HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-18-4223-2014 Coupling a land-surface model with a crop growth model to improve ET flux estimations in the Upper Ganges basin, India Tsarouchi G. M. 1 2 Buytaert W. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6994-4454 1 2 Mijic A. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-9405 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London, London, UK 28 10 2014 18 10 4223 4238 Copyright: © 2014 G. M. Tsarouchi et al. 2014 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/18/4223/2014/hess-18-4223-2014.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/18/4223/2014/hess-18-4223-2014.pdf

Land-Surface Models (LSMs) are tools that represent energy and water flux exchanges between land and the atmosphere. Although much progress has been made in adding detailed physical processes into these models, there is much room left for improved estimates of evapotranspiration fluxes, by including a more reasonable and accurate representation of crop dynamics. Recent studies suggest a strong land-surface–atmosphere coupling over India and since this is one of the most intensively cultivated areas in the world, the strong impact of crops on the evaporative flux cannot be neglected. In this study we dynamically couple the LSM JULES with the crop growth model InfoCrop. JULES in its current version (v3.4) does not simulate crop growth. Instead, it treats crops as natural grass, while using prescribed vegetation parameters. Such simplification might lead to modelling errors. Therefore we developed a coupled modelling scheme that simulates dynamically crop development and parametrized it for the two main crops of the study area, wheat and rice. This setup is used to examine the impact of inter-seasonal land cover changes in evapotranspiration fluxes of the Upper Ganges River basin (India). The sensitivity of JULES with regard to the dynamics of the vegetation cover is evaluated. Our results show that the model is sensitive to the changes introduced after coupling it with the crop model. Evapotranspiration fluxes, which are significantly different between the original and the coupled model, are giving an approximation of the magnitude of error to be expected in LSMs that do not include dynamic crop growth. For the wet season, in the original model, the monthly Mean Error ranges from 7.5 to 24.4 mm month<sup>−1</sup>, depending on different precipitation forcing. For the same season, in the coupled model, the monthly Mean Error's range is reduced to 5.4–11.6 mm month<sup>−1</sup>. For the dry season, in the original model, the monthly Mean Error ranges from 10 to 17 mm month<sup>−1</sup>, depending on different precipitation forcing. For the same season, in the coupled model, the monthly Mean Error's range is reduced to 2.2–3.4 mm month<sup>−1</sup>. The new modelling scheme, by offering increased accuracy of evapotranspiration estimations, is an important step towards a better understanding of the two-way crops–atmosphere interactions.

 NE/I022558/1 References Aggarwal, P., Kalra, N., Chander, S., and Pathak, H.: InfoCrop: a dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description, Agr. Syst., 89, 1–25, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.001</a>, 2006a. \bibitem[Aggarwal et al.(2006b)Aggarwal, Banerjee, Daryaei,Bhatia, Bala, Rani, Chander, Pathak,and Kalra] Aggarwal2006b Aggarwal, P., Banerjee, B., Daryaei, M. G., Bhatia, A., Bala, A., Rani, S., Chander, S., Pathak, H., and Kalra, N.: InfoCrop: A dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. II. Performance of the model, Agr. Syst., 89, 47–67, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.003</a>, 2006b. Agropedia: Agriculture Portal of IIT Kanpur, available at: <a href="http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/content/cropping-system-analysis-and-area-allocation-uttar-pradesh">http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/content/cropping-system-analysis-and-area-allocation-uttar-pradesh</a>, last access: 19 September 2013. Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R .L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011</a>, 2011. Bharati, L. and Jayakody, P.: Hydrology of the Upper Ganga river, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2010. Blyth, E., Gash, J., Lloyd, A., Pryor, M., Weedon, G. P., and Shuttleworth, J.: Evaluating the JULES land surface model energy fluxes using FLUXNET Data, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 509–519, 2010. Blyth, E., Clark, D. B., Ellis, R., Huntingford, C., Los, S., Pryor, M., Best, M., and Sitch, S.: A comprehensive set of benchmark tests for a land surface model of simultaneous fluxes of water and carbon at both the global and seasonal scale, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 255–269, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-255-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-255-2011</a>, 2011. Boegh, E., Thorsen, M., Butts, M., Hansen, S., Christiansen, J., Abrahamsen, P., Hasager, C., Jensen, N., van der Keur, P., Refsgaard, J., Schelde, K., Soegaard, H., and Thomsen, A.: Incorporating remote sensing data in physically based distributed agro-hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 287, 279–299, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.018</a>, 2004. Calvet, J.-C., and Soussana, J.-F.: Modelling CO<sub>2</sub>-enrichment effects using an interactive vegetation SVAT scheme, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 108, 129–152, 2001. Calvet, J.-C., Noilhanm, J., Roujean, J.-L., Bessemoulin, P., Cabelguenne, M., Olioso, A., and Wigneron, J.-P.: An interactive vegetation SVAT-model tested against data from six contrasting sites, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 92, 73–95, 1998. Clark, D. B., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Jones, C. D., Gedney, N., Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Harding, R. J., Huntingford, C., and Cox, P. M.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 701–722, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011</a>, 2011. Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., and Berry, J. A.: Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 54, 107–136, 1991. Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., and Ginn, T. R.: A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils, Water Resour. Res., 20, 682–690, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00682">https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00682</a>, 1984. Cox, P. M.: Description of the "TRIFFID" Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Hadley Center Technical Note 24, Hadley Centre, Met Office., London Road, Bracknell, Berks, RG122SY, UK, 2001. Cox, P. M., Huntingford, C., and Harding, R. J.: A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme, J. Hydrol., 212, 79–94, 1998. Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A., and Totterdell, I. J.: Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model, Nature, 408, 184–187, 2000. Dai, Y., Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Baker, I., Bonan, G., Bosilovich, M., Denning, S., Dirmeyer, P., Houser, P., Niu, G., Oleson, K., Schlosser, A., and Yang, Z.-L.: The common land model (CLM), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013</a>, 2003. Essery, R., Best, M., Betts, R., and Taylor, C.: Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 530–543, 2003. FAO: AQUASTAT. Information System on Water and Agriculture, available at: <a href="http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/water_use_agr/CC_PDF/CC_IND.pdf">http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/water_use_agr/CC_PDF/CC_IND.pdf</a>, last access: 19 September 2013. FAO: FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.1), FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria., available at: <a href="http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/External-World-soil-database/HTML/">http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/External-World-soil-database/HTML/</a> (last access: 24 January 2013), 2009. Friedl, M. A., McIver, D. K., Hodges, J. C. F., Zhang, X. Y., Muchoney, D., and Strahler, A. H. E. A.: Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 287–302, 2002. Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P. A., Koster, R. D., Sud, Y. C., Bonan, G., Oleson, K. W., Chan, E., Verseghy, D., Cox, P., Gordon, C. T., McGregor, J. L., Kanae, S., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Mocko, D., Lu, C.-H., Mitchell, K., Malyshev, S., McAvaney, B., Oki, T., Yamada, T., Pitman, A., Taylor, C. M., Vasic, R., and Xue, Y.: GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part II: Analysis, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 611–625, 2006. Huffman, G. J. and Bolvin, D. T.: Trmm and other data precipitation data set documentation, available at: <a href="ftp://precip.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/trmmdocs/3B42_3B43_doc.pdf">ftp://precip.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/trmmdocs/3B42_3B43_doc.pdf</a>, last access: 16 December 2013. Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., Wolff, D. B., Adler, R. F., Gu, G., Hong, Y., Bowman, K. P., and Stocker, E. F.: The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 38–55, 2007. ICAR: Crop Calendar of Major Crops, available at: <a href="http://www.icar.org.in/en/crop-science.htm">http://www.icar.org.in/en/crop-science.htm</a>, last access: 18 September 2013. Jin, Y., Schaaf, C. B., Woodcock, C. E., Gao, F., Li, X., Strahler, A. H., Lucht, W., and Liang, S.: Consistency of MODIS surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function and albedo retrievals: 2. Validation, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4159, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002804">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002804</a>, 2003. Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996. Koster, R., Dirmeyer, P., Guo, Z., and Bonan, G.: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation, Science, 305, 1138–1140, 2004. Koster, R. D., Sud, Y. C., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P. A., Bonan, G., Oleson, K. W., Chan, E., Verseghy, D., Cox, P., Davies, H., Kowalczyk, E., Gordon, C. T., Kanae, S., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Mocko, D., Lu, C.-H., Mitchell, K., Malyshev, S., McAvaney, B., Oki, T., Yamada, T., Pitman, A., Taylor, C. M., Vasic, R., and Xue, Y.: GLACE: the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 590–610, 2006. Krishna Kumar, K., Rupa Kumar, K., Ashrit, R. G., Deshpande, N. R., and Hansen, J. W.: Climate impacts on Indian agriculture, Int. J. Climatol., 24, 1375–1393, 2004. Lavender, S. L., Taylor, C. M., and Matthews, A. J.: Coupled land–atmosphere intraseasonal variability of the West African Monsoon in a GCM, J. Climate, 23, 5557–5571, 2010. Lei, H., Yang, D., Lokupitiya, E., and Shen, Y.: Coupling land surface and crop growth models for predicting evapotranspiration and carbon exchange in wheat-maize rotation croplands, Biogeosciences, 7, 3363–3375, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3363-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3363-2010</a>, 2010. Li, Y., Kinzelbach, W., Zhou, J., Cheng, G. D., and Li, X.: Modelling irrigated maize with a combination of coupled-model simulation and uncertainty analysis, in the northwest of China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1465–1480, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1465-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1465-2012</a>, 2012. Li, Y., Zhou, J., Kinzelbach, W., Cheng, G., Li, X., and Zhao, W.: Coupling a SVAT heat and water flow model, a stomatal-photosynthesis model and a crop growth model to simulate energy, water and carbon fluxes in an irrigated maize ecosystem, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 176, 10–24, 2013. Lucht, W., Schaaf, C., and Strahler, A.: An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 38, 977–998, 2000. Maruyama, A. and Kuwagata, T.: Coupling land surface and crop growth models to estimate the effects of changes in the growing season on energy balance and water use of rice paddies, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 919–930, 2010. Meehl, G. A.: Influence of the land surface in the Asian Summer Monsoon: external conditions versus internal feedbacks, J. Climate, 7, 1033–1049, 1994. GMAO: Global Modeling and Assimilation Office. File Specification for GEOS-DAS Gridded Output Version 5.3. Document No. GMAO-1001v5.3, Tech. rep., Maryland, USA, 2004. Mo, X., Liu, S., Lin, Z., Xu, Y., Xiang, Y., and McVicar, T.: Prediction of crop yield, water consumption and water use efficiency with a SVAT-crop growth model using remotely sensed data on the North China plain, Ecol. Model., 183, 301–322, 2005. Mu, Q., Heinsch, F. A., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data, Remote Sens. Environ., 111, 519–536, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015</a>, 2007. Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 1781–1800, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019</a>, 2011. Mueller, B., Hirschi, M., Jimenez, C., Ciais, P., Dirmeyer, P. A., Dolman, A. J., Fisher, J. B., Jung, M., Ludwig, F., Maignan, F., Miralles, D. G., McCabe, M. F., Reichstein, M., Sheffield, J., Wang, K., Wood, E. F., Zhang, Y., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3707–3720, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013</a>, 2013. Myneni, R. B., Hoffman, S., Knyazikhin, Y., Privette, J. L., Glassy, J., Tian, Y., Wang, Y., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Smith, G. R., Lotsch, A., Friedl, M., Morisette, J. T., Votava, P., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W.: Global Products Of Vegetation Leaf Area And Fraction Absorbed PAR From Year One Of MODIS Data, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 214–231, 2002. NFSM: Crop Calendar Report, available at: <a href="http://nfsm.gov.in/nfsmmis/RPT/CalenderReport.aspx">http://nfsm.gov.in/nfsmmis/RPT/CalenderReport.aspx</a>, last access: 19 September 2013. Osborne, T. M., Lawrence, D. M., Challinor, A. J., Slingo, J. M., and Wheeler, T. R.: Development and assessment of a coupled crop–climate model, Glob. Change Biol., 13, 169–183, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01274.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01274.x</a>, 2007. Osborne, T., Slingo, J., Lawrence, D., and Wheeler, T.: Examining the interaction of growing crops with local climate using a coupled crop-climate model, J. Climate, 22, 1393–1411, 2009. Pauwels, V. R. N., Verhoest, N. E. C., De Lannoy, G. J. M., Guissard, V., Lucau, C., and Defourny, P.: Optimization of a coupled hydrology – crop growth model through the assimilation of observed soil moisture and leaf area index values using an ensemble Kalman filter, Water Resour. Res., 43, W04421, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004942">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004942</a>, 2007. Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 193, 120–145, 1948. Penning de Vries, F., Jansen, D., ten Berge, H., and Bakema, A.: Simulation of Ecophysiological Processes of Growth in Several Annual Crops, Simulation Monograph PUDOC, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 1989. Richards, L. A.: Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums, J. Appl. Phys., 1, 318–333, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010</a>, 1931. Sellers, P.: Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration, Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 1335–1372, 1985. Seneviratne, S. I., Koster, R. D., Guo, Z., Dirmeyer, P. A., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Mocko, D., Lu, C.-H., Oleson, K. W., and Verseghy, D.: Soil moisture memory in AGCM simulations: analysis of Global Land Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE), J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 1090–1112, 2006. Sheehy, J. E., Mitchell, P. L., and Hardy, B.: Redesigning Rice Photosynthesis to Increase Yield, 1st Edn, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2000. Sheffield, J., Goteti, G., and Wood, E.: Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling, J. Climate, 19, 3088–3111, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3790.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3790.1</a>, 2006. Taylor, C. M. and Ellis, R. J.: Satellite detection of soil moisture impacts on convection at the mesoscale, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L03404, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025252">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025252</a>, 2006. Tsarouchi, G., Mijic, A., Moulds, S., and Buytaert, W.: Historical and future land-cover changes in the Upper Ganges basin of India, Int. J. Remote Sens., 35, 3150–3176, 2014. Tsvetsinskaya, E. A., Mearns, L. O., and Easterling, W. E.: Investigating the effect of seasonal plant growth and development in three-dimensional atmospheric simulations. Part I: Simulation of surface fluxes over the growing season, J. Climate, 14, 692–709, 2001. Turner, A. G. and Annamalai, H.: Climate change and the South Asian summer monsoon, Nature Clim. Change, 2, 587–595, 2012. USDA-I: Crop Information – Crop Descriptions, available at: <a href="http://www.fas.usda.gov/remote/aus_sas/crop_information/Crop_descriptions/in_crops.ht#min_winter_rice">www.fas.usda.gov/remote/</a>, last access: 10 November 2013. USDA-II: Irrigated and rainfed wheat – India, 2013. USDA-II: PECAD-FAS (Production Estimates and Crop Assessment Division of USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service), 2013. Van den Hoof, C., Hanert, E., and Vidale, P. L.: Simulatind dynamic crop growth with an adapted land surface model JULES-SUCROS: model development and validation, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 137–153, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.09.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.09.011</a>, 2011. Van den Hoof, C., Vidale, P. L., Verhoef, A., and Vincke, C.: Improved evaporative flux partitioning and carbon flux in the land surface model JULES: impact on the simulation of land surface processes in temperate Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 181, 108–124, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.011</a>, 2013. van Genuchten, M. T.: a closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, 1980. Van Laar, H., Goudrian, J., and van Keulen, H.: Crop Growth Simulation Model "SUCROS97": Simulation of Crop Growth for Potential and Water-Limited Production Situations as Applied to Spring Wheat. Tech. Rep. AB-DLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1988. Zulkafli, Z., Buytaert, W., Onof, C., Lavado, W., and Guyot, J. L.: A critical assessment of the JULES land surface model hydrology for humid tropical environments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1113–1132, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1113-2013">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1113-2013</a>, 2013a. Zulkafli, Z., Buytaert, W., Onof, C., Manz, B., Tarnavsky, E., Lavado, W., and Guyot, J.-L.: A comparative performance analysis of TRMM 3B42 (TMPA) versions 6 and 7 for hydrological applications over Andean-Amazon river basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 581–592, 2013b.