HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-16-2547-2012 Modifying a dynamic global vegetation model for simulating large spatial scale land surface water balances Tang G. 1 Bartlein P. J. 2 Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USA Department of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA 07 08 2012 16 8 2547 2565 Copyright: © 2012 G. Tang 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/16/2547/2012/hess-16-2547-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/16/2547/2012/hess-16-2547-2012.pdf

Satellite-based data, such as vegetation type and fractional vegetation cover, are widely used in hydrologic models to prescribe the vegetation state in a study region. Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVM) simulate land surface hydrology. Incorporation of satellite-based data into a DGVM may enhance a model's ability to simulate land surface hydrology by reducing the task of model parameterization and providing distributed information on land characteristics. The objectives of this study are to (i) modify a DGVM for simulating land surface water balances; (ii) evaluate the modified model in simulating actual evapotranspiration (ET), soil moisture, and surface runoff at regional or watershed scales; and (iii) gain insight into the ability of both the original and modified model to simulate large spatial scale land surface hydrology. To achieve these objectives, we introduce the "LPJ-hydrology" (LH) model which incorporates satellite-based data into the Lund-Potsdam-Jena (LPJ) DGVM. To evaluate the model we ran LH using historical (1981–2006) climate data and satellite-based land covers at 2.5 arc-min grid cells for the conterminous US and for the entire world using coarser climate and land cover data. We evaluated the simulated ET, soil moisture, and surface runoff using a set of observed or simulated data at different spatial scales. Our results demonstrate that spatial patterns of LH-simulated annual ET and surface runoff are in accordance with previously published data for the US; LH-modeled monthly stream flow for 12 major rivers in the US was consistent with observed values respectively during the years 1981–2006 (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > 0.46, <i>p</i> < 0.01; Nash-Sutcliffe Coefficient > 0.52). The modeled mean annual discharges for 10 major rivers worldwide also agreed well (differences < 15%) with observed values for these rivers. Compared to a degree-day method for snowmelt computation, the addition of the solar radiation effect on snowmelt enabled LH to better simulate monthly stream flow in winter and early spring for rivers located at mid-to-high latitudes. In addition, LH-modeled monthly soil moisture for the state of Illinois (US) agreed well (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.79, <i>p</i> < 0.01) with observed data for the years 1984–2001. Overall, this study justifies both the feasibility of incorporating satellite-based land covers into a DGVM and the reliability of LH to simulate land-surface water balances. To better estimate surface/river runoff at mid-to-high latitudes, we recommended that LPJ-DGVM considers the effects of solar radiation on snowmelt.

 References Anderson, R. M., Koren, V. I., and Reed, S. M.: Using SSURGO data to improve Sacramento Model a priori parameter estimates, J. Hydrol., 320, 103–116, 2006. Arora, V.: The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff, J. Hydrol., 265, 164–177, 2002. Arora, V. and Boer, G.: The temporal variability of soil moisture and surface hydrological quantities in a climate model, J. Climate., 19, 5875–5888, 2006. Betts, R. A., Boucher, O., Collins, M., Cox, P. M., Falloon, P. D., Gedney, G., Hemming, D. L., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D., Sexton, D. M. H., and Webb, M. J.: Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide, Nature, 448, 1037–1041, 2007. Boegh, E., Thorsen, M., Butts, M. B., Hansen, S., Christiansen, J. S., Abrahamsen, P., Hasager, C. B., Jensen, N. O., van der Keur, P., Refsgaard, J. C., Schelde, K., Soegaard, H., and Thomsen, A.: Incorporating remote sensing data in physically based distributed agro-hydrological modeling, J. Hydrol., 287{,} 279–299, 2004. Bowen, I. S.: The ratio of heat losses by conduction and by evapotranspiration from any water surface, Phys. Rev., 27, 779–787, 1926. Brabson, B. B., Lister, D. H., Jones, P. D., and Palutikof, J. P.: Soil moisture and predicted spells of extreme temperatures in Britain, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D05104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005156">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005156</a>, 2005. Brovkin, V., van Bodegom, P. M., Kleinen, T., Wirth, C., Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., and Kattge, J.: Plant-driven variation in decomposition rates improves projections of global litter stock distribution, Biogeosciences, 9, 565–576, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-565-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-565-2012</a>, 2012. Brunel, J. P., Ihab, J., Droubi, A. M., and Samaan, S.: Energy budget and actual evapotranspiration of an arid oasis ecosystem: Palmyra (Syria), Agr. Water Manage., 84, 213–220, 2006. Campo, L., Caparrini, F., and Castelli, F.: Use of multi-platform, multi-temporal remote-sensing data for calibration of a distributed hydrological model: an application in the Arno basin, Italy. Hydrol. Process., 20{,} 2693–2712, 2006. Cogley, J. G.: GGHYDRO – Global Hydrographic Data, Release 2.2. Trent Climate Note 98-1. Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, 1998. Daly, C., Taylor, G. H., Gibson, W. P., Parzybok, T. W., Johnson, G. L., and Pasteris, P.: High-quality spatial climate data sets for the United States and beyond, T. Am. Soc. Agri. Eng., 43, 1957–1962, 2000. Daly, C., Gibson, W. P., Taylor, G. H., Johnson, G. L., and Pasteris, P.: A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate, Clim. Res., 22, 99–113, 2002. Döll, P., Kaspar, F., and Lehner, B.: A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model running and validation, J. Hydrol., 270, 105–134, 2003. Engstrom, R., Hope, A., Kwon, H., Harazono, Y., Mano, M., and Oechel, W.: Modeling evapotranspiration in Arctic coastal plain ecosystems using a modified BIOME-BGC model, J. Geophys. Res-Biogeo., 111, G02021, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000102">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000102</a>, 2006. Entin, J. K.: Spatial and temporal scales of soil moisture variations. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, 125&nbsp;pp. 1998. Entin, J. K., Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., Hollinger, S. E., Liu, S., and Namkhai, A.: Temporal and spatial scales of observed soil moisture variations in the extratropics, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11865–11877, 2000. Evans, S. and Trevisan, M.: A soil water-balance bucket model for paleoclimatic purposes. 1. model structure and validation, Ecol. Model., 82, 109–129, 1995. Fekete, B. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., and Grabs, W.: Global composite runoff fields of observed river discharge and simulated water balances, Report No. 22, Global Runoff Data Centre, Koblenz, 1999. Fekete, B. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., and Grabs, W.: High-resolution fields of global runoff fields of observed river discharge and simulated water balances, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 16, 1042, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999gb001254">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gb001254</a>, 2002. German, E. R.: Regional evaluation of evapotranspiration in the Everglades: US Geological Survey Investigations Report 00-4217, 48 pp., 2000. Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S., Haberlandt, U., Lucht, W., and Sitch, S.: Terrestrial vegetation and water balance – hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model, J. Hydrol., 286, 249–270, 2004. Glenn, E. P., Huete, A. R., Nagler, P. L., Hirschboeck, K. K., and Brown, P.: Integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration, CRC Cr. Rev. Plant Sci., 26, 139–168, 2007. Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., and Sohlberg, R.: Global land cover classification at 1km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach, Int. J. Remote Sens., 21, 1331–1364, 2000. Hansen, M., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., Carroll, M., Dimiceli, C., and Sohlberg, R. A.: Global percent tree cover at a spatial resolution of 500 meters: first results of the MODIS vegetation continuous fields algorithm, Earth Interac., 7, 1–15, 2003. Haxeltine, A. and Prentice, I. C.: BIOME3: An equilibrium biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability and competition among plant functional types, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 10, 693–709, 1996. Hollinger, S. E. and Isard, S. A.: A soil moisture climatology of Illinois, J. Climate, 7, 822–833, 1994. Huang, J., Van Den Dool, H. M., and Georgakakos, K. P.: Analysis of model-calculated soil moisture over the United States, 1931–1993, and applications to long-range temperature forecasts, J. Climate., 9, 1350–1362, 1996. Kane, D. L., ASCE, M., Gieck, R. E., and Hinzman, L. D.: Snowmelt modeling at small Alaskan arctic watershed, J. Hydrol. Eng., 2, 204–210, 1997. Kergoat, L.: A model for hydrological equilibrium of leaf area index on a global scale, J. Hydrol., 213, 268–286, 1998. Kergoat, L., Lafont, S., Douville, H., Berthelot, B., Dedieu, G., Planton, S., and Royer, J. F.: Impact of doubled CO<sub>2</sub> on global-scale leaf area index and evapotranspiration: Conflicting stomatal conductance and LAI responses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4808, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001245">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001245</a>, 2002. Khan, S. I., Hong, Y., Wang, J., Yilmaz, K. K., Gourley, J. J., Adler, R. F., Brakenridge, G. R., Policelli, F., Habib, S., and Irwin, D.: Satellite Remote Sensing and Hydrologic Modeling for Flood Inundation Mapping in Lake Victoria Basin: Implications for Hydrologic Prediction in Ungauged Basins, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote., 49, 85–95, 2011. Kosugi, Y. and Katsuyama, M.: Evapotranspiration over a Japanese cypress forest. II. Comparison of the eddy covariance and water budget methods, J. Hydrol., 334, 305–311, 2007. Lehner, B., Verdin, K., and Jarvis, A.: HydroSHEDS Technical Documentation. World Wildlife Fund US, Washington, DC, available at: <a href="http://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov">http://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov</a>, 2006. Leipprand, A. and Gerten, D.: Global effects of doubled atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> content on evapotranspiration, soil moisture and runoff under potential natural vegetation, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 51, 171–185, 2006. Liu, J. and Yang, H.: Spatially explicit assessment of global consumptive water uses in cropland: Green and blue water, J. Hydrol., 384, 187–197, 2010. Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S. G., and Amatya, D. M.: Modeling actual evapotranspiration from forested watersheds across the Southeastern United States, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 39, 887–896, 2003. Manabe, S. and Delworth, T.: The temporal variability of soil wetness and its impact on climate, Climatic Change, 16, 185–192, 1990. Miller, D. A. and White, R. A.: A conterminous United States multilayer soil characteristics dataset for regional climate and hydrology modeling, Earth Interact., 2, 1–26, 1998. Milly, P. C. D. and Shmakin, A. B.: Global modeling of land water and energy balances. Part I: the land dynamics (LaD) model, J. Hydrometeorol., 3{,} 283–299, 2002. Mitchell, T. D. and Jones, P. D.: An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 693–712, 2005. Montzka, C., Canty, M., Kunkel, R., Menz, G., Vereecken, H., and Wendland, F.: Modelling the water balance of a mesoscale catchment basin using remotely sensed land cover data, J. Hydrol., 353, 322–334, 2008. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L.: Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations, T. ASABE, 50, 885–900, 2007. Müller, C., Bondeau, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Cramer, W., and Lucht, W.: Comparative impact of climatic and nonclimatic factors on global terrestrial carbon and water cycles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB4015, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002742">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002742</a>, 2006. Murphy, S. and Lodge, G.: Surface soil water dynamics in pastures in northern New South Wales. 1. Use of electrical resistance sensors, Aust. J. Exp. Agr., 44, 273–281, 2004. Murray, S. J., Foster, P. N., and Prentice, I. C.: Evaluation of global continental hydrology as simulated by the Land-surface Processes and eXchanges Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 91–105, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-91-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-91-2011</a>, 2011. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, 1970. O'Donnell, G. M., Czajkowski, K. P., Dubayah, R. O., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Macroscale hydrological modeling using remotely sensed inputs: Application to the Ohio River basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 12499–12516, 2000. Paola, C.: Simplicity versus complexity, Nature, 469, 38–39, 2011. Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., Ellsworth, D. S., Vose, J. M., Volin, J. C., Gresham, C., and Bowman W. D.: Relationships of leaf dark respirations to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups, Oecologia, 114, 471–482, 1998. Rim, C. S.: Estimating evapotranspiration from small watersheds using a water and energy balance approach, Hydrol. Process., 22, 703–714, 2008. Robock, A. and Li, H.: Solar dimming and CO<sub>2</sub> effects on soil moisture trends, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L20708, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027585">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027585</a>, 2006. Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., Srinivasan, G., Entin, J. K., Hollinger, S. E., Speranskaya, N. A., Liu, S., and Namkhai, A.: The Global Soil Moisture Data Bank, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 1281–1299, 2000. Rost, S., Gerten, D., Bondeau, A., Lucht, W., Rohwer, J., and Schaphoff, S.: Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09405, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006331">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006331</a>, 2008. Schlesinger, M. E. and Malyshev, S.: Changes in near-surface temperature and sea level for the Post-SRES CO<sub>2</sub>-stabilization scenarios, Integrat. Ass., 2, 95–110, 2001. Shukla, J. and Mintz, Y.: Influence of land-surface evapotranspiration on earth's climate, Science, 215, 1498–1501, 1982. Sitch, S., Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., Arneth, A., Bondeau, A., Cramer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Levis, S., Lucht, W., Sykes, M. T., Thonicke, K., and Venevsky, S.: Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Glob. Change Biol. 9, 161–185, 2003. Smith, B., Prentice, I. C., and Sykes, M. T.: Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modeling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 10, 621–637, 2001. Tang, G. and Beckage, B.: Projecting the distribution of forests in New England in response to climate change, Divers. Distrib., 16, 144–158, 2010. Vörösmarty, C. J., Federer, C. A., and Schloss, A. L.: Potential evaporation functions compared on US watersheds: Possible implications for global-scale water balance and terrestrial ecosystem modeling, J. Hydrol., 207, 147–169, 1998. Wramneby, A., Smith, B., Zaehle, S., and Sykes, M. T.: Parameter uncertainties in the modeling of vegetation dynamics – Effects of on tree community structure and ecosystem functioning in European forest biomes, Ecol. Model., 216, 277–290, 2008. Yates, D., Purkey, D., Sieber, J., Huber-Lee, A., Galbraith, H., West, J., Herrod-Julius, S., Young, C., Joyce, B., and Rayej, M.: Climate Driven Water Resources Model of the Sacramento Basin, California. J. Water Res. Pl-ASCE, 1355, 303–313, 2009. Zaehle, S., Sitch, S., Smith, B., and Hatterman, F.: Effects of parameter uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB3020, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002395">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002395</a>, 2005.