Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 267–285, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-267-2012
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 267–285, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-267-2012

Research article 02 Feb 2012

Research article | 02 Feb 2012

Hydrological response of a small catchment burned by experimental fire

C. R. Stoof1,2,3,4, R. W. Vervoort3, J. Iwema5, E. van den Elsen6, A. J. D. Ferreira2, and C. J. Ritsema1,6 C. R. Stoof et al.
  • 1Land Degradation and Development Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • 2CERNAS, Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra. Bencanta, 3040-316 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 3Faculty of Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • 4Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
  • 5Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • 6Alterra Green World Research, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Abstract. Fire can considerably change hydrological processes, increasing the risk of extreme flooding and erosion events. Although hydrological processes are largely affected by scale, catchment-scale studies on the hydrological impact of fire in Europe are scarce, and nested approaches are rarely used. We performed a catchment-scale experimental fire to improve insight into the drivers of fire impact on hydrology. In north-central Portugal, rainfall, canopy interception, streamflow and soil moisture were monitored in small shrub-covered paired catchments pre- and post-fire. The shrub cover was medium dense to dense (44 to 84%) and pre-fire canopy interception was on average 48.7% of total rainfall. Fire increased streamflow volumes 1.6 times more than predicted, resulting in increased runoff coefficients and changed rainfall-streamflow relationships – although the increase in streamflow per unit rainfall was only significant at the subcatchment-scale. Fire also fastened the response of topsoil moisture to rainfall from 2.7 to 2.1 h (p = 0.058), and caused more rapid drying of topsoils after rain events. Since soil physical changes due to fire were not apparent, we suggest that changes resulting from vegetation removal played an important role in increasing streamflow after fire. Results stress that fire impact on hydrology is largely affected by scale, highlight the hydrological impact of fire on small scales, and emphasize the risk of overestimating fire impact when upscaling plot-scale studies to the catchment-scale. Finally, they increase understanding of the processes contributing to post-fire flooding and erosion events.

Download