HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-18-2343-2014 The suitability of remotely sensed soil moisture for improving operational flood forecasting Wanders N. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-5454 1 Karssenberg D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6475-363X 1 de Roo A. 1 2 de Jong S. M. 1 Bierkens M. F. P. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-6562 1 3 Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands European Commission, Join Research Centre, Ispra, Italy Deltares, Utrecht, the Netherlands 24 06 2014 18 6 2343 2357 Copyright: © 2014 N. Wanders et al. 2014 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/18/2343/2014/hess-18-2343-2014.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/18/2343/2014/hess-18-2343-2014.pdf

We evaluate the added value of assimilated remotely sensed soil moisture for the European Flood Awareness System (EFAS) and its potential to improve the prediction of the timing and height of the flood peak and low flows. EFAS is an operational flood forecasting system for Europe and uses a distributed hydrological model (LISFLOOD) for flood predictions with lead times of up to 10 days. For this study, satellite-derived soil moisture from ASCAT (Advanced SCATterometer), AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer - Earth Observing System) and SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) is assimilated into the LISFLOOD model for the Upper Danube Basin and results are compared to assimilation of discharge observations only. To assimilate soil moisture and discharge data into the hydrological model, an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is used. Information on the spatial (cross-) correlation of the errors in the satellite products, is included to ensure increased performance of the EnKF. For the validation, additional discharge observations not used in the EnKF are used as an independent validation data set. <br><br> Our results show that the accuracy of flood forecasts is increased when more discharge observations are assimilated; the mean absolute error (MAE) of the ensemble mean is reduced by 35%. The additional inclusion of satellite data results in a further increase of the performance: forecasts of baseflows are better and the uncertainty in the overall discharge is reduced, shown by a 10% reduction in the MAE. In addition, floods are predicted with a higher accuracy and the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) shows a performance increase of 5–10% on average, compared to assimilation of discharge only. When soil moisture data is used, the timing errors in the flood predictions are decreased especially for shorter lead times and imminent floods can be forecasted with more skill. The number of false flood alerts is reduced when more observational data is assimilated into the system. The added values of the satellite data is largest when these observations are assimilated in combination with distributed discharge observations. These results show the potential of remotely sensed soil moisture observations to improve near-real time flood forecasting in large catchments.

 References Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Dutra, E., Krzeminski, B., Muraro, D., Thielen, J., and Pappenberger, F.: GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1161–1175, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013</a>, 2013. Aon Benfield: Impact Forecasting – June 2013, Global Catastrophe Recap report, <a href="http://www.claimsjournal.com/news/international/2013/07/12/232685.htm">http://www.claimsjournal.com/news/international/2013/07/12/232685.htm</a>, retrieved on 7 October 2013. Bartalis, Z., Kidd, R., and Scipal, K.: Development and implementation of a Discrete Global Grid System for soil moisture retrieval using the MetOp ASCAT scatterometer, in: 1st EPS/MetOp RAO Workshop, ESA SP-618, 15–17 May 2006, Frascati, Italy, 2006. Bisselink, B., van Meijgaard, E., Dolman, A. J., and De Jeu, R. A. M.: Initializing a regional climate model with satellite-derived soil moisture, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D02121, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014534">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014534</a>, 2011. Brier, G.: Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability, Mon. Weather Rev., 78, 1–3, 1950. Brocca, L., Melone, F., Moramarco, T., Wagner, W., Naeimi, V., Bartalis, Z., and Hasenauer, S.: Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1881–1893, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1881-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1881-2010</a>, 2010. Brocca, L., Moramarco, T., Melone, F., Wagner, W., Hasenauer, S., and Hahn, S.: Assimilation of Surface- and Root-Zone ASCAT Soil Moisture Products Into Rainfall Runoff Modeling, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50, 2542–2555, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2177468">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2177468</a>, 2012. Burgers, G., Van Leeuwen, P., and Evensen, G.: Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1719–1724, 1998. Chen, F., Crow, W. T., Starks, P. J., and Moriasi, D. N.: Improving hydrologic predictions of a catchment model via assimilation of surface soil moisture, Adv. Water Resour., 34, 526–536, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.011</a>, 2011. Clark, M. P., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., Zheng, X., Ibbitt, R. P., Slater, A. G., Schmidt, J., and Uddstrom, M. J.: Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1309–1324, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005</a>, 2008. Crow, W. T., Miralles, D. G., and Cosh, M. H.: A Quasi-Global Evaluation System for Satellite-Based Surface Soil Moisture Retrievals, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 48, 2516–2527, 2010. De Jeu, R. A. M., Wagner, W., Holmes, T. R. H., Dolman, A. J., Van de Giesen, N. C., and Friesen, J.: Global Soil Moisture Patterns Observed by Space Borne Microwave Radiometers and Scatterometers, Surv. Geophys., 28, 399–420, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9044-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9044-0</a>, 2008. De Roo, A., Wesseling, C., and Van Deursen, W.: Physically-based river basin modelling within a GIS: The LISFLOOD model., Hydrol. Process., 14, 1981–1992, 2000. Di Baldassarre, G. and Montanari, A.: Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 913–921, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-913-2009">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-913-2009</a>, 2009. Dorigo, W. A., Scipal, K., Parinussa, R. M., Liu, Y. Y., Wagner, W., de Jeu, R. A. M., and Naeimi, V.: Error characterisation of global active and passive microwave soil moisture datasets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2605–2616, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2605-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2605-2010</a>, 2010. Draper, C., Walker, J. P., Steinle, P., De Jeu, R. A. M., and Holmes, T. R. H.: An evaluation of AMSR-E derived soil moisture over Australia, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 703–710, 2009. Draper, C., Mahfouf, J.-F., Calvet, J.-C., Martin, E., and Wagner, W.: Assimilation of ASCAT near-surface soil moisture into the SIM hydrological model over France, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3829–3841, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3829-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3829-2011</a>, 2011. Evensen, G.: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 99, 10143–10162, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JC00572">https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC00572</a>, 1994. Evensen, G.: The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation, Ocean Dynam., 53, 343–367, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9</a>, 2003. Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter for combined state and parameter estimation, IEEE Control Syst., 29, 83–104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2009.932223">https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2009.932223</a>, 2009. Hersbach, H.: Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather Forecast., 15, 559–570, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000. Karssenberg, D., Schmitz, O., Salamon, P., de Jong, K., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: A software framework for construction of process-based stochastic spatio-temporal models and data assimilation, Environ. Model. Softw., 25, 489–502, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.10.004</a>, 2010. Kerr, Y., Waldteufel, P., Richaume, P., Wigneron, J., Ferrazzoli, P., Mahmoodi, A., Al Bitar, A., Cabot, F., Gruhier, C., Juglea, S., Leroux, D., Mialon, A., and Delwart, S.: The SMOS Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm, IEEE. T. Geosci. Remote, 50, 1384–1403, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2184548</a>, 2012. Lee, H., Seo, D.-J., Liu, Y., Koren, V., McKee, P., and Corby, R.: Variational assimilation of streamflow into operational distributed hydrologic models: effect of spatiotemporal scale of adjustment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2233–2251, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2233-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2233-2012</a>, 2012. Loew, A., Holmes, T. R. H., and De Jeu, R. A. M.: The European heat wave 2003: Early indicators from multisensoral microwave remote sensing?, J. Geophys. Res, 114, D05103, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010533">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010533</a>, 2009. Matgen, P., Fenicia, F., Heitz, S., Plaza, D., de Keyser, R., Pauwels, V. R., Wagner, W., and Savenije, H.: Can ASCAT-derived soil wetness indices reduce predictive uncertainty in well-gauged areas? A comparison with in situ observed soil moisture in an assimilation application, Adv. Water Resour., 44, 49–65, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.022">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.022</a>, 2012. Naeimi, V., Scipal, K., Bartalis, Z., Hasenauer, S., and Wagner, W.: An Improved Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm for ERS and METOP Scatterometer Observations, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 47, 1999–2013, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2011617">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2011617</a>, 2009. Nester, T., Komma, J., Viglione, A., and Blöschl, G.: Flood forecast errors and ensemble spread – A case study, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10502, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011649">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011649</a>, 2012. Njoku, E., Jackson, T. J., Lakshmi, V., Chan, T., and Nghiem, S.: Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41, 215–229, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808243">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808243</a>, 2003. Owe, M., De Jeu, R. A. M., and Holmes, T. R. H.: Multisensor historical climatology of satellite-derived global land surface moisture, J. Geophys. Res., 113, F01002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000769">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000769</a>, 2008. Pauwels, V. R., Hoeben, R., Verhoest, N. E., and Troch, F. P. D.: The importance of the spatial patterns of remotely sensed soil moisture in the improvement of discharge predictions for small-scale basins through data assimilation, J. Hydrol., 251, 88–102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00440-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00440-1</a>, 2001. Rakovec, O., Weerts, A. H., Hazenberg, P., Torfs, P. J. J. F., and Uijlenhoet, R.: State updating of a distributed hydrological model with Ensemble Kalman Filtering: effects of updating frequency and observation network density on forecast accuracy, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3435–3449, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3435-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3435-2012</a>, 2012. Santanello, J., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Garcia, M. E., Mocko, D. M., Tischler, M. A., Moran, M. S., and Thoma, D.: Using remotely-sensed estimates of soil moisture to infer soil texture and hydraulic properties across a semi-arid watershed, Remote Sens.f Environ., 110, 79–97, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.007</a>, 2007. Scipal, K., Drusch, M., and Wagner, W.: Assimilation of a ERS scatterometer derived soil moisture index in the ECMWF numerical weather prediction system, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1101–1112, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.04.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.04.013</a>, 2008. Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, L. P. H., de Jong, S. M., van Geer, F. C., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Calibrating a large-extent high-resolution coupled groundwater-land surface model using soil moisture and discharge data, Water Resour. Res., 50, 687–705, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013807">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013807</a>, 2014. Thielen, J., Bartholmes, J., Ramos, M.-H., and de Roo, A.: The European Flood Alert System – Part 1: Concept and development, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 125–140, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-125-2009">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-125-2009</a>, 2009. Van Der Knijff, J. M., Younis, J., and De Roo, A. P. J.: LISFLOOD: a GIS based distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 24, 189–212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658810802549154">https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802549154</a>, 2010. Vrugt, J., Gupta, H., Nualláin, B., and Bouten, W.: Real-time data assimilation for operational ensemble streamflow forecasting, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 548–565, 2006. Wagner, W., Lemoine, G., and Rott, H.: A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data, Remote Sens. Environ., 70, 191–207, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00036-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00036-X</a>, 1999. Wagner, W., Blöschl, G., Pampaloni, P., Calvet, J. C., Bizzarri, B., Wigneron, J. P., and Kerr, Y.: Operational readiness of microwave remote sensing of soil moisture for hydrologic applications, Nord. Hydrol., 30, 1–20, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/nh.2007.029">https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2007.029</a>, 2007. Wanders, N., Karssenberg, D., Bierkens, M., Parinussa, R., de Jeu, R., van Dam, J., and de Jong, S.: Observation uncertainty of satellite soil moisture products determined with physically-based modeling, Remote Sens. Environ., 127, 341–356, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.004</a>, 2012. Wanders, N., Bierkens, M., de Jong, S., de Roo, A., and Karssenberg, D.: The benefits of using remotly sensed soil moisture in parameter identification of large-scale hydrological models, Water Resources Research, submitted, 2013. Wesseling, C., Karssenberg, D., Burrough, P., and Van Deursen, W.: Integrating dynamic environmental models in GIS: The development of a Dynamic Modelling language, Trans. GIS, 1, 40–48, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.1996.tb00032.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.1996.tb00032.x</a>, 1996.