HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-17-4525-2013 Impact of potential and (scintillometer-based) actual evapotranspiration estimates on the performance of a lumped rainfall–runoff model Samain B. 1 Pauwels V. R. N. 2 Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen – Department of Integrated Water Management, Ghent, Belgium Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 14 11 2013 17 11 4525 4540 Copyright: © 2013 B. Samain 2013 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/17/4525/2013/hess-17-4525-2013.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/17/4525/2013/hess-17-4525-2013.pdf

Evapotranspiration (ET) plays a key role in hydrological impact studies and operational flood forecasting models as ET represents a loss of water from a catchment. <br><br> Although ET is a major component of the catchment water balance, the evapotranspiration input for rainfall–runoff models is often simplified in contrast to the detailed estimates of catchment averaged precipitation. <br><br> In this study, an existing conceptual rainfall–runoff model calibrated for and operational in the Bellebeek catchment in Belgium firstly has been validated and its sensitivity to different available potential ET input has been studied. It has been shown that when applying a calibrated rainfall–runoff model, the model input should be consistent with the input used for the calibration process, not only on the volume of ET, but also on the seasonal pattern. Secondly, estimates of the actual evapotranspiration based on measurements of a large aperture scintillometer (LAS) have been used as model forcing in the rainfall–runoff model. From this analysis, it has been shown that the actual evapotranspiration is a crucial factor in simulating the catchment water balance and the resulting stream flow. <br><br> Regarding the actual evapotranspiration estimates from the LAS, it has been concluded that they can be considered realistic in summer months. In the months where stable conditions prevail (autumn, winter and (early) spring), an underestimation of the actual evapotranspiration is made, which has an important impact on the catchment's water balance.

 References Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998. Box, G. and Cox, D.: An analysis of transformations, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., 26, 211–243, 1964. Cabus, P.: River flow prediction through rainfall-runoff modelling with a probability-distributed model (PDM) in Flanders, Belgium, Agr. Water Manage., 95, 859–868, 2008. Ferket, B. V. A., Samain, B., and Pauwels, V. R. N.: Internal validation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using baseflow separation, J. Hydrol., 381, 158–173, 2010. Hartogensis, O., Watts, C., Rodriquez, J.-C., and De Bruin, H. A. R.: Derivation of an effective height for scintillometers: L}a Poza experiment in Northwest Mexico, J. {Hydrometeorol., 4, 915–928, 2003. Moore, R. J.: The PDM rainfall-runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 483–499, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-483-2007">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-483-2007</a>, 2007. Nathan, R. and McMahon, T.: Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses, Water Resour. Res., 26, 1465–1473, 1990. O'Connor, K.: Derivation of discretely coincident forms of continuous linear time-invariant models using the transfer function approach, J. Hydrol., 59, 1–48, 1982. Oudin, L., Andreassian, V., Perrin, C., and Anctil, F.: Locating the sources of low-pass behavior within rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 40, W11101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003291">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003291</a>, 2004. Oudin, L., Hervieu, F., Michel, C., Perrin, C., Andreassian, V., Anctil, F., and Loumagne, C.: Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? Part 2 - Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modelling, J. Hydrol., 303, 290–306, 2005a. Oudin, L., Michel, C., and Anctil, F.: Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? Part 1 - Can rainfall-runoff models effectively handle detailed potential evapotranspiration inputs?, J. Hydrol., 303, 275–289, 2005b. Oudin, L., Perrin, C., Mathevet, T., Andreassian, V., and Michel, C.: Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 320, 62–83, 2006. Penman, H.: Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, 193, 120–146, 1948. Samain, B., Ferket, B., Defloor, W., and Pauwels, V.: Estimation of catchment averaged sensible heat fluxes sing a Large Aperture Scintillometer, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05536, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR009032">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR009032</a>, 2011. Samain, B., Defloor, W., and Pauwels, V.: Continuous time series of catchment-averaged sensible heat flux from a Large Aperture Scintillometer: efficient estimation of stability conditions and importance of fluxes under stable conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 13, 423–442, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-030.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-030.1</a>, 2012a. Samain, B., Simons, G. W. H., Voogt, M. P., Defloor, W., Bink, N.-J., and Pauwels, V. R. N.: Consistency between hydrological model, large aperture scintillometer and remote sensing based evapotranspiration estimates for a heterogeneous catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2095–2107, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2095-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2095-2012</a>, 2012b. Van Steenbergen, N. and Willems, P.: Method for testing the accuracy of rainfall-runoff models in predicting peak flow changes due to rainfall changes, in a climate changing context, J. Hydrol., 414, 425–434, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydrol.2011.11.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydrol.2011.11.017</a>, 2012. Willems, P.: A time series tool to support the multi-criteria performance evaluation of rainfall-runoff models, Environ. Model. Softw., 24, 311–321, 2009.