HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-16-2393-2012 Moving university hydrology education forward with community-based geoinformatics, data and modeling resources Merwade V. 1 Ruddell B. L. 2 Assistant Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA Assistant Professor, Department of Engineering, College of Technology and Innovation, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, USA 02 08 2012 16 8 2393 2404 Copyright: © 2012 V. Merwade 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/16/2393/2012/hess-16-2393-2012.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/16/2393/2012/hess-16-2393-2012.pdf

In this opinion paper, we review recent literature related to data and modeling driven instruction in hydrology, and present our findings from surveying the hydrology education community in the United States. This paper presents an argument that that data and modeling driven geoscience cybereducation (DMDGC) approaches are essential for teaching the conceptual and applied aspects of hydrology, as a part of the broader effort to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education at the university level. The authors have undertaken a series of surveys and a workshop involving university hydrology educators to determine the state of the practice of DMDGC approaches to hydrology. We identify the most common tools and approaches currently utilized, quantify the extent of the adoption of DMDGC approaches in the university hydrology classroom, and explain the community's views on the challenges and barriers preventing DMDGC approaches from wider use. DMDGC approaches are currently emphasized at the graduate level of the curriculum, and only the most basic modeling and visualization tools are in widespread use. The community identifies the greatest barriers to greater adoption as a lack of access to easily adoptable curriculum materials and a lack of time and training to learn constantly changing tools and methods. The community's current consensus is that DMDGC approaches should emphasize conceptual learning, and should be used to complement rather than replace lecture-based pedagogies. Inadequate online material publication and sharing systems, and a lack of incentives for faculty to develop and publish materials via such systems, is also identified as a challenge. Based on these findings, we suggest that a number of steps should be taken by the community to develop the potential of DMDGC in university hydrology education, including formal development and assessment of curriculum materials, integrating lecture-format and DMDGC approaches, incentivizing the publication by faculty of excellent DMDGC curriculum materials, and implementing the publication and dissemination cyberinfrastructure necessary to support the unique DMDGC digital curriculum materials.

 References Abbott, M. B., Solomatine, D., Minns, A. W., and Van Nievelt, W.: Educating and training in hydroinformatics, J. Hydraul. Res., 32, Iss.&nbsp;sup.&nbsp;1, 1994. Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Lynch, C. A., Oblinger, D. G., Pea, R. D., Salen, K., Smith, M. S., and Szalay, A.: Forthcoming, Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge, A 21st&nbsp;Century Agenda for the National Science Foundation, Report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning, Office of Cyberinfrastructure and Directorate for Education and Human Resources: National Science Foundation, <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/index.jsp">http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/index.jsp</a> (last access: July&nbsp;2012), 2008. Boyer, E. L.: Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professorate, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1990. DiSessa, A.: Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000. Duderstadt, J. J.: Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education, Millennium Project, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007. Estes, A. C., Welch, R. W., and Ressler, S. J.: The ExCEEd Teaching Model, J. Prof. Issue. Eng. Educ. Pract., 131, 218–222, 2005. Jonoski, A. and Popescu, I.: Distance Learning in Support of Water Resources Management: An Online Course on Decision Support Systems in River Basin Management, Water Resour. Manage., 26, 1287–1305, 2012. Kaput, J., Hegedus, S., and Lesh, R., Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education, in: Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education, edited by: Lesh, R., Hamilton, E., and Kaput, J., Routledge, London, 173-192, 2007. Lesko, C. J.: Blending on-campus and online experiences through the use of virtually immersive technologies, J. Online Eng. Educ., 2, 1–10, 2011. Manduca, C., Baer, E., Hancock, G., Macdonald, R. H., Patterson, S., Savina, M., and Wenner, J.: Making Undergraduate Geoscience Quantitative, EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, v.&nbsp;89, no.&nbsp;16, 2008. McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., and Wieman, C. E.: Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys., 76, 406–417, 2008. Melsa, J. L., Rajala, S. A., and Mohsen, J. P.: Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education, J. Eng. Educ., 98, 209, 2009. Molkenthin, F., Holz, P. K., Belleudy, P., Jozsa, J., Price, R. K., and van der Veer, P.: HydroWeb: WWW based collaborative engineering in hydroscience – a European education experiment in the Internet, J. Hydroinform., 3, 239–243, 2001. Morell, L. and DeBoer, J.: The Engineering Professor of 2020: the Forgotten Variable, ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Louisville, Kentucky June&nbsp;2010 AND ASEE Global Colloquium of Engineering Education Proceedings, Singapore, October&nbsp;2010. National Academy of Engineering: Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, The National Academics Press, Washington, DC, 2005. National Academies of Science: The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine: Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future.,The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007. NSF Cyberinfrastructure Council: Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21st&nbsp;Century Discovery, National Science Foudnation, <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/index.jsp">http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/index.jsp</a> (last access: July&nbsp;2012), 2007. Popescu, I., Jonoski, A., Bhattacharya, B., and Keuls, C.: On-Line Competence Based Learning in Hydroinformatics at UNESCO-IHE, Proceedings of the 8th&nbsp;International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Concepción, Chile, January&nbsp;2009. Popescu, I., Jonoski, A., and Bhattacharya, B.: Experiences from online and classroom education in hydroinformatics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 1311–1333, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-1311-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-1311-2012</a>, 2012. Price, R. K., Popescu, I., Jonoski, A., and Solomatine, D. P.: Fifteen years of experience in hydroinformatics at UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Proceedings of the 7th&nbsp;International Conference in Hydroinformatics, Nice, France, Research Publishing, 3101–3108, 2006. Price, R. K., Bhattacharya, B., Popescu, I., and Jonoski, A.: Flood modelling for management: UNESCO-IHE's online course in hydrology, (link to the bulletin issue) World Meteorological Organisation Bulletin&nbsp;56, 102–106, WMO, also see <a href="http://www.unesco-ihe.org/Flood-Management-Education-Platform/Flood-Modelling-for-Management2">http://www.unesco-ihe.org/Flood-Management-Education-Platform/Flood-Modelling-for-Management2</a>, (last access: 18&nbsp;May&nbsp;2012), 2007. Special Report: The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education, Washington, DC, J. Eng Educ., 95, 259–261, 2006. Wagener, T., Weiler, M., McGlynn, B., Gooseff, M., Meixner, T., Marshall, L., McGuire, K., and McHale, M.: Taking the pulse of hydrology education, Hydrol.l Process., 21, 1789–1792, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6766">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6766</a>, 2007.