high water drainage potential compared to the remaining
sedimentary geology classes (see Chiang, 1971). The availability of water
for transpiration and therefore the splitting of available energy into
sensible and latent heat fluxes, resulting in different land surface
temperatures, are thereby strongly affected. In this sense, PC2 can be
interpreted as being related to bedrock information or coupled soil texture.</p>
      <p>Even though land surface temperature is expected to depend on elevation and
other terrain properties, no correlation for PC3 to PC5 (and higher) could
be found with any other available observable land surface characteristic
pattern and, in particular, to DEM related variables. For the Attert
catchment, the elevation differences are moderate, and higher altitudes are
related to the Schist areas (see Fig. 1). Thus, some part of a possible
elevation effect might be “hidden” in PC2 already. However, for other more
mountainous areas, possible relationships might be more pronounced and
should be considered and analyzed in detail.</p>
      <p>In addition to the component values, PCA also provides information on the
weight of each component within each single time step through calculation of
the specific loadings. Table 2 illustrates the first five components and their
loadings for the analyzed data set. While some dependencies of the sign,
mean and standard deviation of the loadings with meteorological or
hydrological conditions or states in the Attert catchment are expected, here,
only the differences in the loadings at individual dates are used to
identify a limited number of images that are most distinct in their
information content but that represent the wide range of LST dynamics over the
considered time period. Based on the cumulative Euclidean distance of
loadings within the LST time series, a number of 5 exemplary images are
selected for further analysis (15 February 2003, 17 May 2004, 24 May 2004, 27 May
2005 and 27 March 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The first five components of the PCA for the LST time series data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The first and second component of the PCA for the LST time series
data (left) next to the patterns of the illustration of Corine land cover
and geology data (right) of the Attert catchment.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of component values and spatial information for the
Attert catchment. The density distribution of the component values (PC1 in
<bold>(a)</bold>; PC2 in <bold>(b)</bold>) are shown for the different classes of the spatial data sets
(Corine land cover in <bold>(a)</bold>; geology in <bold>(b)</bold>). Mean values of the distributions are
shown as vertical bars on the bottom line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Construction of “binary word” classification for a designed
data set. The data are the same as those for Fig. 5. On the left, the three images
are binarized (BIN) from the upper to the lower panel. Values larger than
the median are converted to 1 (blue), values lower are converted to 0
(green). The right panel shows the aggregated words for the three data sets.
Not every possible occurrence of words is produced (maximum: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 8).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Behavioral measure</title>
      <p>In the following, the temporal dynamics of LST data are analyzed in terms of
their “functional behavior” and, to classify the catchment into areas that show some similarity in this behavior (functional units). Similar to the analysis
of pattern dynamics persistency, the vast data variability is transformed
into simple information. Using the five most different images and therefore time steps (see
Sect. 3.3), the data are binarized using an approach suggested by Hauhs and
Lange (2008). The pixels of each image within the time step are separated
into values larger than the median value of the image (1) or lower (0) (Fig. 11, left).
The set of five binarized images can be aggregated into five-letter
“words” (Hauhs and Lange, 2008) by concatenating these binary values (see
the three-letter example in Fig. 11; right). The order of letters within the
words represents the response of the land surface to differences in the
water and energy balance for each pixel. These different land surface
responses refer to differently behaving landscape units.</p>
      <p>The transformation of the five LST images into behavioral words results in
a (still manageable) number of 32 (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> classes throughout the
catchment, as illustrated in Fig. 12. In some areas, functional behavior
changes over short distances, indicating different response of the land
surface towards radiation-driven conditions; other areas behave very
similarly over larger spatial extent. These larger clusters are characterized by a
constant behavior throughout the subset time series with short interruptions
only (e.g., class “00010” only has one short “break” of length 1).
Different binary words represent different land surface functioning and
therefore allow the delineation of functional units (with a focus on the
radiation-driven conditions) in the (Attert) catchment. Based on results
from Figs. 9 and 12, larger units can be found within the forests (e.g., “00000”, “10000”, “00001”), main settlements or frequently bare soils
(”11111”) and large pastures (”11011” and “00100”). The heterogeneous
areas are more related to periodical land cover changes and represent small-scale dominations of processes throughout the time series.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>An alternative way of characterizing land surface functionality based on
time series of thermal remote sensing images is introduced. Firstly, it is
shown that the overall LST patterns of the time series are spatio–temporally
persistent. Secondly, dominant patterns within the time series were extracted
via PCA and could be related to physical ecological features, such as land
use and geology. Based on these analyses, representative images from the
time series were selected to express land surface functionality in terms of
binary words and to classify land surface into different functional
units that, again, could be related to existent land use patterns in the
catchment. In contrast to the “classical” HRU delineation process – in
which maps of land surface properties (DEM, land use, soil) that are often
generalized, estimated, outdated or interpolated from sparse measures, are
intersected, and hydrological similarity is assumed for these units – the
derived principal components and values, as well as the classification with
regards to binary words, both represent “real” and “on-site” catchment
functional behavior with regards to LST and therefore to the water and energy
balance at each location.</p>
      <p>While ASTER data were used here, this approach is applicable to any other
platform or sensor providing LST information (e.g., Landsat 8 data, 100 m resolution, TIR). Given the maximum spatial resolution of ca. 100 m in TIR
remote sensing, any analysis concerning the size of functional similarity in
the landscape is limited to that resolution. Aircraft-based TIR sensing
might overcome this limitation, but it is still not routinely available yet.
More global hence coarse patterns can be derived from geostationary
satellites (e.g., Meteosat) and might improve spatial representations of
global standard data sets for climate modeling; e.g., the FAO (Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) world soil map. By
investigating the PCA results for different resolutions, it should also be
possible to develop new statistical up and down scaling methods for model
parameterizations. This approach is also limited by the number and
seasonality of available (and almost cloud free) LST images. For the Attert
catchment, a data set of 28 LST images was available for a period of ca. 12
years. Using the full data set, any significant land surface changes related
to LST are implicitly contained and expressed in the derived principal
components and their values, as well as in the derived classification of
functional units using binary words. An analysis of historic Landsat
images has shown that the land use changes in the Attert catchment have been
minimal over the last 35 years, so crop rotation by farmers is the most
dominant change over the seasons here. Given an average of not even three
available images per year for this mid-latitude region (see Fig. 2), any
application of this approach will have to balance between sufficient
temporal coverage in order to capture the relevant LST dynamics of the
landscape, and not covering too many externally driven changes in the
procedure.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Behavioral classification of the subset LST time series data. The
algorithm is producing <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 32 classes of different frequency. The
image shows the full bandwidth with classes named in the legend.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/5345/2014/hess-18-5345-2014-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In order to analyze the number of images required, the PCA and “binary
word” classification was repeated with down to just six subsequent images
(given the minimum set of five images considered in Sects. 3.3 to 3.4). For
all the subsets, results in terms of PCA, component values and
classification were similar when compared to the full LST time series,
indicating that already a much smaller time period and smaller number of
images will be sufficient to capture landscape functioning with regards to
LST. This might change with more complex landscapes. The application
of digital numbers instead of extracted LST also showed almost identical
results, so that a proper conversion to LST is, in our opinion, not
fundamentally needed.</p>
      <p>What are the additional benefits of the LST analysis presented here? The
analysis of binary words, as presented in Sect. 3.4, provides a
classification of the catchment into areas that behave similarly (with
regards to the complex interactions of the water and energy balance, as expressed
in LST) in terms of response to radiation-driven conditions. These units can
either be used in an already-established HRU framework or can provide some
guidance on the size of spatial discretization of the landscape in land
surface modeling exercises. They might support effective
observation and monitoring strategies under limited resources by providing
distributed information of distinct behavior and hence might be used as decision
support on the spatial distributions of field experiments. The strongest
impact of the approach presented is expected when the derived component
values from the PCA analysis will be incorporated into model parameter
regionalization schemes (e.g., the multi-scale parameter regionalization
(MPR) scheme presented by Samaniego et al., 2010). Rather than providing
nominal scaled data, the component values are continuous, pixel-based
information representing the land surface functioning with regards to LST.
Formulating the parameterization of land surface models by, e.g., transfer
functions (see MPR) that are based on individual component values derived
from PCA are expected to strongly improve the spatially explicit modeling of
catchment water and energy fluxes. However, this hypothesis has still to be
tested by comparing these different regionalization approaches within
different models and catchments. By extending this analysis to further
catchments under different terrain, climate and vegetation conditions, it
is expected that a more general interpretation and understanding of
principal components, component values and loadings and their occurrence and
interrelation can be derived. The impact of elevation on LST will certainly
be more dominant in mountainous areas, soil texture is supposed to show
stronger signals in water-limited regions; information on variations within
multi-level vegetation will appear in strongly natural and forested areas;
and the association of PCA loadings with, e.g., meteorological measurements or
indices (e.g., cumulative rainfall of the last 7 days) might allow further
processes or states (such as interception storage) to be derived.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding this research
through the CAOS (Catchments as Organised, see CAOS reference below (marked) Systems) Research Unit (FOR 1598;
grant no. SCHU1271/5-1). We also want to thank the LPDAAC (Land Processes
Distributed Active Archive Center) for providing free ASTER data, as well as
the editor and anonymous referees for their contributions to improve this
article.<?xmltex \hack{\\}?><?xmltex \hack{\\}?>
Edited by:  H. Cloke<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and
Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part
I: Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Asner, G. P., Scurlock, J. M. O., and Hicke, J. A.: Global
synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for
ecological and remote sensing studies, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 12,
191–205, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00026.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00026.x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Beven, K. J. and Kirkby, M. J.: A physically based,
variable contributing area model of catchment hydrology,
Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24, 43–69, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667909491834</ext-link>,
1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bolle, H.-J., Feddes, R. A., and Kalma, J. D. (Eds.): Exchange processes at
the land surface for a range of space and time scales, in: Proceedings of
Symposium J3.1, Joint Scientific Assembly of IAMAP and IAHS, Yokohama, Japan,
11–23 July 1993, 626 pp., 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>CAOS: CAOS – Catchments as Organised Systems, available at:
<uri>http://www.caos-project.de</uri> (last access: 22 May 2014), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>CESSLU: How to calculate reflectance and temperature using ASTER data,
prepared by Abduwasit Ghulam, Center for Environmental Sciences at Saint
Louis University, available at:
<uri>http://www.gis.slu.edu/RS/ASTER_Reflectance_Temperature_Calculation.php</uri>
(last access: 22 May 2014), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chiang, S. L.: A runoff potential rating table for soils, J. Hydrol., 13,
54–62, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(71)90200-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-1694(71)90200-9</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Crósta, A. P., De Souza Filho, C. R., Azevedo, F., and
Brodie, C.: Targeting key alteration minerals in epithermal deposits
in Patagonia, Argentina, using ASTER imagery and principal component
analysis, Int. J. Remote Sens., 24, 4233–4240,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000152291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/0143116031000152291</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Denbo, D. W. and Allen, J. S.: Rotary empirical orthogonal function
analysis of currents near the Oregon coast, J. Phys. Oceanogr, 14, 35–46,
doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1984)014<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0035:REOFAO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0.CO;2
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>EEA: CORINE Land Cover Project, published by Commission of the European
Communities, available at:
<uri>http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover</uri> (last access:
22 May 2014), 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>EEA: Environmental Terminology and Discovery Service (ETDS), published by
European Environment Agency, available at:
<uri xlink:href="http://glossary.eea.europa.eu/terminology/concept_html?term=corine\%20land\%20cover">http://glossary.eea.europa.eu/terminology/concept_html?term=corine%20land%20cover</uri>
(last access: 22 May 2014), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Eldeiry, A. and Garcia, L.: Comparison of ordinary
kriging, regression kriging, and cokriging techniques to estimate
soil salinity using LANDSAT images, J. Irrig. Drain. E.-ASCE, 136,
355–364, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000208</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Elder, T. and Strong, J.: The infrared transmission of
atmospheric windows, J. Franklin I, 255, 189–208,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(53)90002-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-0032(53)90002-7</ext-link>, 1953.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>EPA: Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC), available at:
<uri>http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/</uri> (last access: 22 May 2014), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Farah, H. O. and Bastiaanssen, W. G. M.: Impact of
spatial variations of land surface parameters on regional
evaporation: a case study with remote sensing data,
Hydrol. Process., 15, 1585–1607, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.159</ext-link>,
2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R.,
Dure, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E.,
Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S., Shimada, J., Umland, J.,
Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdorf, D.: The shuttle
radar topography mission, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG2004,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005RG000183</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Flügel, W. A.: Delineating Hydrological Response
Units (HRUs) by GIS analysis for regional hydrological modelling
using PRMS/MMS in the drainage basin of the River Bröl, Germany,
Hydrol. Process., 9, 423–436, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360090313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.3360090313</ext-link>,
1995a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Flügel, W. A.: Hydrological Response Units (HRUs) to
preserve basin heterogeneity in hydrological modelling using
PRMS/MMS – case study in the Bröl basin, Germany, in: Modelling
and Management of Sustainable Basin-Scale Water Resource Systems,
Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1–14 July 1995, 79–87, 1995b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fujisada, H.: Design and performance of ASTER instrument,
in: Advanced and Next-Generation Satellites, Proceedings of SPIE,
Paris, France, 15 December 1995, 16–25, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.228565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.228565</ext-link>,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlington, B. D., Leben, R. R., Nerem, R. S., Han, W., and Kim, K. Y.:
Reconstructing sea level using cyclostationary empirical orthogonal
functions, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 1978–2012, 116,
doi:10.1029/2011JC007529, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hauhs, M. and Lange, H.: Classification of runoff in
headwater catchments: a physical problem?, Geography
Compass, 2,
235–254, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00075.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00075.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hirschmüller, H., Innocent, P. R., and Garibaldi, J.:
Real-time correlation-based stereo vision with reduced border
errors, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 47, 229–246,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014554110407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1014554110407</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hook, S. J., Vaughan, R. G., Tonooka, H., and
Schladow, S. G.: Absolute radiometric in-flight validation of mid
infrared and thermal infrared data from ASTER and MODIS on the terra
spacecraft using the Lake Tahoe, CA/NV, USA, automated validation
site, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 1798–1807,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.894564" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2007.894564</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Kheir, R. B., Greve, M. H., Bøcher, P. K.,
Greve, M. B., Larsen, R., and McCloy, K.: Predictive mapping of soil
organic carbon in wet cultivated lands using classification-tree
based models: the case study of Denmark, J. Environ. Manage., 91,
1150–1160, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.001</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ladoni, M., Bahrami, H. A., Alavipanah, S. K., and
Noroozi, A. A.: Estimating soil organic carbon from soil
reflectance: a review, precision agriculture, 11, 82–100,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-009-9123-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11119-009-9123-3</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lagacherie, P., Bailly, J. S., Monestiez, P., and
Gomez, C.: Using scattered hyperspectral imagery data to map the
soil properties of a region, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 63, 110–119,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01409.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01409.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenz, E. N.: Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather
prediction, Scientific Report No. 1, Statistical Forecasting Project,
Department of Meteorology, MIT, 49 pp., 1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Moore, F., Rastmanesh, F., Asadi, H., and Modabberi, S.:
Mapping mineralogical alteration using principal-component analysis
and matched filter processing in the Takab area, north-west Iran,
from ASTER data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 29, 2851–2867,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160701418989" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160701418989</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Moran, M. S.: Thermal infrared measurement as an
indicator of plant ecosystem health, in: Thermal Remote Sensing in
Land Surface Processes, edited by: Quattrochi, D. A. and Luvall, J.,
CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 257–282,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203502174-c9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/9780203502174-c9</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Mulder, V. L., de Bruin, S., Schaepman, M. E., and
Mayr, T. R.: The use of remote sensing in soil and terrain mapping
– a review, Geoderma, 162, 1–19,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.018</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>NASA: Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, available at:
<uri>http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm</uri> (last access: 22 May 2014), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Neumann, L. N., Western, A. W., and Argent, R. M.: The sensitivity of
simulated flow and water quality response to spatial heterogeneity on a
hillslope in the Tarrawarra catchment, Australia, Hydrol Proc., 24,
76–86, doi:10.1002/hyp.7486, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Pomeroy, J. W., Gray, D. M., Brown, T., Hedstrom, N. R.,
Quinton, W. L., Granger, R. J., and Carey, S. K.: The cold regions
hydrological model: a platform for basing process representation and
model structure on physical evidence, Hydrol. Process., 21,
2650–2667, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6787" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.6787</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation> Richards, J. A. and Jia, X.: The principal components
transformation, in: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: an
Introduction, 4th Edn., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 133–148,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., and Attinger, S.: Multiscale
parameter regionalization of a grid-based hydrologic model at the
mesoscale, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05523, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008WR007327</ext-link>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Serbin, G., Daughtry, C. S. T., Hunt, E. R., Jr., Reeves
III, J. B., and Brown, D. J.: Effects of soil composition and
mineralogy on remote sensing of crop residue cover, Remote Sens.
Environ., 113, 224–238, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.004</ext-link>,
2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Serbin, G., Hunt, E. R., Jr., Daughtry, C. S. T.,
McCarty, G. W., and Doraiswamy, P. C.: An improved ASTER index for
remote sensing of crop residue, Remote Sensing,  1, 971–991,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs1040971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs1040971</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> SGL: Carte Géologique du Luxembourg, Feuille No. 7,
Redange, 1:25 000, R. Colpach, Service Géologique du
Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Srinivasan, R., Ramanarayanan, T. S., Arnold, J. G., and
Bednarz, S. T.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, Part
II: Model application, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 91–101,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05962.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05962.x</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Steenpass, C., Vanderborght, J., Herbst, M., Simunek, J.,
and Vereecken, H.: Estimating soil hydraulic properties from
infrared measurements of soil surface temperatures and TDR data,
Vadose Zone J., 9, 910–924, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0176" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2009.0176</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Summers, D., Lewis, M., Ostendorf, B., and
Chittleborough, D.: Unmixing of soil types and estimation of soil
exposure with simulated hyperspectral imagery, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
32, 6507–6526, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.512931" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2010.512931</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation> Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E.: Plant Physiology, 5th Edn.,
Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 782 pp., 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Zehe, E., Ehret, U., Pfister, L., Blume, T., Schröder, B., Westhoff, M.,
Jackisch, C., Schymanski, S. J., Weiler, M., Schulz, K., Allroggen, N.,
Tronicke, J., Dietrich, P., Scherer, U., Eccard, J., Wulfmeyer, V., and
Kleidon, A.: HESS Opinions: Functional units: a novel framework to explore
the link between spatial organization and hydrological functioning of
intermediate scale catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 11, 3249–3313, doi:10.5194/hessd-11-3249-2014, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
