References

HESS

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

HESS

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.

1607-7938

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/hess-17-721-2013

Role of climate forecasts and initial conditions in developing streamflow and soil moisture forecasts in a rainfall–runoff regime

Sinha

¹ Sankarasubramanian

Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA

20 02 2013

17 2 721 733

2013

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/17/721/2013/hess-17-721-2013.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/17/721/2013/hess-17-721-2013.pdf

Skillful seasonal streamflow forecasts obtained from climate and land surface conditions could significantly improve water and energy management. Since climate forecasts are updated on a monthly basis, we evaluate the potential in developing operational monthly streamflow forecasts on a continuous basis throughout the year. Further, basins in the rainfall–runoff regime critically depend on the forecasted precipitation in the upcoming months as opposed to snowmelt regimes where initial hydrological conditions (IHC) play a critical role. The goal of this study is to quantify the role of updated monthly precipitation forecasts and IHC in forecasting 6-month lead monthly streamflow and soil moisture for a rainfall–runoff mechanism dominated basin – Apalachicola River at Chattahoochee, FL. The Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) land surface model is implemented with two forcings: (a) updated monthly precipitation forecasts from ECHAM4.5 Atmospheric General Circulation Model (AGCM) forced with sea surface temperature forecasts and (b) daily climatological ensembles. The difference in skill between the above two quantifies the improvements that could be attainable using the AGCM forecasts. Monthly retrospective streamflow forecasts are developed from 1981 to 2010 and streamflow forecasts estimated from the VIC model are also compared with those predicted by using the principal component regression (PCR) model. The mean square error (MSE) in predicting monthly streamflows, using the VIC model, are compared with the MSE of streamflow climatology under ENSO (El Niño Southern Oscilation) conditions as well as under normal years. Results indicate that VIC forecasts obtained using ECHAM4.5 are significantly better than VIC forecasts obtained using climatological ensembles and PCR models over 2–6 month lead time during winter and spring seasons in capturing streamflow variability and reduced mean square errors. However, at 1-month lead time, streamflow utilizing the climatological forcing scheme outperformed ECHAM4.5 based streamflow forecasts during winter and spring, indicating a dominant role of IHCs up to a 1-month lead time. During ENSO years, streamflow forecasts exhibit better skill even up to a six-month lead time. Comparisons of the seasonal soil moisture forecasts, developed using ECHAM4.5 forcings, with seasonal streamflows also show significant skill, up to a 6-month lead time, in the four seasons.

References 1

Barnston, A. G., Mason, S. J., Goddard, L., Dewitt, D. G., and Zebiak, S. E.: Multimodel ensembling in seasonal climate forecasting at IRI, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1783–1796, 2003.

Cherkauer, K. A. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Simulation of spatial variability in snow and frozen soil. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8858, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003575">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003575</a>, 2003.

Day, G. N.: Extended Streamflow Forecasting Using NWSRFS, J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE, 111, 157–170, 1985.

Devineni, N. and Sankarasubramanian, A.: Improved categorical winter precipitation forecasts through multimodel combinations of coupled GCMs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L24704, 1–22, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044989">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044989</a>, 2010.

Devineni, N., Sankarasubramanian, A., and Ghosh, S.: Multimodel ensembles of streamflow forecasts: Role of predictor state in developing optimal combinations, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09404, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005855">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005855</a>, 2008.

Franz, K. J., Hartmann, H. C., Sorooshian, S., and Bales, R.: Verification of National Weather Service ensemble streamflow predictions for water supply forecasting in the Colorado River basin, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1105–1118, 2003.

Goddard, L., Barnston, A. G., and Mason, S. J.: Evaluation of the IRI's "net assessment" seasonal climate forecasts: 1997–2001, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1761–1781, 2003.

Hamlet, A. F., Huppert, D., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Economic value of long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia River hydropower, J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE, 128, 91–101, 2002.

Koster, R. D., Mahanama, S. P. P., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Reichle, R. H.: Skill in streamflow forecasts derived from large-scale estimates of soil moisture and snow, Nat. Geosci., 3, 613–616, 2010.

Lall, U. and Sharma, A.: A nearest neighbour bootstrap for time series resampling, Water Resour. Res, 32, 679–693, 1996.

Landman, W. A. and Goddard, L.: Statistical recalibration of GCM forecasts over southern Africa using model output statistics, J. Climate, 15, 2038–2055, 2002.

Li, H., Luo, L., Wood, E. F., and Schaake, J.: The role of initial conditions and forcing uncertainties in seasonal hydrologic forecasting, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04114, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010969">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010969</a>, 2009.

Li, S. and Goddard, L.: Retrospective Forecasts with the ECHAM4.5 AGCM, IRI Technical Report, 05–02, available at: <a href="http://iri.columbia.edu/outreach/publication/report/05-02/report05-02.pdf">http://iri.columbia.edu/outreach/publication/report/05-02/report05-02.pdf</a> (last access: 7 July 2012), The Earth Institue, Columbia University, New York, 2005.

Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14415–14428, 1994.

Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Wood, E. F.: One-dimensional statistical dynamic representation of sub-grid spatial variability of precipitation in the two layer variable infiltration capacity model, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21403–21422, 1996.

Lohmann, D., Raschke, E., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Regional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 43, 131–142, 1998a.

Lohmann, D., Raschke, E., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Regional scale hydrology: II. Application of the VIC-2L model to the Weser River, Germany, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 43, 143–158, 1998b.

Luo, L. and Wood, E. F.: Use of Bayesian Merging Techniques in a Multimodel Seasonal Hydrologic Ensemble Prediction System for the Eastern United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 866–884, 2008.

Luo, L., Wood, E. F., and Pan, M.: Bayesian merging of multiple climate model forecasts for seasonal hydrological predictions, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007655">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007655</a>, 2007.

Mahanama, S. and Koster, R.: Intercomparison of soil moisture memory in two land surface models, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1134–1146, 2003.

Mahanama, S., Livneh, B., Koster, R., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Reichle, R.: Soil moisture, snow, and seasonal streamflow forecasts in the United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 189–203, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-046.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-046.1</a>, 2012.

Maurer, E. P. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Predictability of seasonal runoff in the Mississippi River basin, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8607, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002555">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002555</a>, 2003.

Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen, B.: A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous Unites States, J. Climate, 15, 3237–3251, 2002.

Maurer, E. P., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Mantua, N. J.: Variability and potential sources of predictability of North American runoff, Water Resour. Res., 40, W09306, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002789">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002789</a>, 2004.

Oh, J. and Sankarasubramanian, A.: Interannual hydroclimatic variability and its influence on winter nutrients variability over the southeast United States, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, 10935–10971, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-10935-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-10935-2011</a>, 2011.

Prairie, J., Rajagopalan, B., Lall, U., and Fulp, T.: A stochastic nonparametric technique for space-time disaggregation of streamflows, Water Resour. Res., 43, W03432, 1–10, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004721">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004721</a>, 2007.

Ropelewski, C. F. and Halpert, M. S.: Global and Regional Scale Precipitation Patterns Associated with the El-Nino Southern Oscillation, Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 1606–1626, 1987.

Sankarasubramanian, A., Sharma, A., Lall, U., and Espinueva, S.: Role of retrospective forecasts of GCMs forced with persisted SST anomalies in operational streamflow forecasts development, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 212–227, 2008.

Sankarasubramanian, A., Lall, U., Devineni, N., and Espinueva, S.: The Role of Monthly Updated Climate Forecasts in Improving Intraseasonal Water Allocation, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 1464–1482, 2010.

Shukla, S. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Seasonal hydrologic prediction in the United States: understanding the role of initial hydrologic conditions and seasonal climate forecast skill, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3529–3538, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3529-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3529-2011</a>, 2011.

Sinha, T., Cherkauer, K. A., and Mishra, V.: Impacts of historic climate variability on seasonal soil frost in the Midwestern United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 11, 229–252, 2010.

Slack, J. R., Lumb, A., and Landwehr, J. M.: Hydro-Climatic Data Network (HCDN) Streamflow Data Set, 1874–1988, US Geological Survey Report, USGS open-file report, 92–129, available at: <a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri934076/">http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri934076/</a>, 1993.

Tippett, M. K., Anderson, J. L., Bishop, C. H., Hamill, T. M., and Whitaker, J. S.: Ensemble square-root filters, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1485–1490, 2003.

van den Dool, H. M.: Searching for analogues, how long must one wait?, Tellus A, 46, 314–324, 1994.

Voisin, N., Hamlet, A. F., Graham, L. P., Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: The role of climate forecasts in Western US power planning, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 45, 653–673, 2006.

Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Science, Academic Press, 467 pp., San Diego, California, 1995.

Wilks, D. S.: Extending logistic regression to provide full-probability distribution MOS forecasts, Meteor. Appl., 16, 361–368, 2009.

Wilks, D. S. and Hamill, T. M.: Comparison of Ensemble-MOS Methods Using GFS Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 2379–2390, 2007.

Wood, A. W. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: An ensemble approach for attribution of hydrologic prediction uncertainty, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L14401, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034648">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034648</a>, 2008.

Wood, A. W., Maurer, E. P., Kumar, A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the Eastern United States, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4429, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000659">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000659</a>, 2002.

Yao, H. and Georgakakos, A.: Assessment of Folsom Lake response to historical and potential future climate scenarios: 2. Reservoir management, J. Hydrol., 249, 176–196, 2001.

Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., Luo, L., and Pan, M.: A first look at Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2) for hydrological seasonal prediction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13402, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047792">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047792</a>, 2011.