HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-17-3639-2013 On selection of the optimal data time interval for real-time hydrological forecasting Liu J. 1 2 Han D. 2 State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK 30 09 2013 17 9 3639 3659 Copyright: © 2013 J. Liu 2013 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/17/3639/2013/hess-17-3639-2013.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/17/3639/2013/hess-17-3639-2013.pdf

With the advancement in modern telemetry and communication technologies, hydrological data can be collected with an increasingly higher sampling rate. An important issue deserving attention from the hydrological community is which suitable time interval of the model input data should be chosen in hydrological forecasting. Such a problem has long been recognised in the control engineering community but is a largely ignored topic in operational applications of hydrological forecasting. In this study, the intrinsic properties of rainfall–runoff data with different time intervals are first investigated from the perspectives of the sampling theorem and the information loss using the discrete wavelet transform tool. It is found that rainfall signals with very high sampling rates may not always improve the accuracy of rainfall–runoff modelling due to the catchment low-pass-filtering effect. To further investigate the impact of a data time interval in real-time forecasting, a real-time forecasting system is constructed by incorporating the probability distributed model (PDM) with a real-time updating scheme, the autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) model. Case studies are then carried out on four UK catchments with different concentration times for real-time flow forecasting using data with different time intervals of 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min. A positive relation is found between the forecast lead time and the optimal choice of the data time interval, which is also highly dependent on the catchment concentration time. Finally, based on the conclusions from the case studies, a hypothetical pattern is proposed in three-dimensional coordinates to describe the general impact of the data time interval and to provide implications of the selection of the optimal time interval in real-time hydrological forecasting. Although nowadays most operational hydrological systems still have low data sampling rates (daily or hourly), the future is that higher sampling rates will become more widespread, and there is an urgent need for hydrologists both in academia and in the field to realise the significance of the data time interval issue. It is important that more case studies in different catchments with various hydrological forecasting systems are explored in the future to further verify and improve the proposed hypothetical pattern.

 References Åström, K. J.: On the choice of sampling rates in parametric identification of time series, Information Sciences, 1, 273–278, 1969. Akan, A. O.: Time of concentration of overland flow, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 112, 283–292, 1986. Akan, A. O.: Time of concentration formula for previous catchments, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 115, 733–735, 1989. Bailey, R. and Dobson, C.: Forecasting for floods in the Severn catchment, J. Inst. Water Engrs. Sci., 35, 168–178, 1981, 1981. Bayliss, A.: Flood Estimation Handbook, Volume 5: Catchment descriptors, Wallingford HydroSolutions, Wallingford, UK, ISBN: 0948540931, 1999. Bell, V. A., Carrington, D. S., and Moore, R. J.: Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for flood forecasting, Part 2: Calibration and evaluation of models, R&D Technical Report W242, Environment Agency, UK, 239 pp., 2001. Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M.: Time series analysis forecasting and control, Holden Day, San Francisco, 553 pp., 1970. Bras, R. L.: Sampling of interrelated random fields: the rainfall-runoff case, Water Resour. Res., 15, 1767–1780, 1979. Bras, R. L. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Network design for the estimation of areal mean of rainfall events, Water Resour. Res., 12, 1185–1195, 1976. Chen, S. T. and Yu, P. S.: Real-time probabilistic forecasting of flood stages, J. Hydrol., 340, 63–77, 2007. Cho, J., Mostaghimi, S., Kang, M. S., and Chun, J. A.: Sensitivity to grid and time resolution of hydrology components of Dansat, T Asabe, 52, 1121–1128, 2009. Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W.: Applied hydrology, pp. 27–33, McGraw-Hill, New York, ISBN: 0-07-010810-2, 1988. Clark, M. P. and Kavetski, D.: Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Fidelity and efficiency of time stepping schemes, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10510, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008894">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008894</a>, 2010. Clark, M. P., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., Zheng, X., Ibbitt, R. P., Slater, A. G., Schmidt, J., and Uddstrom, M. J.: Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model, Adv. Water Res., 31, 1309–1324, 2008. Cloke, H. L. and Pappenberger, F.: Ensemble flood forecasting: A review, J. Hydrol., 375, 613–626, 2009. Cluckie, I. D. and Han, D.: Fluvial flood forecasting, Water Environ. J., 14, 270–276, 2000. Cole, S. J. and Moore, R. J.: Hydrological modelling using raingauge- and radar-based estimators of areal rainfall, J. Hydrol., 358, 159–181, 2008. Cole, S. J. and Moore, R. J.: Distributed hydrological modelling using weather radar in gauged and ungauged basins, Adv. Water Res., 32, 1107–1120, 2009. Daubechies, I.: The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis, IEEE Trans. Info. Theor., 36, 961–1005, 1990. Dooge, J. C. I.: Linear theory of hydrologic systems, Technical Bulletin 1468, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, 309 pp., 1973. Duan, Q., Schaake, J., Andreassian, V., Franks, S. W., G. Goteti, H. V. Gupta, Y. M. Gusev, F. Habets, A. Hall, L. Hay, T. Hogue, M. Huang, G. Leavesley, X. Liang, O.N. Nasonova, J. Noilhan, L. Oudin, S. Sorooshian, T. Wagener, and E. F. Wood: Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops, J. Hydrol., 320, 3–17, 2006. Eberhart, R. C. and Kennedy, J.: A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, 39–43, Nagoya, Japan, 1995. Eberhart, R. C. and Shi, Y.: Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In: Proceedings of the 2001 congress in evolutionary computation, 81–86, Seoul, Korea, 2001. Finnerty, B. D., Smith, M. B., Seo, D. J., Koren, V., and Moglen, G. E.: Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs, J. Hydrol., 203, 21–38, 1997. Freer, J., Beven, K. J., and Ambroise, B.: Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2161–2173, 1996. Gupta, V. K. and Sorooshian, S.: The relationship between data and the precision of estimated parameters, J. Hydrol., 85, 57–77, 1985a. Gupta, V. K. and Sorooshian, S.: The automatic calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative-based optimization algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 21, 473–486, 1985b. Hall, M. J.:How well does your model fit the data?, J. Hydroinform., 3, 49–55, 2001. Han, D., Kwong, T., and Li, S.: Uncertainties in real-time flood forecasting with neural networks, Hydrol. Proc., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6184">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6184</a>, 21, 223–228, 2007. Houghton-Carr, H.: Flood Estimation Handbook, Volume 4: Restatement and application of the Flood Studies Report rainfall-runoff method, Wallingford HydroSolutions, Wallingford, UK, ISBN: 0948540931, 1999. Kavetski, D. and Clark, M. P.: Ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling: 2. Impact of time stepping schemes on model analysis and prediction, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10511, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008896">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008896</a>, 2010. Kavetski, D., Fenicia, F., and Clark, M. P.: Impact of temporal data resolution on parameter inference and model identification in conceptual hydrological modeling: Insights from an experimental catchment, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05501, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009525">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009525</a>, 2011. Komma, J., Bloschl, G., and Reszler, C.: Soil moisture updating by ensemble Kalman filtering in real-time flood forecasting, J. Hydrol., 357, 228–242, 2007. Krzysztofowicz, R.: Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2739–2750, 1999. Krzysztofowicz, R.: Probabilistic flood forecast: bounds and approximations, J. Hydrol., 268, 41–55, 2002. Labat, D., Ababou, R., and Mangin, A.: Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs, Part II: continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multiresolution analyses, J. Hydrol., 238, 149–178, 2000. Lin, C. A., Wen, L., Béland, M., and Chaumont, D.: A coupled atmospheric-hydrological modeling study of the 1996 Ha! Ha! River basin flash flood in Quebec, Canada, Geogr. Res. Lett., 29, 13/1–13/4, 2002. Lin, C. A., Wen, L., Lu, G., Wu, Z., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Zhu, Y., and Tong, L.: Atmospheric-hydrological modelling of severe precipitation and floods in the Huaihe River Basin, China, J. Hydrol., 330, 249–259, 2006. Lin, C. A., Wen, L., Lu, G., Wu, Z., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Zhu, Y., and Tong, L.: Real-time forecast of the 2005 and 2007 summer severe floods in the Huaihe River Basin of China, J. Hydrol., 381, 33–41, 2010. Littlewood, I. G. and Croke, B. F. W.: Data time-step dependency of conceptual rainfall-streamflow model parameters: An empirical study with implications for regionalization, Hydrol. Sci. J., 53, 685–695, 2008. Liu, J. and Han, D.: Indices for calibration data selection of the rainfall-runoff model, Water Resour. Res., 46, W04512, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008668">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008668</a>, 2010. Ljung, L.: System Identification – Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, ISBN: 0-13-881640, 1987. Ljung, L., Wahlberg, B., and Söderström, T.: On sampling and reconstruction of continuous time stochastic systems, in: Proceedings of the 9th IFAC/IFORS Symposium on System Identification and System Parameter Estimation, Budapest, edited by: Bányász, C. and Keviczky, L., 1174–1178, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991. Ljung, L.: System Identification – Theory for the User (2nd Edition), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, ISBN: 0-13-656695-2, 1999. Madsen, H. and Skotner, C.: Adaptive state updating in real-time river flow forecasting – a combined filtering and error forecasting procedure, J. Hydrol., 308, 302–312, 2005. Mallat, S.: A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 11, 674–693, 1989. Mantovan, P. and Todini, E.: Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 330, 368–381, 2006. Merz, R., Parajka, J., and Blöschl, G.: Scale effects in conceptual hydrological modeling, Water Resour. Res., 45, W09405, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007872">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007872</a>, 2009. Merz, R., Parajka, J., and Blöschl, G.: Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses, Water Resour. Res., 47, W02531, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009505">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009505</a>, 2011. Meyer, Y.: Wavelets: Algorithms and Applications, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1993. Mitchell, D. P. and Netravali, A. N.: Reconstruction filters in computer-graphics, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 22, 221–228, 1988. Moore, R. J.: Transfer functions, noise predictors and the forecasting of flood events in real-time, In: Statistical analysis of rainfall and runoff, edited by: Singh, V. P., 229–250, Water Resources Publication, Littleton, Colorado, USA, 1982. Moore, R. J.: The PDM rainfall-runoff model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 483–499, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-483-2007">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-483-2007</a>, 2007. Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: sequential data assimilation using the particle filter, Water Resour. Res., 41, W05012, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.029/2004WR003604">https://doi.org/10.029/2004WR003604</a>, 2005. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting using conceptual models, Part 1: a discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 280–290, 1970. Nyquist, H.: Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory, Trans. AIEE, 47, 617–644, 1928. Nyquist, H.: Classic paper: Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory, Proc. IEEE, 90, 280–305, 2002. O'Connor, K. M.: Derivation of discretely coincident forms of continuous linear time-invariant models using the transfer function approach, J. Hydrol., 59, 1-48, 1982. Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Anctil, F.: Locating the sources of low-pass behaviour within rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 40, W11101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003291">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003291</a>, 2004. Polikar, R.: The story of wavelets, in: Physics and Modern Topics in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, edited by: Mastorakis, N., 192–197, World Scientific and Engineering Academic Society Press, Athens, Greece, 1999. Refsgaard, J. C.: Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting, Nordic Hydrol., 28, 65–84, 1997. Remesan, R., Ahmadi, A., Shamim, M. A., and Han, D.: Effect of data time interval on real-time flood forecasting, J. Hydroinform., 12, 396–407, 2010. Schaake, J. C., Koren, V. I., Duan, Q. Y., Mitchell, K., and Chen, F.: Simple water balance model for estimating runoff at different spaatial and temporal scales, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 7461–7475, 1996. Schellekens, J., Weerts, A. H., Moore, R. J., Pierce, C. E., and Hildon, S.: The use of MOGREPS ensemble rainfall forecasts in operational flood forecasting systems across England and Wales, Adv. Geosci., 29, 77–84, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-29-77-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-29-77-2011</a>, 2011. Sene, K., Weerts, A. H., Beven, K., Moore, R. J., Whitlow, C., and Young, P.: Risk-based Probabilistic Fluvial Flood Forecasting for Integrated Catchment Models, Phase 1, Science Report: SC080030/SR1, Environment Agency, UK, 2009. Sene, K., Weerts, A. H., Beven, K., Moore, R. J., Whitlow, C., Beckers, J., Minett, A., Winsemius, H. C., Verkade, J., Young, P., Leedall, D., Smith, P., Cole, S., Robson, A., Howard, P., Huband, M. and Breton, N.: Risk-based Probabilistic Fluvial Flood Forecasting for Integrated Catchment Models, Phase 2, Science Report: SC080030/SR2, Environment Agency, UK, 2010. Shannon, C. E. Communication in the presence of noise, Proc. Institute of Radio Engineers, 37, 10–21, 1949. Shannon, C. E.: Classic paper: Communication in the presence of noise, Proc. IEEE, 86, 447–457, 1998. Storm, B., Hogh Jensen, K., and Refsgaard, J. C.: Estimation of catchment rainfall uncertainty and its influence on runoff prediction, Nordic Hydrol., 19, 77–88, 1989. Tamea, S., Laio, F., and Ridolfi, L.: Probabilistic nonlinear prediction of river flows, Water Resour. Res., 41, W09421, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004136">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004136</a>, 2005. Tang, Y., Reed, P., Wagener, T., and van Werkhoven, K.: Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 793–817, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-793-2007">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-793-2007</a>, 2007. Tokar, A. S. and Markus, M.: Precipitation-runoff modelling using artificial neural network and conceptual models, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 156–161, 2000. Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., McGlynn, B. L., Harman, C. J., Gupta, H. V., Kumar, P., Rao, P. S. C., Basu, N. B., and Wilson, J. S.: The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05301, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008906">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008906</a>, 2010. Wang, Y., He, B., and Takase, K.: Effects of temporal resolution on hydrological model parameters and its impact on prediction of river discharge, Hydrol. Sci. J., 54, 886–898, 2009. Weerts, A. H., and El Serafy, G. Y. H.: Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 42, W09403, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004093">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004093</a>, 2006. Weerts, A. H., Winsemius, H. C. and Verkade, J. S.: Estimation of predictive hydrological uncertainty using quantile regression: Examples from the National Flood Forecasting System (England and Wales), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 255–265, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-255-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-255-2011</a>, 2011. Werner, M., Cranston, M., Harrison, T., Whitfield, D., and Schellekens, J.: Recent developments in operational flood forecasting in England, Wales and Scotland, Meteorol. Appl., 16, 13–22, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/met.124">https://doi.org/10.1002/met.124</a>, 2009. Wilby, R., Greenfield, B., and Glenny, C.: A coupled synoptic-hydrological model for climate change impact assessment, J. Hydrol., 153, 256–290, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90195-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90195-3</a>, 1994. Wood, A. W. and Schaake, J. C.: Correcting errors in streamflow forecast ensemble mean and spread, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 132–148, 2008. Young, P. C.: Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis: An Introduction for the Student and Practitioner, 2nd Edition., 504 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN: 978-3-642-21981-8, 2011.