Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1529–1542, 2007
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1529–1542, 2007

  04 Sep 2007

04 Sep 2007

Analysis of effective resistance calculation methods and their effect on modelling evapotranspiration in two different patches of vegetation in semi-arid SE Spain

A. Were1,2, L. Villagarcía3, F. Domingo2,4, L. Alados-Arboledas1,5, and J. Puigdefábregas2 A. Were et al.
  • 1Departamento de Física Aplicada, Universidad de Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain
  • 2Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 04001, Almería, Spain
  • 3Departamento de Sistemas Físicos, Químicos y Naturales, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013, Sevilla, Spain
  • 4Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain
  • 5Centro Andaluz de Medio Ambiente, Universidad de Granada, Junta de Andalucía, 18071, Granada, Spain

Abstract. Effective parameters are of major importance in modelling surface fluxes at different scales of spatial heterogeneity. Different ways to obtain these effective parameters for their use in meso-scale and GCM models have been studied. This paper deals with patch-scale heterogeneity, where effective resistances were calculated in two patches with different vegetation (Retama sphaerocarpa (L.) Boiss shrubs, and herbaceous plants) using different methods: aggregating soil and plant resistances in parallel, in series or by an average of both. Effective aerodynamic resistance was also calculated directly from patch fluxes. To assess the validity of the different methods used, the Penman-Monteith equation was used with effective resistances to estimate the total λE for each patch. The λE estimates found for each patch were compared to Eddy Covariance system measurements. Results showed that for effective surface resistances, parallel aggregation of soil and plant resistances led to λE estimates closer to the measured λE in both patches (differences of around 10%). Results for effective aerodynamic resistances differed depending on the patch considered and the method used to calculate them. The use of effective aerodynamic resistances calculated from fluxes provided less accurate estimates of λE compared to the measured values, than the use of effective aerodynamic resistances aggregated from soil and plant resistances. The results reported in this paper show that the best way of aggregating soil and plant resistances depends on the type of resistance, and the type of vegetation in the patch.