Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
CiteScore value: 7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
IPP value: 4.91
SJR value: 2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
h5-index value: 65
Volume 13, issue 6
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 905–912, 2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: HESS Opinions 2009

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 905–912, 2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Opinion article 23 Jun 2009

Opinion article | 23 Jun 2009

HESS Opinions "Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched"

P. van der Zaag2,1, J. Gupta3,1, and L. P. Darvis1 P. van der Zaag et al.
  • 1UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands
  • 2Water Resources Section, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
  • 3Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract. In this opinion paper we submit that water experts conduct comparatively little research on the more urgent challenges facing the global community. Five specific biases are identified. First, research in the field of water and sanitation is heavily biased against sanitation. Second, research on food security is biased in favour of conventional irrigation and fails to address the problems and opportunities of rainfed agriculture. Third, insufficient water research is dedicated to developmental compared to environmental issues. Fourth, too little research is conducted on adaptation to climate change by developing countries. And finally, research on water governance has a fascination for conflict but too little eye for cooperation and meeting basic needs. This paper illustrates these biases with bibliometric indicators extracted from the ISI Web of Science. There is a stark mismatch between the global demand for knowledge and the supply of it. This mismatch is identified here as a problem that we water scientists must confront and resolve. We still lack a full understanding why this divergence between demand and supply occurs and persists; an understanding that is required to guide us towards aligning our research priorities to societal demands. The paper, however, makes some inferences. On the one hand, we should promote the global South to create its own research biases and allow it to develop alternative solutions. Simultaneously we would benefit from critical examination of our own research practice. Although this paper addresses a critical challenge it does not aim to be exhaustive or definitive. We merely identify the persistence of intransigent water problems as a valid research object in itself.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue