HESS Hydrology and Earth System Sciences HESS Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1607-7938 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/hess-14-2099-2010 Modeling the monthly mean soil-water balance with a statistical-dynamical ecohydrology model as coupled to a two-component canopy model Kochendorfer J. P. 1 Ramírez J. A. 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA 27 10 2010 14 10 2099 2120 Copyright: © 2010 J. P. Kochendorfer 2010 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/14/2099/2010/hess-14-2099-2010.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/14/2099/2010/hess-14-2099-2010.pdf

The statistical-dynamical annual water balance model of Eagleson (1978) is a pioneering work in the analysis of climate, soil and vegetation interactions. This paper describes several enhancements and modifications to the model that improve its physical realism at the expense of its mathematical elegance and analytical tractability. In particular, the analytical solutions for the root zone fluxes are re-derived using separate potential rates of transpiration and bare-soil evaporation. Those potential rates, along with the rate of evaporation from canopy interception, are calculated using the two-component Shuttleworth-Wallace (1985) canopy model. In addition, the soil column is divided into two layers, with the upper layer representing the dynamic root zone. The resulting ability to account for changes in root-zone water storage allows for implementation at the monthly timescale. This new version of the Eagleson model is coined the Statistical-Dynamical Ecohydrology Model (SDEM). The ability of the SDEM to capture the seasonal dynamics of the local-scale soil-water balance is demonstrated for two grassland sites in the US Great Plains. Sensitivity of the results to variations in peak green leaf area index (LAI) suggests that the mean peak green LAI is determined by some minimum in root zone soil moisture during the growing season. That minimum appears to be close to the soil matric potential at which the dominant grass species begins to experience water stress and well above the wilting point, thereby suggesting an ecological optimality hypothesis in which the need to avoid water-stress-induced leaf abscission is balanced by the maximization of carbon assimilation (and associated transpiration). Finally, analysis of the sensitivity of model-determined peak green LAI to soil texture shows that the coupled model is able to reproduce the so-called "inverse texture effect", which consists of the observation that natural vegetation in dry climates tends to be most productive in sandier soils despite their lower water holding capacity. Although the determination of LAI based on complete or near-complete utilization of soil moisture is not a new approach in ecohydrology, this paper demonstrates its use for the first time with a new monthly statistical-dynamical model of the water balance. Accordingly, the SDEM provides a new framework for studying the controls of soil texture and climate on vegetation density and evapotranspiration.

 References Bond, J. J. and Willis, W. O.: Soil water evaporation: surface residue rate and placement effects, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Pro., 33, 445–448, 1969. Braud, I., Dantasantonino, A. C., Vauclin, M., Thony, J. L., and Ruelle, P.: A Simple Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Transfer (SiSPAT) model: Development and field verification, J. Hydrol., 166(3–4), 213–250, 1995. Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T.: Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow, Journal of Irrigation Drainage Division of American Society of Civil Engineers, IR2, 61–88, 1966. Brutsaert, W. and Chen, D.: Desorption and the two stages of drying of natural tallgrass prairie, Water Resour. Res., 31(5), 305–1313, 1995. Camillo, P. J. and Gurney, R. J.: A resistance parameter for bare-soil evaporation models, Soil Sci., 141, 95–105, 1986. Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C.: Conduction of Heat in Solids, Oxford University Press, New York, 510~pp., 1959. Carter, T. R., Hulme, M., and Viner, D.: Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios and impact studies. Report no. 1, ECLAT-2 Workshop. Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 125~pp., 1999. Choudhury, B. J. and Monteith, J. L.: A four-layer model for the heat budget of homogeneous land surfaces, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 373–398, 1988. Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Clapp, R. B., and Ginn, T. R.: A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils, Water Resour. Res., 20(6), 682–690, 1984. Cowan, I. R.: Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system, J. Appl. Ecol., 2, 221–239, 1965. Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P. J.: Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO., 69~pp., 1993. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 1. Introduction to water balance dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 705–712, 1978a. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 2. The distribution of annual precipitation derived from observed sequences, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 713–721, 1978b. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 3. A simplified model of soil moisture movement in the liquid phase, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 722–730, 1978c. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 4. The expected value of annual evapotranspiration, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 731–739, 1978d. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 5. A derived distribution of storm surface runoff, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 740–748, 1978e. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 6. Dynamics of the annual water balance, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 749–764, 1978f. Eagleson, P. S.: Climate, soil, and vegetation: 7. A derived distribution of annual water yield, Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 765–776, 1978g. Eagleson, P. S.: Ecological Optimality in water-limited natural soil-vegetation systems 1. Theory and hypothesis, Water Resour. Res., 18, 325–340, 1982. Eagleson, P. S.: Ecohydrology: Darwinian expression of vegetation form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 443~pp., 2002. Eagleson, P. S. and Tellers, T. E.: Ecological Optimality in water-limited natural soil-vegetation systems 2. Tests and applications, Water Resour. Res., 18, 341–354., 1982. Entekhabi, D. and Eagleson, P. S.: Landsurface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability, J. Clim., 2, 816–831, 1989. Epstein, H. E., Lauenroth, W. K., and Burke, I. C.: Effects of temperature and soil texture on ANPP in the US great plains, Ecology, 78, 2628–2631, 1997b. Federer, C. A.: A soil-plant-atmosphere model for transpiration and availability of soil water, Water Resour. Res., 15, 555–562, 1979. Ferretti, D. F., Pendall, E., Morgan, J. A., Nelson, J. A., LeCain, D., and Mosier, A. R.: Partitioning evapotranspiration fluxes from a Colorado grassland using stable isotopes: Seasonal variations and ecosystem implications of elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, Plant. Soil, 254, 291–303, 2003. Gardner, W. R.: Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants, Soil Sci., 89, 63–73, 1960. Guswa, A. J., Celia, M. A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Models of soil moisture dynamics in ecohydrology: A comparative study, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1166–1181, 2002. Hatton, T. J., Salvucci, G. D., and Wu, H. I.: Eagleson's optimality theory of an ecohydrological equilibrium: quo vadis?, Ecology, 11, 665–674, 1997. Hazlett, D.: Leaf area development of four plant communities in the Colorado steppe, The American Midland Naturalist, 127, 276–289, 1992. Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., and Schulze, E. D.: A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes, Oecologia, 108, 389–411, 1996. Jones, R. N.: Managing uncertainty in climate change projections – issues for impact assessment, Climatic Change, 45, 403–419, 2000. Kergoat, L.: A model for hydrological equilibrium of leaf area index on a global scale, J. Hydrol., 213(1–4), 268–286, 1998. Kerkhoff, A. J., Martens, S. N., and Milne, B. T.: An ecological evaluation of Eagleson's optimality hypotheses, Funct. Ecol., 18, 404–413, 2004. Kittel, T. G. F., Rosenbloom, N. A., Painter, T. H., Schimel, D. S., and Participants, V. M.: The VEMAP integrated database for modeling United States ecosystem/vegetation sensitivity to climate change, J. Biogeogr., 22(4–5), 857–862, 1995. Knight, D.: Leaf area dynamics of a shortgrass prairie in Colorado, Ecology, 54, 891–896, 1973. Kochendorfer, J. P.: A monthly, two-soil-layer statitistical-dynamical water balance model for ecohydrologically focused climate impact assessment, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 211~pp., 2005. Kochendorfer, J. P. and Ram\'irez, J. A.: Ecohydrological controls on vegetation density and evapotranspiration partitioning across the climatic gradients of the central United States, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2121–2139, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2121-2010, 2010. Lafleur, P. M. and Rouse, W. R.: Application of an energy combination model for evaporation from sparse canopies, Agr. Forest. Meteorol., 49, 135–153., 1990. Laio, F., Porporato, A., Fernandez-Illescas, C. P., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress IV. Discussion of real cases, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 745–762, 2001. Lee, C. A. and Lauenroth, W. K.: Spatial distributions of grass and shrub root systems in the shortgrass steppe American Midland Naturalist, 132, 117–123, 1994. Loague, K.: Soil water content a R-5. Part 1. Spatial and temporal variability, J. Hydrol., 139, 233–251, 1992. Loague, K. and Gander, G. A.: R-5 Revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment, Water Resour. Res., 26(5), 957–971, 1990. Luxmoore, R. J. and Sharma, M. L.: Runoff responses to soil heterogeneity: Experimental and simulation comparisons for two contrasting watersheds, Water Resour. Res., 16, 675–684, 1980. Massman, W. J.: A Surface-Energy Balance Method for Partitioning Evapotranspiration data into Plant and Soil components for a surface with Partial Canopy Cover, Water Resour. Res., 28(6), 1723–1732, 1992. Milly, P. C. D.: Climate, soil water storage, and the average annual water balance, Water Resour. Res., 30(7), 2143–2156, 1994. Monteith, J. L.: Evaporation and the environment, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 19, 205–234, 1965. Neilson, R. P.: A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance, Ecol. Appl., 5, 362–385, 1995. Nemani, R. R., Keeling, C. D., Hashimoto, H., et al.: Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999, Science, 300, 5625, 1560–1563, 2003. Newman, E. I.: Resistance to water flow in soil and plant: I. Soil resistance in relation to amounts of root: theoretical estimates, J. Appl. Ecol., 6, 1–112, 1969. Noy-Meir, I.: Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 25–51, 1973. Philip, J. R.: The theory of infiltration, 7, Soil Sci., 85, 333–337, 1958. Phillip, J. R.: Theory of infiltration, Adv. Hydrosci., 5, 215–296, 1969. Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Saxton, K. E.: Estimation of Soil Water Properties, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 25(5), 1316–1330, 1982. Ritchie, J. T., Rhoades, E. D., and Richardson, C. W.: Calculating evaporation from native grassland watersheds, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1098–1103, 1976. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., Isham, V., and Cox, D. R.: Probabilistic modelling of water balance at a point: the role of climate, soil and vegetation, P. Roy. Soc., 455, 3789–3805, 1999. Running, S. W. and Coughlan, J. C.: A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications: 1. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes, Ecol. Model., 42, 125–154, 1988. Rutter, A. J.: The hydrological cycle in vegetation, edited by: Monteith, J. L., Vegetation and the Atmosphere, 1, Principles, Academic Press, 111–154, 1975. Sala, O. E., Lauenroth, W. K., Parton, W. J., and Trlica, M. J.: Water status of soil and vegetation in a shortgrass steppe, Oecologia, 48, 327–331, 1981. Sala, O. E., Parton, W. J., Joyce, L. A., and Lauenroth, W. K.: Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States, Ecology, 69, 40–45, 1988. Salvucci, G. D. and Entekhabi, D.: Equivalent steady soil moisture profile and the time compression approximation in water balance modeling, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2737–2749., 1994a. Salvucci, G. D. and Entekhabi, D.: Comparison of the Eagleson statistical-dynamical water balance model with numerical simulations, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2751–2757, 1994b. Sellers, P. J., Heiser, M. D., and Hall, F. G.: Relation between surface conductance and spectral vegetation indices at intermediate (100 m<sup>2</sup> to 15 km<sup>2</sup>) length scales, J. Geophys. Res., 97, D17, 19033–19059, 1992. Sellers, P. J., Randall, G. J., Collatz, G. J., Berry, J. A., Field, C. B., Dazlich, D. A., Zhang, C., Collelo, G. D., and Bounoua, L.: A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs, Part I: Model formulation, J. Clim., 9, 676–705, 1996. Sellers, W. D.: Physical Climatology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 272~pp., 1965. Shuttleworth, W. J. and Wallace, J. S.: Evaporation from sparse crops: an energy combination theory, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 111, 839–855, 1985. Singh, J. S., Milchunas, D. G., and Lauenroth, W. K.: Soil water dynamics and vegetation patterns in a semiarid grasland, Plant Ecology, 134, 77–89, 1998. Stannard, D. I.: Comparison of Penman-Monteith, Shuttleworth-Wallace, and modified Priestley-Taylor evapotranspiration models for wildland vegetation in semiarid rangeland, Water Resour. Res., 29(5), 1379–1392, 1993. Tellers, T. E. and Eagleson, P. S.: Estimation of Effective Hydrologic Properties of Soils from Observations of Vegetation Density. Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory for Hydrology and Water Resource Systems Report Number 254, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA., (see http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?N=4294862922), 1980. USDA-ARS: Hydrology, erosion, and water-quality studies in the Southern Great Plains Research Watershed, southwestern Oklahoma, 1961–78, ARS Water Quality and Watershed Research Laboratory xi, 175~pp., 1983. Van Bavel, C. H. M., and Hillel, D. I.: Calculating potential and actual evaporation from a bare soil surface by simulation of concurrent flow of water and heat, Agr. Meteorol., 17, 453–476, 1976. Van den Honert, T. H.: Water transport in plants as a catenary process, Discuss. Faraday Soc., 3, 146–153, 1948. Woodward, F. I.: Climate and Plant Distribution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 174~pp., 1987. Zea-Cabrera, E., Iwasa, Y., Levin, S., and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I.: Tragedy of the commons in plant water use, Water Resour. Res., 42(4), W06D02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004514, 2006.