Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2265–2271, 2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2265-2009
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2265–2271, 2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2265-2009

  26 Nov 2009

26 Nov 2009

Geodynamical processes in the channel connecting the two lobes of the Large Aral Sea

E. Roget1, P. Zavialov2, V. Khan3, and M. A. Muñiz1 E. Roget et al.
  • 1Environmental Physics Group, Department of Physics, University of Girona, Catalonia, Spain
  • 2Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow, Russia
  • 3Hydrometeorological Research Center of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Abstract. Reasons for the existence of the channel connecting the two lobes of the present Large Aral Sea are discussed. In situ measurements in 2005 show that differences between the measured depths and those contained in the available digital bathymetry of the lake are considerably different at the channel (7.5±0.9 m, at nine measurement stations along it) and at the northern part of the eastern lobe (1.6±0.3 m, at six stations from the western to the eastern shore). Differences in the misfits observed in the two zones are discussed and thought to be a consequence of the variation of the transversal area of the channel as it enters the eastern lobe, which would affect the flow velocity and thus the strength of the erosion process at the bottom. Field data together with satellite images have been used to modify an original digital bathymetry of the lake and have been implemented into a 3-D hydrodynamical model. A numerical simulation shows that a wind of 12 m/s blowing from the east (112°) generates velocities of up to 45 cm/s in the channel, allowing denser water from the eastern lobe (salinity: 132 g/kg) to flow about 38 km towards the fresher western lobe (salinity: 98 g/kg) in one day. The effect of the inflow on the vertical structure of the western lobe is also illustrated. Although nowadays the channel will be soon a thing of the past, in a more general context, the Aral Sea is presented as an example showing that geomorphologic and geophysical processes, along with hydrological and atmospheric processes, must be taken into account for short-term predictions.